Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data
Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systematic biology 2018-01, Vol.67 (1), p.32-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Bapst, David W. Schreiber, Holly A. Carlson, Sandra J. |
description | Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods, with more than 500 extinct genera but only 19 extant genera represented today, provide an opportunity to explore the factors that produce contentious phylogenetic signal across datasets, as previous phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular sequence data bear little agreement with those constructed using morphological characters. Using a revised matrix of 66 morphological characters, and published ribosomal DNA sequences, we performed a series of combined phylogenetic analyses to identify conflicting phylogenetic signals. We completed a series of parsimony-based and Bayesian analyses, varying the data used, the taxa included, and the models used in the Bayesian analyses. We also performed simulation-based sensitivity analyses to assess whether the small size of the morphological data partition relative to the molecular data influenced the results of the combined analyses. In order to compare and contrast a large number of phylogenetic analyses and their resulting summary trees, we developed a measure for the incongruence between two topologies and simultaneously ignore any differences in phylogenetic resolution. Phylogenetic hypotheses generated using only morphological characters differed among each other, and with previous analyses, whereas molecular-only and combined Bayesian analyses produced extremely similar topologies. Characters historically associated with traditional classification in the Rhynchonellida have very low consistency indices on the topology preferred by the combined Bayesian analyses. Overall, this casts doubt on the use of morphological systematics to resolve relationships among the crown rhynchonellide brachiopods. However, expanding our dataset to a larger number of extinct taxa with intermediate morphologies is necessary to exclude the possibility that the morphology of extant taxa is not dominated by convergence along long branches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/sysbio/syx049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5790130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26581916</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sysbio/syx049</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26581916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ce80972d45c8d2e093522ddfe384d607e90d3844c096900d1324cb5ff02d13e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMotlaXLpVAN3Uxmo9JJtkI7bNWoSKIgruQl2Te5JGXjMmM9P33pkw_1E1X95D8ONxzDwAvMXqLkaTvyr6sfarjCrXyETjEqOONoPzn42vNacMw6w7As1K2CGHMGX4KDohoBUGMHQK1Sru1j87C06jDvvgCUw_PryYdJ_ht2EczpOhC8FbDk7OszeDTmKx-A-fi4wZ-SXkcUkgbb3SAOtr6EpyZg87wg570c_Ck16G4FzfzCPz4eP599am5_HrxeXV62RiG6NQYJ5DsiG2ZEZa4GowRYm3vqGgtR52TyFbZGiS5RMhiSlqzZn2PSNWO0iPwfvEd5_XOWePilHVQY_Y7nfcqaa_-_Yl-UJv0W7FOIkxRNTi5Mcjp1-zKpHa-mJpcR5fmogjtWixZJ9iDKBaSC0nrnhU9_g_dpjnXS1dKSkI4aZmoVLNQJqdSsuvv9sZIXbeslpbV0nLlX_8d9o6-rfV-wzSPD3q9WtBtmVK-t-JMYIk5_QMEtr09</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992262458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bapst, David W. ; Schreiber, Holly A. ; Carlson, Sandra J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bapst, David W. ; Schreiber, Holly A. ; Carlson, Sandra J.</creatorcontrib><description>Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods, with more than 500 extinct genera but only 19 extant genera represented today, provide an opportunity to explore the factors that produce contentious phylogenetic signal across datasets, as previous phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular sequence data bear little agreement with those constructed using morphological characters. Using a revised matrix of 66 morphological characters, and published ribosomal DNA sequences, we performed a series of combined phylogenetic analyses to identify conflicting phylogenetic signals. We completed a series of parsimony-based and Bayesian analyses, varying the data used, the taxa included, and the models used in the Bayesian analyses. We also performed simulation-based sensitivity analyses to assess whether the small size of the morphological data partition relative to the molecular data influenced the results of the combined analyses. In order to compare and contrast a large number of phylogenetic analyses and their resulting summary trees, we developed a measure for the incongruence between two topologies and simultaneously ignore any differences in phylogenetic resolution. Phylogenetic hypotheses generated using only morphological characters differed among each other, and with previous analyses, whereas molecular-only and combined Bayesian analyses produced extremely similar topologies. Characters historically associated with traditional classification in the Rhynchonellida have very low consistency indices on the topology preferred by the combined Bayesian analyses. Overall, this casts doubt on the use of morphological systematics to resolve relationships among the crown rhynchonellide brachiopods. However, expanding our dataset to a larger number of extinct taxa with intermediate morphologies is necessary to exclude the possibility that the morphology of extant taxa is not dominated by convergence along long branches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28482055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animalia ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian theory ; Branches ; data collection ; Data processing ; Datasets ; extinct species ; Genera ; Mathematical models ; Molecules ; Mollusks ; Morphology ; Nucleotide sequence ; nucleotide sequences ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Regular ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Rhynchonellida ; ribosomal DNA ; Sensitivity analysis ; Systematics ; Taxa ; Topology</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2018-01, Vol.67 (1), p.32-48</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ce80972d45c8d2e093522ddfe384d607e90d3844c096900d1324cb5ff02d13e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ce80972d45c8d2e093522ddfe384d607e90d3844c096900d1324cb5ff02d13e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26581916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26581916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,801,883,1581,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28482055$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bapst, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Holly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Sandra J.</creatorcontrib><title>Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods, with more than 500 extinct genera but only 19 extant genera represented today, provide an opportunity to explore the factors that produce contentious phylogenetic signal across datasets, as previous phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular sequence data bear little agreement with those constructed using morphological characters. Using a revised matrix of 66 morphological characters, and published ribosomal DNA sequences, we performed a series of combined phylogenetic analyses to identify conflicting phylogenetic signals. We completed a series of parsimony-based and Bayesian analyses, varying the data used, the taxa included, and the models used in the Bayesian analyses. We also performed simulation-based sensitivity analyses to assess whether the small size of the morphological data partition relative to the molecular data influenced the results of the combined analyses. In order to compare and contrast a large number of phylogenetic analyses and their resulting summary trees, we developed a measure for the incongruence between two topologies and simultaneously ignore any differences in phylogenetic resolution. Phylogenetic hypotheses generated using only morphological characters differed among each other, and with previous analyses, whereas molecular-only and combined Bayesian analyses produced extremely similar topologies. Characters historically associated with traditional classification in the Rhynchonellida have very low consistency indices on the topology preferred by the combined Bayesian analyses. Overall, this casts doubt on the use of morphological systematics to resolve relationships among the crown rhynchonellide brachiopods. However, expanding our dataset to a larger number of extinct taxa with intermediate morphologies is necessary to exclude the possibility that the morphology of extant taxa is not dominated by convergence along long branches.</description><subject>Animalia</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>extinct species</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Molecules</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>nucleotide sequences</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Rhynchonellida</subject><subject>ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Topology</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFTEUxYMotlaXLpVAN3Uxmo9JJtkI7bNWoSKIgruQl2Te5JGXjMmM9P33pkw_1E1X95D8ONxzDwAvMXqLkaTvyr6sfarjCrXyETjEqOONoPzn42vNacMw6w7As1K2CGHMGX4KDohoBUGMHQK1Sru1j87C06jDvvgCUw_PryYdJ_ht2EczpOhC8FbDk7OszeDTmKx-A-fi4wZ-SXkcUkgbb3SAOtr6EpyZg87wg570c_Ck16G4FzfzCPz4eP599am5_HrxeXV62RiG6NQYJ5DsiG2ZEZa4GowRYm3vqGgtR52TyFbZGiS5RMhiSlqzZn2PSNWO0iPwfvEd5_XOWePilHVQY_Y7nfcqaa_-_Yl-UJv0W7FOIkxRNTi5Mcjp1-zKpHa-mJpcR5fmogjtWixZJ9iDKBaSC0nrnhU9_g_dpjnXS1dKSkI4aZmoVLNQJqdSsuvv9sZIXbeslpbV0nLlX_8d9o6-rfV-wzSPD3q9WtBtmVK-t-JMYIk5_QMEtr09</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Bapst, David W.</creator><creator>Schreiber, Holly A.</creator><creator>Carlson, Sandra J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data</title><author>Bapst, David W. ; Schreiber, Holly A. ; Carlson, Sandra J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ce80972d45c8d2e093522ddfe384d607e90d3844c096900d1324cb5ff02d13e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animalia</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>extinct species</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Molecules</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>nucleotide sequences</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Rhynchonellida</topic><topic>ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bapst, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Holly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Sandra J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bapst, David W.</au><au>Schreiber, Holly A.</au><au>Carlson, Sandra J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>32-48</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>Independent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses have often produced discordant results for certain groups which, for fossil-rich groups, raises the possibility that morphological data might mislead in those groups for which we depend upon morphology the most. Rhynchonellide brachiopods, with more than 500 extinct genera but only 19 extant genera represented today, provide an opportunity to explore the factors that produce contentious phylogenetic signal across datasets, as previous phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular sequence data bear little agreement with those constructed using morphological characters. Using a revised matrix of 66 morphological characters, and published ribosomal DNA sequences, we performed a series of combined phylogenetic analyses to identify conflicting phylogenetic signals. We completed a series of parsimony-based and Bayesian analyses, varying the data used, the taxa included, and the models used in the Bayesian analyses. We also performed simulation-based sensitivity analyses to assess whether the small size of the morphological data partition relative to the molecular data influenced the results of the combined analyses. In order to compare and contrast a large number of phylogenetic analyses and their resulting summary trees, we developed a measure for the incongruence between two topologies and simultaneously ignore any differences in phylogenetic resolution. Phylogenetic hypotheses generated using only morphological characters differed among each other, and with previous analyses, whereas molecular-only and combined Bayesian analyses produced extremely similar topologies. Characters historically associated with traditional classification in the Rhynchonellida have very low consistency indices on the topology preferred by the combined Bayesian analyses. Overall, this casts doubt on the use of morphological systematics to resolve relationships among the crown rhynchonellide brachiopods. However, expanding our dataset to a larger number of extinct taxa with intermediate morphologies is necessary to exclude the possibility that the morphology of extant taxa is not dominated by convergence along long branches.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28482055</pmid><doi>10.1093/sysbio/syx049</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2018-01, Vol.67 (1), p.32-48 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5790130 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animalia Bayesian analysis Bayesian theory Branches data collection Data processing Datasets extinct species Genera Mathematical models Molecules Mollusks Morphology Nucleotide sequence nucleotide sequences Phylogenetics Phylogeny Regular REGULAR ARTICLES Rhynchonellida ribosomal DNA Sensitivity analysis Systematics Taxa Topology |
title | Combined Analysis of Extant Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) using Morphological and Molecular Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20Analysis%20of%20Extant%20Rhynchonellida%20(Brachiopoda)%20using%20Morphological%20and%20Molecular%20Data&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Bapst,%20David%20W.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=32-48&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syx049&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26581916%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992262458&rft_id=info:pmid/28482055&rft_jstor_id=26581916&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sysbio/syx049&rfr_iscdi=true |