Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates

Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132
Hauptverfasser: Denton, Travis R., Shields, Lisa B.E., Howe, Jonathan N., Shanks, Todd S., Spalding, Aaron C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 4
container_start_page 123
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 18
creator Denton, Travis R.
Shields, Lisa B.E.
Howe, Jonathan N.
Shanks, Todd S.
Spalding, Aaron C.
description Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900125194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4QFQJC4IaVvbsZP4glStgFYqKgc4WxN7srhK7MV2gL3xCJx5PJ4Eb1OqwoGTR-PPn-eHkKeMHjNK-QmYiR8zzqi8Rw6Z5M1KKSbu34kPyKOUrihlrKu7h-SAd5K1QvFD8vN9BJOdgbEywSdnMUJ2JarCUI3OI8QKjMFxnw_x1_cfPSS01RBhKsmUKvyWiyKCd8URwbqQ5rjBuKuGEKscEfKEPu99wRi3dblwHucI48bBNeTLf-XNUgV46yxkTI_JgwHGhE9uziPy8c3rD-uz1cXl2_P16cXKiLaRK2W7RlJsocG2QYqGix4EU62kDa97gUNtJQdmqTCsswYZs4jcQG1723a2PiKvFu927icsgC8NjXob3QRxpwM4_feNd5_0JnzRsiszlLQIXtwIYvg8Y8p6cqmMbASPYU6aqTJ5LpkSBX3-D3oV5uhLe5pzRRslRVMX6uVCmRhSijjcFsOo3q9c71eur1de4Gd3y79F_-y4AGwBvroRd_9R6dP1O75IfwMVKLzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290695463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><description>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28517492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Dosimetry ; extracranial SRS ; Feasibility studies ; frameless SRS ; Humans ; Localization ; Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging ; Neuralgia - radiotherapy ; occipital neuralgia ; Pain ; Particle Accelerators ; Patients ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Prospective Studies ; quality assurance ; Quality control ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Registration ; Spinal cord ; stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28517492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>extracranial SRS</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>frameless SRS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuralgia - radiotherapy</subject><subject>occipital neuralgia</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4QFQJC4IaVvbsZP4glStgFYqKgc4WxN7srhK7MV2gL3xCJx5PJ4Eb1OqwoGTR-PPn-eHkKeMHjNK-QmYiR8zzqi8Rw6Z5M1KKSbu34kPyKOUrihlrKu7h-SAd5K1QvFD8vN9BJOdgbEywSdnMUJ2JarCUI3OI8QKjMFxnw_x1_cfPSS01RBhKsmUKvyWiyKCd8URwbqQ5rjBuKuGEKscEfKEPu99wRi3dblwHucI48bBNeTLf-XNUgV46yxkTI_JgwHGhE9uziPy8c3rD-uz1cXl2_P16cXKiLaRK2W7RlJsocG2QYqGix4EU62kDa97gUNtJQdmqTCsswYZs4jcQG1723a2PiKvFu927icsgC8NjXob3QRxpwM4_feNd5_0JnzRsiszlLQIXtwIYvg8Y8p6cqmMbASPYU6aqTJ5LpkSBX3-D3oV5uhLe5pzRRslRVMX6uVCmRhSijjcFsOo3q9c71eur1de4Gd3y79F_-y4AGwBvroRd_9R6dP1O75IfwMVKLzA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Denton, Travis R.</creator><creator>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creator><creator>Howe, Jonathan N.</creator><creator>Shanks, Todd S.</creator><creator>Spalding, Aaron C.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><author>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>extracranial SRS</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>frameless SRS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuralgia - radiotherapy</topic><topic>occipital neuralgia</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>stereotactic radiosurgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denton, Travis R.</au><au>Shields, Lisa B.E.</au><au>Howe, Jonathan N.</au><au>Shanks, Todd S.</au><au>Spalding, Aaron C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28517492</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.12105</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874950
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Dosimetry
extracranial SRS
Feasibility studies
frameless SRS
Humans
Localization
Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging
Neuralgia - radiotherapy
occipital neuralgia
Pain
Particle Accelerators
Patients
Phantoms, Imaging
Prospective Studies
quality assurance
Quality control
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiosurgery - methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Registration
Spinal cord
stereotactic radiosurgery
title Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20considerations%20of%20linear%20accelerator%E2%80%90based%20frameless%20extracranial%20radiosurgery%20for%20treatment%20of%20occipital%20neuralgia%20for%20nonsurgical%20candidates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Denton,%20Travis%20R.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.12105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900125194%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290695463&rft_id=info:pmid/28517492&rfr_iscdi=true