Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chronic respiratory disease 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228
Hauptverfasser: Phan, Tina, Carter, Owen, Adams, Claire, Waterer, Grant, Chung, Li Ping, Hawkins, Maxine, Rudd, Cobie, Ziman, Mel, Strobel, Natalie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 3
container_start_page 220
container_title Chronic respiratory disease
container_volume 13
creator Phan, Tina
Carter, Owen
Adams, Claire
Waterer, Grant
Chung, Li Ping
Hawkins, Maxine
Rudd, Cobie
Ziman, Mel
Strobel, Natalie
description The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression. BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1479972316634604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1479972316634604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4188101271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w54QscWklArbjj_qCVFqgK1XiAJwj157sumTt1HYW-qf5DTjd7XapxMnWzPs-M2NPVb0i-B0hUr4nTColaUOEaJjA7Em1P4VqJRvydHunzV51kNI1xlRJwZ5Xe1QoxrDE-9Wfc5dMdEvntc9opXtnXb5FoUN5AegipMFl3aNT_9tBiWtv0TkMEVJywaNvRvfwFn0E83M3PPMr8DnEW3Q0mx3fme4k95SHfA7IBN-5uASLTO-8K0RknZ77kFya-rAP3AmkNwzn0aCzK5yEfrm8QGYRQ7GjcJVyHE12K0DD2C-D16WQdQl0ghfVs073CV5uzsPqx-dP388u6suvX2Znp5e14Q3NNdWGMyax5hhbhnnDrcbUdpQD7YxQJaiAW6oMN4IZYwALxoUVmnHFKTSH1Yc1dxivymimtBl13w7lpUs3bdCu_Tfj3aKdh1XLJcXkhBbA0QYQw80IKbfL8lHQ99pDGFNLTrASmJKGFembR9LrMEZfxisqSjiVmEwqvFaZGFKK0G2bIbidlql9vEzF8np3iK3hfnuKoF4Lkp7DTtX_Af8CWgHYHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821527014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression. BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9723</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1479972316634604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26944070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis ; Anxiety Disorders - etiology ; Anxiety Disorders - psychology ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Inventory ; Male ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; Original Papers ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Chronic respiratory disease, 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016 2016 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720182/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720182/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1479972316634604?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterer, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Li Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziman, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><title>Chronic respiratory disease</title><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression. BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1479-9723</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w54QscWklArbjj_qCVFqgK1XiAJwj157sumTt1HYW-qf5DTjd7XapxMnWzPs-M2NPVb0i-B0hUr4nTColaUOEaJjA7Em1P4VqJRvydHunzV51kNI1xlRJwZ5Xe1QoxrDE-9Wfc5dMdEvntc9opXtnXb5FoUN5AegipMFl3aNT_9tBiWtv0TkMEVJywaNvRvfwFn0E83M3PPMr8DnEW3Q0mx3fme4k95SHfA7IBN-5uASLTO-8K0RknZ77kFya-rAP3AmkNwzn0aCzK5yEfrm8QGYRQ7GjcJVyHE12K0DD2C-D16WQdQl0ghfVs073CV5uzsPqx-dP388u6suvX2Znp5e14Q3NNdWGMyax5hhbhnnDrcbUdpQD7YxQJaiAW6oMN4IZYwALxoUVmnHFKTSH1Yc1dxivymimtBl13w7lpUs3bdCu_Tfj3aKdh1XLJcXkhBbA0QYQw80IKbfL8lHQ99pDGFNLTrASmJKGFembR9LrMEZfxisqSjiVmEwqvFaZGFKK0G2bIbidlql9vEzF8np3iK3hfnuKoF4Lkp7DTtX_Af8CWgHYHA</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Phan, Tina</creator><creator>Carter, Owen</creator><creator>Adams, Claire</creator><creator>Waterer, Grant</creator><creator>Chung, Li Ping</creator><creator>Hawkins, Maxine</creator><creator>Rudd, Cobie</creator><creator>Ziman, Mel</creator><creator>Strobel, Natalie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</title><author>Phan, Tina ; Carter, Owen ; Adams, Claire ; Waterer, Grant ; Chung, Li Ping ; Hawkins, Maxine ; Rudd, Cobie ; Ziman, Mel ; Strobel, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-2ac54470a500d40535da02df25e2fc690d49e5d29c5c64ccce06456d6a45952e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phan, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterer, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Li Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Cobie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziman, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobel, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phan, Tina</au><au>Carter, Owen</au><au>Adams, Claire</au><au>Waterer, Grant</au><au>Chung, Li Ping</au><au>Hawkins, Maxine</au><au>Rudd, Cobie</au><au>Ziman, Mel</au><au>Strobel, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>220-228</pages><issn>1479-9723</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><eissn>1479-9731</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminant validity of commonly used depression and anxiety screening tools in order to determine the most suitable tool for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD patients (n = 56) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). These scores were compared to confirmed clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview. HADS depression subscale (HADS-D) sensitivity/specificity was 78/81%; BDI-II 89/77%; HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) 71/81%; and BAI 89/62%. HADS-D sensitivity/specificity was improved (100/83%) with the removal of Q4 ‘I feel as if I am slowed down’ and adjusted cut-off (≥5). Removal of BDI-II Q21 ‘Loss of interest in sex’ with adjusted cut-off ≥12 resulted in similar improvement (100/79%). No problematic items were identified for HADS-A or BAI. Previously reported low sensitivity/specificity of the HADS for COPD patients was not replicated. Furthermore, simple modifications of the HADS-D markedly improved sensitivity/specificity for depression. BDI-II, HADS-A and BAI produced acceptable sensitivity/specificity unmodified. Pending further research for COPD patients we recommend continued use of the HADS-A with standard cut-off (≥8) and removal of Q4 of the HADS-D with lower cut-off ≥5.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26944070</pmid><doi>10.1177/1479972316634604</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1479-9723
ispartof Chronic respiratory disease, 2016-08, Vol.13 (3), p.220-228
issn 1479-9723
1479-9731
1479-9731
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720182
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anxiety
Anxiety Disorders - diagnosis
Anxiety Disorders - etiology
Anxiety Disorders - psychology
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - etiology
Depression - psychology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Inventory
Male
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Original Papers
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A10%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminant%20validity%20of%20the%20Hospital%20Anxiety%20and%20Depression%20Scale,%20Beck%20Depression%20Inventory%20(II)%20and%20Beck%20Anxiety%20Inventory%20to%20confirmed%20clinical%20diagnosis%20of%20depression%20and%20anxiety%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=Chronic%20respiratory%20disease&rft.au=Phan,%20Tina&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=220-228&rft.issn=1479-9723&rft.eissn=1479-9731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1479972316634604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E4188101271%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821527014&rft_id=info:pmid/26944070&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1479972316634604&rfr_iscdi=true