Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans

For PET/CT, fast CT acquisition time can lead to errors in attenuation correction, particularly at the lung/diaphragm interface. Gated 4D PET can reduce motion artifacts, though residual artifacts may persist depending on the CT dataset used for attenuation correction. We performed phantom studies t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2011, Vol.12 (4), p.261-274
Hauptverfasser: Killoran, Joseph H., Gerbaudo, Victor H, Mamede, Marcelo, Ionascu, Dan, Park, Sang‐June, Berbeco, Ross
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue 4
container_start_page 261
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 12
creator Killoran, Joseph H.
Gerbaudo, Victor H
Mamede, Marcelo
Ionascu, Dan
Park, Sang‐June
Berbeco, Ross
description For PET/CT, fast CT acquisition time can lead to errors in attenuation correction, particularly at the lung/diaphragm interface. Gated 4D PET can reduce motion artifacts, though residual artifacts may persist depending on the CT dataset used for attenuation correction. We performed phantom studies to evaluate 4D PET images of targets near a density interface using three different methods for attenuation correction: a single 3D CT (3D CTAC), an averaged 4D CT (CINE CTAC), and a fully phase matched 4D CT (4D CTAC). A phantom was designed with two density regions corresponding to diaphragm and lung. An 8 mL sphere phantom loaded with 18F‐FDG was used to represent a lung tumor and background FDG included at an 8:1 ratio. Motion patterns of sin(x) and sin4(x) were used for dynamic studies. Image data was acquired using a GE Discovery DVCT‐PET/CT scanner. Attenuation correction methods were compared based on normalized recovery coefficient (NRC), as well as a novel quantity “fixed activity volume” (FAV) introduced in our report. Image metrics were compared to those determined from a 3D PET scan with no motion present (3D STATIC). Values of FAV and NRC showed significant variation over the motion cycle when corrected by 3D CTAC images. 4D CTAC‐ and CINE CTAC–corrected PET images reduced these motion artifacts. The amount of artifact reduction is greater when the target is surrounded by lower density material and when motion was based on sin4(x). 4D CTAC reduced artifacts more than CINE CTAC for most scenarios. For a target surrounded by water equivalent material, there was no advantage to 4D CTAC over CINE CTAC when using the sin(x) motion pattern. Attenuation correction using both 4D CTAC or CINE CTAC can reduce motion artifacts in regions that include a tissue interface such as the lung/diaphragm border. 4D CTAC is more effective than CINE CTAC at reducing artifacts in some, but not all, scenarios. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.57.cp
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3502
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5718739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2290000969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-9ee95cecbd0fc606ec9ebc39dadbe1ea64ea5f48f3489f000aa016612e9fb0d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq2qqFDgzglZ6jlh7N0160slFD6KBIJDOFte7zhxlLVT20vFv-9uAghOnDzyPPN45JeQEwZTxjicrbTpNtNnxl05LSrg38gBq7iYSMnK7x_qffIzpRUAY3VR_yD7nEMtAaoD0t2H7IKnOmZntcmJBmP6GJ1fUJ1pXiJd935x1jq9WUa96KjzGeOAIu3TSJWXdDYf2Iy-11uXCTGi2ZbBjv3HqzlNRvt0RPasXic8fj0PydP11Xz2Z3L3cHM7u7ibGAGCTSSirAyapgU73qCR2JhCtrptkKEWJerKlrUtylpaANAamBCMo7QNtFAckt8776ZvOmwN-hz1Wm2i63R8UUE79bnj3VItwrOqzll9XshB8OtVEMPfHlNWq9BHP-ysOB9-DkCKkYIdZWJIKaJ9f4GBGgNS24DUNiA1BjSMnH7c7H3gLZEBEDvgn1vjy5dCdTG758AFK_4DuvihZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290000969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Killoran, Joseph H. ; Gerbaudo, Victor H ; Mamede, Marcelo ; Ionascu, Dan ; Park, Sang‐June ; Berbeco, Ross</creator><creatorcontrib>Killoran, Joseph H. ; Gerbaudo, Victor H ; Mamede, Marcelo ; Ionascu, Dan ; Park, Sang‐June ; Berbeco, Ross</creatorcontrib><description>For PET/CT, fast CT acquisition time can lead to errors in attenuation correction, particularly at the lung/diaphragm interface. Gated 4D PET can reduce motion artifacts, though residual artifacts may persist depending on the CT dataset used for attenuation correction. We performed phantom studies to evaluate 4D PET images of targets near a density interface using three different methods for attenuation correction: a single 3D CT (3D CTAC), an averaged 4D CT (CINE CTAC), and a fully phase matched 4D CT (4D CTAC). A phantom was designed with two density regions corresponding to diaphragm and lung. An 8 mL sphere phantom loaded with 18F‐FDG was used to represent a lung tumor and background FDG included at an 8:1 ratio. Motion patterns of sin(x) and sin4(x) were used for dynamic studies. Image data was acquired using a GE Discovery DVCT‐PET/CT scanner. Attenuation correction methods were compared based on normalized recovery coefficient (NRC), as well as a novel quantity “fixed activity volume” (FAV) introduced in our report. Image metrics were compared to those determined from a 3D PET scan with no motion present (3D STATIC). Values of FAV and NRC showed significant variation over the motion cycle when corrected by 3D CTAC images. 4D CTAC‐ and CINE CTAC–corrected PET images reduced these motion artifacts. The amount of artifact reduction is greater when the target is surrounded by lower density material and when motion was based on sin4(x). 4D CTAC reduced artifacts more than CINE CTAC for most scenarios. For a target surrounded by water equivalent material, there was no advantage to 4D CTAC over CINE CTAC when using the sin(x) motion pattern. Attenuation correction using both 4D CTAC or CINE CTAC can reduce motion artifacts in regions that include a tissue interface such as the lung/diaphragm border. 4D CTAC is more effective than CINE CTAC at reducing artifacts in some, but not all, scenarios. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.57.cp</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3502</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22089005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>4D PET ; Algorithms ; attenuation correction ; Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging ; Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Liver ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Medical Imaging ; Methods ; Motion ; motion artifacts ; Patients ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Radiation therapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scanners ; Studies ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2011, Vol.12 (4), p.261-274</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors.</rights><rights>2011. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-9ee95cecbd0fc606ec9ebc39dadbe1ea64ea5f48f3489f000aa016612e9fb0d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-9ee95cecbd0fc606ec9ebc39dadbe1ea64ea5f48f3489f000aa016612e9fb0d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718739/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718739/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22089005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Killoran, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbaudo, Victor H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamede, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sang‐June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbeco, Ross</creatorcontrib><title>Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>For PET/CT, fast CT acquisition time can lead to errors in attenuation correction, particularly at the lung/diaphragm interface. Gated 4D PET can reduce motion artifacts, though residual artifacts may persist depending on the CT dataset used for attenuation correction. We performed phantom studies to evaluate 4D PET images of targets near a density interface using three different methods for attenuation correction: a single 3D CT (3D CTAC), an averaged 4D CT (CINE CTAC), and a fully phase matched 4D CT (4D CTAC). A phantom was designed with two density regions corresponding to diaphragm and lung. An 8 mL sphere phantom loaded with 18F‐FDG was used to represent a lung tumor and background FDG included at an 8:1 ratio. Motion patterns of sin(x) and sin4(x) were used for dynamic studies. Image data was acquired using a GE Discovery DVCT‐PET/CT scanner. Attenuation correction methods were compared based on normalized recovery coefficient (NRC), as well as a novel quantity “fixed activity volume” (FAV) introduced in our report. Image metrics were compared to those determined from a 3D PET scan with no motion present (3D STATIC). Values of FAV and NRC showed significant variation over the motion cycle when corrected by 3D CTAC images. 4D CTAC‐ and CINE CTAC–corrected PET images reduced these motion artifacts. The amount of artifact reduction is greater when the target is surrounded by lower density material and when motion was based on sin4(x). 4D CTAC reduced artifacts more than CINE CTAC for most scenarios. For a target surrounded by water equivalent material, there was no advantage to 4D CTAC over CINE CTAC when using the sin(x) motion pattern. Attenuation correction using both 4D CTAC or CINE CTAC can reduce motion artifacts in regions that include a tissue interface such as the lung/diaphragm border. 4D CTAC is more effective than CINE CTAC at reducing artifacts in some, but not all, scenarios. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.57.cp</description><subject>4D PET</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>attenuation correction</subject><subject>Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>motion artifacts</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq2qqFDgzglZ6jlh7N0160slFD6KBIJDOFte7zhxlLVT20vFv-9uAghOnDzyPPN45JeQEwZTxjicrbTpNtNnxl05LSrg38gBq7iYSMnK7x_qffIzpRUAY3VR_yD7nEMtAaoD0t2H7IKnOmZntcmJBmP6GJ1fUJ1pXiJd935x1jq9WUa96KjzGeOAIu3TSJWXdDYf2Iy-11uXCTGi2ZbBjv3HqzlNRvt0RPasXic8fj0PydP11Xz2Z3L3cHM7u7ibGAGCTSSirAyapgU73qCR2JhCtrptkKEWJerKlrUtylpaANAamBCMo7QNtFAckt8776ZvOmwN-hz1Wm2i63R8UUE79bnj3VItwrOqzll9XshB8OtVEMPfHlNWq9BHP-ysOB9-DkCKkYIdZWJIKaJ9f4GBGgNS24DUNiA1BjSMnH7c7H3gLZEBEDvgn1vjy5dCdTG758AFK_4DuvihZA</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Killoran, Joseph H.</creator><creator>Gerbaudo, Victor H</creator><creator>Mamede, Marcelo</creator><creator>Ionascu, Dan</creator><creator>Park, Sang‐June</creator><creator>Berbeco, Ross</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans</title><author>Killoran, Joseph H. ; Gerbaudo, Victor H ; Mamede, Marcelo ; Ionascu, Dan ; Park, Sang‐June ; Berbeco, Ross</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6061-9ee95cecbd0fc606ec9ebc39dadbe1ea64ea5f48f3489f000aa016612e9fb0d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>4D PET</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>attenuation correction</topic><topic>Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>motion artifacts</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Killoran, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbaudo, Victor H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamede, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sang‐June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berbeco, Ross</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Killoran, Joseph H.</au><au>Gerbaudo, Victor H</au><au>Mamede, Marcelo</au><au>Ionascu, Dan</au><au>Park, Sang‐June</au><au>Berbeco, Ross</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>261-274</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>For PET/CT, fast CT acquisition time can lead to errors in attenuation correction, particularly at the lung/diaphragm interface. Gated 4D PET can reduce motion artifacts, though residual artifacts may persist depending on the CT dataset used for attenuation correction. We performed phantom studies to evaluate 4D PET images of targets near a density interface using three different methods for attenuation correction: a single 3D CT (3D CTAC), an averaged 4D CT (CINE CTAC), and a fully phase matched 4D CT (4D CTAC). A phantom was designed with two density regions corresponding to diaphragm and lung. An 8 mL sphere phantom loaded with 18F‐FDG was used to represent a lung tumor and background FDG included at an 8:1 ratio. Motion patterns of sin(x) and sin4(x) were used for dynamic studies. Image data was acquired using a GE Discovery DVCT‐PET/CT scanner. Attenuation correction methods were compared based on normalized recovery coefficient (NRC), as well as a novel quantity “fixed activity volume” (FAV) introduced in our report. Image metrics were compared to those determined from a 3D PET scan with no motion present (3D STATIC). Values of FAV and NRC showed significant variation over the motion cycle when corrected by 3D CTAC images. 4D CTAC‐ and CINE CTAC–corrected PET images reduced these motion artifacts. The amount of artifact reduction is greater when the target is surrounded by lower density material and when motion was based on sin4(x). 4D CTAC reduced artifacts more than CINE CTAC for most scenarios. For a target surrounded by water equivalent material, there was no advantage to 4D CTAC over CINE CTAC when using the sin(x) motion pattern. Attenuation correction using both 4D CTAC or CINE CTAC can reduce motion artifacts in regions that include a tissue interface such as the lung/diaphragm border. 4D CTAC is more effective than CINE CTAC at reducing artifacts in some, but not all, scenarios. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.57.cp</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>22089005</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3502</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2011, Vol.12 (4), p.261-274
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5718739
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects 4D PET
Algorithms
attenuation correction
Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Liver
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Medical Imaging
Methods
Motion
motion artifacts
Patients
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radiation therapy
Reproducibility of Results
Scanners
Studies
Tomography
title Motion artifacts occurring at the lung/diaphragm interface using 4D CT attenuation correction of 4D PET scans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion%20artifacts%20occurring%20at%20the%20lung/diaphragm%20interface%20using%204D%20CT%20attenuation%20correction%20of%204D%20PET%20scans&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Killoran,%20Joseph%20H.&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=261-274&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2290000969%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290000969&rft_id=info:pmid/22089005&rfr_iscdi=true