Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals

Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have indi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiation research 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Abe, Yu, Yoshida, Mitsuaki A, Fujioka, Kurumi, Kurosu, Yumiko, Ujiie, Risa, Yanagi, Aki, Tsuyama, Naohiro, Miura, Tomisato, Inaba, Toshiya, Kamiya, Kenji, Sakai, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of radiation research
container_volume 59
creator Abe, Yu
Yoshida, Mitsuaki A
Fujioka, Kurumi
Kurosu, Yumiko
Ujiie, Risa
Yanagi, Aki
Tsuyama, Naohiro
Miura, Tomisato
Inaba, Toshiya
Kamiya, Kenji
Sakai, Akira
description Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jrr/rrx052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5786284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1ERIbAhgMgb9ggJql2_9kbJBRCQIrEBtYtt12dduS2W-WegWHFHThWbsFJ8DAQhQ2rqpJffa_kx9izAk4LUOXZDdEZ0VeoxQO2KspKrVVRtw_ZCqrcl9DAMXuc0g2AaKGGR-xYKKigkWLFbt_GhD-__yBMcwwJudnQFhMfInEdtN99c-Gax4FbZzAs5Aw3I8UppjhlmQ723swX0iH5aPTiMixDvI9f9gCbXdIeUwAAny53PPM9pvSK9zqh5TFwR6St00ueZiQ3j0ja897HaHnS0-z3Z2UrPrgt8hG1X8Ydd8G6rbMb7dMTdjTkgk__1BP2-d3Fp_P366uPlx_O31ytTaXkshbQC9NbUAMKRC2HpsKhFiCHsqmlLYSSrYK2qayRDbTSWCEEKKWqvgFZlOUJe33gzpt-Qvv7X7TvZnKTpl0Xtev-fQlu7K7jtqtb2QhZZcDLA8BQTIlwuNstoNtH2uVIu0OkWfz8vtud9G-GWfDiIIib-X-gX4lUslg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0449-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-9157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29040682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Female ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Regular Paper ; Tissue Donors ; Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiation research, 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2017</rights><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786284/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Kurumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosu, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujiie, Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagi, Aki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Tomisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><title>Journal of radiation research</title><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Regular Paper</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0449-3060</issn><issn>1349-9157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1ERIbAhgMgb9ggJql2_9kbJBRCQIrEBtYtt12dduS2W-WegWHFHThWbsFJ8DAQhQ2rqpJffa_kx9izAk4LUOXZDdEZ0VeoxQO2KspKrVVRtw_ZCqrcl9DAMXuc0g2AaKGGR-xYKKigkWLFbt_GhD-__yBMcwwJudnQFhMfInEdtN99c-Gax4FbZzAs5Aw3I8UppjhlmQ723swX0iH5aPTiMixDvI9f9gCbXdIeUwAAny53PPM9pvSK9zqh5TFwR6St00ueZiQ3j0ja897HaHnS0-z3Z2UrPrgt8hG1X8Ydd8G6rbMb7dMTdjTkgk__1BP2-d3Fp_P366uPlx_O31ytTaXkshbQC9NbUAMKRC2HpsKhFiCHsqmlLYSSrYK2qayRDbTSWCEEKKWqvgFZlOUJe33gzpt-Qvv7X7TvZnKTpl0Xtev-fQlu7K7jtqtb2QhZZcDLA8BQTIlwuNstoNtH2uVIu0OkWfz8vtud9G-GWfDiIIib-X-gX4lUslg</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Abe, Yu</creator><creator>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creator><creator>Fujioka, Kurumi</creator><creator>Kurosu, Yumiko</creator><creator>Ujiie, Risa</creator><creator>Yanagi, Aki</creator><creator>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creator><creator>Miura, Tomisato</creator><creator>Inaba, Toshiya</creator><creator>Kamiya, Kenji</creator><creator>Sakai, Akira</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</title><author>Abe, Yu ; Yoshida, Mitsuaki A ; Fujioka, Kurumi ; Kurosu, Yumiko ; Ujiie, Risa ; Yanagi, Aki ; Tsuyama, Naohiro ; Miura, Tomisato ; Inaba, Toshiya ; Kamiya, Kenji ; Sakai, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-20b2cbd09fe2eea8f64ef5208f3658d1298790764dc86078cd22209994b608133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Regular Paper</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Kurumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosu, Yumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujiie, Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagi, Aki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuyama, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Tomisato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inaba, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abe, Yu</au><au>Yoshida, Mitsuaki A</au><au>Fujioka, Kurumi</au><au>Kurosu, Yumiko</au><au>Ujiie, Risa</au><au>Yanagi, Aki</au><au>Tsuyama, Naohiro</au><au>Miura, Tomisato</au><au>Inaba, Toshiya</au><au>Kamiya, Kenji</au><au>Sakai, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0449-3060</issn><eissn>1349-9157</eissn><abstract>Abstract In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose–response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29040682</pmid><doi>10.1093/jrr/rrx052</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0449-3060
ispartof Journal of radiation research, 2018-01, Vol.59 (1), p.35-42
issn 0449-3060
1349-9157
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5786284
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Chromosome Aberrations - radiation effects
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Female
Gamma Rays
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Male
Middle Aged
Regular Paper
Tissue Donors
Translocation, Genetic - radiation effects
Young Adult
title Dose–response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%E2%80%93response%20curves%20for%20analyzing%20of%20dicentric%20chromosomes%20and%20chromosome%20translocations%20following%20doses%20of%201000%20mGy%20or%20less,%20based%20on%20irradiated%20peripheral%20blood%20samples%20from%20five%20healthy%20individuals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiation%20research&rft.au=Abe,%20Yu&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0449-3060&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jrr/rrx052&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jrr/rrx052%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29040682&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jrr/rrx052&rfr_iscdi=true