Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer

Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504
Hauptverfasser: Smarr, Melissa M., Sapra, Katherine J., Gemmill, Alison, Kahn, Linda G., Wise, Lauren A., Lynch, Courtney D., Factor-Litvak, Pam, Mumford, Sunni L., Skakkebaek, Niels E., Slama, Rémy, Lobdell, Danelle T., Stanford, Joseph B., Jensen, Tina Kold, Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, Eisenberg, Michael L., Turek, Paul J., Sundaram, Rajeshwari, Thoma, Marie E., Buck Louis, Germaine M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 504
container_issue 3
container_start_page 499
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 32
creator Smarr, Melissa M.
Sapra, Katherine J.
Gemmill, Alison
Kahn, Linda G.
Wise, Lauren A.
Lynch, Courtney D.
Factor-Litvak, Pam
Mumford, Sunni L.
Skakkebaek, Niels E.
Slama, Rémy
Lobdell, Danelle T.
Stanford, Joseph B.
Jensen, Tina Kold
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger
Eisenberg, Michael L.
Turek, Paul J.
Sundaram, Rajeshwari
Thoma, Marie E.
Buck Louis, Germaine M.
description Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/dew361
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/dew361</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1863219832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtv3TAMhYWiQXLzGLsWGrs40cPWtZcWQdBHgABdsgu0RNkubMmVrAT591Vw07SdOpEEDz8SPIS84-ySs05ejXmJuF5ZfJSKvyE7XitWCdmwt2THhGorzhU_Iacp_WCspK06Jiei5XK_b-SODLeJFgR46tBkb6ftiZoR_DD54RO9pnZKJqc0BU-DoxETQjQjBW-phQ3oAGuia0QzZ1tGaE7UxbDQER6ey8IFnx4xnpMjB3PCi5d4Ru6_fL6_-Vbdff96e3N9V5lasK2qkcu67x2AsaiQOwPYWbnvWydM71jnJG94z4EJVspegIKu7hkH5VSN8ox8PGDX3C9oDfotwqzXOC0Qn3SASf_b8dOoh_Cgm7ZhirMC-PACiOFnxrTppXwA5xk8hpx0-Z8UvGulKNLqIDUxpBTRva7hTD97ow_e6IM3Rf_-79te1b_N-LM75PU_rF9REZ36</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863219832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew361</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28137753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Birth Rate ; Female ; Fertility - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Opinion ; Pregnancy ; Reproduction - physiology ; Time-to-Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. 2017</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28137753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemmill, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Linda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Courtney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tina Kold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</description><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Opinion</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Time-to-Pregnancy</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtv3TAMhYWiQXLzGLsWGrs40cPWtZcWQdBHgABdsgu0RNkubMmVrAT591Vw07SdOpEEDz8SPIS84-ySs05ejXmJuF5ZfJSKvyE7XitWCdmwt2THhGorzhU_Iacp_WCspK06Jiei5XK_b-SODLeJFgR46tBkb6ftiZoR_DD54RO9pnZKJqc0BU-DoxETQjQjBW-phQ3oAGuia0QzZ1tGaE7UxbDQER6ey8IFnx4xnpMjB3PCi5d4Ru6_fL6_-Vbdff96e3N9V5lasK2qkcu67x2AsaiQOwPYWbnvWydM71jnJG94z4EJVspegIKu7hkH5VSN8ox8PGDX3C9oDfotwqzXOC0Qn3SASf_b8dOoh_Cgm7ZhirMC-PACiOFnxrTppXwA5xk8hpx0-Z8UvGulKNLqIDUxpBTRva7hTD97ow_e6IM3Rf_-79te1b_N-LM75PU_rF9REZ36</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Smarr, Melissa M.</creator><creator>Sapra, Katherine J.</creator><creator>Gemmill, Alison</creator><creator>Kahn, Linda G.</creator><creator>Wise, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Lynch, Courtney D.</creator><creator>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creator><creator>Mumford, Sunni L.</creator><creator>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creator><creator>Slama, Rémy</creator><creator>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creator><creator>Stanford, Joseph B.</creator><creator>Jensen, Tina Kold</creator><creator>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creator><creator>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creator><creator>Turek, Paul J.</creator><creator>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creator><creator>Thoma, Marie E.</creator><creator>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</title><author>Smarr, Melissa M. ; Sapra, Katherine J. ; Gemmill, Alison ; Kahn, Linda G. ; Wise, Lauren A. ; Lynch, Courtney D. ; Factor-Litvak, Pam ; Mumford, Sunni L. ; Skakkebaek, Niels E. ; Slama, Rémy ; Lobdell, Danelle T. ; Stanford, Joseph B. ; Jensen, Tina Kold ; Boyle, Elizabeth Heger ; Eisenberg, Michael L. ; Turek, Paul J. ; Sundaram, Rajeshwari ; Thoma, Marie E. ; Buck Louis, Germaine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-4e134bbfaacde6e1fcae9d37b8f2cbf09f3151b1a020bf0b2a6a94b01a6f64e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Opinion</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Time-to-Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smarr, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemmill, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Linda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Courtney D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Factor-Litvak, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Sunni L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slama, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Danelle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Joseph B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tina Kold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turek, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smarr, Melissa M.</au><au>Sapra, Katherine J.</au><au>Gemmill, Alison</au><au>Kahn, Linda G.</au><au>Wise, Lauren A.</au><au>Lynch, Courtney D.</au><au>Factor-Litvak, Pam</au><au>Mumford, Sunni L.</au><au>Skakkebaek, Niels E.</au><au>Slama, Rémy</au><au>Lobdell, Danelle T.</au><au>Stanford, Joseph B.</au><au>Jensen, Tina Kold</au><au>Boyle, Elizabeth Heger</au><au>Eisenberg, Michael L.</au><au>Turek, Paul J.</au><au>Sundaram, Rajeshwari</au><au>Thoma, Marie E.</au><au>Buck Louis, Germaine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>Abstract Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28137753</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/dew361</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2017-03, Vol.32 (3), p.499-504
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5850610
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Birth Rate
Female
Fertility - physiology
Humans
Male
Opinion
Pregnancy
Reproduction - physiology
Time-to-Pregnancy
title Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T23%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20human%20fecundity%20changing?%20A%20discussion%20of%20research%20and%20data%20gaps%20precluding%20us%20from%20having%20an%20answer&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Smarr,%20Melissa%20M.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/dew361&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1863219832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863219832&rft_id=info:pmid/28137753&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/dew361&rfr_iscdi=true