Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort

ObjectivesTo estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPatients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2018-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e018934-e018934
Hauptverfasser: Viana, Marta, Borges, Andreia, Araújo, Carla, Rocha, Afonso, Ribeiro, Ana I, Laszczyńska, Olga, Dias, Paula, Maciel, Maria J, Moreira, Ilídio, Lunet, Nuno, Azevedo, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e018934
container_issue 1
container_start_page e018934
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 8
creator Viana, Marta
Borges, Andreia
Araújo, Carla
Rocha, Afonso
Ribeiro, Ana I
Laszczyńska, Olga
Dias, Paula
Maciel, Maria J
Moreira, Ilídio
Lunet, Nuno
Azevedo, Ana
description ObjectivesTo estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPatients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months.ParticipantsBetween August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up.Outcome measuresReferral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians.ResultsPatients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers.ConclusionsCR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5781051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1986679405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b499t-ec6acd8fb745e5c2ea48b64340e1c4ac78f8af3b3dae3a3f8cc457bae3828d0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLHTEUhUOxVLH-goIEunEzNpkkMxkXgohVQWgX7Trcydzpy2MmeSYZwX9vHu9VrKtmkdxwv3O4l0PIF87OORfNt35ehw36qma8rRjXnZAfyFHNpKwaptTBm_qQnKS0ZuVI1SlVfyKHdSeKrqmPyHjv8XGByWWHiTpPwVpMieZALcTBgaURV9C7QkB2oQBjxkhhSy4ZqQ0xeIjPND37IYYZL2heIb356e4QYi79VYj5M_k4wpTwZP8ek9_fb35d31UPP27vr68eql52Xa7QNmAHPfatVKhsjSB130ghGXIrwbZ61DCKXgyAAsSorZWq7ctH13pggzgmlzvfzdLPOFj0OcJkNtHNZUYTwJl_O96tzJ_wZFSrOVO8GJztDWJ4XDBlM7tkcZrAY1iS4Z3ulGjLXdCv79B1WKIv622ppmk7yVShxI6yMaQUcXwdhjOzjdLsozTbKM0uyqI6fbvHq-ZvcAU43wFF_V-OL0K8rW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986679405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort</title><source>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Viana, Marta ; Borges, Andreia ; Araújo, Carla ; Rocha, Afonso ; Ribeiro, Ana I ; Laszczyńska, Olga ; Dias, Paula ; Maciel, Maria J ; Moreira, Ilídio ; Lunet, Nuno ; Azevedo, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Viana, Marta ; Borges, Andreia ; Araújo, Carla ; Rocha, Afonso ; Ribeiro, Ana I ; Laszczyńska, Olga ; Dias, Paula ; Maciel, Maria J ; Moreira, Ilídio ; Lunet, Nuno ; Azevedo, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesTo estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPatients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months.ParticipantsBetween August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up.Outcome measuresReferral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians.ResultsPatients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers.ConclusionsCR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29301762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular Medicine ; Heart attacks ; Mortality ; Participation ; Patients ; Rehabilitation ; Sociodemographics ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2018-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e018934-e018934</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b499t-ec6acd8fb745e5c2ea48b64340e1c4ac78f8af3b3dae3a3f8cc457bae3828d0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b499t-ec6acd8fb745e5c2ea48b64340e1c4ac78f8af3b3dae3a3f8cc457bae3828d0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5657-5570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/1/e018934.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/1/e018934.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27526,27527,27901,27902,53766,53768,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viana, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Andreia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laszczyńska, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Maria J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Ilídio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunet, Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectivesTo estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPatients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months.ParticipantsBetween August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up.Outcome measuresReferral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians.ResultsPatients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers.ConclusionsCR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Medicine</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFLHTEUhUOxVLH-goIEunEzNpkkMxkXgohVQWgX7Trcydzpy2MmeSYZwX9vHu9VrKtmkdxwv3O4l0PIF87OORfNt35ehw36qma8rRjXnZAfyFHNpKwaptTBm_qQnKS0ZuVI1SlVfyKHdSeKrqmPyHjv8XGByWWHiTpPwVpMieZALcTBgaURV9C7QkB2oQBjxkhhSy4ZqQ0xeIjPND37IYYZL2heIb356e4QYi79VYj5M_k4wpTwZP8ek9_fb35d31UPP27vr68eql52Xa7QNmAHPfatVKhsjSB130ghGXIrwbZ61DCKXgyAAsSorZWq7ctH13pggzgmlzvfzdLPOFj0OcJkNtHNZUYTwJl_O96tzJ_wZFSrOVO8GJztDWJ4XDBlM7tkcZrAY1iS4Z3ulGjLXdCv79B1WKIv622ppmk7yVShxI6yMaQUcXwdhjOzjdLsozTbKM0uyqI6fbvHq-ZvcAU43wFF_V-OL0K8rW4</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Viana, Marta</creator><creator>Borges, Andreia</creator><creator>Araújo, Carla</creator><creator>Rocha, Afonso</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Ana I</creator><creator>Laszczyńska, Olga</creator><creator>Dias, Paula</creator><creator>Maciel, Maria J</creator><creator>Moreira, Ilídio</creator><creator>Lunet, Nuno</creator><creator>Azevedo, Ana</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-5570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort</title><author>Viana, Marta ; Borges, Andreia ; Araújo, Carla ; Rocha, Afonso ; Ribeiro, Ana I ; Laszczyńska, Olga ; Dias, Paula ; Maciel, Maria J ; Moreira, Ilídio ; Lunet, Nuno ; Azevedo, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b499t-ec6acd8fb745e5c2ea48b64340e1c4ac78f8af3b3dae3a3f8cc457bae3828d0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Medicine</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viana, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Andreia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laszczyńska, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Maria J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Ilídio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunet, Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viana, Marta</au><au>Borges, Andreia</au><au>Araújo, Carla</au><au>Rocha, Afonso</au><au>Ribeiro, Ana I</au><au>Laszczyńska, Olga</au><au>Dias, Paula</au><au>Maciel, Maria J</au><au>Moreira, Ilídio</au><au>Lunet, Nuno</au><au>Azevedo, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e018934</spage><epage>e018934</epage><pages>e018934-e018934</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesTo estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPatients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months.ParticipantsBetween August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up.Outcome measuresReferral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians.ResultsPatients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers.ConclusionsCR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29301762</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-5570</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2018-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e018934-e018934
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5781051
source BMJ Journals (Open Access); PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular Medicine
Heart attacks
Mortality
Participation
Patients
Rehabilitation
Sociodemographics
Systematic review
title Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inequalities%20in%20access%20to%20cardiac%20rehabilitation%20after%20an%20acute%20coronary%20syndrome:%20the%20EPiHeart%20cohort&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Viana,%20Marta&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e018934&rft.epage=e018934&rft.pages=e018934-e018934&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1986679405%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986679405&rft_id=info:pmid/29301762&rfr_iscdi=true