The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer

Purpose Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2018-02, Vol.45 (2), p.170-178
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Ka-Rham, Shim, Hyun-Jeong, Hwang, Jun-Eul, Cho, Sang-Hee, Chung, Ik-Joo, Park, Ki Seong, Kang, Sae-Ryung, Kwon, Seong Young, Chung, Woong-Ki, Bae, Woo Kyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 45
creator Kim, Ka-Rham
Shim, Hyun-Jeong
Hwang, Jun-Eul
Cho, Sang-Hee
Chung, Ik-Joo
Park, Ki Seong
Kang, Sae-Ryung
Kwon, Seong Young
Chung, Woong-Ki
Bae, Woo Kyun
description Purpose Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will benefit more from surgery than from CCRT. We investigated the role of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) after ICT to predict the efficacy of CCRT and clinical outcomes. Methods Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed after CCRT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. FDG PET-CT imaging was performed before and after three cycles of TPF. We examined the associations between the metabolic response (percentage decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and total metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) after ICT and complete response (CR) to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results We studied 43 HNC patients with a median follow-up of 32.7 months. Lymph node (LN) SUVmax and total MTV decreases from baseline after ICT were greater in patients with a CR to CCRT than in non-CR patients (LN SUVmax, 88.8% vs. 62.5%, respectively; total MTV, 99.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively). Decreases in total MTV ≥ 78% and LN SUVmax ≥73% after ICT predicted CR to CCRT and longer OS and PFS. Conclusions Using interim FDG PET-CT to measure SUVmax and total MTV after three cycles of ICT may be a useful technique for identifying HNC patients who will benefit from CCRT and predicting survival outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5745569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1981649652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ac6dc14a22c5203e04482debf48b1367a9257291d182c340dc2e1305b68652a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2OFCEUhYnROD_6AG4MiRs3pUBRBbUxMe3MaDKJLto1oeFWF2M1tFA1ybyKT-vtqbEzmrgBwv3O4V4OIa84e8cZU-8LY6LpKsZVVeu6rfQTcspb3lWK6e7p8azYCTkr5YYxroXunpMTXCXjjJ-SX-sBaE4j0NTTECfIYUcvP13RbxfrarWmtscrLPjZTSFF6gbYpWmAbPd31BZq6T6DD25K-eDgUnRzzhCnhczWhyMOfR-cdaiLHmVpG1MJhfYoHcD6--sI7gd1NjrIL8iz3o4FXj7s5-T75cV69bm6_nr1ZfXxunJSsamyrvWOSyuEawSrgUmphYdNL_WG162ynWiU6LjH4V0tmXcCeM2aTavbRti2PicfFt_9vNmBd9h8tqPZ40_YfGeSDebvSgyD2aZb0yjZNG2HBm8fDHL6OUOZzC4UB-NoI6S5GN5JobAtdUDf_IPepDlHHA8pzVvZYU9I8YVyOZWSoT82w5k5JG-W5A0mbw7JG42a14-nOCr-RI2AWICCpbiF_Ojp_7r-BoQuuuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1981649652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kim, Ka-Rham ; Shim, Hyun-Jeong ; Hwang, Jun-Eul ; Cho, Sang-Hee ; Chung, Ik-Joo ; Park, Ki Seong ; Kang, Sae-Ryung ; Kwon, Seong Young ; Chung, Woong-Ki ; Bae, Woo Kyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ka-Rham ; Shim, Hyun-Jeong ; Hwang, Jun-Eul ; Cho, Sang-Hee ; Chung, Ik-Joo ; Park, Ki Seong ; Kang, Sae-Ryung ; Kwon, Seong Young ; Chung, Woong-Ki ; Bae, Woo Kyun</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will benefit more from surgery than from CCRT. We investigated the role of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) after ICT to predict the efficacy of CCRT and clinical outcomes. Methods Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed after CCRT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. FDG PET-CT imaging was performed before and after three cycles of TPF. We examined the associations between the metabolic response (percentage decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and total metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) after ICT and complete response (CR) to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results We studied 43 HNC patients with a median follow-up of 32.7 months. Lymph node (LN) SUVmax and total MTV decreases from baseline after ICT were greater in patients with a CR to CCRT than in non-CR patients (LN SUVmax, 88.8% vs. 62.5%, respectively; total MTV, 99.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively). Decreases in total MTV ≥ 78% and LN SUVmax ≥73% after ICT predicted CR to CCRT and longer OS and PFS. Conclusions Using interim FDG PET-CT to measure SUVmax and total MTV after three cycles of ICT may be a useful technique for identifying HNC patients who will benefit from CCRT and predicting survival outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28940101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>5-Fluorouracil ; Cancer ; Cardiology ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin ; Computed tomography ; Effectiveness ; Emission analysis ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; Imaging ; Information technology ; Lymph nodes ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolic response ; Metabolism ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Predictions ; Preservation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiology ; Solid tumors ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018-02, Vol.45 (2), p.170-178</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ac6dc14a22c5203e04482debf48b1367a9257291d182c340dc2e1305b68652a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ac6dc14a22c5203e04482debf48b1367a9257291d182c340dc2e1305b68652a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ka-Rham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Hyun-Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jun-Eul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sang-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ik-Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ki Seong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sae-Ryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seong Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Woong-Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Woo Kyun</creatorcontrib><title>The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will benefit more from surgery than from CCRT. We investigated the role of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) after ICT to predict the efficacy of CCRT and clinical outcomes. Methods Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed after CCRT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. FDG PET-CT imaging was performed before and after three cycles of TPF. We examined the associations between the metabolic response (percentage decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and total metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) after ICT and complete response (CR) to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results We studied 43 HNC patients with a median follow-up of 32.7 months. Lymph node (LN) SUVmax and total MTV decreases from baseline after ICT were greater in patients with a CR to CCRT than in non-CR patients (LN SUVmax, 88.8% vs. 62.5%, respectively; total MTV, 99.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively). Decreases in total MTV ≥ 78% and LN SUVmax ≥73% after ICT predicted CR to CCRT and longer OS and PFS. Conclusions Using interim FDG PET-CT to measure SUVmax and total MTV after three cycles of ICT may be a useful technique for identifying HNC patients who will benefit from CCRT and predicting survival outcomes.</description><subject>5-Fluorouracil</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic response</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2OFCEUhYnROD_6AG4MiRs3pUBRBbUxMe3MaDKJLto1oeFWF2M1tFA1ybyKT-vtqbEzmrgBwv3O4V4OIa84e8cZU-8LY6LpKsZVVeu6rfQTcspb3lWK6e7p8azYCTkr5YYxroXunpMTXCXjjJ-SX-sBaE4j0NTTECfIYUcvP13RbxfrarWmtscrLPjZTSFF6gbYpWmAbPd31BZq6T6DD25K-eDgUnRzzhCnhczWhyMOfR-cdaiLHmVpG1MJhfYoHcD6--sI7gd1NjrIL8iz3o4FXj7s5-T75cV69bm6_nr1ZfXxunJSsamyrvWOSyuEawSrgUmphYdNL_WG162ynWiU6LjH4V0tmXcCeM2aTavbRti2PicfFt_9vNmBd9h8tqPZ40_YfGeSDebvSgyD2aZb0yjZNG2HBm8fDHL6OUOZzC4UB-NoI6S5GN5JobAtdUDf_IPepDlHHA8pzVvZYU9I8YVyOZWSoT82w5k5JG-W5A0mbw7JG42a14-nOCr-RI2AWICCpbiF_Ojp_7r-BoQuuuU</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kim, Ka-Rham</creator><creator>Shim, Hyun-Jeong</creator><creator>Hwang, Jun-Eul</creator><creator>Cho, Sang-Hee</creator><creator>Chung, Ik-Joo</creator><creator>Park, Ki Seong</creator><creator>Kang, Sae-Ryung</creator><creator>Kwon, Seong Young</creator><creator>Chung, Woong-Ki</creator><creator>Bae, Woo Kyun</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer</title><author>Kim, Ka-Rham ; Shim, Hyun-Jeong ; Hwang, Jun-Eul ; Cho, Sang-Hee ; Chung, Ik-Joo ; Park, Ki Seong ; Kang, Sae-Ryung ; Kwon, Seong Young ; Chung, Woong-Ki ; Bae, Woo Kyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-ac6dc14a22c5203e04482debf48b1367a9257291d182c340dc2e1305b68652a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>5-Fluorouracil</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic response</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ka-Rham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Hyun-Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Jun-Eul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Sang-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Ik-Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ki Seong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sae-Ryung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seong Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Woong-Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Woo Kyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ka-Rham</au><au>Shim, Hyun-Jeong</au><au>Hwang, Jun-Eul</au><au>Cho, Sang-Hee</au><au>Chung, Ik-Joo</au><au>Park, Ki Seong</au><au>Kang, Sae-Ryung</au><au>Kwon, Seong Young</au><au>Chung, Woong-Ki</au><au>Bae, Woo Kyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>170-178</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Purpose Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will benefit more from surgery than from CCRT. We investigated the role of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) after ICT to predict the efficacy of CCRT and clinical outcomes. Methods Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed after CCRT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. FDG PET-CT imaging was performed before and after three cycles of TPF. We examined the associations between the metabolic response (percentage decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and total metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) after ICT and complete response (CR) to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results We studied 43 HNC patients with a median follow-up of 32.7 months. Lymph node (LN) SUVmax and total MTV decreases from baseline after ICT were greater in patients with a CR to CCRT than in non-CR patients (LN SUVmax, 88.8% vs. 62.5%, respectively; total MTV, 99.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively). Decreases in total MTV ≥ 78% and LN SUVmax ≥73% after ICT predicted CR to CCRT and longer OS and PFS. Conclusions Using interim FDG PET-CT to measure SUVmax and total MTV after three cycles of ICT may be a useful technique for identifying HNC patients who will benefit from CCRT and predicting survival outcomes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28940101</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018-02, Vol.45 (2), p.170-178
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5745569
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects 5-Fluorouracil
Cancer
Cardiology
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Computed tomography
Effectiveness
Emission analysis
Head & neck cancer
Imaging
Information technology
Lymph nodes
Medical prognosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolic response
Metabolism
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Orthopedics
Patients
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Predictions
Preservation
Radiation therapy
Radiology
Solid tumors
Surgery
Survival
Tomography
Tumors
title The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20interim%20FDG%20PET-CT%20after%20induction%20chemotherapy%20as%20a%20predictor%20of%20concurrent%20chemoradiotherapy%20efficacy%20and%20prognosis%20for%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Kim,%20Ka-Rham&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=170-178&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-017-3836-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1981649652%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1981649652&rft_id=info:pmid/28940101&rfr_iscdi=true