Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures

Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international medical research 2017-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2085-2091
Hauptverfasser: Yeying, Ge, Liyong, Yuan, Yuebo, Chen, Yu, Zhang, Guangao, Ye, Weihu, Ma, Liujun, Zhao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2091
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2085
container_title Journal of international medical research
container_volume 45
creator Yeying, Ge
Liyong, Yuan
Yuebo, Chen
Yu, Zhang
Guangao, Ye
Weihu, Ma
Liujun, Zhao
description Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included in this prospective study and randomly assigned to the TPVB or IVPCA group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, blood gas analysis, and bedside spirometry were measured and recorded at different time points after analgesia. Results TPVB and IVPCA provided good pain relief. VAS scores were significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the IVPCA group at rest and during coughing (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0300060517710068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5805206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0300060517710068</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1912195263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-d735434d73e39752b3889d5ef36274e6e308a3d9b1b1795b1551b15dc80e4d333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctO3TAQtapWcAvsu6q87CbgR5zHBgmhtlRC6gbWluNM7jV14tR2QP2C_nYnuoAKEisfz3mMPUPIJ85OOa_rMyYZYxVTiDmC5h3Z8LKWhcD6e7JZ6WLlD8nHlO4YK0WlxAE5FE0llVTthvy92YVorLN0NtHcQ8zQReNp54P9RfGelkTdlFduCohnkx1MubABi8F76KmZjN9CcoYOIaLATTRHMHlEHXqfLIk-uLyj4-Kzmz3Q6Do6YO-8REjH5MNgfIKTx_OI3H77enN5VVz__P7j8uK6sGXFctHXUpWyxANkWyvRyaZpewWDrERdQgWSNUb2bcc7Xreq40ohUr1tGJS9lPKInO9z56Ubobewfs3rObrRxD86GKdfMpPb6W2416phSrAKA748BsTwe4GU9eiSBe_NBDgfzVsueKtEtfZie6mNIaUIw3MbzvS6P_16f2j5_P_zng1PC0NBsRckswV9F5aIw09vB_4DvjKmbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912195263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yeying, Ge ; Liyong, Yuan ; Yuebo, Chen ; Yu, Zhang ; Guangao, Ye ; Weihu, Ma ; Liujun, Zhao</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeying, Ge ; Liyong, Yuan ; Yuebo, Chen ; Yu, Zhang ; Guangao, Ye ; Weihu, Ma ; Liujun, Zhao</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included in this prospective study and randomly assigned to the TPVB or IVPCA group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, blood gas analysis, and bedside spirometry were measured and recorded at different time points after analgesia. Results TPVB and IVPCA provided good pain relief. VAS scores were significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the IVPCA group at rest and during coughing (P &lt; 0.05). Patients in the TPVB group had a higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 and lower P(A–a)O2 compared with the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Moreover, patients in the TPVB group showed higher FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEFR, and fewer complications than did the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion TPVB is superior to IVPCA in pain relief and preservation of pulmonary function in patients with MRFs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0300060517710068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28635359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical Report</subject><ispartof>Journal of international medical research, 2017-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2085-2091</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-d735434d73e39752b3889d5ef36274e6e308a3d9b1b1795b1551b15dc80e4d333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-d735434d73e39752b3889d5ef36274e6e308a3d9b1b1795b1551b15dc80e4d333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805206/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805206/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21964,27851,27922,27923,44943,45331,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeying, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liyong, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuebo, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangao, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weihu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liujun, Zhao</creatorcontrib><title>Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures</title><title>Journal of international medical research</title><addtitle>J Int Med Res</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included in this prospective study and randomly assigned to the TPVB or IVPCA group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, blood gas analysis, and bedside spirometry were measured and recorded at different time points after analgesia. Results TPVB and IVPCA provided good pain relief. VAS scores were significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the IVPCA group at rest and during coughing (P &lt; 0.05). Patients in the TPVB group had a higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 and lower P(A–a)O2 compared with the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Moreover, patients in the TPVB group showed higher FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEFR, and fewer complications than did the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion TPVB is superior to IVPCA in pain relief and preservation of pulmonary function in patients with MRFs.</description><subject>Clinical Report</subject><issn>0300-0605</issn><issn>1473-2300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctO3TAQtapWcAvsu6q87CbgR5zHBgmhtlRC6gbWluNM7jV14tR2QP2C_nYnuoAKEisfz3mMPUPIJ85OOa_rMyYZYxVTiDmC5h3Z8LKWhcD6e7JZ6WLlD8nHlO4YK0WlxAE5FE0llVTthvy92YVorLN0NtHcQ8zQReNp54P9RfGelkTdlFduCohnkx1MubABi8F76KmZjN9CcoYOIaLATTRHMHlEHXqfLIk-uLyj4-Kzmz3Q6Do6YO-8REjH5MNgfIKTx_OI3H77enN5VVz__P7j8uK6sGXFctHXUpWyxANkWyvRyaZpewWDrERdQgWSNUb2bcc7Xreq40ohUr1tGJS9lPKInO9z56Ubobewfs3rObrRxD86GKdfMpPb6W2416phSrAKA748BsTwe4GU9eiSBe_NBDgfzVsueKtEtfZie6mNIaUIw3MbzvS6P_16f2j5_P_zng1PC0NBsRckswV9F5aIw09vB_4DvjKmbA</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Yeying, Ge</creator><creator>Liyong, Yuan</creator><creator>Yuebo, Chen</creator><creator>Yu, Zhang</creator><creator>Guangao, Ye</creator><creator>Weihu, Ma</creator><creator>Liujun, Zhao</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures</title><author>Yeying, Ge ; Liyong, Yuan ; Yuebo, Chen ; Yu, Zhang ; Guangao, Ye ; Weihu, Ma ; Liujun, Zhao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-d735434d73e39752b3889d5ef36274e6e308a3d9b1b1795b1551b15dc80e4d333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeying, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liyong, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuebo, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangao, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weihu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liujun, Zhao</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of international medical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeying, Ge</au><au>Liyong, Yuan</au><au>Yuebo, Chen</au><au>Yu, Zhang</au><au>Guangao, Ye</au><au>Weihu, Ma</au><au>Liujun, Zhao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international medical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Med Res</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2085</spage><epage>2091</epage><pages>2085-2091</pages><issn>0300-0605</issn><eissn>1473-2300</eissn><abstract>Objectives To assess the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on pain management and preservation of pulmonary function compared with intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). Methods Ninety patients with unilateral MRFs were included in this prospective study and randomly assigned to the TPVB or IVPCA group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, blood gas analysis, and bedside spirometry were measured and recorded at different time points after analgesia. Results TPVB and IVPCA provided good pain relief. VAS scores were significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the IVPCA group at rest and during coughing (P &lt; 0.05). Patients in the TPVB group had a higher PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 and lower P(A–a)O2 compared with the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Moreover, patients in the TPVB group showed higher FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEFR, and fewer complications than did the IVPCA group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion TPVB is superior to IVPCA in pain relief and preservation of pulmonary function in patients with MRFs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28635359</pmid><doi>10.1177/0300060517710068</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0605
ispartof Journal of international medical research, 2017-12, Vol.45 (6), p.2085-2091
issn 0300-0605
1473-2300
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5805206
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Report
title Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoracic%20paravertebral%20block%20versus%20intravenous%20patient-controlled%20analgesia%20for%20pain%20treatment%20in%20patients%20with%20multiple%20rib%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20medical%20research&rft.au=Yeying,%20Ge&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2085&rft.epage=2091&rft.pages=2085-2091&rft.issn=0300-0605&rft.eissn=1473-2300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0300060517710068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1912195263%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912195263&rft_id=info:pmid/28635359&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0300060517710068&rfr_iscdi=true