Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device
We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8±1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-4 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2018 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | BioMed research international |
| container_volume | 2018 |
| creator | Goseki, Toshiaki Ishikawa, Hitoshi Handa, Tomoya Iwata, Yo Shoji, Nobuyuki |
| description | We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8±1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either with glasses only, or with glasses in combination with the Occlu-pad (training time: 2 days a week, 30 minutes per day). We compared visual acuity scores at 3 and 6 months after treatment had started, and examined the compliance rate for the Occlu-pad training. Three months as well as 6 months after amblyopia treatment started, the “Occlu-pad treatment group” showed significantly improved visual acuity, compared to the “Glasses treatment group” (at both 3 and 6 months: p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2018/2459696 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5836454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A621799687</galeid><sourcerecordid>A621799687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-ca277eceae593397fbaa9b891eb1584e93da9d28c95e912ee542318f5442a0463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEolXpjTOyxAUJQmPHduwL0naBglRpOSznaOJMuq4SO8RJV3ureI725fokeLXLFjjhiy393_zj354keUmz95QKccYyqs4YF1pq-SQ5ZjnlqaScPj2c8_woOQ3hOotLUZlp-Tw5YloWmdLiOPk5910Pgw3ekQrHNaIjs65qN763QJYDwtihG8najity0UIIGMjCtRsCriaxuLIORhurfXPQt9KiR5cuNz2Sc-u8mVoYyMPt3cKYdkq_Qf1we08-4o01-CJ51kAb8HS_nyTfP39azr-kl4uLr_PZZWq41mNqgBUFGgQUOs910VQAulKaYkWF4qjzGnTNlNECNWWIgscnUI3gnEHGZX6SfNj59lPVYW1irAHash9sB8Om9GDLvxVnV-WVvymFyiUXPBq82RsM_seEYSw7Gwy2LTj0UyhZxgqhlaTbXq__Qa_9NLgYL1I0Y0owqR6pK2ixtK7xsa_ZmpYzyWihtVRFpN7tKDP4EAZsDlemWbmdgq2lKvdTEPFXf8Y8wL__PAJvd8DKuhrW9j_tMDLYwCNNmcgkz38BhpLFgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010285268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goseki, Toshiaki ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Handa, Tomoya ; Iwata, Yo ; Shoji, Nobuyuki</creator><contributor>Mizota, Atsushi ; Atsushi Mizota</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goseki, Toshiaki ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Handa, Tomoya ; Iwata, Yo ; Shoji, Nobuyuki ; Mizota, Atsushi ; Atsushi Mizota</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8±1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either with glasses only, or with glasses in combination with the Occlu-pad (training time: 2 days a week, 30 minutes per day). We compared visual acuity scores at 3 and 6 months after treatment had started, and examined the compliance rate for the Occlu-pad training. Three months as well as 6 months after amblyopia treatment started, the “Occlu-pad treatment group” showed significantly improved visual acuity, compared to the “Glasses treatment group” (at both 3 and 6 months: p<0.0001). The compliance rate for using the Occlu-pad was 88.4±18.7% after 3 months and 69.6±19.5%, after 6 months. There was no significant correlation between the training time using the Occlu-pad and improvement in visual acuity (3 months: p=0.97; 6 months: p=0.55). The compliance rate for months 4 to 6 was significantly lower than that for months 1 to 3 (p=0.003). Amblyopia treatment using the Occlu-pad device in combination with glasses led to a better effect than treatment with glasses alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2018/2459696</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29670895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Age ; Amblyopia ; Amblyopia - therapy ; Anisometropia - therapy ; Binocular vision ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Compliance ; Eyeglasses ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical screening ; Pediatrics ; Training ; Training devices ; Treatment Outcome ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual acuity ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-4</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Yo Iwata et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Yo Iwata et al.; This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Yo Iwata et al. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-ca277eceae593397fbaa9b891eb1584e93da9d28c95e912ee542318f5442a0463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-ca277eceae593397fbaa9b891eb1584e93da9d28c95e912ee542318f5442a0463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0707-5502 ; 0000-0001-8943-6924</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836454/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836454/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670895$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mizota, Atsushi</contributor><contributor>Atsushi Mizota</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goseki, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoji, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8±1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either with glasses only, or with glasses in combination with the Occlu-pad (training time: 2 days a week, 30 minutes per day). We compared visual acuity scores at 3 and 6 months after treatment had started, and examined the compliance rate for the Occlu-pad training. Three months as well as 6 months after amblyopia treatment started, the “Occlu-pad treatment group” showed significantly improved visual acuity, compared to the “Glasses treatment group” (at both 3 and 6 months: p<0.0001). The compliance rate for using the Occlu-pad was 88.4±18.7% after 3 months and 69.6±19.5%, after 6 months. There was no significant correlation between the training time using the Occlu-pad and improvement in visual acuity (3 months: p=0.97; 6 months: p=0.55). The compliance rate for months 4 to 6 was significantly lower than that for months 1 to 3 (p=0.003). Amblyopia treatment using the Occlu-pad device in combination with glasses led to a better effect than treatment with glasses alone.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Amblyopia</subject><subject>Amblyopia - therapy</subject><subject>Anisometropia - therapy</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Training devices</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEolXpjTOyxAUJQmPHduwL0naBglRpOSznaOJMuq4SO8RJV3ureI725fokeLXLFjjhiy393_zj354keUmz95QKccYyqs4YF1pq-SQ5ZjnlqaScPj2c8_woOQ3hOotLUZlp-Tw5YloWmdLiOPk5910Pgw3ekQrHNaIjs65qN763QJYDwtihG8najity0UIIGMjCtRsCriaxuLIORhurfXPQt9KiR5cuNz2Sc-u8mVoYyMPt3cKYdkq_Qf1we08-4o01-CJ51kAb8HS_nyTfP39azr-kl4uLr_PZZWq41mNqgBUFGgQUOs910VQAulKaYkWF4qjzGnTNlNECNWWIgscnUI3gnEHGZX6SfNj59lPVYW1irAHash9sB8Om9GDLvxVnV-WVvymFyiUXPBq82RsM_seEYSw7Gwy2LTj0UyhZxgqhlaTbXq__Qa_9NLgYL1I0Y0owqR6pK2ixtK7xsa_ZmpYzyWihtVRFpN7tKDP4EAZsDlemWbmdgq2lKvdTEPFXf8Y8wL__PAJvd8DKuhrW9j_tMDLYwCNNmcgkz38BhpLFgw</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Goseki, Toshiaki</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Handa, Tomoya</creator><creator>Iwata, Yo</creator><creator>Shoji, Nobuyuki</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-6924</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device</title><author>Goseki, Toshiaki ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Handa, Tomoya ; Iwata, Yo ; Shoji, Nobuyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-ca277eceae593397fbaa9b891eb1584e93da9d28c95e912ee542318f5442a0463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Amblyopia</topic><topic>Amblyopia - therapy</topic><topic>Anisometropia - therapy</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Training devices</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goseki, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handa, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoji, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goseki, Toshiaki</au><au>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</au><au>Handa, Tomoya</au><au>Iwata, Yo</au><au>Shoji, Nobuyuki</au><au>Mizota, Atsushi</au><au>Atsushi Mizota</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>2018</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>We evaluated amblyopia treatment, comparing training with glasses only and training with glasses and the Occlu-pad, a binocular open-type amblyopia training device. Forty-six children (4.8±1.1 years) diagnosed with anisometropic amblyopia, all wearing complete correction glasses, were treated either with glasses only, or with glasses in combination with the Occlu-pad (training time: 2 days a week, 30 minutes per day). We compared visual acuity scores at 3 and 6 months after treatment had started, and examined the compliance rate for the Occlu-pad training. Three months as well as 6 months after amblyopia treatment started, the “Occlu-pad treatment group” showed significantly improved visual acuity, compared to the “Glasses treatment group” (at both 3 and 6 months: p<0.0001). The compliance rate for using the Occlu-pad was 88.4±18.7% after 3 months and 69.6±19.5%, after 6 months. There was no significant correlation between the training time using the Occlu-pad and improvement in visual acuity (3 months: p=0.97; 6 months: p=0.55). The compliance rate for months 4 to 6 was significantly lower than that for months 1 to 3 (p=0.003). Amblyopia treatment using the Occlu-pad device in combination with glasses led to a better effect than treatment with glasses alone.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>29670895</pmid><doi>10.1155/2018/2459696</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-6924</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
| ispartof | BioMed research international, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-4 |
| issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5836454 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Acuity Age Amblyopia Amblyopia - therapy Anisometropia - therapy Binocular vision Child Child, Preschool Children Compliance Eyeglasses Female Health aspects Humans Male Medical screening Pediatrics Training Training devices Treatment Outcome Vision, Binocular - physiology Visual acuity Visual Acuity - physiology Visual impairment |
| title | Comparison between Amblyopia Treatment with Glasses Only and Combination of Glasses and Open-Type Binocular “Occlu-Pad” Device |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Amblyopia%20Treatment%20with%20Glasses%20Only%20and%20Combination%20of%20Glasses%20and%20Open-Type%20Binocular%20%E2%80%9COcclu-Pad%E2%80%9D%20Device&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Goseki,%20Toshiaki&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=2018&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2018/2459696&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA621799687%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010285268&rft_id=info:pmid/29670895&rft_galeid=A621799687&rfr_iscdi=true |