Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis
Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ releas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thorax 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | Thorax |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Pareek, Manish Bond, Marion Shorey, Jennifer Seneviratne, Suranjith Guy, Margaret White, Peter Lalvani, Ajit Kon, Onn Min |
description | Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5741173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1287382801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUBesgn4J05iFkhoBBRRAYIKlpbt3Ew9TezWdkbNG7HnPXgmPE0ZwQo217Lud869tk5RPCb4GSGsfp7OfVDXWzeUFBOyL7yid4oVqeq2ZFTUd4sVxhUua9bUR8WDGLcY45aQ5n5xRGktGGnEqvi-9uM4OZvmUqsIHYKdGiaVrHfI98iOo90E5RJKk4ZgpsFHG1E0AcBZt0FT3FfrEoQeQhb9_IECDJC9kIpRzREp1x3U1qF4kUuCmLLwBfI6QtjdzFMDimnq5hsBGO_8aE2-qGHOMx8W93o1RHh0ex4XZ29en61PytOPb9-tX52WmlOWSlYLyoUmvDGtMQ0XbU9ZD7xqKSWat1z0rOpFY4SmGBNdYdFxSoxQfaXBsOPi5WJ7OekROgMuBTXIy2BHFWbplZV_d5w9lxu_k7yp8t-ybPD01iD4qyk_U442GhgG5cBPURLOSV3xuhL_RmnbsJa2mGSUL6gJPsYA_WEjguU-D_KQB7nPg1zykHVP_nzOQfU7ABkoF8DGBNeHvgoXsm5Yw-WHr2v57fMXyt5_4vIk83jh9bj9zx1-AUIV2Z4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1287382801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><description>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-6376</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22693179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Asia - ethnology ; asthma ; asthma pharmacology ; atypical mycobacterial infection ; bacterial infection ; bronchoscopy ; clinical epidemiology ; COPD pharmacology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Emigration and Immigration ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; infection control ; innate immunity ; interferon γ release assay ; Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics ; Latent tuberculosis ; Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis ; Latent Tuberculosis - economics ; Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology ; lymphocyte biology ; macrophage biology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; migration ; Multivariate Analysis ; Mycobacterium ; neutrophil biology ; opportunist lung infections ; pneumonia ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography, Thoracic - economics ; respiratory infection ; screening ; tobacco and the lung ; tuberculin skin test ; Tuberculin Test - economics ; tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; viral infection ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Thorax, 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/68/3/230.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/68/3/230.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><title>Thorax</title><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><description>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asia - ethnology</subject><subject>asthma</subject><subject>asthma pharmacology</subject><subject>atypical mycobacterial infection</subject><subject>bacterial infection</subject><subject>bronchoscopy</subject><subject>clinical epidemiology</subject><subject>COPD pharmacology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Emigration and Immigration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>infection control</subject><subject>innate immunity</subject><subject>interferon γ release assay</subject><subject>Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics</subject><subject>Latent tuberculosis</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology</subject><subject>lymphocyte biology</subject><subject>macrophage biology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Mycobacterium</subject><subject>neutrophil biology</subject><subject>opportunist lung infections</subject><subject>pneumonia</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - economics</subject><subject>respiratory infection</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>tobacco and the lung</subject><subject>tuberculin skin test</subject><subject>Tuberculin Test - economics</subject><subject>tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>viral infection</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0040-6376</issn><issn>1468-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUBesgn4J05iFkhoBBRRAYIKlpbt3Ew9TezWdkbNG7HnPXgmPE0ZwQo217Lud869tk5RPCb4GSGsfp7OfVDXWzeUFBOyL7yid4oVqeq2ZFTUd4sVxhUua9bUR8WDGLcY45aQ5n5xRGktGGnEqvi-9uM4OZvmUqsIHYKdGiaVrHfI98iOo90E5RJKk4ZgpsFHG1E0AcBZt0FT3FfrEoQeQhb9_IECDJC9kIpRzREp1x3U1qF4kUuCmLLwBfI6QtjdzFMDimnq5hsBGO_8aE2-qGHOMx8W93o1RHh0ex4XZ29en61PytOPb9-tX52WmlOWSlYLyoUmvDGtMQ0XbU9ZD7xqKSWat1z0rOpFY4SmGBNdYdFxSoxQfaXBsOPi5WJ7OekROgMuBTXIy2BHFWbplZV_d5w9lxu_k7yp8t-ybPD01iD4qyk_U442GhgG5cBPURLOSV3xuhL_RmnbsJa2mGSUL6gJPsYA_WEjguU-D_KQB7nPg1zykHVP_nzOQfU7ABkoF8DGBNeHvgoXsm5Yw-WHr2v57fMXyt5_4vIk83jh9bj9zx1-AUIV2Z4</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Pareek, Manish</creator><creator>Bond, Marion</creator><creator>Shorey, Jennifer</creator><creator>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creator><creator>Guy, Margaret</creator><creator>White, Peter</creator><creator>Lalvani, Ajit</creator><creator>Kon, Onn Min</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</title><author>Pareek, Manish ; Bond, Marion ; Shorey, Jennifer ; Seneviratne, Suranjith ; Guy, Margaret ; White, Peter ; Lalvani, Ajit ; Kon, Onn Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-369259b157c8cc7598f23fe548221b5859f34f97c9b2001b409d521c9af4bec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asia - ethnology</topic><topic>asthma</topic><topic>asthma pharmacology</topic><topic>atypical mycobacterial infection</topic><topic>bacterial infection</topic><topic>bronchoscopy</topic><topic>clinical epidemiology</topic><topic>COPD pharmacology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Emigration and Immigration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>infection control</topic><topic>innate immunity</topic><topic>interferon γ release assay</topic><topic>Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics</topic><topic>Latent tuberculosis</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology</topic><topic>lymphocyte biology</topic><topic>macrophage biology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Mycobacterium</topic><topic>neutrophil biology</topic><topic>opportunist lung infections</topic><topic>pneumonia</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - economics</topic><topic>respiratory infection</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>tobacco and the lung</topic><topic>tuberculin skin test</topic><topic>Tuberculin Test - economics</topic><topic>tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>viral infection</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seneviratne, Suranjith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalvani, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kon, Onn Min</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareek, Manish</au><au>Bond, Marion</au><au>Shorey, Jennifer</au><au>Seneviratne, Suranjith</au><au>Guy, Margaret</au><au>White, Peter</au><au>Lalvani, Ajit</au><au>Kon, Onn Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Thorax</jtitle><addtitle>Thorax</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>230-239</pages><issn>0040-6376</issn><eissn>1468-3296</eissn><abstract>Background UK tuberculosis (TB) notifications are rising due to disease in the immigrant population. National screening guidelines have been revised but cost-effectiveness analyses are hampered by the lack of data on the comparative performance of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) in immigrants. Methods Three-way evaluation of TSTs and two IGRAs (QuantiFERON Gold in-tube (QFN-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB) in immigrants aged ≥16 years to quantify test positivity, concordance and factors associated with positivity. Yields were computed at different incidence thresholds and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening was estimated using different latent TB infection (LTBI) screening modalities at varying incidence thresholds with or without port-of-arrival chest x-ray (CXR). Results 231 immigrants were included; median age 29 (IQR 24–37). TSTs were accepted by 80.9%, read in 93.5% and 30.3% were positive – QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB positive in 16.6% and 22.5% respectively. Positive TSTs, QFN-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were independently associated with increasing TB incidence in immigrants' countries of origin (p=0.007, 0.007, 0.037 respectively). Implementing current guidance (threshold 40/100 000 per year) would identify 98–100% of LTBIs (depending on test) but entail testing 97–99% of the cohort; screening at 150/100 000 per year would identify 49–71% of LTBIs but only entail screening half the cohort. The two most cost-effective screening strategies were no port-of-entry chest radiography and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 250/100 000 per year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)) £21 565.3/case averted); and no port-of-entry CXR and screen with single-step QFN-GIT at 150/100 000 per year (averted additional 7.8 TB cases; ICER £31 867.1/case averted). Conclusions UK immigrant screening could cost-effectively and safely eliminate mandatory CXR on arrival by emphasising systematic screening for LTBI with single-step IGRA. Intermediate incidence thresholds balance the need to identify as many imported LTBIs as possible against limited service capacity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>22693179</pmid><doi>10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-6376 |
ispartof | Thorax, 2013-03, Vol.68 (3), p.230-239 |
issn | 0040-6376 1468-3296 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5741173 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Asia - ethnology asthma asthma pharmacology atypical mycobacterial infection bacterial infection bronchoscopy clinical epidemiology COPD pharmacology Cost-Benefit Analysis Emigration and Immigration Female Humans Incidence infection control innate immunity interferon γ release assay Interferon-gamma Release Tests - economics Latent tuberculosis Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis Latent Tuberculosis - economics Latent Tuberculosis - ethnology lymphocyte biology macrophage biology Male Middle Aged migration Multivariate Analysis Mycobacterium neutrophil biology opportunist lung infections pneumonia Prospective Studies Radiography, Thoracic - economics respiratory infection screening tobacco and the lung tuberculin skin test Tuberculin Test - economics tuberculosis Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - economics Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - ethnology United Kingdom - epidemiology viral infection Young Adult |
title | Community-based evaluation of immigrant tuberculosis screening using interferon γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing: observational study and economic analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-based%20evaluation%20of%20immigrant%20tuberculosis%20screening%20using%20interferon%20%CE%B3%20release%20assays%20and%20tuberculin%20skin%20testing:%20observational%20study%20and%20economic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Thorax&rft.au=Pareek,%20Manish&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=230-239&rft.issn=0040-6376&rft.eissn=1468-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1287382801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1287382801&rft_id=info:pmid/22693179&rfr_iscdi=true |