Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates
Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Journal of applied clinical medical physics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Denton, Travis R. Shields, Lisa B.E. Howe, Jonathan N. Shanks, Todd S. Spalding, Aaron C. |
description | Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.12105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900125194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4QFQJC4IaVvbsZP4glStgFYqKgc4WxN7srhK7MV2gL3xCJx5PJ4Eb1OqwoGTR-PPn-eHkKeMHjNK-QmYiR8zzqi8Rw6Z5M1KKSbu34kPyKOUrihlrKu7h-SAd5K1QvFD8vN9BJOdgbEywSdnMUJ2JarCUI3OI8QKjMFxnw_x1_cfPSS01RBhKsmUKvyWiyKCd8URwbqQ5rjBuKuGEKscEfKEPu99wRi3dblwHucI48bBNeTLf-XNUgV46yxkTI_JgwHGhE9uziPy8c3rD-uz1cXl2_P16cXKiLaRK2W7RlJsocG2QYqGix4EU62kDa97gUNtJQdmqTCsswYZs4jcQG1723a2PiKvFu927icsgC8NjXob3QRxpwM4_feNd5_0JnzRsiszlLQIXtwIYvg8Y8p6cqmMbASPYU6aqTJ5LpkSBX3-D3oV5uhLe5pzRRslRVMX6uVCmRhSijjcFsOo3q9c71eur1de4Gd3y79F_-y4AGwBvroRd_9R6dP1O75IfwMVKLzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290695463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><description>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28517492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Dosimetry ; extracranial SRS ; Feasibility studies ; frameless SRS ; Humans ; Localization ; Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging ; Neuralgia - radiotherapy ; occipital neuralgia ; Pain ; Particle Accelerators ; Patients ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Prospective Studies ; quality assurance ; Quality control ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Registration ; Spinal cord ; stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28517492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>extracranial SRS</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>frameless SRS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuralgia - radiotherapy</subject><subject>occipital neuralgia</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>stereotactic radiosurgery</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4QFQJC4IaVvbsZP4glStgFYqKgc4WxN7srhK7MV2gL3xCJx5PJ4Eb1OqwoGTR-PPn-eHkKeMHjNK-QmYiR8zzqi8Rw6Z5M1KKSbu34kPyKOUrihlrKu7h-SAd5K1QvFD8vN9BJOdgbEywSdnMUJ2JarCUI3OI8QKjMFxnw_x1_cfPSS01RBhKsmUKvyWiyKCd8URwbqQ5rjBuKuGEKscEfKEPu99wRi3dblwHucI48bBNeTLf-XNUgV46yxkTI_JgwHGhE9uziPy8c3rD-uz1cXl2_P16cXKiLaRK2W7RlJsocG2QYqGix4EU62kDa97gUNtJQdmqTCsswYZs4jcQG1723a2PiKvFu927icsgC8NjXob3QRxpwM4_feNd5_0JnzRsiszlLQIXtwIYvg8Y8p6cqmMbASPYU6aqTJ5LpkSBX3-D3oV5uhLe5pzRRslRVMX6uVCmRhSijjcFsOo3q9c71eur1de4Gd3y79F_-y4AGwBvroRd_9R6dP1O75IfwMVKLzA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Denton, Travis R.</creator><creator>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creator><creator>Howe, Jonathan N.</creator><creator>Shanks, Todd S.</creator><creator>Spalding, Aaron C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</title><author>Denton, Travis R. ; Shields, Lisa B.E. ; Howe, Jonathan N. ; Shanks, Todd S. ; Spalding, Aaron C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4765-9d8650e7a6e76e0ec24ba419750623b4ef3d52a1d04c18dce11dee2ca3dbd78d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>extracranial SRS</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>frameless SRS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuralgia - radiotherapy</topic><topic>occipital neuralgia</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>stereotactic radiosurgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denton, Travis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Lisa B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalding, Aaron C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denton, Travis R.</au><au>Shields, Lisa B.E.</au><au>Howe, Jonathan N.</au><au>Shanks, Todd S.</au><au>Spalding, Aaron C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Occipital neuralgia generally responds to medical or invasive procedures. Repeated invasive procedures generate increasing complications and are often contraindicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has not been reported as a treatment option largely due to the extracranial nature of the target as opposed to the similar, more established trigeminal neuralgia. A dedicated phantom study was conducted to determine the optimum imaging studies, fusion matrices, and treatment planning parameters to target the C2 dorsal root ganglion which forms the occipital nerve. The conditions created from the phantom were applied to a patient with medically and surgically refractory occipital neuralgia. A dose of 80 Gy in one fraction was prescribed to the C2 occipital dorsal root ganglion. The phantom study resulted in a treatment achieved with an average translational magnitude of correction of 1.35 mm with an acceptable tolerance of 0.5 mm and an average rotational magnitude of correction of 0.4° with an acceptable tolerance of 1.0°. For the patient, the spinal cord was 12.0 mm at its closest distance to the isocenter and received a maximum dose of 3.36 Gy, a dose to 0.35 cc of 1.84 Gy, and a dose to 1.2 cc of 0.79 Gy. The brain maximum dose was 2.20 Gy. Treatment time was 59 min for 18, 323 MUs. Imaging was performed prior to each arc delivery resulting in 21 imaging sessions. The average deviation magnitude requiring a positional or rotational correction was 0.96 ± 0.25 mm, 0.8 ± 0.41°, whereas the average deviation magnitude deemed within tolerance was 0.41 ± 0.12 mm, 0.57 ± 0.28°. Dedicated quality assurance of the treatment planning and delivery is necessary for safe and accurate SRS to the cervical spine dorsal root ganglion. With additional prospective study, linear accelerator‐based frameless radiosurgery can provide an accurate, noninvasive alternative for treating occipital neuralgia where an invasive procedure is contraindicated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28517492</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.12105</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-07, Vol.18 (4), p.123-132 |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874950 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Dosimetry extracranial SRS Feasibility studies frameless SRS Humans Localization Neuralgia - diagnostic imaging Neuralgia - radiotherapy occipital neuralgia Pain Particle Accelerators Patients Phantoms, Imaging Prospective Studies quality assurance Quality control Radiation Oncology Physics Radiosurgery - methods Radiotherapy Dosage Registration Spinal cord stereotactic radiosurgery |
title | Practical considerations of linear accelerator‐based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20considerations%20of%20linear%20accelerator%E2%80%90based%20frameless%20extracranial%20radiosurgery%20for%20treatment%20of%20occipital%20neuralgia%20for%20nonsurgical%20candidates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Denton,%20Travis%20R.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.12105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900125194%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290695463&rft_id=info:pmid/28517492&rfr_iscdi=true |