Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable

Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecological surgery 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.8-9, Article 8
Hauptverfasser: Sandberg, Evelien M., Driessen, Sara R. C., Bak, Evelien A. T., van Geloven, Nan, Berger, Judith P., Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H., Rhemrev, Johann P. T., Jansen, Frank Willem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Gynecological surgery
container_volume 15
creator Sandberg, Evelien M.
Driessen, Sara R. C.
Bak, Evelien A. T.
van Geloven, Nan
Berger, Judith P.
Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H.
Rhemrev, Johann P. T.
Jansen, Frank Willem
description Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences surgical outcomes of LH and to determine if it should be considered as case-mix variable. Results A total of 2655 LH’s were analyzed, of which 397 (15.0%) with concomitant endometriosis. For blood loss and operative time, no measurable association was found for stages I ( n  = 106) and II ( n  = 103) endometriosis compared to LH without endometriosis. LH with stages III ( n  = 93) and IV ( n  = 95) endometriosis were associated with more intra-operative blood loss ( p  = 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5856860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2018665338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b001c4d5c734103e2b8efe1d4547f9fea02aecc5d71b9c15e7b6f4b0cda6db703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstuFDEQRS0EImHgA9ggS2zYNNjutt3DAimKwkOKxAJYW35UzzjqtgfbnTC_ky_FnQnDQ2Llku69x3ZVIfSckteU9uJNpqRdy4bQvlmqpn2ATqmgbcNI3z081lKcoCc5XxHS9oSzx-iErbkUUtBTdPtlThtv9YjjXGycIOM44FHvdIrZxp23eLvPBRLYEqc9vvFli20M1eqLDgVDcDVVko_Z5zu5grCJN1CRCZtROwcJO59zRfgY3mJdAduYCtZBj_slViJ2MPgAi6YzNJP_ga918tqM8BQ9GvSY4dn9uULf3l98Pf_YXH7-8On87LKxHWOlMYRQ2zluZdvVbgAzPQxAXcc7OawH0IRpsJY7Sc3aUg7SiKEzxDotnJGkXaF3B-5uNhM4C6EkPapd8pNOexW1V38rwW_VJl4r3nPRiwXw6h6Q4vcZclGTzxbGUQeIc1asDkoI3rZ9tb78x3oV51TbcefiknBSjStEDy5bh5ETDMfHUKKWDVCHDVAVrJZKtTXz4s9fHBO_Rl4N7GDIVQobSL-v_j_1J1VjwhI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015705065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Sandberg, Evelien M. ; Driessen, Sara R. C. ; Bak, Evelien A. T. ; van Geloven, Nan ; Berger, Judith P. ; Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H. ; Rhemrev, Johann P. T. ; Jansen, Frank Willem</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Evelien M. ; Driessen, Sara R. C. ; Bak, Evelien A. T. ; van Geloven, Nan ; Berger, Judith P. ; Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H. ; Rhemrev, Johann P. T. ; Jansen, Frank Willem</creatorcontrib><description>Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences surgical outcomes of LH and to determine if it should be considered as case-mix variable. Results A total of 2655 LH’s were analyzed, of which 397 (15.0%) with concomitant endometriosis. For blood loss and operative time, no measurable association was found for stages I ( n  = 106) and II ( n  = 103) endometriosis compared to LH without endometriosis. LH with stages III ( n  = 93) and IV ( n  = 95) endometriosis were associated with more intra-operative blood loss ( p  = &lt; .001) and a prolonged operative time ( p  = &lt; .001) compared to LH without endometriosis. No significant association was found between endometriosis (all stages) and complications ( p  = .62). Conclusions The findings of our study have provided numeric support for the influence of concomitant endometriosis on surgical outcomes of LH, without bowel or bladder dissection. Only stages III and IV were associated with a longer operative time and more blood loss and should thus be considered as case-mix variables in future quality measurement tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29576761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Breasts ; Cohort analysis ; Endometriosis ; Gynecology ; Hysterectomy ; Interventional Radiology ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Original ; Original Article ; Reproductive Medicine ; Surgical Oncology ; Surgical outcomes</subject><ispartof>Gynecological surgery, 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.8-9, Article 8</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><rights>Gynecological Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b001c4d5c734103e2b8efe1d4547f9fea02aecc5d71b9c15e7b6f4b0cda6db703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Evelien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Sara R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Evelien A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geloven, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Judith P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhemrev, Johann P. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Frank Willem</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable</title><title>Gynecological surgery</title><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><description>Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences surgical outcomes of LH and to determine if it should be considered as case-mix variable. Results A total of 2655 LH’s were analyzed, of which 397 (15.0%) with concomitant endometriosis. For blood loss and operative time, no measurable association was found for stages I ( n  = 106) and II ( n  = 103) endometriosis compared to LH without endometriosis. LH with stages III ( n  = 93) and IV ( n  = 95) endometriosis were associated with more intra-operative blood loss ( p  = &lt; .001) and a prolonged operative time ( p  = &lt; .001) compared to LH without endometriosis. No significant association was found between endometriosis (all stages) and complications ( p  = .62). Conclusions The findings of our study have provided numeric support for the influence of concomitant endometriosis on surgical outcomes of LH, without bowel or bladder dissection. Only stages III and IV were associated with a longer operative time and more blood loss and should thus be considered as case-mix variables in future quality measurement tools.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Breasts</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><issn>1613-2076</issn><issn>1613-2084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstuFDEQRS0EImHgA9ggS2zYNNjutt3DAimKwkOKxAJYW35UzzjqtgfbnTC_ky_FnQnDQ2Llku69x3ZVIfSckteU9uJNpqRdy4bQvlmqpn2ATqmgbcNI3z081lKcoCc5XxHS9oSzx-iErbkUUtBTdPtlThtv9YjjXGycIOM44FHvdIrZxp23eLvPBRLYEqc9vvFli20M1eqLDgVDcDVVko_Z5zu5grCJN1CRCZtROwcJO59zRfgY3mJdAduYCtZBj_slViJ2MPgAi6YzNJP_ga918tqM8BQ9GvSY4dn9uULf3l98Pf_YXH7-8On87LKxHWOlMYRQ2zluZdvVbgAzPQxAXcc7OawH0IRpsJY7Sc3aUg7SiKEzxDotnJGkXaF3B-5uNhM4C6EkPapd8pNOexW1V38rwW_VJl4r3nPRiwXw6h6Q4vcZclGTzxbGUQeIc1asDkoI3rZ9tb78x3oV51TbcefiknBSjStEDy5bh5ETDMfHUKKWDVCHDVAVrJZKtTXz4s9fHBO_Rl4N7GDIVQobSL-v_j_1J1VjwhI</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Sandberg, Evelien M.</creator><creator>Driessen, Sara R. C.</creator><creator>Bak, Evelien A. T.</creator><creator>van Geloven, Nan</creator><creator>Berger, Judith P.</creator><creator>Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H.</creator><creator>Rhemrev, Johann P. T.</creator><creator>Jansen, Frank Willem</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable</title><author>Sandberg, Evelien M. ; Driessen, Sara R. C. ; Bak, Evelien A. T. ; van Geloven, Nan ; Berger, Judith P. ; Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H. ; Rhemrev, Johann P. T. ; Jansen, Frank Willem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-b001c4d5c734103e2b8efe1d4547f9fea02aecc5d71b9c15e7b6f4b0cda6db703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Breasts</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, Evelien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Sara R. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Evelien A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geloven, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Judith P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhemrev, Johann P. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Frank Willem</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandberg, Evelien M.</au><au>Driessen, Sara R. C.</au><au>Bak, Evelien A. T.</au><au>van Geloven, Nan</au><au>Berger, Judith P.</au><au>Smeets, Mathilde J. G. H.</au><au>Rhemrev, Johann P. T.</au><au>Jansen, Frank Willem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable</atitle><jtitle>Gynecological surgery</jtitle><stitle>Gynecol Surg</stitle><addtitle>Gynecol Surg</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>8-9</pages><artnum>8</artnum><issn>1613-2076</issn><eissn>1613-2084</eissn><abstract>Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences surgical outcomes of LH and to determine if it should be considered as case-mix variable. Results A total of 2655 LH’s were analyzed, of which 397 (15.0%) with concomitant endometriosis. For blood loss and operative time, no measurable association was found for stages I ( n  = 106) and II ( n  = 103) endometriosis compared to LH without endometriosis. LH with stages III ( n  = 93) and IV ( n  = 95) endometriosis were associated with more intra-operative blood loss ( p  = &lt; .001) and a prolonged operative time ( p  = &lt; .001) compared to LH without endometriosis. No significant association was found between endometriosis (all stages) and complications ( p  = .62). Conclusions The findings of our study have provided numeric support for the influence of concomitant endometriosis on surgical outcomes of LH, without bowel or bladder dissection. Only stages III and IV were associated with a longer operative time and more blood loss and should thus be considered as case-mix variables in future quality measurement tools.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29576761</pmid><doi>10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1613-2076
ispartof Gynecological surgery, 2018, Vol.15 (1), p.8-9, Article 8
issn 1613-2076
1613-2084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5856860
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Bladder
Breasts
Cohort analysis
Endometriosis
Gynecology
Hysterectomy
Interventional Radiology
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Original
Original Article
Reproductive Medicine
Surgical Oncology
Surgical outcomes
title Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A51%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20outcomes%20of%20laparoscopic%20hysterectomy%20with%20concomitant%20endometriosis%20without%20bowel%20or%20bladder%20dissection:%20a%20cohort%20analysis%20to%20define%20a%20case-mix%20variable&rft.jtitle=Gynecological%20surgery&rft.au=Sandberg,%20Evelien%20M.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=8-9&rft.artnum=8&rft.issn=1613-2076&rft.eissn=1613-2084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2018665338%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015705065&rft_id=info:pmid/29576761&rfr_iscdi=true