Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer
Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 504 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Smarr, Melissa M. Sapra, Katherine J. Gemmill, Alison Kahn, Linda G. Wise, Lauren A. Lynch, Courtney D. Factor-Litvak, Pam Mumford, Sunni L. Skakkebaek, Niels E. Slama, Rémy Lobdell, Danelle T. Stanford, Joseph B. Jensen, Tina Kold Boyle, Elizabeth Heger Eisenberg, Michael L. Turek, Paul J. Sundaram, Rajeshwari Thoma, Marie E. Buck Louis, Germaine M. |
description | Abstract
Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/dew361 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/dew361</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1863219832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtv3TAMhYWiQXLzGLsWGrs40cPWtZcWQdBHgABdsgu0RNkubMmVrAT591Vw07SdOpEEDz8SPIS84-ySs05ejXmJuF5ZfJSKvyE7XitWCdmwt2THhGorzhU_Iacp_WCspK06Jiei5XK_b-SODLeJFgR46tBkb6ftiZoR_DD54RO9pnZKJqc0BU-DoxETQjQjBW-phQ3oAGuia0QzZ1tGaE7UxbDQER6ey8IFnx4xnpMjB3PCi5d4Ru6_fL6_-Vbdff96e3N9V5lasK2qkcu67x2AsaiQOwPYWbnvWydM71jnJG94z4EJVspegIKu7hkH5VSN8ox8PGDX3C9oDfotwqzXOC0Qn3SASf_b8dOoh_Cgm7ZhirMC-PACiOFnxrTppXwA5xk8hpx0-Z8UvGulKNLqIDUxpBTRva7hTD97ow_e6IM3Rf_-79te1b_N-LM75PU_rF9REZ36</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863219832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28137753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Birth Rate ; Female ; Fertility - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Opinion ; Pregnancy ; Reproduction - physiology ; Time-to-Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2017</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28137753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemmill, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Linda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Courtney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tina Kold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Abstract
Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</description><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Opinion</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Time-to-Pregnancy</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtv3TAMhYWiQXLzGLsWGrs40cPWtZcWQdBHgABdsgu0RNkubMmVrAT591Vw07SdOpEEDz8SPIS84-ySs05ejXmJuF5ZfJSKvyE7XitWCdmwt2THhGorzhU_Iacp_WCspK06Jiei5XK_b-SODLeJFgR46tBkb6ftiZoR_DD54RO9pnZKJqc0BU-DoxETQjQjBW-phQ3oAGuia0QzZ1tGaE7UxbDQER6ey8IFnx4xnpMjB3PCi5d4Ru6_fL6_-Vbdff96e3N9V5lasK2qkcu67x2AsaiQOwPYWbnvWydM71jnJG94z4EJVspegIKu7hkH5VSN8ox8PGDX3C9oDfotwqzXOC0Qn3SASf_b8dOoh_Cgm7ZhirMC-PACiOFnxrTppXwA5xk8hpx0-Z8UvGulKNLqIDUxpBTRva7hTD97ow_e6IM3Rf_-79te1b_N-LM75PU_rF9REZ36</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Smarr, Melissa M.</creator><creator>Sapra, Katherine J.</creator><creator>Gemmill, Alison</creator><creator>Kahn, Linda G.</creator><creator>Wise, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Lynch, Courtney D.</creator><creator>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creator><creator>Mumford, Sunni L.</creator><creator>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creator><creator>Slama, Rémy</creator><creator>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creator><creator>Stanford, Joseph B.</creator><creator>Jensen, Tina Kold</creator><creator>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creator><creator>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creator><creator>Turek, Paul J.</creator><creator>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creator><creator>Thoma, Marie E.</creator><creator>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><author>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Opinion</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Time-to-Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemmill, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Linda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Courtney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tina Kold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smarr, Melissa M.</au><au>Sapra, Katherine J.</au><au>Gemmill, Alison</au><au>Kahn, Linda G.</au><au>Wise, Lauren A.</au><au>Lynch, Courtney D.</au><au>Factor-Litvak, Pam</au><au>Mumford, Sunni L.</au><au>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</au><au>Slama, Rémy</au><au>Lobdell, Danelle T.</au><au>Stanford, Joseph B.</au><au>Jensen, Tina Kold</au><au>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</au><au>Eisenberg, Michael L.</au><au>Turek, Paul J.</au><au>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</au><au>Thoma, Marie E.</au><au>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28137753</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/dew361</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850610 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Birth Rate Female Fertility - physiology Humans Male Opinion Pregnancy Reproduction - physiology Time-to-Pregnancy |
title | Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20human%20fecundity%20changing?%20A%20discussion%20of%20research%20and%20data%20gaps%20precluding%20us%20from%20having%20an%20answer&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Smarr,%20Melissa%20M.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/dew361&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1863219832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863219832&rft_id=info:pmid/28137753&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/dew361&rfr_iscdi=true |