Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study

This study investigates the dosimetric dependence of the dimension of a lead (Pb) layer for shielding using clinical electron beams with different energies. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate phase space files for the 4, 9 and 16 MeV electron beams produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2009-04, Vol.10 (2), p.75-91
Hauptverfasser: Chow, James C L, Grigorov, Grigor N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 2
container_start_page 75
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 10
creator Chow, James C L
Grigorov, Grigor N
description This study investigates the dosimetric dependence of the dimension of a lead (Pb) layer for shielding using clinical electron beams with different energies. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate phase space files for the 4, 9 and 16 MeV electron beams produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc‐based BEAMnrc code, and validated by measurements using films. Pb layers with different thicknesses (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) and diameters (2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 cm) were placed at the center of an electron field on a solid water phantom. Beam profiles were determined at the depth of maximum dose (dm) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose profiles under the Pb layer at dm, including the penumbra at the edge of the layer and relative dose at the central beam axis (CAX), were studied with varying thicknesses and diameters of Pb. It is found that 2 mm of Pb is adequate to provide 5 half value layer (HVL) attenuation for the 4 MeV electron beams, and the beam profiles at dm are dependent on the diameter but not the thickness of the Pb. However, for the 9 and 16 MeV electron beams, the relative dose at the CAX and dm depends on both the thickness and diameter of the Pb layer. For 8 mm thickness of Pb, 4 and 5 HVL attenuation of electron beams with energies of 9 and 16 MeV can be achieved at dm, respectively. Moreover, the beam profile under the Pb layer at dm depends on: (1) the penumbra region at the edge of the Pb layer; (2) the beam attenuation varying with the thickness of the Pb layer; (3) the electron side scatter contributing to the CAX under the Pb layer; and (4) the photon contamination produced by the Pb layer. A parameter called “shielding area factor” (defined as the ratio of the length between two points of 50% relative doses in the beam profile at dm to the diameter of the Pb layer) is suggested to predict the required size and thickness of Pb for shielding a target with known dimension at dm. The dosimetric data calculated by Monte Carlo simulations in this study are useful to select the suitable thickness and size of Pb for the protection of critical tissue in electron radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.kh and 87.55.km.
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67267256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-645d390a48dd83bb98519ca826f54be0dee7fd85701050f0c0f5e3648337fb023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2LFDEQxYMo7jp69yQBYW8zVpJOf3gQlvETdvGi55BOqp0M6aRNuneZ_97szqCrFyFFAu9Xj0o9Ql4y2DDG4c1em3Ha3DBwfMM71j4i50zyet11rHr84H1GnuW8B2CsFe1Tcsa6SrayE-fk9n3MbsQ5OUMtThgsBoM0DnTeIbVFCtnFoD01O520mTG5PDuTaQxUU4_a0rxz6C11gaJHM6eiJG1dLA5JT4e3hbuOYUa61clHmufFHp6TJ4P2GV-c7hX5_vHDt-3n9dXXT1-2l1drI4WU67qSVnSgq9baVvR910rWGd3yepBVj2ARm8G2sgEGEgYwMEgUddUK0Qw9cLEi746-09KPaA2GOWmvpuRGnQ4qaqf-VoLbqR_xRsmGQ1VDMbg4GaT4c8E8q9Flg97rgHHJqm54ObIu4Ot_wH1cUtlcVpx3wKWoS60IHCmTYs4Jh9-jMFB3mar7TNV9puou09Ly6uEX_jScQixAfQRuncfDfw3V5faaAzRS_AKkr7HX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290253625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chow, James C L ; Grigorov, Grigor N</creator><creatorcontrib>Chow, James C L ; Grigorov, Grigor N</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the dosimetric dependence of the dimension of a lead (Pb) layer for shielding using clinical electron beams with different energies. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate phase space files for the 4, 9 and 16 MeV electron beams produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc‐based BEAMnrc code, and validated by measurements using films. Pb layers with different thicknesses (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) and diameters (2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 cm) were placed at the center of an electron field on a solid water phantom. Beam profiles were determined at the depth of maximum dose (dm) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose profiles under the Pb layer at dm, including the penumbra at the edge of the layer and relative dose at the central beam axis (CAX), were studied with varying thicknesses and diameters of Pb. It is found that 2 mm of Pb is adequate to provide 5 half value layer (HVL) attenuation for the 4 MeV electron beams, and the beam profiles at dm are dependent on the diameter but not the thickness of the Pb. However, for the 9 and 16 MeV electron beams, the relative dose at the CAX and dm depends on both the thickness and diameter of the Pb layer. For 8 mm thickness of Pb, 4 and 5 HVL attenuation of electron beams with energies of 9 and 16 MeV can be achieved at dm, respectively. Moreover, the beam profile under the Pb layer at dm depends on: (1) the penumbra region at the edge of the Pb layer; (2) the beam attenuation varying with the thickness of the Pb layer; (3) the electron side scatter contributing to the CAX under the Pb layer; and (4) the photon contamination produced by the Pb layer. A parameter called “shielding area factor” (defined as the ratio of the length between two points of 50% relative doses in the beam profile at dm to the diameter of the Pb layer) is suggested to predict the required size and thickness of Pb for shielding a target with known dimension at dm. The dosimetric data calculated by Monte Carlo simulations in this study are useful to select the suitable thickness and size of Pb for the protection of critical tissue in electron radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.kh and 87.55.km.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19458593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Dosimetry ; electron dosimetry ; electron radiotherapy ; Electrons ; Energy ; Geometry ; Humans ; Lead ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Monte Carlo, Pb shielding ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation Protection ; Radiation therapy ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-04, Vol.10 (2), p.75-91</ispartof><rights>2009 The Authors.</rights><rights>2009. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-645d390a48dd83bb98519ca826f54be0dee7fd85701050f0c0f5e3648337fb023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-645d390a48dd83bb98519ca826f54be0dee7fd85701050f0c0f5e3648337fb023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720460/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720460/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19458593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chow, James C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigorov, Grigor N</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>This study investigates the dosimetric dependence of the dimension of a lead (Pb) layer for shielding using clinical electron beams with different energies. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate phase space files for the 4, 9 and 16 MeV electron beams produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc‐based BEAMnrc code, and validated by measurements using films. Pb layers with different thicknesses (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) and diameters (2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 cm) were placed at the center of an electron field on a solid water phantom. Beam profiles were determined at the depth of maximum dose (dm) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose profiles under the Pb layer at dm, including the penumbra at the edge of the layer and relative dose at the central beam axis (CAX), were studied with varying thicknesses and diameters of Pb. It is found that 2 mm of Pb is adequate to provide 5 half value layer (HVL) attenuation for the 4 MeV electron beams, and the beam profiles at dm are dependent on the diameter but not the thickness of the Pb. However, for the 9 and 16 MeV electron beams, the relative dose at the CAX and dm depends on both the thickness and diameter of the Pb layer. For 8 mm thickness of Pb, 4 and 5 HVL attenuation of electron beams with energies of 9 and 16 MeV can be achieved at dm, respectively. Moreover, the beam profile under the Pb layer at dm depends on: (1) the penumbra region at the edge of the Pb layer; (2) the beam attenuation varying with the thickness of the Pb layer; (3) the electron side scatter contributing to the CAX under the Pb layer; and (4) the photon contamination produced by the Pb layer. A parameter called “shielding area factor” (defined as the ratio of the length between two points of 50% relative doses in the beam profile at dm to the diameter of the Pb layer) is suggested to predict the required size and thickness of Pb for shielding a target with known dimension at dm. The dosimetric data calculated by Monte Carlo simulations in this study are useful to select the suitable thickness and size of Pb for the protection of critical tissue in electron radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.kh and 87.55.km.</description><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>electron dosimetry</subject><subject>electron radiotherapy</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Monte Carlo, Pb shielding</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2LFDEQxYMo7jp69yQBYW8zVpJOf3gQlvETdvGi55BOqp0M6aRNuneZ_97szqCrFyFFAu9Xj0o9Ql4y2DDG4c1em3Ha3DBwfMM71j4i50zyet11rHr84H1GnuW8B2CsFe1Tcsa6SrayE-fk9n3MbsQ5OUMtThgsBoM0DnTeIbVFCtnFoD01O520mTG5PDuTaQxUU4_a0rxz6C11gaJHM6eiJG1dLA5JT4e3hbuOYUa61clHmufFHp6TJ4P2GV-c7hX5_vHDt-3n9dXXT1-2l1drI4WU67qSVnSgq9baVvR910rWGd3yepBVj2ARm8G2sgEGEgYwMEgUddUK0Qw9cLEi746-09KPaA2GOWmvpuRGnQ4qaqf-VoLbqR_xRsmGQ1VDMbg4GaT4c8E8q9Flg97rgHHJqm54ObIu4Ot_wH1cUtlcVpx3wKWoS60IHCmTYs4Jh9-jMFB3mar7TNV9puou09Ly6uEX_jScQixAfQRuncfDfw3V5faaAzRS_AKkr7HX</recordid><startdate>20090429</startdate><enddate>20090429</enddate><creator>Chow, James C L</creator><creator>Grigorov, Grigor N</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090429</creationdate><title>Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study</title><author>Chow, James C L ; Grigorov, Grigor N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-645d390a48dd83bb98519ca826f54be0dee7fd85701050f0c0f5e3648337fb023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>electron dosimetry</topic><topic>electron radiotherapy</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Monte Carlo, Pb shielding</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chow, James C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigorov, Grigor N</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chow, James C L</au><au>Grigorov, Grigor N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2009-04-29</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>75-91</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the dosimetric dependence of the dimension of a lead (Pb) layer for shielding using clinical electron beams with different energies. Monte Carlo simulations were used to generate phase space files for the 4, 9 and 16 MeV electron beams produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator using the EGSnrc‐based BEAMnrc code, and validated by measurements using films. Pb layers with different thicknesses (2, 4, 6 and 8 mm) and diameters (2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 cm) were placed at the center of an electron field on a solid water phantom. Beam profiles were determined at the depth of maximum dose (dm) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose profiles under the Pb layer at dm, including the penumbra at the edge of the layer and relative dose at the central beam axis (CAX), were studied with varying thicknesses and diameters of Pb. It is found that 2 mm of Pb is adequate to provide 5 half value layer (HVL) attenuation for the 4 MeV electron beams, and the beam profiles at dm are dependent on the diameter but not the thickness of the Pb. However, for the 9 and 16 MeV electron beams, the relative dose at the CAX and dm depends on both the thickness and diameter of the Pb layer. For 8 mm thickness of Pb, 4 and 5 HVL attenuation of electron beams with energies of 9 and 16 MeV can be achieved at dm, respectively. Moreover, the beam profile under the Pb layer at dm depends on: (1) the penumbra region at the edge of the Pb layer; (2) the beam attenuation varying with the thickness of the Pb layer; (3) the electron side scatter contributing to the CAX under the Pb layer; and (4) the photon contamination produced by the Pb layer. A parameter called “shielding area factor” (defined as the ratio of the length between two points of 50% relative doses in the beam profile at dm to the diameter of the Pb layer) is suggested to predict the required size and thickness of Pb for shielding a target with known dimension at dm. The dosimetric data calculated by Monte Carlo simulations in this study are useful to select the suitable thickness and size of Pb for the protection of critical tissue in electron radiotherapy. PACS number: 87.53.Bn; 87.55.kh and 87.55.km.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>19458593</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2918</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2009-04, Vol.10 (2), p.75-91
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720460
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Dosimetry
electron dosimetry
electron radiotherapy
Electrons
Energy
Geometry
Humans
Lead
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo simulation
Monte Carlo, Pb shielding
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiation Protection
Radiation therapy
Radiometry - methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Studies
title Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20dependence%20of%20the%20dimensional%20characteristics%20on%20a%20lead%20shield%20in%20electron%20radiotherapy:%20a%20Monte%20Carlo%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Chow,%20James%20C%20L&rft.date=2009-04-29&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=75-91&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67267256%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290253625&rft_id=info:pmid/19458593&rfr_iscdi=true