Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens
ABSTRACT The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of compo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2016-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1053-1060 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1060 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1053 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic research |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Lewis, Gregory S. Brenza, Jacob B. Paul, Emmanuel M. Armstrong, April D. |
description | ABSTRACT
The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of components, and subject to cyclic loading. Five glenoid cadaver bones were implanted with either a three‐pegged polyethylene component, or prototype posteriorly augmented component which addresses posterior bone loss. Specimens were loaded by constant glenohumeral compression combined with cyclic anterior–posterior displacement of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. At six time points across 100,000 cycles, implant loosening micromotions were optically measured, and specimens were imaged by micro‐computed tomography. Scans were 3D registered and inspected for crack initiation and progression, and micro‐CT based time‐lapse movies were created. Cement cracking initiated at stress concentrations and progressed with additional cyclic loading. Failure planes within trabecular bone and the bone–cement interface were identified in four of the five specimens. Implant subsidence increased to greater than 1.0 mm in two specimens. Cemented glenoid structural failure can occur within the cement, along planes of trabecular bone, or at the bone cement interface. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1053–1060, 2016. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jor.23119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5800522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1792372006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-de6f6759650f46db9b467e59c9b0757433291eef6c8dd3ae8dd49e2f1d57240d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtvEzEUhS0EoqGw4A8gL2ExrR9jO2aBVNJSHlUrQRDsLGd8Z3CZsYM9k5J_jyFtBAs2tnT83XN970HoKSVHlBB2fB3TEeOU6ntoRoWoK8HU1_toRhSXFWFSHqBHOV8TQhRl84fooEicMCJmKC5iyGOamhE7O9gOsA0O9zFmCD502KY4FaHrIUTvsB_WvQ1jfolPChQ6P07OB9vjwTcpVoslzkXZ4tji1m8AN9bZDSSc19D4AUJ-jB60ts_w5PY-RJ_fnC0Xb6uLq_N3i5OLqqkF15UD2UoltBSkraVb6VUtFQjd6BVRQtWcM00BWtnMneMWyllrYC11QrGaOH6IXu1819NqANdAGJPtzTr5waatidabf1-C_2a6uDFiTohgrBg8vzVI8ccEeTSDzw30ZXyIUzZUacYVI0QW9MUOLSvIOUG7b0OJ-R2QKQGZPwEV9tnf_9qTd4kU4HgH3Pgetv93Mu-vPt5ZVrsKn0f4ua-w6buRiithvlyem8tPH-Tp61NtlvwXLEWsLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792372006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lewis, Gregory S. ; Brenza, Jacob B. ; Paul, Emmanuel M. ; Armstrong, April D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gregory S. ; Brenza, Jacob B. ; Paul, Emmanuel M. ; Armstrong, April D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of components, and subject to cyclic loading. Five glenoid cadaver bones were implanted with either a three‐pegged polyethylene component, or prototype posteriorly augmented component which addresses posterior bone loss. Specimens were loaded by constant glenohumeral compression combined with cyclic anterior–posterior displacement of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. At six time points across 100,000 cycles, implant loosening micromotions were optically measured, and specimens were imaged by micro‐computed tomography. Scans were 3D registered and inspected for crack initiation and progression, and micro‐CT based time‐lapse movies were created. Cement cracking initiated at stress concentrations and progressed with additional cyclic loading. Failure planes within trabecular bone and the bone–cement interface were identified in four of the five specimens. Implant subsidence increased to greater than 1.0 mm in two specimens. Cemented glenoid structural failure can occur within the cement, along planes of trabecular bone, or at the bone cement interface. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1053–1060, 2016.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.23119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26630205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>glenoid component ; Humans ; implant fixation ; implant loosening ; Longitudinal Studies ; micro-computed tomography ; Prosthesis Failure ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Prosthesis ; total shoulder arthroplasty ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2016-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1053-1060</ispartof><rights>2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-de6f6759650f46db9b467e59c9b0757433291eef6c8dd3ae8dd49e2f1d57240d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-de6f6759650f46db9b467e59c9b0757433291eef6c8dd3ae8dd49e2f1d57240d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjor.23119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjor.23119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenza, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Emmanuel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, April D.</creatorcontrib><title>Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of components, and subject to cyclic loading. Five glenoid cadaver bones were implanted with either a three‐pegged polyethylene component, or prototype posteriorly augmented component which addresses posterior bone loss. Specimens were loaded by constant glenohumeral compression combined with cyclic anterior–posterior displacement of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. At six time points across 100,000 cycles, implant loosening micromotions were optically measured, and specimens were imaged by micro‐computed tomography. Scans were 3D registered and inspected for crack initiation and progression, and micro‐CT based time‐lapse movies were created. Cement cracking initiated at stress concentrations and progressed with additional cyclic loading. Failure planes within trabecular bone and the bone–cement interface were identified in four of the five specimens. Implant subsidence increased to greater than 1.0 mm in two specimens. Cemented glenoid structural failure can occur within the cement, along planes of trabecular bone, or at the bone cement interface. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1053–1060, 2016.</description><subject>glenoid component</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant fixation</subject><subject>implant loosening</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>micro-computed tomography</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Prosthesis</subject><subject>total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtvEzEUhS0EoqGw4A8gL2ExrR9jO2aBVNJSHlUrQRDsLGd8Z3CZsYM9k5J_jyFtBAs2tnT83XN970HoKSVHlBB2fB3TEeOU6ntoRoWoK8HU1_toRhSXFWFSHqBHOV8TQhRl84fooEicMCJmKC5iyGOamhE7O9gOsA0O9zFmCD502KY4FaHrIUTvsB_WvQ1jfolPChQ6P07OB9vjwTcpVoslzkXZ4tji1m8AN9bZDSSc19D4AUJ-jB60ts_w5PY-RJ_fnC0Xb6uLq_N3i5OLqqkF15UD2UoltBSkraVb6VUtFQjd6BVRQtWcM00BWtnMneMWyllrYC11QrGaOH6IXu1819NqANdAGJPtzTr5waatidabf1-C_2a6uDFiTohgrBg8vzVI8ccEeTSDzw30ZXyIUzZUacYVI0QW9MUOLSvIOUG7b0OJ-R2QKQGZPwEV9tnf_9qTd4kU4HgH3Pgetv93Mu-vPt5ZVrsKn0f4ua-w6buRiithvlyem8tPH-Tp61NtlvwXLEWsLw</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Lewis, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Brenza, Jacob B.</creator><creator>Paul, Emmanuel M.</creator><creator>Armstrong, April D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens</title><author>Lewis, Gregory S. ; Brenza, Jacob B. ; Paul, Emmanuel M. ; Armstrong, April D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-de6f6759650f46db9b467e59c9b0757433291eef6c8dd3ae8dd49e2f1d57240d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>glenoid component</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant fixation</topic><topic>implant loosening</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>micro-computed tomography</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Prosthesis</topic><topic>total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenza, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Emmanuel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, April D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Gregory S.</au><au>Brenza, Jacob B.</au><au>Paul, Emmanuel M.</au><au>Armstrong, April D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1053-1060</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
The evolution of failure of bone and cement leading to loosening of glenoid components following shoulder arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify and visualize potential mechanisms of mechanical failure within cadavers, cemented with two types of components, and subject to cyclic loading. Five glenoid cadaver bones were implanted with either a three‐pegged polyethylene component, or prototype posteriorly augmented component which addresses posterior bone loss. Specimens were loaded by constant glenohumeral compression combined with cyclic anterior–posterior displacement of the humeral head relative to the glenoid. At six time points across 100,000 cycles, implant loosening micromotions were optically measured, and specimens were imaged by micro‐computed tomography. Scans were 3D registered and inspected for crack initiation and progression, and micro‐CT based time‐lapse movies were created. Cement cracking initiated at stress concentrations and progressed with additional cyclic loading. Failure planes within trabecular bone and the bone–cement interface were identified in four of the five specimens. Implant subsidence increased to greater than 1.0 mm in two specimens. Cemented glenoid structural failure can occur within the cement, along planes of trabecular bone, or at the bone cement interface. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1053–1060, 2016.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26630205</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.23119</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-0266 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic research, 2016-06, Vol.34 (6), p.1053-1060 |
issn | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5800522 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | glenoid component Humans implant fixation implant loosening Longitudinal Studies micro-computed tomography Prosthesis Failure Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Prosthesis total shoulder arthroplasty X-Ray Microtomography |
title | Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T06%3A16%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construct%20damage%20and%20loosening%20around%20glenoid%20implants:%20A%20longitudinal%20micro-CT%20study%20of%20five%20cadaver%20specimens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Lewis,%20Gregory%20S.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1053-1060&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.23119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1792372006%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792372006&rft_id=info:pmid/26630205&rfr_iscdi=true |