Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients

U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.205-213
Hauptverfasser: O’Leary, Sean T., Riley, Laura E., Lindley, Megan C., Allison, Mandy A., Crane, Lori A., Hurley, Laura P., Beaty, Brenda L., Brtnikova, Michaela, Collins, Margaret, Albert, Alison P., Fisher, Allison K., Jiles, Angela J., Kempe, Allison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 205
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 54
creator O’Leary, Sean T.
Riley, Laura E.
Lindley, Megan C.
Allison, Mandy A.
Crane, Lori A.
Hurley, Laura P.
Beaty, Brenda L.
Brtnikova, Michaela
Collins, Margaret
Albert, Alison P.
Fisher, Allison K.
Jiles, Angela J.
Kempe, Allison
description U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (2) barriers to stocking and administering vaccines; and (3) factors associated with administering both influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. An e-mail and mail survey among a national sample of obstetrician/gynecologists conducted July–October 2015 (analysis August 2016–August 2017). The response rate was 73.2% (353/482). Among obstetrician/gynecologists caring for pregnant women (n=324), vaccination status was most commonly assessed for influenza (97%), Tdap (92%), and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines (88%). Vaccines most commonly administered included influenza (85%) and Tdap (76%). Few respondents reported administering other vaccines to pregnant patients. More physicians reported using standing orders for influenza (66%) than Tdap (39%). Other evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccine uptake were less frequently used (electronic decision support, 42%; immunization information system to record [13%] or assess vaccination status [11%]; reminder/recall, 7%). Barriers most commonly reported were provider financial barriers, yet provider attitudinal barriers were rare. Providers who administered both influenza and Tdap vaccines were more likely to be female, perceive fewer financial and practice barriers, less likely to be in private practice, and perceive more patient barriers. Although most obstetrician/gynecologists administer some vaccines to pregnant women, the focus remains on influenza and Tdap. Financial barriers and infrequent use of evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccination uptake may be hindering delivery of a broader complement of adult vaccines in obstetrician/gynecologist offices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5783738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379717306396</els_id><sourcerecordid>1977783404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8813d7d779a6545db591acffcfe1ec6f2e09a496fbc74b60cef2e4b2d30b24563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFO3DAUtKqisoX-Aaoi9cIlwU4cO74gIUQpEtIiAWfLcZ4XrxJ7aztI8PX1diltOXCyNJ6Z9-YNQkcEVwQTdrKu1ASbAFWNCc9QlcEPaEE63pQ1w_wjWmBORdlwwffR5xjXGGPeEfEJ7deipoxxukDLq2manX1WyXpX3ASlk9UQC2-K--q2KpZ9TJCC1Va5k8snB9qPfmVjioXxIQtg5ZRLxU02AJfiIdozaozw5eU9QPffL-7Of5TXy8ur87PrUlNBUtl1pBn4wLlQrKXt0LeCKG2MNkBAM1MDFooKZnrNac-whgzRvh4a3Ne0Zc0BOt35buZ-gkHn2UGNchPspMKT9MrK_3-cfZAr_yhb3jW86bLB8YtB8D9niElONmoYR-XAz1ESwXmmUkwz9dsb6trPweV4cnt73NSsw5lFdywdfIwBzOsyBMttY3Itd439Vm3RDGbZ13-DvIr-VPQ3KeRzPloIMup8ag2DDaCTHLx9f8IvcUSqww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017032680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>O’Leary, Sean T. ; Riley, Laura E. ; Lindley, Megan C. ; Allison, Mandy A. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Collins, Margaret ; Albert, Alison P. ; Fisher, Allison K. ; Jiles, Angela J. ; Kempe, Allison</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Sean T. ; Riley, Laura E. ; Lindley, Megan C. ; Allison, Mandy A. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Collins, Margaret ; Albert, Alison P. ; Fisher, Allison K. ; Jiles, Angela J. ; Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><description>U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (2) barriers to stocking and administering vaccines; and (3) factors associated with administering both influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. An e-mail and mail survey among a national sample of obstetrician/gynecologists conducted July–October 2015 (analysis August 2016–August 2017). The response rate was 73.2% (353/482). Among obstetrician/gynecologists caring for pregnant women (n=324), vaccination status was most commonly assessed for influenza (97%), Tdap (92%), and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines (88%). Vaccines most commonly administered included influenza (85%) and Tdap (76%). Few respondents reported administering other vaccines to pregnant patients. More physicians reported using standing orders for influenza (66%) than Tdap (39%). Other evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccine uptake were less frequently used (electronic decision support, 42%; immunization information system to record [13%] or assess vaccination status [11%]; reminder/recall, 7%). Barriers most commonly reported were provider financial barriers, yet provider attitudinal barriers were rare. Providers who administered both influenza and Tdap vaccines were more likely to be female, perceive fewer financial and practice barriers, less likely to be in private practice, and perceive more patient barriers. Although most obstetrician/gynecologists administer some vaccines to pregnant women, the focus remains on influenza and Tdap. Financial barriers and infrequent use of evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccination uptake may be hindering delivery of a broader complement of adult vaccines in obstetrician/gynecologist offices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29246674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Barriers ; Caregiving ; Diphtheria ; Diphtheria - prevention & control ; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics ; Email ; Evidence-Based Medicine - economics ; Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration ; Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gynecologists ; Gynecology ; Gynecology - organization & administration ; Gynecology - statistics & numerical data ; Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data ; Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunization Programs - statistics & numerical data ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Influenza Vaccines - economics ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Mail surveys ; Male ; Measles ; Medical practices ; Middle Aged ; Mumps ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics - organization & administration ; Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention & control ; Private practice ; Response rates ; Rubella ; Tetanus ; Tetanus - prevention & control ; United States ; Uptake ; Vaccination - economics ; Vaccination - statistics & numerical data ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough ; Whooping Cough - prevention & control]]></subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.205-213</ispartof><rights>2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8813d7d779a6545db591acffcfe1ec6f2e09a496fbc74b60cef2e4b2d30b24563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8813d7d779a6545db591acffcfe1ec6f2e09a496fbc74b60cef2e4b2d30b24563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379717306396$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Megan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Mandy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brtnikova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Alison P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Allison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiles, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><title>Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (2) barriers to stocking and administering vaccines; and (3) factors associated with administering both influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. An e-mail and mail survey among a national sample of obstetrician/gynecologists conducted July–October 2015 (analysis August 2016–August 2017). The response rate was 73.2% (353/482). Among obstetrician/gynecologists caring for pregnant women (n=324), vaccination status was most commonly assessed for influenza (97%), Tdap (92%), and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines (88%). Vaccines most commonly administered included influenza (85%) and Tdap (76%). Few respondents reported administering other vaccines to pregnant patients. More physicians reported using standing orders for influenza (66%) than Tdap (39%). Other evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccine uptake were less frequently used (electronic decision support, 42%; immunization information system to record [13%] or assess vaccination status [11%]; reminder/recall, 7%). Barriers most commonly reported were provider financial barriers, yet provider attitudinal barriers were rare. Providers who administered both influenza and Tdap vaccines were more likely to be female, perceive fewer financial and practice barriers, less likely to be in private practice, and perceive more patient barriers. Although most obstetrician/gynecologists administer some vaccines to pregnant women, the focus remains on influenza and Tdap. Financial barriers and infrequent use of evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccination uptake may be hindering delivery of a broader complement of adult vaccines in obstetrician/gynecologist offices.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Caregiving</subject><subject>Diphtheria</subject><subject>Diphtheria - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics</subject><subject>Email</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologists</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Gynecology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - economics</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mail surveys</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measles</subject><subject>Medical practices</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mumps</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Private practice</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Rubella</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Tetanus - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vaccination - economics</subject><subject>Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><subject>Whooping Cough - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFO3DAUtKqisoX-Aaoi9cIlwU4cO74gIUQpEtIiAWfLcZ4XrxJ7aztI8PX1diltOXCyNJ6Z9-YNQkcEVwQTdrKu1ASbAFWNCc9QlcEPaEE63pQ1w_wjWmBORdlwwffR5xjXGGPeEfEJ7deipoxxukDLq2manX1WyXpX3ASlk9UQC2-K--q2KpZ9TJCC1Va5k8snB9qPfmVjioXxIQtg5ZRLxU02AJfiIdozaozw5eU9QPffL-7Of5TXy8ur87PrUlNBUtl1pBn4wLlQrKXt0LeCKG2MNkBAM1MDFooKZnrNac-whgzRvh4a3Ne0Zc0BOt35buZ-gkHn2UGNchPspMKT9MrK_3-cfZAr_yhb3jW86bLB8YtB8D9niElONmoYR-XAz1ESwXmmUkwz9dsb6trPweV4cnt73NSsw5lFdywdfIwBzOsyBMttY3Itd439Vm3RDGbZ13-DvIr-VPQ3KeRzPloIMup8ag2DDaCTHLx9f8IvcUSqww</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>O’Leary, Sean T.</creator><creator>Riley, Laura E.</creator><creator>Lindley, Megan C.</creator><creator>Allison, Mandy A.</creator><creator>Crane, Lori A.</creator><creator>Hurley, Laura P.</creator><creator>Beaty, Brenda L.</creator><creator>Brtnikova, Michaela</creator><creator>Collins, Margaret</creator><creator>Albert, Alison P.</creator><creator>Fisher, Allison K.</creator><creator>Jiles, Angela J.</creator><creator>Kempe, Allison</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients</title><author>O’Leary, Sean T. ; Riley, Laura E. ; Lindley, Megan C. ; Allison, Mandy A. ; Crane, Lori A. ; Hurley, Laura P. ; Beaty, Brenda L. ; Brtnikova, Michaela ; Collins, Margaret ; Albert, Alison P. ; Fisher, Allison K. ; Jiles, Angela J. ; Kempe, Allison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8813d7d779a6545db591acffcfe1ec6f2e09a496fbc74b60cef2e4b2d30b24563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Caregiving</topic><topic>Diphtheria</topic><topic>Diphtheria - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics</topic><topic>Email</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologists</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Gynecology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - economics</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mail surveys</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measles</topic><topic>Medical practices</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mumps</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Private practice</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Rubella</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Tetanus - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vaccination - economics</topic><topic>Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><topic>Whooping Cough - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Sean T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Laura E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Megan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Mandy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Laura P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brtnikova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Alison P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Allison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiles, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Leary, Sean T.</au><au>Riley, Laura E.</au><au>Lindley, Megan C.</au><au>Allison, Mandy A.</au><au>Crane, Lori A.</au><au>Hurley, Laura P.</au><au>Beaty, Brenda L.</au><au>Brtnikova, Michaela</au><au>Collins, Margaret</au><au>Albert, Alison P.</au><au>Fisher, Allison K.</au><au>Jiles, Angela J.</au><au>Kempe, Allison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>205-213</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (2) barriers to stocking and administering vaccines; and (3) factors associated with administering both influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. An e-mail and mail survey among a national sample of obstetrician/gynecologists conducted July–October 2015 (analysis August 2016–August 2017). The response rate was 73.2% (353/482). Among obstetrician/gynecologists caring for pregnant women (n=324), vaccination status was most commonly assessed for influenza (97%), Tdap (92%), and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines (88%). Vaccines most commonly administered included influenza (85%) and Tdap (76%). Few respondents reported administering other vaccines to pregnant patients. More physicians reported using standing orders for influenza (66%) than Tdap (39%). Other evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccine uptake were less frequently used (electronic decision support, 42%; immunization information system to record [13%] or assess vaccination status [11%]; reminder/recall, 7%). Barriers most commonly reported were provider financial barriers, yet provider attitudinal barriers were rare. Providers who administered both influenza and Tdap vaccines were more likely to be female, perceive fewer financial and practice barriers, less likely to be in private practice, and perceive more patient barriers. Although most obstetrician/gynecologists administer some vaccines to pregnant women, the focus remains on influenza and Tdap. Financial barriers and infrequent use of evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccination uptake may be hindering delivery of a broader complement of adult vaccines in obstetrician/gynecologist offices.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29246674</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.016</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2018-02, Vol.54 (2), p.205-213
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5783738
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Barriers
Caregiving
Diphtheria
Diphtheria - prevention & control
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - administration & dosage
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - economics
Email
Evidence-Based Medicine - economics
Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration
Evidence-Based Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Female
Gynecologists
Gynecology
Gynecology - organization & administration
Gynecology - statistics & numerical data
Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data
Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Immunization
Immunization Programs - statistics & numerical data
Influenza
Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage
Influenza Vaccines - economics
Influenza, Human - prevention & control
Mail surveys
Male
Measles
Medical practices
Middle Aged
Mumps
Obstetrics
Obstetrics - organization & administration
Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention & control
Private practice
Response rates
Rubella
Tetanus
Tetanus - prevention & control
United States
Uptake
Vaccination - economics
Vaccination - statistics & numerical data
Vaccines
Whooping cough
Whooping Cough - prevention & control
title Immunization Practices of U.S. Obstetrician/Gynecologists for Pregnant Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunization%20Practices%20of%20U.S.%20Obstetrician/Gynecologists%20for%20Pregnant%20Patients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Leary,%20Sean%20T.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=205-213&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1977783404%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017032680&rft_id=info:pmid/29246674&rft_els_id=S0749379717306396&rfr_iscdi=true