52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis
To compare the 52-week efficacy and safety of SB4 [an etanercept biosimilar] with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA. In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomized to receive 50 mg/week of s.c....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2017-12, Vol.56 (12), p.2093-2101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2093 |
container_title | Rheumatology (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Emery, Paul Vencovský, Jirí Sylwestrzak, Anna Leszczynski, Piotr Porawska, Wieslawa Baranauskaite, Asta Tseluyko, Vira Zhdan, Vyacheslav M Stasiuk, Barbara Milasiene, Roma Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro Cheong, Soo Yeon Ghil, Jeehoon |
description | To compare the 52-week efficacy and safety of SB4 [an etanercept biosimilar] with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA.
In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomized to receive 50 mg/week of s.c. SB4 or ETN up to week 52. Efficacy assessments included ACR response rates, 28-joint DAS, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices and changes in the modified total Sharp score (mTSS). Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.
A total of 596 patients were randomized to receive either SB4 (n = 299) or ETN (n = 297) and 505 (84.7%) patients completed 52 weeks of the study. At week 52, the ACR20 response rates in the per-protocol set were comparable between SB4 (80.8%) and ETN (81.5%). All efficacy results were comparable between the two groups and they were maintained up to week 52. Radiographic progression was also comparable and the change from baseline in the mTSS was 0.45 for SB4 and 0.74 for ETN. The safety profile of SB4 was similar to that of ETN and the incidence of anti-drug antibody development up to week 52 was 1.0 and 13.2% in the SB4 and ETN groups, respectively.
Efficacy including radiographic progression was comparable between SB4 and ETN up to week 52. SB4 was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to that of ETN.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01895309, EudraCT 2012-005026-30. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1946435876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3cb6941808559e5ec178e11f6553a09be2df1642b11b195e4ea647b2423caa983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P3TAQtFARUNpfgIR87CXF38--ILWo0EpIHNqeLcfZvBiSOLUd6OuZH07aB0_0tCvtzOzsDkInlHykxPCz1ME8uBL7uN6c3cFvpsweOqJCsYpwzt7seiYO0ducbwkhknJ9gA6ZNkqvDD9Cj5JVDwB3OEGe-5JxbHHpAE-dy4A5Tm5s4hD-QINzmZsN9nGYXArjGn__LPBDKN1CbSHB6AFDcSMkD1PBYcSTKwHGRfMfyvkS7gG_uA4Ndql0KZSQ36H91vUZ3j_XY_Tz8suPi6_V9c3Vt4tP15UXRJaK-1oZQTXRUhqQ4OlKA6WtkpI7YmpgTUuVYDWlNTUSBDglVjUTjHvnjObH6HyrO831AI1fzCXX2ymFwaWNjS7Y_ydj6Ow63lupJVGSLQIfngVS_DVDLnYI2UPfL2fHOVtqhBJc6pVaoHwL9SnmvLxot4YS-zc_-zo_u81vYZ2-drjjvATGnwD3AJ8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1946435876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Emery, Paul ; Vencovský, Jirí ; Sylwestrzak, Anna ; Leszczynski, Piotr ; Porawska, Wieslawa ; Baranauskaite, Asta ; Tseluyko, Vira ; Zhdan, Vyacheslav M ; Stasiuk, Barbara ; Milasiene, Roma ; Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro ; Cheong, Soo Yeon ; Ghil, Jeehoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Emery, Paul ; Vencovský, Jirí ; Sylwestrzak, Anna ; Leszczynski, Piotr ; Porawska, Wieslawa ; Baranauskaite, Asta ; Tseluyko, Vira ; Zhdan, Vyacheslav M ; Stasiuk, Barbara ; Milasiene, Roma ; Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro ; Cheong, Soo Yeon ; Ghil, Jeehoon</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the 52-week efficacy and safety of SB4 [an etanercept biosimilar] with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA.
In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomized to receive 50 mg/week of s.c. SB4 or ETN up to week 52. Efficacy assessments included ACR response rates, 28-joint DAS, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices and changes in the modified total Sharp score (mTSS). Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.
A total of 596 patients were randomized to receive either SB4 (n = 299) or ETN (n = 297) and 505 (84.7%) patients completed 52 weeks of the study. At week 52, the ACR20 response rates in the per-protocol set were comparable between SB4 (80.8%) and ETN (81.5%). All efficacy results were comparable between the two groups and they were maintained up to week 52. Radiographic progression was also comparable and the change from baseline in the mTSS was 0.45 for SB4 and 0.74 for ETN. The safety profile of SB4 was similar to that of ETN and the incidence of anti-drug antibody development up to week 52 was 1.0 and 13.2% in the SB4 and ETN groups, respectively.
Efficacy including radiographic progression was comparable between SB4 and ETN up to week 52. SB4 was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to that of ETN.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01895309, EudraCT 2012-005026-30.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28968793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - therapeutic use ; Clinical Science ; Disease Progression ; Double-Blind Method ; Etanercept - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography - methods ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.56 (12), p.2093-2101</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3cb6941808559e5ec178e11f6553a09be2df1642b11b195e4ea647b2423caa983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3cb6941808559e5ec178e11f6553a09be2df1642b11b195e4ea647b2423caa983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emery, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vencovský, Jirí</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylwestrzak, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszczynski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porawska, Wieslawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranauskaite, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseluyko, Vira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhdan, Vyacheslav M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasiuk, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milasiene, Roma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghil, Jeehoon</creatorcontrib><title>52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><description>To compare the 52-week efficacy and safety of SB4 [an etanercept biosimilar] with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA.
In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomized to receive 50 mg/week of s.c. SB4 or ETN up to week 52. Efficacy assessments included ACR response rates, 28-joint DAS, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices and changes in the modified total Sharp score (mTSS). Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.
A total of 596 patients were randomized to receive either SB4 (n = 299) or ETN (n = 297) and 505 (84.7%) patients completed 52 weeks of the study. At week 52, the ACR20 response rates in the per-protocol set were comparable between SB4 (80.8%) and ETN (81.5%). All efficacy results were comparable between the two groups and they were maintained up to week 52. Radiographic progression was also comparable and the change from baseline in the mTSS was 0.45 for SB4 and 0.74 for ETN. The safety profile of SB4 was similar to that of ETN and the incidence of anti-drug antibody development up to week 52 was 1.0 and 13.2% in the SB4 and ETN groups, respectively.
Efficacy including radiographic progression was comparable between SB4 and ETN up to week 52. SB4 was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to that of ETN.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01895309, EudraCT 2012-005026-30.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Science</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Etanercept - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1P3TAQtFARUNpfgIR87CXF38--ILWo0EpIHNqeLcfZvBiSOLUd6OuZH07aB0_0tCvtzOzsDkInlHykxPCz1ME8uBL7uN6c3cFvpsweOqJCsYpwzt7seiYO0ducbwkhknJ9gA6ZNkqvDD9Cj5JVDwB3OEGe-5JxbHHpAE-dy4A5Tm5s4hD-QINzmZsN9nGYXArjGn__LPBDKN1CbSHB6AFDcSMkD1PBYcSTKwHGRfMfyvkS7gG_uA4Ndql0KZSQ36H91vUZ3j_XY_Tz8suPi6_V9c3Vt4tP15UXRJaK-1oZQTXRUhqQ4OlKA6WtkpI7YmpgTUuVYDWlNTUSBDglVjUTjHvnjObH6HyrO831AI1fzCXX2ymFwaWNjS7Y_ydj6Ow63lupJVGSLQIfngVS_DVDLnYI2UPfL2fHOVtqhBJc6pVaoHwL9SnmvLxot4YS-zc_-zo_u81vYZ2-drjjvATGnwD3AJ8g</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Emery, Paul</creator><creator>Vencovský, Jirí</creator><creator>Sylwestrzak, Anna</creator><creator>Leszczynski, Piotr</creator><creator>Porawska, Wieslawa</creator><creator>Baranauskaite, Asta</creator><creator>Tseluyko, Vira</creator><creator>Zhdan, Vyacheslav M</creator><creator>Stasiuk, Barbara</creator><creator>Milasiene, Roma</creator><creator>Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro</creator><creator>Cheong, Soo Yeon</creator><creator>Ghil, Jeehoon</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Emery, Paul ; Vencovský, Jirí ; Sylwestrzak, Anna ; Leszczynski, Piotr ; Porawska, Wieslawa ; Baranauskaite, Asta ; Tseluyko, Vira ; Zhdan, Vyacheslav M ; Stasiuk, Barbara ; Milasiene, Roma ; Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro ; Cheong, Soo Yeon ; Ghil, Jeehoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3cb6941808559e5ec178e11f6553a09be2df1642b11b195e4ea647b2423caa983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Science</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Etanercept - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emery, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vencovský, Jirí</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sylwestrzak, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszczynski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porawska, Wieslawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranauskaite, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseluyko, Vira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhdan, Vyacheslav M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasiuk, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milasiene, Roma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghil, Jeehoon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emery, Paul</au><au>Vencovský, Jirí</au><au>Sylwestrzak, Anna</au><au>Leszczynski, Piotr</au><au>Porawska, Wieslawa</au><au>Baranauskaite, Asta</au><au>Tseluyko, Vira</au><au>Zhdan, Vyacheslav M</au><au>Stasiuk, Barbara</au><au>Milasiene, Roma</au><au>Barrera Rodriguez, Aaron Alejandro</au><au>Cheong, Soo Yeon</au><au>Ghil, Jeehoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology (Oxford)</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2093</spage><epage>2101</epage><pages>2093-2101</pages><issn>1462-0324</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><abstract>To compare the 52-week efficacy and safety of SB4 [an etanercept biosimilar] with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with active RA.
In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomized to receive 50 mg/week of s.c. SB4 or ETN up to week 52. Efficacy assessments included ACR response rates, 28-joint DAS, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indices and changes in the modified total Sharp score (mTSS). Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.
A total of 596 patients were randomized to receive either SB4 (n = 299) or ETN (n = 297) and 505 (84.7%) patients completed 52 weeks of the study. At week 52, the ACR20 response rates in the per-protocol set were comparable between SB4 (80.8%) and ETN (81.5%). All efficacy results were comparable between the two groups and they were maintained up to week 52. Radiographic progression was also comparable and the change from baseline in the mTSS was 0.45 for SB4 and 0.74 for ETN. The safety profile of SB4 was similar to that of ETN and the incidence of anti-drug antibody development up to week 52 was 1.0 and 13.2% in the SB4 and ETN groups, respectively.
Efficacy including radiographic progression was comparable between SB4 and ETN up to week 52. SB4 was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to that of ETN.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01895309, EudraCT 2012-005026-30.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28968793</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/kex269</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-0324 |
ispartof | Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.56 (12), p.2093-2101 |
issn | 1462-0324 1462-0332 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850652 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnostic imaging Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - therapeutic use Clinical Science Disease Progression Double-Blind Method Etanercept - therapeutic use Female Humans Male Middle Aged Radiography - methods Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | 52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=52-week%20results%20of%20the%20phase%203%20randomized%20study%20comparing%20SB4%20with%20reference%20etanercept%20in%20patients%20with%20active%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=Rheumatology%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Emery,%20Paul&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2093&rft.epage=2101&rft.pages=2093-2101&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/kex269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1946435876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1946435876&rft_id=info:pmid/28968793&rfr_iscdi=true |