Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgerie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2018-02, Vol.97 (8), p.e0016-e0016
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Feiyu, Wang, Wei, Wang, Chengde, Peng, Xiaonu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0016
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0016
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 97
creator Liu, Feiyu
Wang, Wei
Wang, Chengde
Peng, Xiaonu
description Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000010016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5842024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2007116641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5163-ca4fe1ad1378482d94a1dda2123f37cdf058b4d93aebb9566a84c498d63814ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtr3DAQhUVpaTZpf0Gh-DF9cKq77ZdCSDZJIaHQy7OYlcZrt7a1leRd_O_rzaZpEzEgNOfMp4FDyDtGzxitio93l2f032Fz6RdkwZTQuaq0fEkWlHKVF1Uhj8hxjD9nhyi4fE2OeCW1UqJckLQcGhgsuiyg9VsMUwZ1wpDFMaz3r9Pl1_NvH7JN8OsAfcxqHzKMftPAGm3y_bSXkre-u5cgi1NM2ENq7YzctrjLYHBZjwlyGKCbYhvfkFc1dBHfPtwn5MfV8vvFTX775frzxfltbhXTIrcga2Tg5q1LWXJXSWDOAWdc1KKwrqaqXElXCcDVqlJaQymtrEqnRcmkRXFCPh24m3HVo7M4pACd2YS2hzAZD615qgxtY9Z-a1QpOeVyBpw-AIL_PWJMpm-jxa6DAf0YDae0YExryWarOFht8DEGrB-_YdTs8zJ3l-Z5XvPU-_83fJz5G9BskAfDzndzLPFXN-4wmAahS809TxUVzzllJeVc0HzfEuIPClKi3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007116641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liu, Feiyu ; Wang, Wei ; Wang, Chengde ; Peng, Xiaonu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feiyu ; Wang, Wei ; Wang, Chengde ; Peng, Xiaonu</creatorcontrib><description>Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29465538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Clinical Protocols ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; Esophagectomy - rehabilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation ; Recovery of Function ; Study Protocol Systematic Review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-02, Vol.97 (8), p.e0016-e0016</ispartof><rights>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5163-ca4fe1ad1378482d94a1dda2123f37cdf058b4d93aebb9566a84c498d63814ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5163-ca4fe1ad1378482d94a1dda2123f37cdf058b4d93aebb9566a84c498d63814ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842024/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842024/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29465538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chengde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaonu</creatorcontrib><title>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.</description><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Study Protocol Systematic Review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtr3DAQhUVpaTZpf0Gh-DF9cKq77ZdCSDZJIaHQy7OYlcZrt7a1leRd_O_rzaZpEzEgNOfMp4FDyDtGzxitio93l2f032Fz6RdkwZTQuaq0fEkWlHKVF1Uhj8hxjD9nhyi4fE2OeCW1UqJckLQcGhgsuiyg9VsMUwZ1wpDFMaz3r9Pl1_NvH7JN8OsAfcxqHzKMftPAGm3y_bSXkre-u5cgi1NM2ENq7YzctrjLYHBZjwlyGKCbYhvfkFc1dBHfPtwn5MfV8vvFTX775frzxfltbhXTIrcga2Tg5q1LWXJXSWDOAWdc1KKwrqaqXElXCcDVqlJaQymtrEqnRcmkRXFCPh24m3HVo7M4pACd2YS2hzAZD615qgxtY9Z-a1QpOeVyBpw-AIL_PWJMpm-jxa6DAf0YDae0YExryWarOFht8DEGrB-_YdTs8zJ3l-Z5XvPU-_83fJz5G9BskAfDzndzLPFXN-4wmAahS809TxUVzzllJeVc0HzfEuIPClKi3g</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Liu, Feiyu</creator><creator>Wang, Wei</creator><creator>Wang, Chengde</creator><creator>Peng, Xiaonu</creator><general>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Liu, Feiyu ; Wang, Wei ; Wang, Chengde ; Peng, Xiaonu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5163-ca4fe1ad1378482d94a1dda2123f37cdf058b4d93aebb9566a84c498d63814ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Study Protocol Systematic Review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Feiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chengde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaonu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Feiyu</au><au>Wang, Wei</au><au>Wang, Chengde</au><au>Peng, Xiaonu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0016</spage><epage>e0016</epage><pages>e0016-e0016</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Esophagectomy plays an important role and offers a potential curable chance to these patients. However, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is known as one of the most invasive digestive surgeries which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition, and psychology, which is designed for reducing complications, promoting recovery, and improving treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming at how beneficial, and to what extent ERAS really will be. A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and propensity-matched comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the comparisons between ERAS and conventional care in aspects of perioperative outcomes and provide level I evidences for clinical decision makings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>29465538</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000010016</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-02, Vol.97 (8), p.e0016-e0016
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5842024
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Protocols
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Esophagectomy - rehabilitation
Female
Humans
Male
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Postoperative Care - methods
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - rehabilitation
Recovery of Function
Study Protocol Systematic Review
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Treatment Outcome
title Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T01%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced%20recovery%20after%20surgery%20(ERAS)%20programs%20for%20esophagectomy%20protocol%20for%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Liu,%20Feiyu&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0016&rft.epage=e0016&rft.pages=e0016-e0016&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000010016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2007116641%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007116641&rft_id=info:pmid/29465538&rfr_iscdi=true