Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chronic respiratory disease 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 220 |
container_title | Chronic respiratory disease |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Phan, Tina Carter, Owen Adams, Claire Waterer, Grant Chung, Li Ping Hawkins, Maxine Rudd, Cobie Ziman, Mel Strobel, Natalie |
description | The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression.
BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1479972316634604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1479972316634604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4188101271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w54QscWklArbjj_qCVFqgK1XiAJwj157sumTt1HYW-qf5DTjd7XapxMnWzPs-M2NPVb0i-B0hUr4nTColaUOEaJjA7Em1P4VqJRvydHunzV51kNI1xlRJwZ5Xe1QoxrDE-9Wfc5dMdEvntc9opXtnXb5FoUN5AegipMFl3aNT_9tBiWtv0TkMEVJywaNvRvfwFn0E83M3PPMr8DnEW3Q0mx3fme4k95SHfA7IBN-5uASLTO-8K0RknZ77kFya-rAP3AmkNwzn0aCzK5yEfrm8QGYRQ7GjcJVyHE12K0DD2C-D16WQdQl0ghfVs073CV5uzsPqx-dP388u6suvX2Znp5e14Q3NNdWGMyax5hhbhnnDrcbUdpQD7YxQJaiAW6oMN4IZYwALxoUVmnHFKTSH1Yc1dxivymimtBl13w7lpUs3bdCu_Tfj3aKdh1XLJcXkhBbA0QYQw80IKbfL8lHQ99pDGFNLTrASmJKGFembR9LrMEZfxisqSjiVmEwqvFaZGFKK0G2bIbidlql9vEzF8np3iK3hfnuKoF4Lkp7DTtX_Af8CWgHYHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821527014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression.
BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9723</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1479972316634604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26944070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis ; Anxiety Disorders - etiology ; Anxiety Disorders - psychology ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Inventory ; Male ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; Original Papers ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Chronic respiratory disease, 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016 2016 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720182/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720182/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1479972316634604?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterer, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Li Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziman, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><title>Chronic respiratory disease</title><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression.
BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1479-9723</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w54QscWklArbjj_qCVFqgK1XiAJwj157sumTt1HYW-qf5DTjd7XapxMnWzPs-M2NPVb0i-B0hUr4nTColaUOEaJjA7Em1P4VqJRvydHunzV51kNI1xlRJwZ5Xe1QoxrDE-9Wfc5dMdEvntc9opXtnXb5FoUN5AegipMFl3aNT_9tBiWtv0TkMEVJywaNvRvfwFn0E83M3PPMr8DnEW3Q0mx3fme4k95SHfA7IBN-5uASLTO-8K0RknZ77kFya-rAP3AmkNwzn0aCzK5yEfrm8QGYRQ7GjcJVyHE12K0DD2C-D16WQdQl0ghfVs073CV5uzsPqx-dP388u6suvX2Znp5e14Q3NNdWGMyax5hhbhnnDrcbUdpQD7YxQJaiAW6oMN4IZYwALxoUVmnHFKTSH1Yc1dxivymimtBl13w7lpUs3bdCu_Tfj3aKdh1XLJcXkhBbA0QYQw80IKbfL8lHQ99pDGFNLTrASmJKGFembR9LrMEZfxisqSjiVmEwqvFaZGFKK0G2bIbidlql9vEzF8np3iK3hfnuKoF4Lkp7DTtX_Af8CWgHYHA</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Phan, Tina</creator><creator>Carter, Owen</creator><creator>Adams, Claire</creator><creator>Waterer, Grant</creator><creator>Chung, Li Ping</creator><creator>Hawkins, Maxine</creator><creator>Rudd, Cobie</creator><creator>Ziman, Mel</creator><creator>Strobel, Natalie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><author>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterer, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Li Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziman, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phan, Tina</au><au>Carter, Owen</au><au>Adams, Claire</au><au>Waterer, Grant</au><au>Chung, Li Ping</au><au>Hawkins, Maxine</au><au>Rudd, Cobie</au><au>Ziman, Mel</au><au>Strobel, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>220-228</pages><issn>1479-9723</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><eissn>1479-9731</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression.
BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26944070</pmid><doi>10.1177/1479972316634604</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-9723 |
ispartof | Chronic respiratory disease, 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228 |
issn | 1479-9723 1479-9731 1479-9731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720182 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anxiety Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis Anxiety Disorders - etiology Anxiety Disorders - psychology Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Depression - diagnosis Depression - etiology Depression - psychology Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Inventory Male Mental depression Middle Aged Original Papers Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A10%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminant%20validity%20of%20the%20Hospital%20Anxiety%20and%20Depression%20Scale,%20Beck%20Depression%20Inventory%20(II)%20and%20Beck%20Anxiety%20Inventory%20to%20confirmed%20clinical%20diagnosis%20of%20depression%20and%20anxiety%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=Chronic%20respiratory%20disease&rft.au=Phan,%20Tina&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=220-228&rft.issn=1479-9723&rft.eissn=1479-9731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1479972316634604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E4188101271%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821527014&rft_id=info:pmid/26944070&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1479972316634604&rfr_iscdi=true |