Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?

Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?

Unconventional oil and gas extraction (UOGE) has spurred an unprecedented boom in on-shore production in the U.S. Despite a surge in related research, a void exists regarding inquiries into policy outcomes and perceptions. To address this, support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE is examin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental politics 2017, Vol.26 (3), p.521-545
Hauptverfasser: Malin, Stephanie A, Mayer, Adam, Shreeve, Kelly, Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K, Adgate, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 545
container_issue 3
container_start_page 521
container_title Environmental politics
container_volume 26
creator Malin, Stephanie A
Mayer, Adam
Shreeve, Kelly
Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K
Adgate, John
description Unconventional oil and gas extraction (UOGE) has spurred an unprecedented boom in on-shore production in the U.S. Despite a surge in related research, a void exists regarding inquiries into policy outcomes and perceptions. To address this, support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE is examined using survey data collected in 2015 from two northern Colorado communities. Current regulatory exemptions for UOGE can be understood as components of broader societal processes of neoliberalization. Free market ideology increases public support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE. Perceived negative impacts do not necessarily drive people to support increased federal regulation. Utilizing neo-Polanyian theory, interaction between free market ideology and perceived negative impacts is explored. Free market ideology appears to moderate people's views of regulation: the effect of perceived negative impacts while simultaneously increasing support for regulation. To conclude, the ways in which free market ideology might normalize the impacts of UOGE activity are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287627
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1975596766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1119-20a186076b13942b23ff3782055982ff610963882eba706f49356904f0953c533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMlOwzAQ9QFES-ETQL7BpcVLYsccQKi0UKmoFzhHTjIuBicudhqpf08qFsFlRpo3ehtCZ5RMKMnIFVEiSQgVE0aonFCWScHkARru7-M9MEDHMb4RQjOm2BEa9JOlCUuHCOYBAD_p8A4tXlTgnV_vsG4qfA8B1lunW-sbbBs87aGgK38R8co6Y8FV8RrPOltBUwI2PuA22I0DXPsOamharMvWdjbWtyfo0GgX4fR7j9DLfPY8fRwvVw-L6d1yvKGUqjEjmmaCSFFQrhJWMG4MlxkjaaoyZoygfSKeZQwKLYkwieKpUCQxRKW8TDkfoZsv3s22qKEqexNBu3wTbK3DLvfa5v-Rxr7ma9_lqeyr6-lG6PKbIPiPLcQ2r20swTndgN_GnCrZexFSiP71_K_Wr8hPt_wTf1h6MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975596766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Malin, Stephanie A ; Mayer, Adam ; Shreeve, Kelly ; Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K ; Adgate, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Malin, Stephanie A ; Mayer, Adam ; Shreeve, Kelly ; Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K ; Adgate, John</creatorcontrib><description>Unconventional oil and gas extraction (UOGE) has spurred an unprecedented boom in on-shore production in the U.S. Despite a surge in related research, a void exists regarding inquiries into policy outcomes and perceptions. To address this, support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE is examined using survey data collected in 2015 from two northern Colorado communities. Current regulatory exemptions for UOGE can be understood as components of broader societal processes of neoliberalization. Free market ideology increases public support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE. Perceived negative impacts do not necessarily drive people to support increased federal regulation. Utilizing neo-Polanyian theory, interaction between free market ideology and perceived negative impacts is explored. Free market ideology appears to moderate people's views of regulation: the effect of perceived negative impacts while simultaneously increasing support for regulation. To conclude, the ways in which free market ideology might normalize the impacts of UOGE activity are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287627</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29225425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Environmental politics, 2017, Vol.26 (3), p.521-545</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29225425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malin, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shreeve, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adgate, John</creatorcontrib><title>Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?</title><title>Environmental politics</title><addtitle>Env Polit</addtitle><description>Unconventional oil and gas extraction (UOGE) has spurred an unprecedented boom in on-shore production in the U.S. Despite a surge in related research, a void exists regarding inquiries into policy outcomes and perceptions. To address this, support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE is examined using survey data collected in 2015 from two northern Colorado communities. Current regulatory exemptions for UOGE can be understood as components of broader societal processes of neoliberalization. Free market ideology increases public support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE. Perceived negative impacts do not necessarily drive people to support increased federal regulation. Utilizing neo-Polanyian theory, interaction between free market ideology and perceived negative impacts is explored. Free market ideology appears to moderate people's views of regulation: the effect of perceived negative impacts while simultaneously increasing support for regulation. To conclude, the ways in which free market ideology might normalize the impacts of UOGE activity are discussed.</description><issn>0964-4016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUMlOwzAQ9QFES-ETQL7BpcVLYsccQKi0UKmoFzhHTjIuBicudhqpf08qFsFlRpo3ehtCZ5RMKMnIFVEiSQgVE0aonFCWScHkARru7-M9MEDHMb4RQjOm2BEa9JOlCUuHCOYBAD_p8A4tXlTgnV_vsG4qfA8B1lunW-sbbBs87aGgK38R8co6Y8FV8RrPOltBUwI2PuA22I0DXPsOamharMvWdjbWtyfo0GgX4fR7j9DLfPY8fRwvVw-L6d1yvKGUqjEjmmaCSFFQrhJWMG4MlxkjaaoyZoygfSKeZQwKLYkwieKpUCQxRKW8TDkfoZsv3s22qKEqexNBu3wTbK3DLvfa5v-Rxr7ma9_lqeyr6-lG6PKbIPiPLcQ2r20swTndgN_GnCrZexFSiP71_K_Wr8hPt_wTf1h6MA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Malin, Stephanie A</creator><creator>Mayer, Adam</creator><creator>Shreeve, Kelly</creator><creator>Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K</creator><creator>Adgate, John</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?</title><author>Malin, Stephanie A ; Mayer, Adam ; Shreeve, Kelly ; Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K ; Adgate, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1119-20a186076b13942b23ff3782055982ff610963882eba706f49356904f0953c533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malin, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shreeve, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adgate, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malin, Stephanie A</au><au>Mayer, Adam</au><au>Shreeve, Kelly</au><au>Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K</au><au>Adgate, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental politics</jtitle><addtitle>Env Polit</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>521-545</pages><issn>0964-4016</issn><abstract>Unconventional oil and gas extraction (UOGE) has spurred an unprecedented boom in on-shore production in the U.S. Despite a surge in related research, a void exists regarding inquiries into policy outcomes and perceptions. To address this, support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE is examined using survey data collected in 2015 from two northern Colorado communities. Current regulatory exemptions for UOGE can be understood as components of broader societal processes of neoliberalization. Free market ideology increases public support for federal regulatory exemptions for UOGE. Perceived negative impacts do not necessarily drive people to support increased federal regulation. Utilizing neo-Polanyian theory, interaction between free market ideology and perceived negative impacts is explored. Free market ideology appears to moderate people's views of regulation: the effect of perceived negative impacts while simultaneously increasing support for regulation. To conclude, the ways in which free market ideology might normalize the impacts of UOGE activity are discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29225425</pmid><doi>10.1080/09644016.2017.1287627</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4016
ispartof Environmental politics, 2017, Vol.26 (3), p.521-545
issn 0964-4016
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5720149
source EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
title Free Market Ideology and Deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Free%20Market%20Ideology%20and%20Deregulation%20in%20Colorado's%20Oilfields:%20Evidence%20for%20triple%20movement%20activism?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20politics&rft.au=Malin,%20Stephanie%20A&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=521-545&rft.issn=0964-4016&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09644016.2017.1287627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1975596766%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975596766&rft_id=info:pmid/29225425&rfr_iscdi=true