Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients

The stripping of the densely innervated and inflamed parietal pleura in empyema during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication can lead to significant pain and major postoperative respiratory compromise. Hence, we compared the analgesic efficacy of continuous epidural infusion vers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Saudi journal of anaesthesia 2018-04, Vol.12 (2), p.240-244
Hauptverfasser: Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep, Dave, Nandini Malay, Garasia, Madhu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 2
container_start_page 240
container_title Saudi journal of anaesthesia
container_volume 12
creator Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep
Dave, Nandini Malay
Garasia, Madhu
description The stripping of the densely innervated and inflamed parietal pleura in empyema during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication can lead to significant pain and major postoperative respiratory compromise. Hence, we compared the analgesic efficacy of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in children undergoing VATS decortications. Following ethics approval and informed consent, forty patients from 1 to 12 years of age were randomized into two groups, Group E (epidural) and Group L (local infiltration) after induction of anesthesia. In Group E, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted between T4 and T8. A bolus dose of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% injection bupivacaine was given epidurally before incision. Postoperatively, the patients received epidural infusion with bupivacaine and fentanyl up to 48 h using an elastomeric balloon pump. In Group L, patients received local infiltration of bupivacaine (2 mg/kg) and lignocaine (5 mg/kg) at the port sites before incision and at the end of surgery. They also received injection tramadol 1 mg/kg intravenously TDS with thrice daily postoperatively. The pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability/ Wong-Baker FACES scale) were assessed every 4 h on the 1 day and 6 h on the 2 day. Injection diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous was used as a rescue analgesic for pain scores more than 4. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and motor blockade were noted. Quantitative and categorical data were assessed using -test and Chi-square test, respectively. The pain scores were lower in the epidural group than in the local infiltration group at 0, 4, and 20 h postoperatively ( = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.038, respectively). Seventeen out of nineteen patients required rescue analgesia in the local infiltration group in the postoperative period as compared to five patients in the epidural group with a value of 0.000081. Epidural analgesia can be considered as an effective modality of reducing pain in patients undergoing VATS decortication for empyema in pediatric patients.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/sja.SJA_659_17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5875212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A530723137</galeid><sourcerecordid>A530723137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a9a64d629c054ee9edaf48154199e7385066899f7a66305bcaa65ffaf230e67c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqvSK0cUiQuXLP6IneSCVK3KlypxACRu1tQZb71K4mAnK-VP8puYtKUF1PgQye8zr-2ZN8tecrYtOZNv0wG2Xz-fG60aw6sn2YY1lSokF-pptuFa1YVU5Y-T7CylA1u_itWcPc9ORKNFXctyk_3ahX6E6FMY8uByGKDbY_I2R-e8BbvQVpsncDgtK2DDMPlhDnPKcfTtHKHL_eDm5MngiDGR0AV7u-u7KcK0KjcmS5qwJ-sw-uDbRER-9C2GAlLypLX5dB0i2JAsITZPc9xjXPIWbYgT3ebGiqpGbD1Mcb1lPy7YQz6ShsOUXmTPHHQJz-7-p9n39xffdh-Lyy8fPu3OLwurOJ8KaECXrRaNZapEbLAFV9ZclbxpsJK1YlrXTeMq0FoydWUBtHIOnJAMdWXlafbu1necr3psLZ1NnTBj9D3ExQTw5l9l8NdmH45G1ZUSXJDBmzuDGH7OmCbT-2Sx62BAaq4RTMiSi1rUhL7-Dz2EOdKgiOJccIqClg_UHjo01PxA59rV1JwrySohuayI2j5C0WrXyYQBaWb4aIGNIaWI7v6NnJk1hIZCaB5CSAWv_u7MPf4ncvI3AsjfKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112141063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep ; Dave, Nandini Malay ; Garasia, Madhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep ; Dave, Nandini Malay ; Garasia, Madhu</creatorcontrib><description>The stripping of the densely innervated and inflamed parietal pleura in empyema during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication can lead to significant pain and major postoperative respiratory compromise. Hence, we compared the analgesic efficacy of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in children undergoing VATS decortications. Following ethics approval and informed consent, forty patients from 1 to 12 years of age were randomized into two groups, Group E (epidural) and Group L (local infiltration) after induction of anesthesia. In Group E, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted between T4 and T8. A bolus dose of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% injection bupivacaine was given epidurally before incision. Postoperatively, the patients received epidural infusion with bupivacaine and fentanyl up to 48 h using an elastomeric balloon pump. In Group L, patients received local infiltration of bupivacaine (2 mg/kg) and lignocaine (5 mg/kg) at the port sites before incision and at the end of surgery. They also received injection tramadol 1 mg/kg intravenously TDS with thrice daily postoperatively. The pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability/ Wong-Baker FACES scale) were assessed every 4 h on the 1 day and 6 h on the 2 day. Injection diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous was used as a rescue analgesic for pain scores more than 4. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and motor blockade were noted. Quantitative and categorical data were assessed using -test and Chi-square test, respectively. The pain scores were lower in the epidural group than in the local infiltration group at 0, 4, and 20 h postoperatively ( = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.038, respectively). Seventeen out of nineteen patients required rescue analgesia in the local infiltration group in the postoperative period as compared to five patients in the epidural group with a value of 0.000081. Epidural analgesia can be considered as an effective modality of reducing pain in patients undergoing VATS decortication for empyema in pediatric patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1658-354X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-3125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_659_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29628834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Catheters ; Drug dosages ; Empyema ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Original ; Ostomy ; Pain ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Sepsis ; Surgery ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 2018-04, Vol.12 (2), p.240-244</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a9a64d629c054ee9edaf48154199e7385066899f7a66305bcaa65ffaf230e67c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875212/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875212/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Nandini Malay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garasia, Madhu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients</title><title>Saudi journal of anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Saudi J Anaesth</addtitle><description>The stripping of the densely innervated and inflamed parietal pleura in empyema during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication can lead to significant pain and major postoperative respiratory compromise. Hence, we compared the analgesic efficacy of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in children undergoing VATS decortications. Following ethics approval and informed consent, forty patients from 1 to 12 years of age were randomized into two groups, Group E (epidural) and Group L (local infiltration) after induction of anesthesia. In Group E, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted between T4 and T8. A bolus dose of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% injection bupivacaine was given epidurally before incision. Postoperatively, the patients received epidural infusion with bupivacaine and fentanyl up to 48 h using an elastomeric balloon pump. In Group L, patients received local infiltration of bupivacaine (2 mg/kg) and lignocaine (5 mg/kg) at the port sites before incision and at the end of surgery. They also received injection tramadol 1 mg/kg intravenously TDS with thrice daily postoperatively. The pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability/ Wong-Baker FACES scale) were assessed every 4 h on the 1 day and 6 h on the 2 day. Injection diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous was used as a rescue analgesic for pain scores more than 4. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and motor blockade were noted. Quantitative and categorical data were assessed using -test and Chi-square test, respectively. The pain scores were lower in the epidural group than in the local infiltration group at 0, 4, and 20 h postoperatively ( = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.038, respectively). Seventeen out of nineteen patients required rescue analgesia in the local infiltration group in the postoperative period as compared to five patients in the epidural group with a value of 0.000081. Epidural analgesia can be considered as an effective modality of reducing pain in patients undergoing VATS decortication for empyema in pediatric patients.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Empyema</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1658-354X</issn><issn>0975-3125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqvSK0cUiQuXLP6IneSCVK3KlypxACRu1tQZb71K4mAnK-VP8puYtKUF1PgQye8zr-2ZN8tecrYtOZNv0wG2Xz-fG60aw6sn2YY1lSokF-pptuFa1YVU5Y-T7CylA1u_itWcPc9ORKNFXctyk_3ahX6E6FMY8uByGKDbY_I2R-e8BbvQVpsncDgtK2DDMPlhDnPKcfTtHKHL_eDm5MngiDGR0AV7u-u7KcK0KjcmS5qwJ-sw-uDbRER-9C2GAlLypLX5dB0i2JAsITZPc9xjXPIWbYgT3ebGiqpGbD1Mcb1lPy7YQz6ShsOUXmTPHHQJz-7-p9n39xffdh-Lyy8fPu3OLwurOJ8KaECXrRaNZapEbLAFV9ZclbxpsJK1YlrXTeMq0FoydWUBtHIOnJAMdWXlafbu1necr3psLZ1NnTBj9D3ExQTw5l9l8NdmH45G1ZUSXJDBmzuDGH7OmCbT-2Sx62BAaq4RTMiSi1rUhL7-Dz2EOdKgiOJccIqClg_UHjo01PxA59rV1JwrySohuayI2j5C0WrXyYQBaWb4aIGNIaWI7v6NnJk1hIZCaB5CSAWv_u7MPf4ncvI3AsjfKw</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep</creator><creator>Dave, Nandini Malay</creator><creator>Garasia, Madhu</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients</title><author>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep ; Dave, Nandini Malay ; Garasia, Madhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a9a64d629c054ee9edaf48154199e7385066899f7a66305bcaa65ffaf230e67c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Empyema</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Nandini Malay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garasia, Madhu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Saudi journal of anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karnik, Priyanka Pradeep</au><au>Dave, Nandini Malay</au><au>Garasia, Madhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients</atitle><jtitle>Saudi journal of anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Saudi J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>240-244</pages><issn>1658-354X</issn><eissn>0975-3125</eissn><abstract>The stripping of the densely innervated and inflamed parietal pleura in empyema during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication can lead to significant pain and major postoperative respiratory compromise. Hence, we compared the analgesic efficacy of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in children undergoing VATS decortications. Following ethics approval and informed consent, forty patients from 1 to 12 years of age were randomized into two groups, Group E (epidural) and Group L (local infiltration) after induction of anesthesia. In Group E, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted between T4 and T8. A bolus dose of 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% injection bupivacaine was given epidurally before incision. Postoperatively, the patients received epidural infusion with bupivacaine and fentanyl up to 48 h using an elastomeric balloon pump. In Group L, patients received local infiltration of bupivacaine (2 mg/kg) and lignocaine (5 mg/kg) at the port sites before incision and at the end of surgery. They also received injection tramadol 1 mg/kg intravenously TDS with thrice daily postoperatively. The pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability/ Wong-Baker FACES scale) were assessed every 4 h on the 1 day and 6 h on the 2 day. Injection diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous was used as a rescue analgesic for pain scores more than 4. Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and motor blockade were noted. Quantitative and categorical data were assessed using -test and Chi-square test, respectively. The pain scores were lower in the epidural group than in the local infiltration group at 0, 4, and 20 h postoperatively ( = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.038, respectively). Seventeen out of nineteen patients required rescue analgesia in the local infiltration group in the postoperative period as compared to five patients in the epidural group with a value of 0.000081. Epidural analgesia can be considered as an effective modality of reducing pain in patients undergoing VATS decortication for empyema in pediatric patients.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>29628834</pmid><doi>10.4103/sja.SJA_659_17</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1658-354X
ispartof Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 2018-04, Vol.12 (2), p.240-244
issn 1658-354X
0975-3125
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5875212
source PMC (PubMed Central); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age
Analgesics
Analysis
Anesthesia
Catheters
Drug dosages
Empyema
Narcotics
Opioids
Original
Ostomy
Pain
Patients
Pediatrics
Sepsis
Surgery
Vomiting
title Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A32%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20analgesic%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20continuous%20epidural%20infusion%20versus%20local%20infiltration%20and%20systemic%20opioids%20in%20video-assisted%20thoracoscopic%20surgery%20decortication%20in%20pediatric%20empyema%20patients&rft.jtitle=Saudi%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia&rft.au=Karnik,%20Priyanka%20Pradeep&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=240-244&rft.issn=1658-354X&rft.eissn=0975-3125&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/sja.SJA_659_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA530723137%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112141063&rft_id=info:pmid/29628834&rft_galeid=A530723137&rfr_iscdi=true