The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years

The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biopreservation and biobanking 2018-02, Vol.16 (1), p.16-22
Hauptverfasser: McCall, Shannon J, Branton, Philip A, Blanc, Victoria M, Dry, Sarah M, Gastier-Foster, Julie M, Harrison, James H, Jewell, Scott D, Dash, Rajesh C, Obeng, Rebecca C, Rose, Joan, Mateski, Dawna L, Liubinskas, Albi, Robb, James A, Ramirez, Nilsa C, Shea, Kathi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Biopreservation and biobanking
container_volume 16
creator McCall, Shannon J
Branton, Philip A
Blanc, Victoria M
Dry, Sarah M
Gastier-Foster, Julie M
Harrison, James H
Jewell, Scott D
Dash, Rajesh C
Obeng, Rebecca C
Rose, Joan
Mateski, Dawna L
Liubinskas, Albi
Robb, James A
Ramirez, Nilsa C
Shea, Kathi
description The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal of this elective program is to provide requirements for standardization in biorepository processes that will result in high-quality specimens that can be used to support research, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. CAP uses a peer inspection model to ensure the inspectors have proper expertise and to promote educational efforts through information sharing. Lead inspectors are comprised of pathologists, PhDs, and managers of biorepositories and they are often supported by CAP staff inspectors. Accreditation is a 3-year continuous cycle of quality with a peer inspection occurring at the start of year 1 and a self-inspection and CAP desk assessment at the start of year 2 and 3. At this time 53 biorepositories are fully CAP BAP accredited and 13 are in the process of obtaining accreditation. There are currently 273 established standards with requirement lists customized based on the scope of activities performed by a biorepository. A total of 90 inspections were completed between May 2012 and December 2016. Sixty-one were initial inspections and 29 were reinspections. A total of 527 deficiencies were identified in the areas of Equipment/Instrumentation (22%), Information Technology (18%), Specimen Handling and QC (15%), Quality Management (16%), Personnel (11%), Safety (10%), Facilities (6%), and Regulatory (2%). Assessment of common deficiencies identifies areas of focus for continuous improvement and educational opportunities. Overall success of the program is high based on the current enrollment of 66 biorepositories, anecdotal participant feedback and increasing national recognition of the BAP in federal documents.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/bio.2017.0108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5824654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29394087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b92459c3038c24f04499c787dab238eee49c709852ac7d2e09f84f725d4e7d5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoVqtHr5I_sDWbjybxINRiVSgoUg-eQpqdbSO7TUlSof_eLdWip5lhnnkHHoSuSjIoidI3cx8GlJRyQLrxCJ2VmstCCM6ODz0TPXSe0ichQyGJPkU9qpnmRMkztJwtAY9D08ACcKjxqIXonV3hV5uXoQkLn3LC9z5EWIfkc4hbPHIuQuWzzT50YAyLaNtb_AZp03RwHUOLcxc78TFlLPAH2Jgu0EltmwSXP7WP3icPs_FTMX15fB6PpoVjSuZirikX2jHClKO8Jpxr7aSSlZ1TpgCAdyPRSlDrZEWB6FrxWlJRcZCVcKyP7va56828hcrBKkfbmHX0rY1bE6w3_zcrvzSL8GWEonzYeeujYh_gYkgpQn24LYnZKTedcrNTbnbKO_7678MD_euYfQOZhH81</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McCall, Shannon J ; Branton, Philip A ; Blanc, Victoria M ; Dry, Sarah M ; Gastier-Foster, Julie M ; Harrison, James H ; Jewell, Scott D ; Dash, Rajesh C ; Obeng, Rebecca C ; Rose, Joan ; Mateski, Dawna L ; Liubinskas, Albi ; Robb, James A ; Ramirez, Nilsa C ; Shea, Kathi</creator><creatorcontrib>McCall, Shannon J ; Branton, Philip A ; Blanc, Victoria M ; Dry, Sarah M ; Gastier-Foster, Julie M ; Harrison, James H ; Jewell, Scott D ; Dash, Rajesh C ; Obeng, Rebecca C ; Rose, Joan ; Mateski, Dawna L ; Liubinskas, Albi ; Robb, James A ; Ramirez, Nilsa C ; Shea, Kathi</creatorcontrib><description>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal of this elective program is to provide requirements for standardization in biorepository processes that will result in high-quality specimens that can be used to support research, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. CAP uses a peer inspection model to ensure the inspectors have proper expertise and to promote educational efforts through information sharing. Lead inspectors are comprised of pathologists, PhDs, and managers of biorepositories and they are often supported by CAP staff inspectors. Accreditation is a 3-year continuous cycle of quality with a peer inspection occurring at the start of year 1 and a self-inspection and CAP desk assessment at the start of year 2 and 3. At this time 53 biorepositories are fully CAP BAP accredited and 13 are in the process of obtaining accreditation. There are currently 273 established standards with requirement lists customized based on the scope of activities performed by a biorepository. A total of 90 inspections were completed between May 2012 and December 2016. Sixty-one were initial inspections and 29 were reinspections. A total of 527 deficiencies were identified in the areas of Equipment/Instrumentation (22%), Information Technology (18%), Specimen Handling and QC (15%), Quality Management (16%), Personnel (11%), Safety (10%), Facilities (6%), and Regulatory (2%). Assessment of common deficiencies identifies areas of focus for continuous improvement and educational opportunities. Overall success of the program is high based on the current enrollment of 66 biorepositories, anecdotal participant feedback and increasing national recognition of the BAP in federal documents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-5535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-5543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0108</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29394087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation - standards ; Biological Specimen Banks - organization &amp; administration ; Biological Specimen Banks - standards ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Pathologists ; Quality Control ; Societies, Medical ; Special Section on Standards, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern Biobanking ; United States</subject><ispartof>Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018-02, Vol.16 (1), p.16-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b92459c3038c24f04499c787dab238eee49c709852ac7d2e09f84f725d4e7d5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b92459c3038c24f04499c787dab238eee49c709852ac7d2e09f84f725d4e7d5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29394087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCall, Shannon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branton, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Victoria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dry, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastier-Foster, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jewell, Scott D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, Rajesh C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obeng, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateski, Dawna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liubinskas, Albi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Nilsa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Kathi</creatorcontrib><title>The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years</title><title>Biopreservation and biobanking</title><addtitle>Biopreserv Biobank</addtitle><description>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal of this elective program is to provide requirements for standardization in biorepository processes that will result in high-quality specimens that can be used to support research, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. CAP uses a peer inspection model to ensure the inspectors have proper expertise and to promote educational efforts through information sharing. Lead inspectors are comprised of pathologists, PhDs, and managers of biorepositories and they are often supported by CAP staff inspectors. Accreditation is a 3-year continuous cycle of quality with a peer inspection occurring at the start of year 1 and a self-inspection and CAP desk assessment at the start of year 2 and 3. At this time 53 biorepositories are fully CAP BAP accredited and 13 are in the process of obtaining accreditation. There are currently 273 established standards with requirement lists customized based on the scope of activities performed by a biorepository. A total of 90 inspections were completed between May 2012 and December 2016. Sixty-one were initial inspections and 29 were reinspections. A total of 527 deficiencies were identified in the areas of Equipment/Instrumentation (22%), Information Technology (18%), Specimen Handling and QC (15%), Quality Management (16%), Personnel (11%), Safety (10%), Facilities (6%), and Regulatory (2%). Assessment of common deficiencies identifies areas of focus for continuous improvement and educational opportunities. Overall success of the program is high based on the current enrollment of 66 biorepositories, anecdotal participant feedback and increasing national recognition of the BAP in federal documents.</description><subject>Accreditation - standards</subject><subject>Biological Specimen Banks - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Biological Specimen Banks - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Pathologists</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Special Section on Standards, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern Biobanking</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1947-5535</issn><issn>1947-5543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoVqtHr5I_sDWbjybxINRiVSgoUg-eQpqdbSO7TUlSof_eLdWip5lhnnkHHoSuSjIoidI3cx8GlJRyQLrxCJ2VmstCCM6ODz0TPXSe0ichQyGJPkU9qpnmRMkztJwtAY9D08ACcKjxqIXonV3hV5uXoQkLn3LC9z5EWIfkc4hbPHIuQuWzzT50YAyLaNtb_AZp03RwHUOLcxc78TFlLPAH2Jgu0EltmwSXP7WP3icPs_FTMX15fB6PpoVjSuZirikX2jHClKO8Jpxr7aSSlZ1TpgCAdyPRSlDrZEWB6FrxWlJRcZCVcKyP7va56828hcrBKkfbmHX0rY1bE6w3_zcrvzSL8GWEonzYeeujYh_gYkgpQn24LYnZKTedcrNTbnbKO_7678MD_euYfQOZhH81</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>McCall, Shannon J</creator><creator>Branton, Philip A</creator><creator>Blanc, Victoria M</creator><creator>Dry, Sarah M</creator><creator>Gastier-Foster, Julie M</creator><creator>Harrison, James H</creator><creator>Jewell, Scott D</creator><creator>Dash, Rajesh C</creator><creator>Obeng, Rebecca C</creator><creator>Rose, Joan</creator><creator>Mateski, Dawna L</creator><creator>Liubinskas, Albi</creator><creator>Robb, James A</creator><creator>Ramirez, Nilsa C</creator><creator>Shea, Kathi</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years</title><author>McCall, Shannon J ; Branton, Philip A ; Blanc, Victoria M ; Dry, Sarah M ; Gastier-Foster, Julie M ; Harrison, James H ; Jewell, Scott D ; Dash, Rajesh C ; Obeng, Rebecca C ; Rose, Joan ; Mateski, Dawna L ; Liubinskas, Albi ; Robb, James A ; Ramirez, Nilsa C ; Shea, Kathi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-b92459c3038c24f04499c787dab238eee49c709852ac7d2e09f84f725d4e7d5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accreditation - standards</topic><topic>Biological Specimen Banks - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Biological Specimen Banks - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Pathologists</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Special Section on Standards, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern Biobanking</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCall, Shannon J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branton, Philip A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Victoria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dry, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastier-Foster, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jewell, Scott D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, Rajesh C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obeng, Rebecca C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateski, Dawna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liubinskas, Albi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Nilsa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Kathi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biopreservation and biobanking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCall, Shannon J</au><au>Branton, Philip A</au><au>Blanc, Victoria M</au><au>Dry, Sarah M</au><au>Gastier-Foster, Julie M</au><au>Harrison, James H</au><au>Jewell, Scott D</au><au>Dash, Rajesh C</au><au>Obeng, Rebecca C</au><au>Rose, Joan</au><au>Mateski, Dawna L</au><au>Liubinskas, Albi</au><au>Robb, James A</au><au>Ramirez, Nilsa C</au><au>Shea, Kathi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years</atitle><jtitle>Biopreservation and biobanking</jtitle><addtitle>Biopreserv Biobank</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>16-22</pages><issn>1947-5535</issn><eissn>1947-5543</eissn><abstract>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed the Biorepository Accreditation Program (BAP) in 2012. This program integrates best practices from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Biorepositories, the National Cancer Institute, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal of this elective program is to provide requirements for standardization in biorepository processes that will result in high-quality specimens that can be used to support research, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. CAP uses a peer inspection model to ensure the inspectors have proper expertise and to promote educational efforts through information sharing. Lead inspectors are comprised of pathologists, PhDs, and managers of biorepositories and they are often supported by CAP staff inspectors. Accreditation is a 3-year continuous cycle of quality with a peer inspection occurring at the start of year 1 and a self-inspection and CAP desk assessment at the start of year 2 and 3. At this time 53 biorepositories are fully CAP BAP accredited and 13 are in the process of obtaining accreditation. There are currently 273 established standards with requirement lists customized based on the scope of activities performed by a biorepository. A total of 90 inspections were completed between May 2012 and December 2016. Sixty-one were initial inspections and 29 were reinspections. A total of 527 deficiencies were identified in the areas of Equipment/Instrumentation (22%), Information Technology (18%), Specimen Handling and QC (15%), Quality Management (16%), Personnel (11%), Safety (10%), Facilities (6%), and Regulatory (2%). Assessment of common deficiencies identifies areas of focus for continuous improvement and educational opportunities. Overall success of the program is high based on the current enrollment of 66 biorepositories, anecdotal participant feedback and increasing national recognition of the BAP in federal documents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>29394087</pmid><doi>10.1089/bio.2017.0108</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1947-5535
ispartof Biopreservation and biobanking, 2018-02, Vol.16 (1), p.16-22
issn 1947-5535
1947-5543
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5824654
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accreditation - standards
Biological Specimen Banks - organization & administration
Biological Specimen Banks - standards
Humans
Information Dissemination
Pathologists
Quality Control
Societies, Medical
Special Section on Standards, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern Biobanking
United States
title The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20College%20of%20American%20Pathologists%20Biorepository%20Accreditation%20Program:%20Results%20from%20the%20First%205%20Years&rft.jtitle=Biopreservation%20and%20biobanking&rft.au=McCall,%20Shannon%20J&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=16-22&rft.issn=1947-5535&rft.eissn=1947-5543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/bio.2017.0108&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E29394087%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29394087&rfr_iscdi=true