The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesTo determine whether the impact of guided self-determination (GSD) applied in group training (GSD-GT) in people with chronically elevated HbA1c and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) was superior to ‘care as usual’ in improving HbA1c and psychological functioning.SettingAn outpatient clinic at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2017-07, Vol.7 (6), p.e013295-e013295
Hauptverfasser: Mohn, Jannike, Graue, Marit, Assmus, Jõrg, Zoffmann, Vibeke, Thordarson, Hrafnkell, Peyrot, Mark, Rokne, Berit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e013295
container_issue 6
container_start_page e013295
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 7
creator Mohn, Jannike
Graue, Marit
Assmus, Jõrg
Zoffmann, Vibeke
Thordarson, Hrafnkell
Peyrot, Mark
Rokne, Berit
description ObjectivesTo determine whether the impact of guided self-determination (GSD) applied in group training (GSD-GT) in people with chronically elevated HbA1c and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) was superior to ‘care as usual’ in improving HbA1c and psychological functioning.SettingAn outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Western Norway.ParticipantsA total of 178 adults (all Caucasian) aged 18–55 (mean age 36.7±10.7, 62% women) with type 1 DM for at least 1 year and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%) were randomly assigned to participate in either GSD-GT or a control group (CG). Exclusion criteria were severe comorbidity, major psychiatric disorder, cognitive deficiency/language barriers and pregnancy.InterventionIntervention group met seven times for 2 hours over 14 weeks to promote patient autonomy and intrinsic motivation using reflection sheets and advanced professional communication in accordance with the GSD methodology.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes (all outcomes 9 months post intervention) were self-monitored blood glucose frequency, self-reported diabetes competence, autonomy support by healthcare providers (Health Care Climate Questionnaire), autonomous versus controlled diabetes motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire), diabetes distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and psychological well-being (World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index scale).ResultsAmong participants allocated to the GSD-GT (=90) 48 completed the study, whereas 83 completed in the CG (n=88). With 95% CIs GSD-GT did not have effect on HbA1c (B −0.18, CI (−0.48, 0.12), p=0.234). GSD-GT improved autonomy-motivated behaviour (B 0.51, CI (0.25, 0.77), p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5734217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1915476541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1557-fa278db1024bddb5faf19fa87104cdcc7002f253d6ed8710b42de70a74707b5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUsFuFSEUnRiNbWq_wA2JGzfTAgPDPBcmTWOtSRM3dU1guLzHywAjMJp-gh9i_K9-iUzfi1EJhJPLuQcu9zTNa4IvCOn6S-33cYbQUkz6FpOObviz5pRixtoec_78L3zSnOe8x3UwvuGcvmxO6NALRig_bX7d7wCBtTAWFC3aLs6AQRkm2xookLwLqrgYUJ1PUa-C2oKHUJALaIaUY8jouys7VB5mQAQZp3RNzcjDNLmyZKSCQbf6iozo8cfPniHv43RZ1zuk0DbFZW61yvXaVInRuxWOMZQUp6nCkpyaXjUvrJoynB_3s-bLzYf769v27vPHT9dXd60mnIvWKioGowmmTBujuVWWbKwaBMFsNOMoMKaW8s70YNagZtSAwEowgYXmpjtr3h9050V7MGOtM6lJzsl5lR5kVE7-exLcTm7jN8lFxygRVeDtUSDFrwvkImtBY_0JFSAuWZIN4cNQG0Yq9c1_1H1cUqjlPbGY6DlbWRcHVm35n3cQLFcbyKMN5GoDebBB9xvkm6k3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915476541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mohn, Jannike ; Graue, Marit ; Assmus, Jõrg ; Zoffmann, Vibeke ; Thordarson, Hrafnkell ; Peyrot, Mark ; Rokne, Berit</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Jannike ; Graue, Marit ; Assmus, Jõrg ; Zoffmann, Vibeke ; Thordarson, Hrafnkell ; Peyrot, Mark ; Rokne, Berit</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesTo determine whether the impact of guided self-determination (GSD) applied in group training (GSD-GT) in people with chronically elevated HbA1c and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) was superior to ‘care as usual’ in improving HbA1c and psychological functioning.SettingAn outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Western Norway.ParticipantsA total of 178 adults (all Caucasian) aged 18–55 (mean age 36.7±10.7, 62% women) with type 1 DM for at least 1 year and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%) were randomly assigned to participate in either GSD-GT or a control group (CG). Exclusion criteria were severe comorbidity, major psychiatric disorder, cognitive deficiency/language barriers and pregnancy.InterventionIntervention group met seven times for 2 hours over 14 weeks to promote patient autonomy and intrinsic motivation using reflection sheets and advanced professional communication in accordance with the GSD methodology.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes (all outcomes 9 months post intervention) were self-monitored blood glucose frequency, self-reported diabetes competence, autonomy support by healthcare providers (Health Care Climate Questionnaire), autonomous versus controlled diabetes motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire), diabetes distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and psychological well-being (World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index scale).ResultsAmong participants allocated to the GSD-GT (=90) 48 completed the study, whereas 83 completed in the CG (n=88). With 95% CIs GSD-GT did not have effect on HbA1c (B −0.18, CI (−0.48, 0.12), p=0.234). GSD-GT improved autonomy-motivated behaviour (B 0.51, CI (0.25, 0.77), p&lt;0.001), diabetes distress (PAID, B −6.96, CI (−11.40, −2.52), p=0.002), total DDS (B −5.15, CI (−9.34, −0.96), p=0.016), DDS emotional burden (B −7.19, CI (−13.20, −1.19), p=0.019) and self-esteem (B 1.43, CI (0.34, 2.52), p=0.011).ConclusionsResults from this behavioural intervention must be interpreted cautiously because of recruitment and attrition problems. Medical outcomes did not improve. Psychological outcomes improved, especially reduced diabetes distress.Trial registration numberClinical Trials.gov NCT 01317459.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28674125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adults ; Collaboration ; Diabetes ; Diabetes and Endocrinology ; Education ; Evidence-based medicine ; Intervention ; Patient satisfaction ; Power ; Quality of life ; Theory ; Well being</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2017-07, Vol.7 (6), p.e013295-e013295</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>2017 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1557-fa278db1024bddb5faf19fa87104cdcc7002f253d6ed8710b42de70a74707b5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/6/e013295.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/6/e013295.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27549,27550,27924,27925,53791,53793,77601,77632</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Jannike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graue, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmus, Jõrg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoffmann, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thordarson, Hrafnkell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrot, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rokne, Berit</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial</title><title>BMJ open</title><description>ObjectivesTo determine whether the impact of guided self-determination (GSD) applied in group training (GSD-GT) in people with chronically elevated HbA1c and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) was superior to ‘care as usual’ in improving HbA1c and psychological functioning.SettingAn outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Western Norway.ParticipantsA total of 178 adults (all Caucasian) aged 18–55 (mean age 36.7±10.7, 62% women) with type 1 DM for at least 1 year and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%) were randomly assigned to participate in either GSD-GT or a control group (CG). Exclusion criteria were severe comorbidity, major psychiatric disorder, cognitive deficiency/language barriers and pregnancy.InterventionIntervention group met seven times for 2 hours over 14 weeks to promote patient autonomy and intrinsic motivation using reflection sheets and advanced professional communication in accordance with the GSD methodology.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes (all outcomes 9 months post intervention) were self-monitored blood glucose frequency, self-reported diabetes competence, autonomy support by healthcare providers (Health Care Climate Questionnaire), autonomous versus controlled diabetes motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire), diabetes distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and psychological well-being (World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index scale).ResultsAmong participants allocated to the GSD-GT (=90) 48 completed the study, whereas 83 completed in the CG (n=88). With 95% CIs GSD-GT did not have effect on HbA1c (B −0.18, CI (−0.48, 0.12), p=0.234). GSD-GT improved autonomy-motivated behaviour (B 0.51, CI (0.25, 0.77), p&lt;0.001), diabetes distress (PAID, B −6.96, CI (−11.40, −2.52), p=0.002), total DDS (B −5.15, CI (−9.34, −0.96), p=0.016), DDS emotional burden (B −7.19, CI (−13.20, −1.19), p=0.019) and self-esteem (B 1.43, CI (0.34, 2.52), p=0.011).ConclusionsResults from this behavioural intervention must be interpreted cautiously because of recruitment and attrition problems. Medical outcomes did not improve. Psychological outcomes improved, especially reduced diabetes distress.Trial registration numberClinical Trials.gov NCT 01317459.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes and Endocrinology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUsFuFSEUnRiNbWq_wA2JGzfTAgPDPBcmTWOtSRM3dU1guLzHywAjMJp-gh9i_K9-iUzfi1EJhJPLuQcu9zTNa4IvCOn6S-33cYbQUkz6FpOObviz5pRixtoec_78L3zSnOe8x3UwvuGcvmxO6NALRig_bX7d7wCBtTAWFC3aLs6AQRkm2xookLwLqrgYUJ1PUa-C2oKHUJALaIaUY8jouys7VB5mQAQZp3RNzcjDNLmyZKSCQbf6iozo8cfPniHv43RZ1zuk0DbFZW61yvXaVInRuxWOMZQUp6nCkpyaXjUvrJoynB_3s-bLzYf769v27vPHT9dXd60mnIvWKioGowmmTBujuVWWbKwaBMFsNOMoMKaW8s70YNagZtSAwEowgYXmpjtr3h9050V7MGOtM6lJzsl5lR5kVE7-exLcTm7jN8lFxygRVeDtUSDFrwvkImtBY_0JFSAuWZIN4cNQG0Yq9c1_1H1cUqjlPbGY6DlbWRcHVm35n3cQLFcbyKMN5GoDebBB9xvkm6k3</recordid><startdate>20170703</startdate><enddate>20170703</enddate><creator>Mohn, Jannike</creator><creator>Graue, Marit</creator><creator>Assmus, Jõrg</creator><creator>Zoffmann, Vibeke</creator><creator>Thordarson, Hrafnkell</creator><creator>Peyrot, Mark</creator><creator>Rokne, Berit</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170703</creationdate><title>The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial</title><author>Mohn, Jannike ; Graue, Marit ; Assmus, Jõrg ; Zoffmann, Vibeke ; Thordarson, Hrafnkell ; Peyrot, Mark ; Rokne, Berit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1557-fa278db1024bddb5faf19fa87104cdcc7002f253d6ed8710b42de70a74707b5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes and Endocrinology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Jannike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graue, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmus, Jõrg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoffmann, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thordarson, Hrafnkell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrot, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rokne, Berit</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohn, Jannike</au><au>Graue, Marit</au><au>Assmus, Jõrg</au><au>Zoffmann, Vibeke</au><au>Thordarson, Hrafnkell</au><au>Peyrot, Mark</au><au>Rokne, Berit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><date>2017-07-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e013295</spage><epage>e013295</epage><pages>e013295-e013295</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesTo determine whether the impact of guided self-determination (GSD) applied in group training (GSD-GT) in people with chronically elevated HbA1c and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) was superior to ‘care as usual’ in improving HbA1c and psychological functioning.SettingAn outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Western Norway.ParticipantsA total of 178 adults (all Caucasian) aged 18–55 (mean age 36.7±10.7, 62% women) with type 1 DM for at least 1 year and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%) were randomly assigned to participate in either GSD-GT or a control group (CG). Exclusion criteria were severe comorbidity, major psychiatric disorder, cognitive deficiency/language barriers and pregnancy.InterventionIntervention group met seven times for 2 hours over 14 weeks to promote patient autonomy and intrinsic motivation using reflection sheets and advanced professional communication in accordance with the GSD methodology.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes (all outcomes 9 months post intervention) were self-monitored blood glucose frequency, self-reported diabetes competence, autonomy support by healthcare providers (Health Care Climate Questionnaire), autonomous versus controlled diabetes motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire), diabetes distress (Problem Areas In Diabetes Scale (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and psychological well-being (World Health Organization five-item Well-Being Index scale).ResultsAmong participants allocated to the GSD-GT (=90) 48 completed the study, whereas 83 completed in the CG (n=88). With 95% CIs GSD-GT did not have effect on HbA1c (B −0.18, CI (−0.48, 0.12), p=0.234). GSD-GT improved autonomy-motivated behaviour (B 0.51, CI (0.25, 0.77), p&lt;0.001), diabetes distress (PAID, B −6.96, CI (−11.40, −2.52), p=0.002), total DDS (B −5.15, CI (−9.34, −0.96), p=0.016), DDS emotional burden (B −7.19, CI (−13.20, −1.19), p=0.019) and self-esteem (B 1.43, CI (0.34, 2.52), p=0.011).ConclusionsResults from this behavioural intervention must be interpreted cautiously because of recruitment and attrition problems. Medical outcomes did not improve. Psychological outcomes improved, especially reduced diabetes distress.Trial registration numberClinical Trials.gov NCT 01317459.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>28674125</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2017-07, Vol.7 (6), p.e013295-e013295
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5734217
source BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adults
Collaboration
Diabetes
Diabetes and Endocrinology
Education
Evidence-based medicine
Intervention
Patient satisfaction
Power
Quality of life
Theory
Well being
title The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A41%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20guided%20self-determination%20on%20self-management%20in%20persons%20with%20type%201%20diabetes%20mellitus%20and%20HbA1c%20%E2%89%A564%20mmol/mol:%20a%20group-based%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Mohn,%20Jannike&rft.date=2017-07-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e013295&rft.epage=e013295&rft.pages=e013295-e013295&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1915476541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915476541&rft_id=info:pmid/28674125&rfr_iscdi=true