Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides

Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2009-09, Vol.10 (4), p.260-272
Hauptverfasser: Rajon, Didier A., Bova, Frank J., Chi, Yueh‐Yun, Friedman, William A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 272
container_issue 4
container_start_page 260
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 10
creator Rajon, Didier A.
Bova, Frank J.
Chi, Yueh‐Yun
Friedman, William A.
description Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In our approach, we fabricated custom patient‐specific face masks and guides that can be applied to the patient during stereotactic surgery. While the use of RP machines has previously been shown to be satisfactory from an accuracy standpoint, one of our design criteria – completing the entire build and introduction into the sterile field in less than two hours – was unobtainable.(1) Our primary problems were the fabrication time and the nonresistance of the built material to high‐temperature sterilization. In the current study, we have investigated the use of subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) machines to perform the same quality of surgical guidance, while improving the fabrication time and allowing for choosing materials suitable for sterilization. Because SRP technology does not offer the same flexibility as RP in terms of prototype shape and complexity, our software program was adapted to provide new guide designs suitable for SRP fabrication. The biopsy guide was subdivided for a more efficient build with the parts being uniquely assembled to form the final guide. The accuracy of the assembly was then assessed using a modified Brown‐Roberts‐Wells phantom base by which the position of a biopsy needle introduced into the guide can be measured and compared with the actual planned target. These tests showed that: 1) SRP machines provide an average technical accuracy of 0.77 mm with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.07 mm, and 2) SRP allows for fabrication and sterilization within three‐and‐a‐half hours after diagnostic image acquisition. We are confident that technology is capable of reducing this time to less than one hour. Further tests are being conducted to determine the registration accuracy of the face mask on the patient's head under IRB‐approved trials. The accuracy of this new guidance technology will be verified by judging it against current frame‐based or frameless systems. PACS number: 87.57.Gg
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2897
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290777018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-99a49934e637572555ed94e6be0d13f67c018030d0849bdad5162eb90cd4e3ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMovu-epODB066TV9NcBFl8gSKInkOapGuWtqnNVtn_3qy7-Lp4SjLzm29m8iF0hGGMMYGzmTZNN37D4NmYFFJsoF3MST6SErPNH_cdtBfjDADjghbbaAenYEGw3EX4UXfeZpUue2_03Ic2C1VmhjgPTdalgGvnWelDFxfZdPDWxQO0Vek6usP1uY-ery6fJjeju4fr28nF3cgwAZDaaiYlZS6nggvCOXdWplfpwGJa5cIALoCChYLJ0mrLcU5cKcFY5qjRdB-dr3S7oWycNWmQXteq632j-4UK2qvfmda_qGl4U6kb8IIngdO1QB9eBxfnqvHRuLrWrQtDVIIyzDgIlsiTP-QsDH2btlOESBBCpFkTBSvK9CHG3lVfs2BQSzvUpx3q0w61tCOVHP_c4btg_f8JyFfAu6_d4l9BdTG5J0ByoB_XG5gp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290777018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rajon, Didier A. ; Bova, Frank J. ; Chi, Yueh‐Yun ; Friedman, William A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajon, Didier A. ; Bova, Frank J. ; Chi, Yueh‐Yun ; Friedman, William A.</creatorcontrib><description>Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In our approach, we fabricated custom patient‐specific face masks and guides that can be applied to the patient during stereotactic surgery. While the use of RP machines has previously been shown to be satisfactory from an accuracy standpoint, one of our design criteria – completing the entire build and introduction into the sterile field in less than two hours – was unobtainable.(1) Our primary problems were the fabrication time and the nonresistance of the built material to high‐temperature sterilization. In the current study, we have investigated the use of subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) machines to perform the same quality of surgical guidance, while improving the fabrication time and allowing for choosing materials suitable for sterilization. Because SRP technology does not offer the same flexibility as RP in terms of prototype shape and complexity, our software program was adapted to provide new guide designs suitable for SRP fabrication. The biopsy guide was subdivided for a more efficient build with the parts being uniquely assembled to form the final guide. The accuracy of the assembly was then assessed using a modified Brown‐Roberts‐Wells phantom base by which the position of a biopsy needle introduced into the guide can be measured and compared with the actual planned target. These tests showed that: 1) SRP machines provide an average technical accuracy of 0.77 mm with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.07 mm, and 2) SRP allows for fabrication and sterilization within three‐and‐a‐half hours after diagnostic image acquisition. We are confident that technology is capable of reducing this time to less than one hour. Further tests are being conducted to determine the registration accuracy of the face mask on the patient's head under IRB‐approved trials. The accuracy of this new guidance technology will be verified by judging it against current frame‐based or frameless systems. PACS number: 87.57.Gg</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19918219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biopsy ; biopsy guide ; Biopsy, Needle - instrumentation ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Brain - pathology ; Composite materials ; Computer Simulation ; Design ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; image‐guided surgery ; Investigations ; Models, Biological ; Neuronavigation - instrumentation ; Neuronavigation - methods ; Non‐ionizing Topics ; Phantoms, Imaging - standards ; Radiosurgery - instrumentation ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Rapid prototyping ; Software ; Stainless steel ; stereotactic frame ; Stereotaxic Techniques - instrumentation ; subtractive rapid prototyping ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-09, Vol.10 (4), p.260-272</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors.</rights><rights>2009. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-99a49934e637572555ed94e6be0d13f67c018030d0849bdad5162eb90cd4e3ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-99a49934e637572555ed94e6be0d13f67c018030d0849bdad5162eb90cd4e3ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720585/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720585/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,1419,11571,27933,27934,45583,45584,46061,46485,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajon, Didier A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bova, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Yueh‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, William A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In our approach, we fabricated custom patient‐specific face masks and guides that can be applied to the patient during stereotactic surgery. While the use of RP machines has previously been shown to be satisfactory from an accuracy standpoint, one of our design criteria – completing the entire build and introduction into the sterile field in less than two hours – was unobtainable.(1) Our primary problems were the fabrication time and the nonresistance of the built material to high‐temperature sterilization. In the current study, we have investigated the use of subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) machines to perform the same quality of surgical guidance, while improving the fabrication time and allowing for choosing materials suitable for sterilization. Because SRP technology does not offer the same flexibility as RP in terms of prototype shape and complexity, our software program was adapted to provide new guide designs suitable for SRP fabrication. The biopsy guide was subdivided for a more efficient build with the parts being uniquely assembled to form the final guide. The accuracy of the assembly was then assessed using a modified Brown‐Roberts‐Wells phantom base by which the position of a biopsy needle introduced into the guide can be measured and compared with the actual planned target. These tests showed that: 1) SRP machines provide an average technical accuracy of 0.77 mm with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.07 mm, and 2) SRP allows for fabrication and sterilization within three‐and‐a‐half hours after diagnostic image acquisition. We are confident that technology is capable of reducing this time to less than one hour. Further tests are being conducted to determine the registration accuracy of the face mask on the patient's head under IRB‐approved trials. The accuracy of this new guidance technology will be verified by judging it against current frame‐based or frameless systems. PACS number: 87.57.Gg</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>biopsy guide</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>image‐guided surgery</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - methods</subject><subject>Non‐ionizing Topics</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Rapid prototyping</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>stereotactic frame</subject><subject>Stereotaxic Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>subtractive rapid prototyping</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMovu-epODB066TV9NcBFl8gSKInkOapGuWtqnNVtn_3qy7-Lp4SjLzm29m8iF0hGGMMYGzmTZNN37D4NmYFFJsoF3MST6SErPNH_cdtBfjDADjghbbaAenYEGw3EX4UXfeZpUue2_03Ic2C1VmhjgPTdalgGvnWelDFxfZdPDWxQO0Vek6usP1uY-ery6fJjeju4fr28nF3cgwAZDaaiYlZS6nggvCOXdWplfpwGJa5cIALoCChYLJ0mrLcU5cKcFY5qjRdB-dr3S7oWycNWmQXteq632j-4UK2qvfmda_qGl4U6kb8IIngdO1QB9eBxfnqvHRuLrWrQtDVIIyzDgIlsiTP-QsDH2btlOESBBCpFkTBSvK9CHG3lVfs2BQSzvUpx3q0w61tCOVHP_c4btg_f8JyFfAu6_d4l9BdTG5J0ByoB_XG5gp</recordid><startdate>20090902</startdate><enddate>20090902</enddate><creator>Rajon, Didier A.</creator><creator>Bova, Frank J.</creator><creator>Chi, Yueh‐Yun</creator><creator>Friedman, William A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090902</creationdate><title>Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides</title><author>Rajon, Didier A. ; Bova, Frank J. ; Chi, Yueh‐Yun ; Friedman, William A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-99a49934e637572555ed94e6be0d13f67c018030d0849bdad5162eb90cd4e3ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>biopsy guide</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>image‐guided surgery</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - methods</topic><topic>Non‐ionizing Topics</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Rapid prototyping</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>stereotactic frame</topic><topic>Stereotaxic Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>subtractive rapid prototyping</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajon, Didier A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bova, Frank J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Yueh‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, William A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajon, Didier A.</au><au>Bova, Frank J.</au><au>Chi, Yueh‐Yun</au><au>Friedman, William A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2009-09-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>260-272</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Image‐guided surgery is currently performed using frame‐based as well as frameless approaches. In order to reduce the invasive nature of stereotactic guidance and the cost in both equipment and time required within the operating room, we investigated the use of rapid prototyping (RP) technology. In our approach, we fabricated custom patient‐specific face masks and guides that can be applied to the patient during stereotactic surgery. While the use of RP machines has previously been shown to be satisfactory from an accuracy standpoint, one of our design criteria – completing the entire build and introduction into the sterile field in less than two hours – was unobtainable.(1) Our primary problems were the fabrication time and the nonresistance of the built material to high‐temperature sterilization. In the current study, we have investigated the use of subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) machines to perform the same quality of surgical guidance, while improving the fabrication time and allowing for choosing materials suitable for sterilization. Because SRP technology does not offer the same flexibility as RP in terms of prototype shape and complexity, our software program was adapted to provide new guide designs suitable for SRP fabrication. The biopsy guide was subdivided for a more efficient build with the parts being uniquely assembled to form the final guide. The accuracy of the assembly was then assessed using a modified Brown‐Roberts‐Wells phantom base by which the position of a biopsy needle introduced into the guide can be measured and compared with the actual planned target. These tests showed that: 1) SRP machines provide an average technical accuracy of 0.77 mm with a standard deviation of the mean of 0.07 mm, and 2) SRP allows for fabrication and sterilization within three‐and‐a‐half hours after diagnostic image acquisition. We are confident that technology is capable of reducing this time to less than one hour. Further tests are being conducted to determine the registration accuracy of the face mask on the patient's head under IRB‐approved trials. The accuracy of this new guidance technology will be verified by judging it against current frame‐based or frameless systems. PACS number: 87.57.Gg</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>19918219</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2897</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-09, Vol.10 (4), p.260-272
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720585
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Biopsy
biopsy guide
Biopsy, Needle - instrumentation
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Brain - pathology
Composite materials
Computer Simulation
Design
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
image‐guided surgery
Investigations
Models, Biological
Neuronavigation - instrumentation
Neuronavigation - methods
Non‐ionizing Topics
Phantoms, Imaging - standards
Radiosurgery - instrumentation
Radiosurgery - methods
Rapid prototyping
Software
Stainless steel
stereotactic frame
Stereotaxic Techniques - instrumentation
subtractive rapid prototyping
Surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Work stations
title Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T07%3A56%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20fabrication%20of%20custom%20patient%20biopsy%20guides&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Rajon,%20Didier%20A.&rft.date=2009-09-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=260-272&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.2897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290777018%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290777018&rft_id=info:pmid/19918219&rfr_iscdi=true