Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis

Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ releas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thorax 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239
Hauptverfasser: Pareek, Manish, Bond, Marion, Shorey, Jennifer, Seneviratne, Suranjith, Guy, Margaret, White, Peter, Lalvani, Ajit, Kon, Onn Min
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 3
container_start_page 230
container_title Thorax
container_volume 68
creator Pareek, Manish
Bond, Marion
Shorey, Jennifer
Seneviratne, Suranjith
Guy, Margaret
White, Peter
Lalvani, Ajit
Kon, Onn Min
description Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5741173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1287382801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUBesgn4J05iFkhoBBRRAYIKlpbt3Ew9TezWdkbNG7HnPXgmPE0ZwQo217Lud869tk5RPCb4GSGsfp7OfVDXWzeUFBOyL7yid4oVqeq2ZFTUd4sVxhUua9bUR8WDGLcY45aQ5n5xRGktGGnEqvi-9uM4OZvmUqsIHYKdGiaVrHfI98iOo90E5RJKk4ZgpsFHG1E0AcBZt0FT3FfrEoQeQhb9_IECDJC9kIpRzREp1x3U1qF4kUuCmLLwBfI6QtjdzFMDimnq5hsBGO_8aE2-qGHOMx8W93o1RHh0ex4XZ29en61PytOPb9-tX52WmlOWSlYLyoUmvDGtMQ0XbU9ZD7xqKSWat1z0rOpFY4SmGBNdYdFxSoxQfaXBsOPi5WJ7OekROgMuBTXIy2BHFWbplZV_d5w9lxu_k7yp8t-ybPD01iD4qyk_U442GhgG5cBPURLOSV3xuhL_RmnbsJa2mGSUL6gJPsYA_WEjguU-D_KQB7nPg1zykHVP_nzOQfU7ABkoF8DGBNeHvgoXsm5Yw-WHr2v57fMXyt5_4vIk83jh9bj9zx1-AUIV2Z4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287382801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><description>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22693179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Asia - ethnology ; asthma ; asthma pharmacology ; atypical mycobacterial infection ; bacterial infection ; bronchoscopy ; clinical epidemiology ; COPD pharmacology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Emigration and Immigration ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; infection control ; innate immunity ; interferon γ release assay ; Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics ; Latent tuberculosis ; Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis ; Latent Tuberculosis - economics ; Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology ; lymphocyte biology ; macrophage biology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; migration ; Multivariate Analysis ; Mycobacterium ; neutrophil biology ; opportunist lung infections ; pneumonia ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography, Thoracic - economics ; respiratory infection ; screening ; tobacco and the lung ; tuberculin skin test ; Tuberculin Test - economics ; tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; viral infection ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Thorax, 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/68/3/230.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/68/3/230.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><title>Thorax</title><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><description>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asia - ethnology</subject><subject>asthma</subject><subject>asthma pharmacology</subject><subject>atypical mycobacterial infection</subject><subject>bacterial infection</subject><subject>bronchoscopy</subject><subject>clinical epidemiology</subject><subject>COPD pharmacology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Emigration and Immigration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>infection control</subject><subject>innate immunity</subject><subject>interferon γ release assay</subject><subject>Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics</subject><subject>Latent tuberculosis</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology</subject><subject>lymphocyte biology</subject><subject>macrophage biology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Mycobacterium</subject><subject>neutrophil biology</subject><subject>opportunist lung infections</subject><subject>pneumonia</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - economics</subject><subject>respiratory infection</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>tobacco and the lung</subject><subject>tuberculin skin test</subject><subject>Tuberculin Test - economics</subject><subject>tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>viral infection</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0040-6376</issn><issn>1468-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUBesgn4J05iFkhoBBRRAYIKlpbt3Ew9TezWdkbNG7HnPXgmPE0ZwQo217Lud869tk5RPCb4GSGsfp7OfVDXWzeUFBOyL7yid4oVqeq2ZFTUd4sVxhUua9bUR8WDGLcY45aQ5n5xRGktGGnEqvi-9uM4OZvmUqsIHYKdGiaVrHfI98iOo90E5RJKk4ZgpsFHG1E0AcBZt0FT3FfrEoQeQhb9_IECDJC9kIpRzREp1x3U1qF4kUuCmLLwBfI6QtjdzFMDimnq5hsBGO_8aE2-qGHOMx8W93o1RHh0ex4XZ29en61PytOPb9-tX52WmlOWSlYLyoUmvDGtMQ0XbU9ZD7xqKSWat1z0rOpFY4SmGBNdYdFxSoxQfaXBsOPi5WJ7OekROgMuBTXIy2BHFWbplZV_d5w9lxu_k7yp8t-ybPD01iD4qyk_U442GhgG5cBPURLOSV3xuhL_RmnbsJa2mGSUL6gJPsYA_WEjguU-D_KQB7nPg1zykHVP_nzOQfU7ABkoF8DGBNeHvgoXsm5Yw-WHr2v57fMXyt5_4vIk83jh9bj9zx1-AUIV2Z4</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Pareek, Manish</creator><creator>Bond, Marion</creator><creator>Shorey, Jennifer</creator><creator>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creator><creator>Guy, Margaret</creator><creator>White, Peter</creator><creator>Lalvani, Ajit</creator><creator>Kon, Onn Min</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><author>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asia - ethnology</topic><topic>asthma</topic><topic>asthma pharmacology</topic><topic>atypical mycobacterial infection</topic><topic>bacterial infection</topic><topic>bronchoscopy</topic><topic>clinical epidemiology</topic><topic>COPD pharmacology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Emigration and Immigration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>infection control</topic><topic>innate immunity</topic><topic>interferon γ release assay</topic><topic>Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics</topic><topic>Latent tuberculosis</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology</topic><topic>lymphocyte biology</topic><topic>macrophage biology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Mycobacterium</topic><topic>neutrophil biology</topic><topic>opportunist lung infections</topic><topic>pneumonia</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - economics</topic><topic>respiratory infection</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>tobacco and the lung</topic><topic>tuberculin skin test</topic><topic>Tuberculin Test - economics</topic><topic>tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>viral infection</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareek, Manish</au><au>Bond, Marion</au><au>Shorey, Jennifer</au><au>Seneviratne, Suranjith</au><au>Guy, Margaret</au><au>White, Peter</au><au>Lalvani, Ajit</au><au>Kon, Onn Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>230-239</pages><issn>0040-6376</issn><eissn>1468-3296</eissn><abstract>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>22693179</pmid><doi>10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-6376
ispartof Thorax, 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239
issn 0040-6376
1468-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5741173
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Asia - ethnology
asthma
asthma pharmacology
atypical mycobacterial infection
bacterial infection
bronchoscopy
clinical epidemiology
COPD pharmacology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Emigration and Immigration
Female
Humans
Incidence
infection control
innate immunity
interferon γ release assay
Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics
Latent tuberculosis
Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis
Latent Tuberculosis - economics
Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology
lymphocyte biology
macrophage biology
Male
Middle Aged
migration
Multivariate Analysis
Mycobacterium
neutrophil biology
opportunist lung infections
pneumonia
Prospective Studies
Radiography, Thoracic - economics
respiratory infection
screening
tobacco and the lung
tuberculin skin test
Tuberculin Test - economics
tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology
United Kingdom - epidemiology
viral infection
Young Adult
title Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-based%20evaluation%20of%20immigrant%20tuberculosis%20screening%20using%20interferon%20%CE%B3%20release%20assays%20and%20tuberculin%20skin%20testing:%20observational%20study%20and%20economic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Thorax&rft.au=Pareek,%20Manish&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=230-239&rft.issn=0040-6376&rft.eissn=1468-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1287382801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287382801&rft_id=info:pmid/22693179&rfr_iscdi=true