Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies
The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid ME...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2018-02, Vol.71 (2), p.326-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Bello, Natalie A Woolley, Jonathan J Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence Falzon, Louise Alpert, Bruce S Oparil, Suzanne Cutter, Gary Wapner, Ronald Muntner, Paul Tita, Alan T Shimbo, Daichi |
description | The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and dabl from inception through August 3, 2017 for articles that assessed the validity of an upper arm BP measurement device against a mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnant women. Two independent investigators determined eligibility, extracted data, and adjudicated protocol violations. From 1798 potential articles identified, 41, that assessed 28 devices, met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (n=32) followed a standard or modified American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization, British Hypertension Society, or European Society of Hypertension validation protocol. Several articles described the results of validation studies performed on >1 device (n=7) or in >1 population of pregnant women (n=12), comprising 64 pairwise validity assessments. The device was validated in 61% (32 of 52) of studies which used a standard or modified protocol. Only 34% (11 of 32) of the studies wherein the device was successfully validated were performed without a protocol violation. Given the implications of inaccurate BP measurement in pregnant women, healthcare providers should be aware of and try to use the BP measurement devices which have been properly validated in this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5764819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1976008676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-645e1b899eb692f45e26bd658ed6dbef8be0e94f25cbe57223dba56d421a1c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v1DAUtBCIbgt_AZkbl7S2YzsxB6TQLt1K_VK3IDhZjv1SjJK42EnR_nu8tFSU0-jNm5n3pEHoLSX7lEp6sPp2uby6Xp6vTy7Om1WTyWqfEqbEM7SggvGCC1k-RwtCFS8UpV930G5KPwihnPPqJdphijFVcbpAXWPtHI3d4NDhj30IDl9GSGmOgM_AbHGAccJHcOctJOzH7f5mNKPdvMcNXm_SBIOZvMVXWQK_tjlfTO9d5sKI19PsPKRX6EVn-gSvH3APff60vD5cFacXxyeHzWlhSyqnQnIBtK2VglYq1uWJydZJUYOTroWuboGA4h0TtgVRMVa61gjpOKOGWgblHvpwn3s7twM4m1-Ppte30Q8mbnQwXj_djP67vgl3WlSS11TlgHcPATH8nCFNevDJQt-bEcKcNFWVJKSWlcxSdS-1MaQUoXs8Q4ne9qT_6ymTlf7TU_a--ffPR-ffYsrftXmTpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1976008676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bello, Natalie A ; Woolley, Jonathan J ; Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence ; Falzon, Louise ; Alpert, Bruce S ; Oparil, Suzanne ; Cutter, Gary ; Wapner, Ronald ; Muntner, Paul ; Tita, Alan T ; Shimbo, Daichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Bello, Natalie A ; Woolley, Jonathan J ; Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence ; Falzon, Louise ; Alpert, Bruce S ; Oparil, Suzanne ; Cutter, Gary ; Wapner, Ronald ; Muntner, Paul ; Tita, Alan T ; Shimbo, Daichi</creatorcontrib><description>The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and dabl from inception through August 3, 2017 for articles that assessed the validity of an upper arm BP measurement device against a mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnant women. Two independent investigators determined eligibility, extracted data, and adjudicated protocol violations. From 1798 potential articles identified, 41, that assessed 28 devices, met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (n=32) followed a standard or modified American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization, British Hypertension Society, or European Society of Hypertension validation protocol. Several articles described the results of validation studies performed on >1 device (n=7) or in >1 population of pregnant women (n=12), comprising 64 pairwise validity assessments. The device was validated in 61% (32 of 52) of studies which used a standard or modified protocol. Only 34% (11 of 32) of the studies wherein the device was successfully validated were performed without a protocol violation. Given the implications of inaccurate BP measurement in pregnant women, healthcare providers should be aware of and try to use the BP measurement devices which have been properly validated in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29229741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Blood Pressure ; Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation ; Blood Pressure Determination - methods ; Blood Pressure Determination - standards ; Equipment Design - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension - diagnosis ; Pregnancy ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Validation Studies as Topic</subject><ispartof>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2018-02, Vol.71 (2), p.326-335</ispartof><rights>2017 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-645e1b899eb692f45e26bd658ed6dbef8be0e94f25cbe57223dba56d421a1c2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29229741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bello, Natalie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Jonathan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falzon, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Bruce S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oparil, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wapner, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntner, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tita, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimbo, Daichi</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies</title><title>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</title><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><description>The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and dabl from inception through August 3, 2017 for articles that assessed the validity of an upper arm BP measurement device against a mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnant women. Two independent investigators determined eligibility, extracted data, and adjudicated protocol violations. From 1798 potential articles identified, 41, that assessed 28 devices, met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (n=32) followed a standard or modified American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization, British Hypertension Society, or European Society of Hypertension validation protocol. Several articles described the results of validation studies performed on >1 device (n=7) or in >1 population of pregnant women (n=12), comprising 64 pairwise validity assessments. The device was validated in 61% (32 of 52) of studies which used a standard or modified protocol. Only 34% (11 of 32) of the studies wherein the device was successfully validated were performed without a protocol violation. Given the implications of inaccurate BP measurement in pregnant women, healthcare providers should be aware of and try to use the BP measurement devices which have been properly validated in this population.</description><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - standards</subject><subject>Equipment Design - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Validation Studies as Topic</subject><issn>0194-911X</issn><issn>1524-4563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1v1DAUtBCIbgt_AZkbl7S2YzsxB6TQLt1K_VK3IDhZjv1SjJK42EnR_nu8tFSU0-jNm5n3pEHoLSX7lEp6sPp2uby6Xp6vTy7Om1WTyWqfEqbEM7SggvGCC1k-RwtCFS8UpV930G5KPwihnPPqJdphijFVcbpAXWPtHI3d4NDhj30IDl9GSGmOgM_AbHGAccJHcOctJOzH7f5mNKPdvMcNXm_SBIOZvMVXWQK_tjlfTO9d5sKI19PsPKRX6EVn-gSvH3APff60vD5cFacXxyeHzWlhSyqnQnIBtK2VglYq1uWJydZJUYOTroWuboGA4h0TtgVRMVa61gjpOKOGWgblHvpwn3s7twM4m1-Ppte30Q8mbnQwXj_djP67vgl3WlSS11TlgHcPATH8nCFNevDJQt-bEcKcNFWVJKSWlcxSdS-1MaQUoXs8Q4ne9qT_6ymTlf7TU_a--ffPR-ffYsrftXmTpQ</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Bello, Natalie A</creator><creator>Woolley, Jonathan J</creator><creator>Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence</creator><creator>Falzon, Louise</creator><creator>Alpert, Bruce S</creator><creator>Oparil, Suzanne</creator><creator>Cutter, Gary</creator><creator>Wapner, Ronald</creator><creator>Muntner, Paul</creator><creator>Tita, Alan T</creator><creator>Shimbo, Daichi</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies</title><author>Bello, Natalie A ; Woolley, Jonathan J ; Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence ; Falzon, Louise ; Alpert, Bruce S ; Oparil, Suzanne ; Cutter, Gary ; Wapner, Ronald ; Muntner, Paul ; Tita, Alan T ; Shimbo, Daichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-645e1b899eb692f45e26bd658ed6dbef8be0e94f25cbe57223dba56d421a1c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - standards</topic><topic>Equipment Design - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Validation Studies as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bello, Natalie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Jonathan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falzon, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpert, Bruce S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oparil, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutter, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wapner, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntner, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tita, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimbo, Daichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bello, Natalie A</au><au>Woolley, Jonathan J</au><au>Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence</au><au>Falzon, Louise</au><au>Alpert, Bruce S</au><au>Oparil, Suzanne</au><au>Cutter, Gary</au><au>Wapner, Ronald</au><au>Muntner, Paul</au><au>Tita, Alan T</au><au>Shimbo, Daichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies</atitle><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle><addtitle>Hypertension</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>326-335</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><eissn>1524-4563</eissn><abstract>The accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is essential to guide medical decision making that affects both mother and fetus. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy of ambulatory, home, and clinic BP measurement devices in pregnant women. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and dabl from inception through August 3, 2017 for articles that assessed the validity of an upper arm BP measurement device against a mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnant women. Two independent investigators determined eligibility, extracted data, and adjudicated protocol violations. From 1798 potential articles identified, 41, that assessed 28 devices, met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (n=32) followed a standard or modified American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization, British Hypertension Society, or European Society of Hypertension validation protocol. Several articles described the results of validation studies performed on >1 device (n=7) or in >1 population of pregnant women (n=12), comprising 64 pairwise validity assessments. The device was validated in 61% (32 of 52) of studies which used a standard or modified protocol. Only 34% (11 of 32) of the studies wherein the device was successfully validated were performed without a protocol violation. Given the implications of inaccurate BP measurement in pregnant women, healthcare providers should be aware of and try to use the BP measurement devices which have been properly validated in this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29229741</pmid><doi>10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-911X |
ispartof | Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 2018-02, Vol.71 (2), p.326-335 |
issn | 0194-911X 1524-4563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5764819 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Blood Pressure Blood Pressure Determination - instrumentation Blood Pressure Determination - methods Blood Pressure Determination - standards Equipment Design - standards Female Humans Hypertension - diagnosis Pregnancy Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results Validation Studies as Topic |
title | Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Blood%20Pressure%20Measurement%20Devices%20in%20Pregnancy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Validation%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Hypertension%20(Dallas,%20Tex.%201979)&rft.au=Bello,%20Natalie%20A&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=326-335&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft.eissn=1524-4563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1976008676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1976008676&rft_id=info:pmid/29229741&rfr_iscdi=true |