The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic

Sexually transmitted diseases continue to increase in the U.S. There is a growing need for financially viable models to ensure the longevity of safety-net sexually transmitted disease clinics, which provide testing and treatment to high-risk populations. This micro-costing analysis estimated the num...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2018-04, Vol.54 (4), p.552-558
Hauptverfasser: Dean, Lorraine T., Montgomery, Madeline C., Raifman, Julia, Nunn, Amy, Bertrand, Thomas, Almonte, Alexi, Chan, Philip A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 4
container_start_page 552
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 54
creator Dean, Lorraine T.
Montgomery, Madeline C.
Raifman, Julia
Nunn, Amy
Bertrand, Thomas
Almonte, Alexi
Chan, Philip A.
description Sexually transmitted diseases continue to increase in the U.S. There is a growing need for financially viable models to ensure the longevity of safety-net sexually transmitted disease clinics, which provide testing and treatment to high-risk populations. This micro-costing analysis estimated the number of visits required to balance cost and revenue of a sexually transmitted disease clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. In 2017, actual and projected cost and revenues were estimated from the Rhode Island sexually transmitted disease clinic in 2015. Projected revenues for a hypothetical clinic offering a standard set of sexually transmitted disease services were based on Medicaid; private (“commercial”) insurance; and institutional (“list price”) reimbursement rates. The number of visits needed to cover clinic costs at each rate was assessed. Total operating cost for 2,153 clinic visits was estimated at $255,769, or $119 per visit. Laboratory testing and salaries each accounted for 44% of operating costs, medications for treatment 7%, supplies 5%, and 28% of visits used insurance. For a standard clinic offering a basic set of sexually transmitted disease services to break even, a projected 73% of visits need to be covered at the Medicaid rate, 38% at private rate, or 11% at institutional rate. Sexually transmitted disease clinics may be financially viable when a majority of visits are billed at a Medicaid rate; however, mixed private/public models may be needed if not all visits are billed. In this manner, sexually transmitted disease clinics can be solvent even if not all visits are billed to insurance, thus ensuring access to uninsured or underinsured patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5860994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379717307481</els_id><sourcerecordid>1994366602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7208f482bcd7b2d70707a937924484bc8f2d56cf5e208e54ee45aa2b4d6cec393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqNzCGxIuXboGmm-ZishldNdlEkx1PHggNxS6T7mYEeuJ8-2Uy6_rnYDiQVP3qUY-H0EtKakpo93Zb6wl2EWpGqKgpq0vxEVrRXjQV64h4jFZEcFk1Qooz9CylLSFE9FQ-RWdMNlKwnqzQ980t4AvnQrR68KPPBxwc_hrD3ls_3-Br-LnocTzgTdRzmnzOYPF7n0AnKM249wYS1hlrfK0d5EM1Q8br0c_ePEdPnB4TvLi_z9G3yw-b9afq6svHz-uLq8pwSXMlGOkd79lgrBiYFaQcLcvajPOeD6Z3zLadcS0UEFoOwFut2cBtZ8A0sjlH7066u2WYwBqYc9Sj2kU_6XhQQXv1d2f2t-om7FXbd0RKXgTe3AvE8GOBlNXkk4Fx1DOEJSl6hLquI6ygr_9Bt2GJc7GnGOloywhvaaH4iTIxpBTBPSxDiTqmp7bqlJ46pqcoU6VYxl79aeRh6Fdcv51C-c69h6iS8TAbsD6CycoG__8X7gDm5q3_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061520451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dean, Lorraine T. ; Montgomery, Madeline C. ; Raifman, Julia ; Nunn, Amy ; Bertrand, Thomas ; Almonte, Alexi ; Chan, Philip A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dean, Lorraine T. ; Montgomery, Madeline C. ; Raifman, Julia ; Nunn, Amy ; Bertrand, Thomas ; Almonte, Alexi ; Chan, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><description>Sexually transmitted diseases continue to increase in the U.S. There is a growing need for financially viable models to ensure the longevity of safety-net sexually transmitted disease clinics, which provide testing and treatment to high-risk populations. This micro-costing analysis estimated the number of visits required to balance cost and revenue of a sexually transmitted disease clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. In 2017, actual and projected cost and revenues were estimated from the Rhode Island sexually transmitted disease clinic in 2015. Projected revenues for a hypothetical clinic offering a standard set of sexually transmitted disease services were based on Medicaid; private (“commercial”) insurance; and institutional (“list price”) reimbursement rates. The number of visits needed to cover clinic costs at each rate was assessed. Total operating cost for 2,153 clinic visits was estimated at $255,769, or $119 per visit. Laboratory testing and salaries each accounted for 44% of operating costs, medications for treatment 7%, supplies 5%, and 28% of visits used insurance. For a standard clinic offering a basic set of sexually transmitted disease services to break even, a projected 73% of visits need to be covered at the Medicaid rate, 38% at private rate, or 11% at institutional rate. Sexually transmitted disease clinics may be financially viable when a majority of visits are billed at a Medicaid rate; however, mixed private/public models may be needed if not all visits are billed. In this manner, sexually transmitted disease clinics can be solvent even if not all visits are billed to insurance, thus ensuring access to uninsured or underinsured patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29397280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affordability ; Clinics ; Costing ; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health care expenditures ; Health Services Accessibility - economics ; Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data ; High risk ; Humans ; Income ; Insurance ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - economics ; Medically Uninsured - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Operating costs ; Reimbursement Mechanisms - economics ; Safety ; Safety-net Providers - economics ; Safety-net Providers - methods ; Safety-net Providers - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - economics ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - therapy ; STD ; Uninsured people ; United States - epidemiology ; Visits ; Wages &amp; salaries</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2018-04, Vol.54 (4), p.552-558</ispartof><rights>2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7208f482bcd7b2d70707a937924484bc8f2d56cf5e208e54ee45aa2b4d6cec393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7208f482bcd7b2d70707a937924484bc8f2d56cf5e208e54ee45aa2b4d6cec393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29397280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dean, Lorraine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Madeline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raifman, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunn, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almonte, Alexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Sexually transmitted diseases continue to increase in the U.S. There is a growing need for financially viable models to ensure the longevity of safety-net sexually transmitted disease clinics, which provide testing and treatment to high-risk populations. This micro-costing analysis estimated the number of visits required to balance cost and revenue of a sexually transmitted disease clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. In 2017, actual and projected cost and revenues were estimated from the Rhode Island sexually transmitted disease clinic in 2015. Projected revenues for a hypothetical clinic offering a standard set of sexually transmitted disease services were based on Medicaid; private (“commercial”) insurance; and institutional (“list price”) reimbursement rates. The number of visits needed to cover clinic costs at each rate was assessed. Total operating cost for 2,153 clinic visits was estimated at $255,769, or $119 per visit. Laboratory testing and salaries each accounted for 44% of operating costs, medications for treatment 7%, supplies 5%, and 28% of visits used insurance. For a standard clinic offering a basic set of sexually transmitted disease services to break even, a projected 73% of visits need to be covered at the Medicaid rate, 38% at private rate, or 11% at institutional rate. Sexually transmitted disease clinics may be financially viable when a majority of visits are billed at a Medicaid rate; however, mixed private/public models may be needed if not all visits are billed. In this manner, sexually transmitted disease clinics can be solvent even if not all visits are billed to insurance, thus ensuring access to uninsured or underinsured patients.</description><subject>Affordability</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Costing</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - economics</subject><subject>Medically Uninsured - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms - economics</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety-net Providers - economics</subject><subject>Safety-net Providers - methods</subject><subject>Safety-net Providers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - economics</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Uninsured people</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Visits</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqNzCGxIuXboGmm-ZishldNdlEkx1PHggNxS6T7mYEeuJ8-2Uy6_rnYDiQVP3qUY-H0EtKakpo93Zb6wl2EWpGqKgpq0vxEVrRXjQV64h4jFZEcFk1Qooz9CylLSFE9FQ-RWdMNlKwnqzQ980t4AvnQrR68KPPBxwc_hrD3ls_3-Br-LnocTzgTdRzmnzOYPF7n0AnKM249wYS1hlrfK0d5EM1Q8br0c_ePEdPnB4TvLi_z9G3yw-b9afq6svHz-uLq8pwSXMlGOkd79lgrBiYFaQcLcvajPOeD6Z3zLadcS0UEFoOwFut2cBtZ8A0sjlH7066u2WYwBqYc9Sj2kU_6XhQQXv1d2f2t-om7FXbd0RKXgTe3AvE8GOBlNXkk4Fx1DOEJSl6hLquI6ygr_9Bt2GJc7GnGOloywhvaaH4iTIxpBTBPSxDiTqmp7bqlJ46pqcoU6VYxl79aeRh6Fdcv51C-c69h6iS8TAbsD6CycoG__8X7gDm5q3_</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Dean, Lorraine T.</creator><creator>Montgomery, Madeline C.</creator><creator>Raifman, Julia</creator><creator>Nunn, Amy</creator><creator>Bertrand, Thomas</creator><creator>Almonte, Alexi</creator><creator>Chan, Philip A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic</title><author>Dean, Lorraine T. ; Montgomery, Madeline C. ; Raifman, Julia ; Nunn, Amy ; Bertrand, Thomas ; Almonte, Alexi ; Chan, Philip A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-7208f482bcd7b2d70707a937924484bc8f2d56cf5e208e54ee45aa2b4d6cec393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Affordability</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Costing</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - economics</topic><topic>Medically Uninsured - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms - economics</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety-net Providers - economics</topic><topic>Safety-net Providers - methods</topic><topic>Safety-net Providers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - economics</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Uninsured people</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Visits</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dean, Lorraine T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Madeline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raifman, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunn, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almonte, Alexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Philip A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dean, Lorraine T.</au><au>Montgomery, Madeline C.</au><au>Raifman, Julia</au><au>Nunn, Amy</au><au>Bertrand, Thomas</au><au>Almonte, Alexi</au><au>Chan, Philip A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>552-558</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Sexually transmitted diseases continue to increase in the U.S. There is a growing need for financially viable models to ensure the longevity of safety-net sexually transmitted disease clinics, which provide testing and treatment to high-risk populations. This micro-costing analysis estimated the number of visits required to balance cost and revenue of a sexually transmitted disease clinic in a Medicaid expansion state. In 2017, actual and projected cost and revenues were estimated from the Rhode Island sexually transmitted disease clinic in 2015. Projected revenues for a hypothetical clinic offering a standard set of sexually transmitted disease services were based on Medicaid; private (“commercial”) insurance; and institutional (“list price”) reimbursement rates. The number of visits needed to cover clinic costs at each rate was assessed. Total operating cost for 2,153 clinic visits was estimated at $255,769, or $119 per visit. Laboratory testing and salaries each accounted for 44% of operating costs, medications for treatment 7%, supplies 5%, and 28% of visits used insurance. For a standard clinic offering a basic set of sexually transmitted disease services to break even, a projected 73% of visits need to be covered at the Medicaid rate, 38% at private rate, or 11% at institutional rate. Sexually transmitted disease clinics may be financially viable when a majority of visits are billed at a Medicaid rate; however, mixed private/public models may be needed if not all visits are billed. In this manner, sexually transmitted disease clinics can be solvent even if not all visits are billed to insurance, thus ensuring access to uninsured or underinsured patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29397280</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2018-04, Vol.54 (4), p.552-558
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5860994
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Affordability
Clinics
Costing
Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Health care expenditures
Health Services Accessibility - economics
Health Services Accessibility - statistics & numerical data
High risk
Humans
Income
Insurance
Medicaid
Medicaid - economics
Medically Uninsured - statistics & numerical data
Operating costs
Reimbursement Mechanisms - economics
Safety
Safety-net Providers - economics
Safety-net Providers - methods
Safety-net Providers - statistics & numerical data
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - economics
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - therapy
STD
Uninsured people
United States - epidemiology
Visits
Wages & salaries
title The Affordability of Providing Sexually Transmitted Disease Services at a Safety-net Clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Affordability%20of%20Providing%20Sexually%20Transmitted%20Disease%20Services%20at%20a%20Safety-net%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Dean,%20Lorraine%20T.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=552-558&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1994366602%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061520451&rft_id=info:pmid/29397280&rft_els_id=S0749379717307481&rfr_iscdi=true