Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data
Acoustic surveys of bats are one of the techniques most commonly used by ecological practitioners. The results are used in Ecological Impact Assessments to assess the likely impacts of future developments on species that are widely protected in law, and to monitor developments’ postconstruction. How...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2018-01, Vol.8 (2), p.935-941 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 941 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 935 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lintott, Paul R. Davison, Sophie Breda, John Kubasiewicz, Laura Dowse, David Daisley, Jonathan Haddy, Emily Mathews, Fiona |
description | Acoustic surveys of bats are one of the techniques most commonly used by ecological practitioners. The results are used in Ecological Impact Assessments to assess the likely impacts of future developments on species that are widely protected in law, and to monitor developments’ postconstruction. However, there is no standardized methodology for analyzing or interpreting these data, which can make the assessment of the ecological value of a site very subjective. Comparisons of sites and projects are therefore difficult for ecologists and decision‐makers, for example, when trying to identify the best location for a new road based on relative bat activity levels along alternative routes. Here, we present a new web‐based, data‐driven tool, Ecobat, which addresses the need for a more robust way of interpreting ecological data. Ecobat offers users an easy, standardized, and objective method for analyzing bat activity data. It allows ecological practitioners to compare bat activity data at regional and national scales and to generate a numerical indicator of the relative importance of a night's worth of bat activity. The tool is free and open‐source; because the underlying algorithms are already developed, it could easily be expanded to new geographical regions and species. Data donation is required to ensure the robustness of the analyses; we use a positive feedback mechanism to encourage ecological practitioners to share data by providing in return high quality, contextualized data analysis, and graphical visualizations for direct use in ecological reports.
Ecological practitioners survey bat activity to assess the level of development permitted at a site, but these surveys are not currently standardised, so site‐to‐site comparisons are not possible. Ecobat is a new online resource that standardizes bat activity and allows relative assessments to be made in a local and national context. This innovative tool enables practitioners and policymakers to make informed, defensible decisions about site development, policy, and conservation of protected bat species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.3692 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5773315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989635017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-1296d7650cd57169c781c6e8f744ff4169fffbe4615453d42562b8b0649b5c0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qVDEYhg9isaXtwhuQgBsFp81_TlwUyjD-QMGNrkNOzhfNcCYZk8zI7LwEr9ErMePUUgvNJn8PD2_ydt1zgi8IxvQSHLALJjV90p1QzMVMKdE_vbc-7s5LWeI2JKYcq2fdMdVMCSXVSbdcuDTY-hZdR5TiFCKgDCVtsgNUE_LWhSlUW9su21jWNkOsbxBswwjRwe-fvwZbYEQhVsjrDA0Nqak8alZkXQ3bUHdotNWedUfeTgXOb-fT7su7xef5h9nNp_cf59c3M8c5ozNCtRyVFNiNQhGpneqJk9B7xbn3vJ147wfgkggu2MipkHToByy5HoTDjp12VwfvejOsYHQtcLaTWeewsnlnkg3m_5sYvpmvaWuEUowR0QSvbgU5fd9AqWYVioNpshHSphiiNcO4x5o19OUDdNn-LrbnNarXkglMVKNeHyiXUykZ_F0Ygs2-RLMv0exLbOyL--nvyH-VNeDyAPwIE-weN5nFfMH-Kv8AnmKnlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989635017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lintott, Paul R. ; Davison, Sophie ; Breda, John ; Kubasiewicz, Laura ; Dowse, David ; Daisley, Jonathan ; Haddy, Emily ; Mathews, Fiona</creator><creatorcontrib>Lintott, Paul R. ; Davison, Sophie ; Breda, John ; Kubasiewicz, Laura ; Dowse, David ; Daisley, Jonathan ; Haddy, Emily ; Mathews, Fiona</creatorcontrib><description>Acoustic surveys of bats are one of the techniques most commonly used by ecological practitioners. The results are used in Ecological Impact Assessments to assess the likely impacts of future developments on species that are widely protected in law, and to monitor developments’ postconstruction. However, there is no standardized methodology for analyzing or interpreting these data, which can make the assessment of the ecological value of a site very subjective. Comparisons of sites and projects are therefore difficult for ecologists and decision‐makers, for example, when trying to identify the best location for a new road based on relative bat activity levels along alternative routes. Here, we present a new web‐based, data‐driven tool, Ecobat, which addresses the need for a more robust way of interpreting ecological data. Ecobat offers users an easy, standardized, and objective method for analyzing bat activity data. It allows ecological practitioners to compare bat activity data at regional and national scales and to generate a numerical indicator of the relative importance of a night's worth of bat activity. The tool is free and open‐source; because the underlying algorithms are already developed, it could easily be expanded to new geographical regions and species. Data donation is required to ensure the robustness of the analyses; we use a positive feedback mechanism to encourage ecological practitioners to share data by providing in return high quality, contextualized data analysis, and graphical visualizations for direct use in ecological reports.
Ecological practitioners survey bat activity to assess the level of development permitted at a site, but these surveys are not currently standardised, so site‐to‐site comparisons are not possible. Ecobat is a new online resource that standardizes bat activity and allows relative assessments to be made in a local and national context. This innovative tool enables practitioners and policymakers to make informed, defensible decisions about site development, policy, and conservation of protected bat species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29375767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic surveying ; Animal behavior ; Bats ; Chiroptera ; conservation tool ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; data sharing ; decision making ; ecological consultancy data ; Ecological effects ; Ecological monitoring ; environmental impact assessments ; Freeware ; Original Research ; Positive feedback ; Protected species ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Source code</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2018-01, Vol.8 (2), p.935-941</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-1296d7650cd57169c781c6e8f744ff4169fffbe4615453d42562b8b0649b5c0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-1296d7650cd57169c781c6e8f744ff4169fffbe4615453d42562b8b0649b5c0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3479-8199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773315/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773315/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lintott, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breda, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubasiewicz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowse, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daisley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddy, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Fiona</creatorcontrib><title>Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Acoustic surveys of bats are one of the techniques most commonly used by ecological practitioners. The results are used in Ecological Impact Assessments to assess the likely impacts of future developments on species that are widely protected in law, and to monitor developments’ postconstruction. However, there is no standardized methodology for analyzing or interpreting these data, which can make the assessment of the ecological value of a site very subjective. Comparisons of sites and projects are therefore difficult for ecologists and decision‐makers, for example, when trying to identify the best location for a new road based on relative bat activity levels along alternative routes. Here, we present a new web‐based, data‐driven tool, Ecobat, which addresses the need for a more robust way of interpreting ecological data. Ecobat offers users an easy, standardized, and objective method for analyzing bat activity data. It allows ecological practitioners to compare bat activity data at regional and national scales and to generate a numerical indicator of the relative importance of a night's worth of bat activity. The tool is free and open‐source; because the underlying algorithms are already developed, it could easily be expanded to new geographical regions and species. Data donation is required to ensure the robustness of the analyses; we use a positive feedback mechanism to encourage ecological practitioners to share data by providing in return high quality, contextualized data analysis, and graphical visualizations for direct use in ecological reports.
Ecological practitioners survey bat activity to assess the level of development permitted at a site, but these surveys are not currently standardised, so site‐to‐site comparisons are not possible. Ecobat is a new online resource that standardizes bat activity and allows relative assessments to be made in a local and national context. This innovative tool enables practitioners and policymakers to make informed, defensible decisions about site development, policy, and conservation of protected bat species.</description><subject>Acoustic surveying</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>conservation tool</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>data sharing</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>ecological consultancy data</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>environmental impact assessments</subject><subject>Freeware</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Source code</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qVDEYhg9isaXtwhuQgBsFp81_TlwUyjD-QMGNrkNOzhfNcCYZk8zI7LwEr9ErMePUUgvNJn8PD2_ydt1zgi8IxvQSHLALJjV90p1QzMVMKdE_vbc-7s5LWeI2JKYcq2fdMdVMCSXVSbdcuDTY-hZdR5TiFCKgDCVtsgNUE_LWhSlUW9su21jWNkOsbxBswwjRwe-fvwZbYEQhVsjrDA0Nqak8alZkXQ3bUHdotNWedUfeTgXOb-fT7su7xef5h9nNp_cf59c3M8c5ozNCtRyVFNiNQhGpneqJk9B7xbn3vJ147wfgkggu2MipkHToByy5HoTDjp12VwfvejOsYHQtcLaTWeewsnlnkg3m_5sYvpmvaWuEUowR0QSvbgU5fd9AqWYVioNpshHSphiiNcO4x5o19OUDdNn-LrbnNarXkglMVKNeHyiXUykZ_F0Ygs2-RLMv0exLbOyL--nvyH-VNeDyAPwIE-weN5nFfMH-Kv8AnmKnlg</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Lintott, Paul R.</creator><creator>Davison, Sophie</creator><creator>Breda, John</creator><creator>Kubasiewicz, Laura</creator><creator>Dowse, David</creator><creator>Daisley, Jonathan</creator><creator>Haddy, Emily</creator><creator>Mathews, Fiona</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-8199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data</title><author>Lintott, Paul R. ; Davison, Sophie ; Breda, John ; Kubasiewicz, Laura ; Dowse, David ; Daisley, Jonathan ; Haddy, Emily ; Mathews, Fiona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-1296d7650cd57169c781c6e8f744ff4169fffbe4615453d42562b8b0649b5c0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic surveying</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>conservation tool</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>data sharing</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>ecological consultancy data</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>environmental impact assessments</topic><topic>Freeware</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Source code</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lintott, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breda, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubasiewicz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowse, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daisley, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddy, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Fiona</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lintott, Paul R.</au><au>Davison, Sophie</au><au>Breda, John</au><au>Kubasiewicz, Laura</au><au>Dowse, David</au><au>Daisley, Jonathan</au><au>Haddy, Emily</au><au>Mathews, Fiona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>935</spage><epage>941</epage><pages>935-941</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Acoustic surveys of bats are one of the techniques most commonly used by ecological practitioners. The results are used in Ecological Impact Assessments to assess the likely impacts of future developments on species that are widely protected in law, and to monitor developments’ postconstruction. However, there is no standardized methodology for analyzing or interpreting these data, which can make the assessment of the ecological value of a site very subjective. Comparisons of sites and projects are therefore difficult for ecologists and decision‐makers, for example, when trying to identify the best location for a new road based on relative bat activity levels along alternative routes. Here, we present a new web‐based, data‐driven tool, Ecobat, which addresses the need for a more robust way of interpreting ecological data. Ecobat offers users an easy, standardized, and objective method for analyzing bat activity data. It allows ecological practitioners to compare bat activity data at regional and national scales and to generate a numerical indicator of the relative importance of a night's worth of bat activity. The tool is free and open‐source; because the underlying algorithms are already developed, it could easily be expanded to new geographical regions and species. Data donation is required to ensure the robustness of the analyses; we use a positive feedback mechanism to encourage ecological practitioners to share data by providing in return high quality, contextualized data analysis, and graphical visualizations for direct use in ecological reports.
Ecological practitioners survey bat activity to assess the level of development permitted at a site, but these surveys are not currently standardised, so site‐to‐site comparisons are not possible. Ecobat is a new online resource that standardizes bat activity and allows relative assessments to be made in a local and national context. This innovative tool enables practitioners and policymakers to make informed, defensible decisions about site development, policy, and conservation of protected bat species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>29375767</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.3692</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-8199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2018-01, Vol.8 (2), p.935-941 |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5773315 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acoustic surveying Animal behavior Bats Chiroptera conservation tool Data analysis Data processing data sharing decision making ecological consultancy data Ecological effects Ecological monitoring environmental impact assessments Freeware Original Research Positive feedback Protected species Robustness (mathematics) Source code |
title | Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence‐based interpretation of bat activity data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecobat:%20An%20online%20resource%20to%20facilitate%20transparent,%20evidence%E2%80%90based%20interpretation%20of%20bat%20activity%20data&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Lintott,%20Paul%20R.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=935&rft.epage=941&rft.pages=935-941&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.3692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1989635017%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989635017&rft_id=info:pmid/29375767&rfr_iscdi=true |