Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium

Objective: Till date, typical antipsychotic haloperidol is the treatment of choice for delirium. But, due to higher side effects with haloperidol, newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., olanzapine) are increasingly being used in the treatment of delirious patients. The aim of the current research was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of psychiatry 2017-10, Vol.59 (4), p.451-456
Hauptverfasser: Jain, Rajan, Arun, Priti, Sidana, Ajeet, Sachdev, Atul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue 4
container_start_page 451
container_title Indian journal of psychiatry
container_volume 59
creator Jain, Rajan
Arun, Priti
Sidana, Ajeet
Sachdev, Atul
description Objective: Till date, typical antipsychotic haloperidol is the treatment of choice for delirium. But, due to higher side effects with haloperidol, newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., olanzapine) are increasingly being used in the treatment of delirious patients. The aim of the current research was to study the efficacy and tolerability of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized controlled study carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Chandigarh, India. A total of 100 patients admitted in medicine, surgery, and orthopedic wards and diagnosed as having delirium on Confusion Assessment Method scale were included in the study. Patients were given either haloperidol (1-4 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube) or olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube). Severity of delirium and pattern of symptom improvement were assessed by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed by Simpson-Angus Scale. Results: There was an improvement in delirium severity in both groups with treatment. Mean daily dose of haloperidol and olanzapine used per patient was 2.10 and 5.49 mg, respectively, and the mean duration of treatment in olanzapine group and haloperidol group was 3.57 days and 3.37 days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of treatment in both groups. At the end of study period, the MDAS scores in olanzapine and haloperidol groups were 8.43 and 8.00, respectively, and the difference was not significant statistically with P = 0.765. Five patients experienced drug-related mild side effects. Conclusion: Low-dose haloperidol and olanzapine were equally efficacious and well tolerated in delirium.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_59_17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5806324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A524351141</galeid><sourcerecordid>A524351141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534s-c14919067ece85685bea8e2aa6c5df246f08aa505c8fe56cd80177d56adb4cbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1km2L1DAQx4so3nr6FaQgiAi7Jm3SJm-EY_Hh5ECF83WYTabX3KVJTVqX9dOb5R5XlLxImPzmP5l_pijeUrJilNTvxrTTvYUp7lan3ljwX77dRRSXiraPigWVUizrVrLHxYIQKpecM35UPEvpkpCqYbx9WhxVksmWinZRfF-HYYRoU_Bl6ErsOqtB7_bnHlwYMVoTXAnelMGB_w2j9VhaX049llNEmAb00x436Gy08_C8eNKBS_jiZj8ufnz8cL7-vDz7-ul0fXK21Lxmaakpk1SSpkWNgjeCbxAEVgCN5qarWNMRAcAJ16JD3mgjCG1bwxswG6Y3pj4u3l_rjvNmQKPzMyI4NUY7QPYjgFWHN9726iL8UlyQpq5YFnhzIxDDzxnTpAabNLrcJoY5qYpk01tSyyqjr_5CL8McfW5PUSmkqHlF-D11AQ6V9V3IdfVeVJ3wXJBTymimVv-g8jI4WB08djbHDxJeP0joEdzUp-DmyQafDsGXDx25s-L2tzNwfg1sg5swpis3bzGqzF75sFWUqP2cqfs5U_-ZM8U4VbeTU_8BmsLTpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989835205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jain, Rajan ; Arun, Priti ; Sidana, Ajeet ; Sachdev, Atul</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Rajan ; Arun, Priti ; Sidana, Ajeet ; Sachdev, Atul</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Till date, typical antipsychotic haloperidol is the treatment of choice for delirium. But, due to higher side effects with haloperidol, newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., olanzapine) are increasingly being used in the treatment of delirious patients. The aim of the current research was to study the efficacy and tolerability of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized controlled study carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Chandigarh, India. A total of 100 patients admitted in medicine, surgery, and orthopedic wards and diagnosed as having delirium on Confusion Assessment Method scale were included in the study. Patients were given either haloperidol (1-4 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube) or olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube). Severity of delirium and pattern of symptom improvement were assessed by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed by Simpson-Angus Scale. Results: There was an improvement in delirium severity in both groups with treatment. Mean daily dose of haloperidol and olanzapine used per patient was 2.10 and 5.49 mg, respectively, and the mean duration of treatment in olanzapine group and haloperidol group was 3.57 days and 3.37 days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of treatment in both groups. At the end of study period, the MDAS scores in olanzapine and haloperidol groups were 8.43 and 8.00, respectively, and the difference was not significant statistically with P = 0.765. Five patients experienced drug-related mild side effects. Conclusion: Low-dose haloperidol and olanzapine were equally efficacious and well tolerated in delirium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_59_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29497187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Analysis ; Antipsychotics ; Biomedical research ; Comparative analysis ; Delirium ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy ; Ethics ; Extrapyramidal system ; Haloperidol ; Olanzapine ; Original ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Phenomenology ; Psychiatry ; Psychotropic drugs ; Schizophrenia ; Side effects ; Sociodemographics ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Treatment outcome</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of psychiatry, 2017-10, Vol.59 (4), p.451-456</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd. Oct/Dec 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Psychiatry 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534s-c14919067ece85685bea8e2aa6c5df246f08aa505c8fe56cd80177d56adb4cbd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806324/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806324/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27439,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Rajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arun, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidana, Ajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Atul</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium</title><title>Indian journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Indian J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective: Till date, typical antipsychotic haloperidol is the treatment of choice for delirium. But, due to higher side effects with haloperidol, newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., olanzapine) are increasingly being used in the treatment of delirious patients. The aim of the current research was to study the efficacy and tolerability of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized controlled study carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Chandigarh, India. A total of 100 patients admitted in medicine, surgery, and orthopedic wards and diagnosed as having delirium on Confusion Assessment Method scale were included in the study. Patients were given either haloperidol (1-4 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube) or olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube). Severity of delirium and pattern of symptom improvement were assessed by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed by Simpson-Angus Scale. Results: There was an improvement in delirium severity in both groups with treatment. Mean daily dose of haloperidol and olanzapine used per patient was 2.10 and 5.49 mg, respectively, and the mean duration of treatment in olanzapine group and haloperidol group was 3.57 days and 3.37 days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of treatment in both groups. At the end of study period, the MDAS scores in olanzapine and haloperidol groups were 8.43 and 8.00, respectively, and the difference was not significant statistically with P = 0.765. Five patients experienced drug-related mild side effects. Conclusion: Low-dose haloperidol and olanzapine were equally efficacious and well tolerated in delirium.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Extrapyramidal system</subject><subject>Haloperidol</subject><subject>Olanzapine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment outcome</subject><issn>0019-5545</issn><issn>1998-3794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1km2L1DAQx4so3nr6FaQgiAi7Jm3SJm-EY_Hh5ECF83WYTabX3KVJTVqX9dOb5R5XlLxImPzmP5l_pijeUrJilNTvxrTTvYUp7lan3ljwX77dRRSXiraPigWVUizrVrLHxYIQKpecM35UPEvpkpCqYbx9WhxVksmWinZRfF-HYYRoU_Bl6ErsOqtB7_bnHlwYMVoTXAnelMGB_w2j9VhaX049llNEmAb00x436Gy08_C8eNKBS_jiZj8ufnz8cL7-vDz7-ul0fXK21Lxmaakpk1SSpkWNgjeCbxAEVgCN5qarWNMRAcAJ16JD3mgjCG1bwxswG6Y3pj4u3l_rjvNmQKPzMyI4NUY7QPYjgFWHN9726iL8UlyQpq5YFnhzIxDDzxnTpAabNLrcJoY5qYpk01tSyyqjr_5CL8McfW5PUSmkqHlF-D11AQ6V9V3IdfVeVJ3wXJBTymimVv-g8jI4WB08djbHDxJeP0joEdzUp-DmyQafDsGXDx25s-L2tzNwfg1sg5swpis3bzGqzF75sFWUqP2cqfs5U_-ZM8U4VbeTU_8BmsLTpw</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Jain, Rajan</creator><creator>Arun, Priti</creator><creator>Sidana, Ajeet</creator><creator>Sachdev, Atul</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium</title><author>Jain, Rajan ; Arun, Priti ; Sidana, Ajeet ; Sachdev, Atul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534s-c14919067ece85685bea8e2aa6c5df246f08aa505c8fe56cd80177d56adb4cbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Extrapyramidal system</topic><topic>Haloperidol</topic><topic>Olanzapine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Rajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arun, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidana, Ajeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Atul</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Rajan</au><au>Arun, Priti</au><au>Sidana, Ajeet</au><au>Sachdev, Atul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>451-456</pages><issn>0019-5545</issn><eissn>1998-3794</eissn><abstract>Objective: Till date, typical antipsychotic haloperidol is the treatment of choice for delirium. But, due to higher side effects with haloperidol, newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., olanzapine) are increasingly being used in the treatment of delirious patients. The aim of the current research was to study the efficacy and tolerability of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium. Materials and Methods: This was an open-label, randomized controlled study carried out in a tertiary care hospital at Chandigarh, India. A total of 100 patients admitted in medicine, surgery, and orthopedic wards and diagnosed as having delirium on Confusion Assessment Method scale were included in the study. Patients were given either haloperidol (1-4 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube) or olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/day either orally or by nasogastric tube). Severity of delirium and pattern of symptom improvement were assessed by Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). Extrapyramidal side effects were assessed by Simpson-Angus Scale. Results: There was an improvement in delirium severity in both groups with treatment. Mean daily dose of haloperidol and olanzapine used per patient was 2.10 and 5.49 mg, respectively, and the mean duration of treatment in olanzapine group and haloperidol group was 3.57 days and 3.37 days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of treatment in both groups. At the end of study period, the MDAS scores in olanzapine and haloperidol groups were 8.43 and 8.00, respectively, and the difference was not significant statistically with P = 0.765. Five patients experienced drug-related mild side effects. Conclusion: Low-dose haloperidol and olanzapine were equally efficacious and well tolerated in delirium.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>29497187</pmid><doi>10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_59_17</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5545
ispartof Indian journal of psychiatry, 2017-10, Vol.59 (4), p.451-456
issn 0019-5545
1998-3794
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5806324
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Alcohol
Analysis
Antipsychotics
Biomedical research
Comparative analysis
Delirium
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy
Ethics
Extrapyramidal system
Haloperidol
Olanzapine
Original
Patient outcomes
Patients
Phenomenology
Psychiatry
Psychotropic drugs
Schizophrenia
Side effects
Sociodemographics
Statistical analysis
Studies
Surgery
Systematic review
Treatment outcome
title Comparison of efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20efficacy%20of%20haloperidol%20and%20olanzapine%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20delirium&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Jain,%20Rajan&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=451-456&rft.issn=0019-5545&rft.eissn=1998-3794&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_59_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA524351141%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989835205&rft_id=info:pmid/29497187&rft_galeid=A524351141&rfr_iscdi=true