Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis

Background and Objective Peri‐implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants. Although the pathogenesis of PI is not fully understood, evidence suggests that the etiology is multifactorial and may include a genetic component. The aim of this study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontal research 2018-02, Vol.53 (1), p.107-116
Hauptverfasser: Hiyari, S., Naghibi, A., Wong, R., Sadreshkevary, R., Yi‐Ling, L., Tetradis, S., Camargo, P. M., Pirih, F. Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Journal of periodontal research
container_volume 53
creator Hiyari, S.
Naghibi, A.
Wong, R.
Sadreshkevary, R.
Yi‐Ling, L.
Tetradis, S.
Camargo, P. M.
Pirih, F. Q.
description Background and Objective Peri‐implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants. Although the pathogenesis of PI is not fully understood, evidence suggests that the etiology is multifactorial and may include a genetic component. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of genetics in the development of peri‐implantitis. Material and Methods Four‐week‐old C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ and A/J male mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. Implants were placed in the healed extraction sockets. Upon osseointegration, ligatures were placed around the implant head for 1 or 4 weeks to induce PI. Micro‐computed tomography scanning was used to measure volumetric bone loss. Histological analyses were also performed to evaluate collagen organization and the presence of neutrophils and osteoclasts. Results Radiographically, comparing the ligature‐treated mice, C57BL/6J displayed the greatest amount of bone loss, followed by C3H/HeJ and A/J mice at 1 and 4 weeks. Histologically, at 1 week, C57BL/6J mice presented with the highest numbers of neutrophils and osteoclasts. At 4 weeks, C57BL/6J mice presented with the most active bone remodeling compared with the other two strains. Conclusion There were significant differences in the severity of peri‐implantitis among the different mouse strains, suggesting that the genetic framework can affect implant survival and success. Future work is needed to dissect the genetic contribution to the development of peri‐implantitis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jre.12493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5760471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1984750718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-c40e5b53360de669d59e94a2ac1c455d77183953a93ec5e920fc763ff667d85f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhq0KVELaRV8AjcSmLCbY41u8AaEo3BSpUi9ry_EcF0dzw54pyo5H4Bl5EgyhUYvE2VhH_vTr_8-P0BeCJyTN8SrAhBRM0Q9oRATGOZaC76ARxkWRUzZle2g_xhVOu5DqI9orFGaMF3yETn8M0ULX-6WvfL_OWpeV3jkI0PRZ3Q4RstgH45uY9W3WQfCP9w--7irT9L738RPadaaK8Pn1HaNf5_Ofs8t88e3iana2yC3HiuaWYeBLTqnAJQihSq5AMVMYSyzjvJSSTKni1CgKloMqsLNSUOeEkOWUOzpGJxvdbljWUNpkL5hKd8HXJqx1a7z-_6fxN_p3-0dzKTCTJAl8fRUI7e0Asde1T8mrFARSTE1UugclSuGEHr5BV-0QmhQvUVMmOX52O0ZHG8qGNsYAbmuGYP1ci0616JdaEnvwr_st-beHBBxvgDtfwfp9JX39fb6RfAK055gh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984750718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hiyari, S. ; Naghibi, A. ; Wong, R. ; Sadreshkevary, R. ; Yi‐Ling, L. ; Tetradis, S. ; Camargo, P. M. ; Pirih, F. Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hiyari, S. ; Naghibi, A. ; Wong, R. ; Sadreshkevary, R. ; Yi‐Ling, L. ; Tetradis, S. ; Camargo, P. M. ; Pirih, F. Q.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objective Peri‐implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants. Although the pathogenesis of PI is not fully understood, evidence suggests that the etiology is multifactorial and may include a genetic component. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of genetics in the development of peri‐implantitis. Material and Methods Four‐week‐old C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ and A/J male mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. Implants were placed in the healed extraction sockets. Upon osseointegration, ligatures were placed around the implant head for 1 or 4 weeks to induce PI. Micro‐computed tomography scanning was used to measure volumetric bone loss. Histological analyses were also performed to evaluate collagen organization and the presence of neutrophils and osteoclasts. Results Radiographically, comparing the ligature‐treated mice, C57BL/6J displayed the greatest amount of bone loss, followed by C3H/HeJ and A/J mice at 1 and 4 weeks. Histologically, at 1 week, C57BL/6J mice presented with the highest numbers of neutrophils and osteoclasts. At 4 weeks, C57BL/6J mice presented with the most active bone remodeling compared with the other two strains. Conclusion There were significant differences in the severity of peri‐implantitis among the different mouse strains, suggesting that the genetic framework can affect implant survival and success. Future work is needed to dissect the genetic contribution to the development of peri‐implantitis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jre.12493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29044525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Bone Loss - pathology ; Animals ; Bone loss ; Bone remodeling ; Bone Remodeling - genetics ; Collagen ; Computed tomography ; dental implant ; Dental implants ; Dental prosthetics ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Etiology ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; genetics ; Inflammation ; Leukocytes (neutrophilic) ; Maxilla ; Mice, Inbred Strains ; Molars ; murine ; Neutrophils ; Neutrophils - metabolism ; Osseointegration ; Osteoclasts ; Osteoclasts - metabolism ; Peri-Implantitis - genetics ; Rodents ; Teeth ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontal research, 2018-02, Vol.53 (1), p.107-116</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-c40e5b53360de669d59e94a2ac1c455d77183953a93ec5e920fc763ff667d85f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-c40e5b53360de669d59e94a2ac1c455d77183953a93ec5e920fc763ff667d85f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1670-7345</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjre.12493$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjre.12493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hiyari, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghibi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadreshkevary, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi‐Ling, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetradis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirih, F. Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis</title><title>Journal of periodontal research</title><addtitle>J Periodontal Res</addtitle><description>Background and Objective Peri‐implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants. Although the pathogenesis of PI is not fully understood, evidence suggests that the etiology is multifactorial and may include a genetic component. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of genetics in the development of peri‐implantitis. Material and Methods Four‐week‐old C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ and A/J male mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. Implants were placed in the healed extraction sockets. Upon osseointegration, ligatures were placed around the implant head for 1 or 4 weeks to induce PI. Micro‐computed tomography scanning was used to measure volumetric bone loss. Histological analyses were also performed to evaluate collagen organization and the presence of neutrophils and osteoclasts. Results Radiographically, comparing the ligature‐treated mice, C57BL/6J displayed the greatest amount of bone loss, followed by C3H/HeJ and A/J mice at 1 and 4 weeks. Histologically, at 1 week, C57BL/6J mice presented with the highest numbers of neutrophils and osteoclasts. At 4 weeks, C57BL/6J mice presented with the most active bone remodeling compared with the other two strains. Conclusion There were significant differences in the severity of peri‐implantitis among the different mouse strains, suggesting that the genetic framework can affect implant survival and success. Future work is needed to dissect the genetic contribution to the development of peri‐implantitis.</description><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - pathology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>Bone remodeling</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling - genetics</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>genetics</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>murine</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Neutrophils - metabolism</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Osteoclasts</subject><subject>Osteoclasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Peri-Implantitis - genetics</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0022-3484</issn><issn>1600-0765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhq0KVELaRV8AjcSmLCbY41u8AaEo3BSpUi9ry_EcF0dzw54pyo5H4Bl5EgyhUYvE2VhH_vTr_8-P0BeCJyTN8SrAhBRM0Q9oRATGOZaC76ARxkWRUzZle2g_xhVOu5DqI9orFGaMF3yETn8M0ULX-6WvfL_OWpeV3jkI0PRZ3Q4RstgH45uY9W3WQfCP9w--7irT9L738RPadaaK8Pn1HaNf5_Ofs8t88e3iana2yC3HiuaWYeBLTqnAJQihSq5AMVMYSyzjvJSSTKni1CgKloMqsLNSUOeEkOWUOzpGJxvdbljWUNpkL5hKd8HXJqx1a7z-_6fxN_p3-0dzKTCTJAl8fRUI7e0Asde1T8mrFARSTE1UugclSuGEHr5BV-0QmhQvUVMmOX52O0ZHG8qGNsYAbmuGYP1ci0616JdaEnvwr_st-beHBBxvgDtfwfp9JX39fb6RfAK055gh</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Hiyari, S.</creator><creator>Naghibi, A.</creator><creator>Wong, R.</creator><creator>Sadreshkevary, R.</creator><creator>Yi‐Ling, L.</creator><creator>Tetradis, S.</creator><creator>Camargo, P. M.</creator><creator>Pirih, F. Q.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-7345</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis</title><author>Hiyari, S. ; Naghibi, A. ; Wong, R. ; Sadreshkevary, R. ; Yi‐Ling, L. ; Tetradis, S. ; Camargo, P. M. ; Pirih, F. Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-c40e5b53360de669d59e94a2ac1c455d77183953a93ec5e920fc763ff667d85f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - pathology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>Bone remodeling</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling - genetics</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>genetics</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>murine</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Neutrophils - metabolism</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Osteoclasts</topic><topic>Osteoclasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Peri-Implantitis - genetics</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hiyari, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghibi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadreshkevary, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi‐Ling, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetradis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirih, F. Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hiyari, S.</au><au>Naghibi, A.</au><au>Wong, R.</au><au>Sadreshkevary, R.</au><au>Yi‐Ling, L.</au><au>Tetradis, S.</au><au>Camargo, P. M.</au><au>Pirih, F. Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontal research</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontal Res</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>107-116</pages><issn>0022-3484</issn><eissn>1600-0765</eissn><abstract>Background and Objective Peri‐implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants. Although the pathogenesis of PI is not fully understood, evidence suggests that the etiology is multifactorial and may include a genetic component. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of genetics in the development of peri‐implantitis. Material and Methods Four‐week‐old C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ and A/J male mice had their left maxillary molars extracted. Implants were placed in the healed extraction sockets. Upon osseointegration, ligatures were placed around the implant head for 1 or 4 weeks to induce PI. Micro‐computed tomography scanning was used to measure volumetric bone loss. Histological analyses were also performed to evaluate collagen organization and the presence of neutrophils and osteoclasts. Results Radiographically, comparing the ligature‐treated mice, C57BL/6J displayed the greatest amount of bone loss, followed by C3H/HeJ and A/J mice at 1 and 4 weeks. Histologically, at 1 week, C57BL/6J mice presented with the highest numbers of neutrophils and osteoclasts. At 4 weeks, C57BL/6J mice presented with the most active bone remodeling compared with the other two strains. Conclusion There were significant differences in the severity of peri‐implantitis among the different mouse strains, suggesting that the genetic framework can affect implant survival and success. Future work is needed to dissect the genetic contribution to the development of peri‐implantitis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29044525</pmid><doi>10.1111/jre.12493</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-7345</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3484
ispartof Journal of periodontal research, 2018-02, Vol.53 (1), p.107-116
issn 0022-3484
1600-0765
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5760471
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging
Alveolar Bone Loss - pathology
Animals
Bone loss
Bone remodeling
Bone Remodeling - genetics
Collagen
Computed tomography
dental implant
Dental implants
Dental prosthetics
Dental restorative materials
Dentistry
Etiology
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
genetics
Inflammation
Leukocytes (neutrophilic)
Maxilla
Mice, Inbred Strains
Molars
murine
Neutrophils
Neutrophils - metabolism
Osseointegration
Osteoclasts
Osteoclasts - metabolism
Peri-Implantitis - genetics
Rodents
Teeth
Transplants & implants
title Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri‐implantitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20of%20different%20mouse%20strains%20to%20peri%E2%80%90implantitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontal%20research&rft.au=Hiyari,%20S.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=107-116&rft.issn=0022-3484&rft.eissn=1600-0765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jre.12493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1984750718%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984750718&rft_id=info:pmid/29044525&rfr_iscdi=true