Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have indi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radiation research 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Journal of radiation research |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Abe, Yu Yoshida, Mitsuaki A Fujioka, Kurumi Kurosu, Yumiko Ujiie, Risa Yanagi, Aki Tsuyama, Naohiro Miura, Tomisato Inaba, Toshiya Kamiya, Kenji Sakai, Akira |
description | Abstract
In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jrr/rrx052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5786284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1ERIbAhgMgb9ggJql2_9kbJBRCQIrEBtYtt12dduS2W-WegWHFHThWbsFJ8DAQhQ2rqpJffa_kx9izAk4LUOXZDdEZ0VeoxQO2KspKrVVRtw_ZCqrcl9DAMXuc0g2AaKGGR-xYKKigkWLFbt_GhD-__yBMcwwJudnQFhMfInEdtN99c-Gax4FbZzAs5Aw3I8UppjhlmQ723swX0iH5aPTiMixDvI9f9gCbXdIeUwAAny53PPM9pvSK9zqh5TFwR6St00ueZiQ3j0ja897HaHnS0-z3Z2UrPrgt8hG1X8Ydd8G6rbMb7dMTdjTkgk__1BP2-d3Fp_P366uPlx_O31ytTaXkshbQC9NbUAMKRC2HpsKhFiCHsqmlLYSSrYK2qayRDbTSWCEEKKWqvgFZlOUJe33gzpt-Qvv7X7TvZnKTpl0Xtev-fQlu7K7jtqtb2QhZZcDLA8BQTIlwuNstoNtH2uVIu0OkWfz8vtud9G-GWfDiIIib-X-gX4lUslg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0449-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-9157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29040682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Female ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Regular Paper ; Tissue Donors ; Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiation research, 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2017</rights><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Kurumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosu, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujiie, Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagi, Aki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Tomisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><title>Journal of radiation research</title><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Abstract
In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Regular Paper</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0449-3060</issn><issn>1349-9157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1ERIbAhgMgb9ggJql2_9kbJBRCQIrEBtYtt12dduS2W-WegWHFHThWbsFJ8DAQhQ2rqpJffa_kx9izAk4LUOXZDdEZ0VeoxQO2KspKrVVRtw_ZCqrcl9DAMXuc0g2AaKGGR-xYKKigkWLFbt_GhD-__yBMcwwJudnQFhMfInEdtN99c-Gax4FbZzAs5Aw3I8UppjhlmQ723swX0iH5aPTiMixDvI9f9gCbXdIeUwAAny53PPM9pvSK9zqh5TFwR6St00ueZiQ3j0ja897HaHnS0-z3Z2UrPrgt8hG1X8Ydd8G6rbMb7dMTdjTkgk__1BP2-d3Fp_P366uPlx_O31ytTaXkshbQC9NbUAMKRC2HpsKhFiCHsqmlLYSSrYK2qayRDbTSWCEEKKWqvgFZlOUJe33gzpt-Qvv7X7TvZnKTpl0Xtev-fQlu7K7jtqtb2QhZZcDLA8BQTIlwuNstoNtH2uVIu0OkWfz8vtud9G-GWfDiIIib-X-gX4lUslg</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Abe, Yu</creator><creator>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creator><creator>Fujioka, Kurumi</creator><creator>Kurosu, Yumiko</creator><creator>Ujiie, Risa</creator><creator>Yanagi, Aki</creator><creator>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creator><creator>Miura, Tomisato</creator><creator>Inaba, Toshiya</creator><creator>Kamiya, Kenji</creator><creator>Sakai, Akira</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><author>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Regular Paper</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Kurumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosu, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujiie, Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagi, Aki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Tomisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abe, Yu</au><au>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</au><au>Fujioka, Kurumi</au><au>Kurosu, Yumiko</au><au>Ujiie, Risa</au><au>Yanagi, Aki</au><au>Tsuyama, Naohiro</au><au>Miura, Tomisato</au><au>Inaba, Toshiya</au><au>Kamiya, Kenji</au><au>Sakai, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0449-3060</issn><eissn>1349-9157</eissn><abstract>Abstract
In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29040682</pmid><doi>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0449-3060 |
ispartof | Journal of radiation research, 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42 |
issn | 0449-3060 1349-9157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5786284 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Female Gamma Rays Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Male Middle Aged Regular Paper Tissue Donors Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects Young Adult |
title | Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%E2%80%93response%20curves%20for%20analyzing%20of%20dicentric%20chromosomes%20and%20chromosome%20translocations%20following%20doses%20of%201000%20mGy%20or%20less,%20based%20on%20irradiated%20peripheral%20blood%20samples%20from%20five%20healthy%20individuals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiation%20research&rft.au=Abe,%20Yu&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0449-3060&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jrr/rrx052&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jrr/rrx052%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29040682&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jrr/rrx052&rfr_iscdi=true |