Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation

Many studies report that mountain plant species are shifting upward in elevation. However, the majority of these reports focus on shifts of upper limits. Here, we expand the focus and simultaneously analyze changes of both range limits, optima, and abundances of 183 mountain plant species. We theref...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2018-02, Vol.115 (8), p.1848-1853
Hauptverfasser: Rumpf, Sabine B., Hülber, Karl, Klonner, Günther, Moser, Dietmar, Schütz, Martin, Wessely, Jhannes, Willner, Wolfgang, Zimmermann, Niklaus E., Dullinger, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1853
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1848
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 115
creator Rumpf, Sabine B.
Hülber, Karl
Klonner, Günther
Moser, Dietmar
Schütz, Martin
Wessely, Jhannes
Willner, Wolfgang
Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
Dullinger, Stefan
description Many studies report that mountain plant species are shifting upward in elevation. However, the majority of these reports focus on shifts of upper limits. Here, we expand the focus and simultaneously analyze changes of both range limits, optima, and abundances of 183 mountain plant species. We therefore resurveyed 1,576 vegetation plots first recorded before 1970 in the European Alps. We found that both range limits and optima shifted upward in elevation, but the most pronounced trend was a mean increase in species abundance. Despite huge species-specific variation, range dynamics showed a consistent trend along the elevational gradient: Both range limits and optima shifted upslope faster the lower they were situated historically, and species’ abundance increased more for species from lower elevations. Traits affecting the species’ dispersal and persistence capacity were not related to their range dynamics. Using indicator values to stratify species by their thermal and nutrient demands revealed that elevational ranges of thermophilic species tended to expand, while those of cold-adapted species tended to contract. Abundance increases were strongest for nutriphilous species. These results suggest that recent climate warming interacted with airborne nitrogen deposition in driving the observed dynamics. So far, the majority of species appear as “winners” of recent changes, yet “losers” are overrepresented among high-elevation, cold-adapted species with low nutrient demands. In the decades to come, high-alpine species may hence face the double pressure of climatic changes and novel, superior competitors that move up faster than they themselves can escape to even higher elevations.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1713936115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5828587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26507569</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26507569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-5dc50ecf5398d42ec8f6df5cbe4227f38b400d27a1309bc79202db27f9e1b67f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0556KInHpJTD-iu1LpQpRioRUqYKz5TgTyCqxFzuh4r-vV0uhcJrD-83TvHmEfKZwQkHx001w-YQqyg1vKJXvyIqCoXUjDLwnKwCmai2Y2CcHOa8BwEgNH8g-M1xpw82KmN8u3GLVPQY3DT5Xsa-muITZDaHajC7MuerQJ3QZqz_DfFfhiA9uHmL4SPZ6N2b89DQPyc2P8-uzn_XVr4vLs-9XtReCz7XsvAT0veRGd4Kh133T9dK3KBhTPdetAOiYcpSDab0yDFjXFsUgbZsCHJJvO9_N0k7YeQxzcqPdpGFy6dFGN9jXShju7G18sFIzLbUqBl-fDFK8XzDPdhqyx7Gkw7hkS43hQKmQW_T4DbqOSwolnmVApWLlsaJQpzvKp5hzwv75GAp2W4vd1mJfaikbR_9neOb_9VCALztgneeYXvRGgpKN4X8BROWTKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015726494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Rumpf, Sabine B. ; Hülber, Karl ; Klonner, Günther ; Moser, Dietmar ; Schütz, Martin ; Wessely, Jhannes ; Willner, Wolfgang ; Zimmermann, Niklaus E. ; Dullinger, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rumpf, Sabine B. ; Hülber, Karl ; Klonner, Günther ; Moser, Dietmar ; Schütz, Martin ; Wessely, Jhannes ; Willner, Wolfgang ; Zimmermann, Niklaus E. ; Dullinger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies report that mountain plant species are shifting upward in elevation. However, the majority of these reports focus on shifts of upper limits. Here, we expand the focus and simultaneously analyze changes of both range limits, optima, and abundances of 183 mountain plant species. We therefore resurveyed 1,576 vegetation plots first recorded before 1970 in the European Alps. We found that both range limits and optima shifted upward in elevation, but the most pronounced trend was a mean increase in species abundance. Despite huge species-specific variation, range dynamics showed a consistent trend along the elevational gradient: Both range limits and optima shifted upslope faster the lower they were situated historically, and species’ abundance increased more for species from lower elevations. Traits affecting the species’ dispersal and persistence capacity were not related to their range dynamics. Using indicator values to stratify species by their thermal and nutrient demands revealed that elevational ranges of thermophilic species tended to expand, while those of cold-adapted species tended to contract. Abundance increases were strongest for nutriphilous species. These results suggest that recent climate warming interacted with airborne nitrogen deposition in driving the observed dynamics. So far, the majority of species appear as “winners” of recent changes, yet “losers” are overrepresented among high-elevation, cold-adapted species with low nutrient demands. In the decades to come, high-alpine species may hence face the double pressure of climatic changes and novel, superior competitors that move up faster than they themselves can escape to even higher elevations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713936115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29378939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adaptation ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Alpine environments ; Altitude ; Biological Sciences ; Climate change ; Cold ; Demography ; Dispersal ; Dynamics ; Ecosystem ; Elevation ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Global warming ; Historical account ; Nutrient dynamics ; Nutrients ; Plant Physiological Phenomena ; Plant species ; Plants - classification ; Species ; Temperature ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-02, Vol.115 (8), p.1848-1853</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–114, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Feb 20, 2018</rights><rights>2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-5dc50ecf5398d42ec8f6df5cbe4227f38b400d27a1309bc79202db27f9e1b67f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-5dc50ecf5398d42ec8f6df5cbe4227f38b400d27a1309bc79202db27f9e1b67f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5237-2231 ; 0000-0003-3099-9604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26507569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26507569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29378939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rumpf, Sabine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülber, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonner, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessely, Jhannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Niklaus E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullinger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Many studies report that mountain plant species are shifting upward in elevation. However, the majority of these reports focus on shifts of upper limits. Here, we expand the focus and simultaneously analyze changes of both range limits, optima, and abundances of 183 mountain plant species. We therefore resurveyed 1,576 vegetation plots first recorded before 1970 in the European Alps. We found that both range limits and optima shifted upward in elevation, but the most pronounced trend was a mean increase in species abundance. Despite huge species-specific variation, range dynamics showed a consistent trend along the elevational gradient: Both range limits and optima shifted upslope faster the lower they were situated historically, and species’ abundance increased more for species from lower elevations. Traits affecting the species’ dispersal and persistence capacity were not related to their range dynamics. Using indicator values to stratify species by their thermal and nutrient demands revealed that elevational ranges of thermophilic species tended to expand, while those of cold-adapted species tended to contract. Abundance increases were strongest for nutriphilous species. These results suggest that recent climate warming interacted with airborne nitrogen deposition in driving the observed dynamics. So far, the majority of species appear as “winners” of recent changes, yet “losers” are overrepresented among high-elevation, cold-adapted species with low nutrient demands. In the decades to come, high-alpine species may hence face the double pressure of climatic changes and novel, superior competitors that move up faster than they themselves can escape to even higher elevations.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Alpine environments</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Historical account</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Plant Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants - classification</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0556KInHpJTD-iu1LpQpRioRUqYKz5TgTyCqxFzuh4r-vV0uhcJrD-83TvHmEfKZwQkHx001w-YQqyg1vKJXvyIqCoXUjDLwnKwCmai2Y2CcHOa8BwEgNH8g-M1xpw82KmN8u3GLVPQY3DT5Xsa-muITZDaHajC7MuerQJ3QZqz_DfFfhiA9uHmL4SPZ6N2b89DQPyc2P8-uzn_XVr4vLs-9XtReCz7XsvAT0veRGd4Kh133T9dK3KBhTPdetAOiYcpSDab0yDFjXFsUgbZsCHJJvO9_N0k7YeQxzcqPdpGFy6dFGN9jXShju7G18sFIzLbUqBl-fDFK8XzDPdhqyx7Gkw7hkS43hQKmQW_T4DbqOSwolnmVApWLlsaJQpzvKp5hzwv75GAp2W4vd1mJfaikbR_9neOb_9VCALztgneeYXvRGgpKN4X8BROWTKg</recordid><startdate>20180220</startdate><enddate>20180220</enddate><creator>Rumpf, Sabine B.</creator><creator>Hülber, Karl</creator><creator>Klonner, Günther</creator><creator>Moser, Dietmar</creator><creator>Schütz, Martin</creator><creator>Wessely, Jhannes</creator><creator>Willner, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Niklaus E.</creator><creator>Dullinger, Stefan</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-9604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180220</creationdate><title>Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation</title><author>Rumpf, Sabine B. ; Hülber, Karl ; Klonner, Günther ; Moser, Dietmar ; Schütz, Martin ; Wessely, Jhannes ; Willner, Wolfgang ; Zimmermann, Niklaus E. ; Dullinger, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-5dc50ecf5398d42ec8f6df5cbe4227f38b400d27a1309bc79202db27f9e1b67f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Alpine environments</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Historical account</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Plant Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants - classification</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rumpf, Sabine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülber, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonner, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Dietmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schütz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessely, Jhannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Niklaus E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullinger, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rumpf, Sabine B.</au><au>Hülber, Karl</au><au>Klonner, Günther</au><au>Moser, Dietmar</au><au>Schütz, Martin</au><au>Wessely, Jhannes</au><au>Willner, Wolfgang</au><au>Zimmermann, Niklaus E.</au><au>Dullinger, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2018-02-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1848</spage><epage>1853</epage><pages>1848-1853</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Many studies report that mountain plant species are shifting upward in elevation. However, the majority of these reports focus on shifts of upper limits. Here, we expand the focus and simultaneously analyze changes of both range limits, optima, and abundances of 183 mountain plant species. We therefore resurveyed 1,576 vegetation plots first recorded before 1970 in the European Alps. We found that both range limits and optima shifted upward in elevation, but the most pronounced trend was a mean increase in species abundance. Despite huge species-specific variation, range dynamics showed a consistent trend along the elevational gradient: Both range limits and optima shifted upslope faster the lower they were situated historically, and species’ abundance increased more for species from lower elevations. Traits affecting the species’ dispersal and persistence capacity were not related to their range dynamics. Using indicator values to stratify species by their thermal and nutrient demands revealed that elevational ranges of thermophilic species tended to expand, while those of cold-adapted species tended to contract. Abundance increases were strongest for nutriphilous species. These results suggest that recent climate warming interacted with airborne nitrogen deposition in driving the observed dynamics. So far, the majority of species appear as “winners” of recent changes, yet “losers” are overrepresented among high-elevation, cold-adapted species with low nutrient demands. In the decades to come, high-alpine species may hence face the double pressure of climatic changes and novel, superior competitors that move up faster than they themselves can escape to even higher elevations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>29378939</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1713936115</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-9604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-02, Vol.115 (8), p.1848-1853
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5828587
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Abundance
Adaptation
Adaptation, Physiological
Alpine environments
Altitude
Biological Sciences
Climate change
Cold
Demography
Dispersal
Dynamics
Ecosystem
Elevation
Flowers & plants
Global warming
Historical account
Nutrient dynamics
Nutrients
Plant Physiological Phenomena
Plant species
Plants - classification
Species
Temperature
Vegetation
title Range dynamics of mountain plants decrease with elevation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A42%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Range%20dynamics%20of%20mountain%20plants%20decrease%20with%20elevation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Rumpf,%20Sabine%20B.&rft.date=2018-02-20&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1848&rft.epage=1853&rft.pages=1848-1853&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1713936115&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26507569%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015726494&rft_id=info:pmid/29378939&rft_jstor_id=26507569&rfr_iscdi=true