Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA)
Before implementing one of two new LVEF radionuclide gated ventriculogram (MUGA) systems, the results from 312 consecutive parallel patient studies were evaluated. Each gamma‐camera acquisition was simultaneously processed by semi‐automatic Medasys Pinnacle and by fully automatic and semiautomatic P...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2009-07, Vol.10 (3), p.173-179 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 179 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 173 |
| container_title | Journal of applied clinical medical physics |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Fair, Joanna R. Heintz, Philip H. Telepak, Robert J. |
| description | Before implementing one of two new LVEF radionuclide gated ventriculogram (MUGA) systems, the results from 312 consecutive parallel patient studies were evaluated. Each gamma‐camera acquisition was simultaneously processed by semi‐automatic Medasys Pinnacle and by fully automatic and semiautomatic Philips nuclear medicine computer systems. The Philips systems yielded LVEF results within ±5LVEF percentage points of the Medasys system in fewer than half of the studies. The remaining values were higher or lower than those from the long‐used Medasys system. These differences might have changed cancer patient chemotherapy clinical decisions. As a result, our institution elected not to implement either new system.
PACS: 87.57.U‐ Nuclear medicine imaging |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2977 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733969744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-a7080a241a28f5442bc6751edf83513ea4574494f511aa67c23688305c6f2f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0EoqVw54QscQAOCf5cry-VoqgtSK24kLM1deyNo931Yu-myn-P00SlcOE0luY3T-_5IfSekjmljHzdgu2G-Y6SwOdMK_UCnVPJqpnWVLx89j5Db3LeEkJpzevX6IzqShden6PV1Q7aCcYQexw97t0DXsMIeEjRupxD32Bom5jCuOky9jHhoYUeEm5gdGu8c_2Ygp3a2CQYNnv8-W51s_jyFr3y0Gb37jQv0Or66ufy2-z2x8335eJ2ZoUifAaK1ASYoMBqL4Vg97ZSkrq1r7mk3IGQSggtvKQUoFKW8aquOZG28sxXml-gy6PuMN13bm0PbqA1QwodpL2JEMzfmz5sTBN3RipGpGBF4NNJIMVfk8uj6UK2ri0ZXZyyUZyXryomCvnxH3Ibp9SXdIYxTZgsjg8UOVI2xZyT809eKDGHysxjZeaxMnOorJx8eJ7hz8GpowJUR-AhtG7_X0GzWN4xQovz37-opJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290253514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fair, Joanna R. ; Heintz, Philip H. ; Telepak, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fair, Joanna R. ; Heintz, Philip H. ; Telepak, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>Before implementing one of two new LVEF radionuclide gated ventriculogram (MUGA) systems, the results from 312 consecutive parallel patient studies were evaluated. Each gamma‐camera acquisition was simultaneously processed by semi‐automatic Medasys Pinnacle and by fully automatic and semiautomatic Philips nuclear medicine computer systems. The Philips systems yielded LVEF results within ±5LVEF percentage points of the Medasys system in fewer than half of the studies. The remaining values were higher or lower than those from the long‐used Medasys system. These differences might have changed cancer patient chemotherapy clinical decisions. As a result, our institution elected not to implement either new system.
PACS: 87.57.U‐ Nuclear medicine imaging</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2977</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19692979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; automated data processing ; Chemotherapy ; clinical testing ; ejection fraction ; Erythrocytes - diagnostic imaging ; Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - instrumentation ; Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - methods ; Humans ; left ventriculography ; Measurement techniques ; Medical Imaging ; MUGA ; Nuclear medicine ; Patients ; phantom ; radionuclide ventriculography ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Software packages ; Technetium</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-07, Vol.10 (3), p.173-179</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors.</rights><rights>2009. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-a7080a241a28f5442bc6751edf83513ea4574494f511aa67c23688305c6f2f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-a7080a241a28f5442bc6751edf83513ea4574494f511aa67c23688305c6f2f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720542/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720542/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fair, Joanna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Philip H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telepak, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA)</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Before implementing one of two new LVEF radionuclide gated ventriculogram (MUGA) systems, the results from 312 consecutive parallel patient studies were evaluated. Each gamma‐camera acquisition was simultaneously processed by semi‐automatic Medasys Pinnacle and by fully automatic and semiautomatic Philips nuclear medicine computer systems. The Philips systems yielded LVEF results within ±5LVEF percentage points of the Medasys system in fewer than half of the studies. The remaining values were higher or lower than those from the long‐used Medasys system. These differences might have changed cancer patient chemotherapy clinical decisions. As a result, our institution elected not to implement either new system.
PACS: 87.57.U‐ Nuclear medicine imaging</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>automated data processing</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>clinical testing</subject><subject>ejection fraction</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>left ventriculography</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>MUGA</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>phantom</subject><subject>radionuclide ventriculography</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>Technetium</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0EoqVw54QscQAOCf5cry-VoqgtSK24kLM1deyNo931Yu-myn-P00SlcOE0luY3T-_5IfSekjmljHzdgu2G-Y6SwOdMK_UCnVPJqpnWVLx89j5Db3LeEkJpzevX6IzqShden6PV1Q7aCcYQexw97t0DXsMIeEjRupxD32Bom5jCuOky9jHhoYUeEm5gdGu8c_2Ygp3a2CQYNnv8-W51s_jyFr3y0Gb37jQv0Or66ufy2-z2x8335eJ2ZoUifAaK1ASYoMBqL4Vg97ZSkrq1r7mk3IGQSggtvKQUoFKW8aquOZG28sxXml-gy6PuMN13bm0PbqA1QwodpL2JEMzfmz5sTBN3RipGpGBF4NNJIMVfk8uj6UK2ri0ZXZyyUZyXryomCvnxH3Ibp9SXdIYxTZgsjg8UOVI2xZyT809eKDGHysxjZeaxMnOorJx8eJ7hz8GpowJUR-AhtG7_X0GzWN4xQovz37-opJM</recordid><startdate>20090708</startdate><enddate>20090708</enddate><creator>Fair, Joanna R.</creator><creator>Heintz, Philip H.</creator><creator>Telepak, Robert J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090708</creationdate><title>Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA)</title><author>Fair, Joanna R. ; Heintz, Philip H. ; Telepak, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-a7080a241a28f5442bc6751edf83513ea4574494f511aa67c23688305c6f2f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>automated data processing</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>clinical testing</topic><topic>ejection fraction</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>left ventriculography</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>MUGA</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>phantom</topic><topic>radionuclide ventriculography</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>Technetium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fair, Joanna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heintz, Philip H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telepak, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fair, Joanna R.</au><au>Heintz, Philip H.</au><au>Telepak, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2009-07-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>173-179</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Before implementing one of two new LVEF radionuclide gated ventriculogram (MUGA) systems, the results from 312 consecutive parallel patient studies were evaluated. Each gamma‐camera acquisition was simultaneously processed by semi‐automatic Medasys Pinnacle and by fully automatic and semiautomatic Philips nuclear medicine computer systems. The Philips systems yielded LVEF results within ±5LVEF percentage points of the Medasys system in fewer than half of the studies. The remaining values were higher or lower than those from the long‐used Medasys system. These differences might have changed cancer patient chemotherapy clinical decisions. As a result, our institution elected not to implement either new system.
PACS: 87.57.U‐ Nuclear medicine imaging</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>19692979</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2977</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-07, Vol.10 (3), p.173-179 |
| issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720542 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; PubMed (Medline); Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Algorithms automated data processing Chemotherapy clinical testing ejection fraction Erythrocytes - diagnostic imaging Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - instrumentation Gated Blood-Pool Imaging - methods Humans left ventriculography Measurement techniques Medical Imaging MUGA Nuclear medicine Patients phantom radionuclide ventriculography Radiopharmaceuticals Software packages Technetium |
| title | Evaluation of new data processing algorithms for planar gated ventriculography (MUGA) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A12%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20new%20data%20processing%20algorithms%20for%20planar%20gated%20ventriculography%20(MUGA)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Fair,%20Joanna%20R.&rft.date=2009-07-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=173-179&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v10i3.2977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733969744%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290253514&rft_id=info:pmid/19692979&rfr_iscdi=true |