An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors

In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2012-07, Vol.13 (4), p.36-43
Hauptverfasser: Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya, Vaitheeswaran, R., Bhangle, Janhavi R., Basu, Sumit, Maiya, Vikram, Zade, Bhooshan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue 4
container_start_page 36
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 13
creator Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya
Vaitheeswaran, R.
Bhangle, Janhavi R.
Basu, Sumit
Maiya, Vikram
Zade, Bhooshan
description In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and neck cases to carry out the study. Basically the methodology uses a parameter called “Beam Intensity Profile Perturbation Score” (BIPPS) to determine the suitable beam angles in IMRT. We used two set of plans in which one set contains plans with equispaced beam configuration starting from beam numbers 3 to 18, and another set contains plans with optimal beam angles chosen using the in‐house BAO algorithm. We used quadratic dose‐based single criteria objective function as a measure of the quality of a plan. The objective function scores obtained for equispaced beam plans and optimal beam angle plans for six head and neck cases were plotted against the beam numbers in a single graphical plot for effective comparison. It is observed that the optimization of beam angles reduces the beam numbers required to produce clinically acceptable dose distribution in IMRT of head and neck tumors. Especially N0.1 (represents the beam number at which the objective function reaches a value of 0.1) is considerably reduced by beam angle optimization in almost all the cases included in the study. We believe that the experimental findings of this study will be helpful in understanding the interplay between beam angle optimization and beam number selection process in IMRT which, in turn, can be used to improve the performance of BAO algorithms and beam number selection process in IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.de
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3912
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5716515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024094253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5416-dddcc317a2c4c95ffd382cd57066e014c5ecfb9e27a51d73e9573b55bf959f5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS0EoqVw54QsceGS4D_r3fiCFEVQKrVCQuVsee1x4rBrL_ZuoHyBfm2cJlQtFyRLY8385snPD6HXlMwpZeT9Vpt-mO8o99WcS8qeoFMqWD2TklZPH9xP0Iuct4RQuuCL5-iEsaaupRCn6HYZMPwaIPkewqg77MMO8ujXevQx4HLGDWBwDsyIo8Mt6B7rsO4Ax2H0vf_9CExgJ3NoHNkw9S2kXHTxxdXX631_A9oWDYsDmO94nPqY8kv0zOkuw6tjPUPfPn28Xn2eXX45v1gtL2dGVLSeWWuN4bTRzFRGCucsXzBjRUPqGgitjADjWgms0YLahoMUDW-FaJ0U0gnHz9CHg-4wtT1YU0wn3amh-NfpRkXt1eNJ8Bu1jjslGloLKorAu6NAij-m8lWq99lA1-kAccqKElYRWTHBC_r2H3QbpxSKPcWYJLQpaZBCkQNlUsw5gbt_DCVqn7K6S1ndpaz2KZeVNw9N3C_8jbUA9QH46Tu4-a-gWq6uGCG85n8ADAa4fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290171830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya ; Vaitheeswaran, R. ; Bhangle, Janhavi R. ; Basu, Sumit ; Maiya, Vikram ; Zade, Bhooshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya ; Vaitheeswaran, R. ; Bhangle, Janhavi R. ; Basu, Sumit ; Maiya, Vikram ; Zade, Bhooshan</creatorcontrib><description>In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and neck cases to carry out the study. Basically the methodology uses a parameter called “Beam Intensity Profile Perturbation Score” (BIPPS) to determine the suitable beam angles in IMRT. We used two set of plans in which one set contains plans with equispaced beam configuration starting from beam numbers 3 to 18, and another set contains plans with optimal beam angles chosen using the in‐house BAO algorithm. We used quadratic dose‐based single criteria objective function as a measure of the quality of a plan. The objective function scores obtained for equispaced beam plans and optimal beam angle plans for six head and neck cases were plotted against the beam numbers in a single graphical plot for effective comparison. It is observed that the optimization of beam angles reduces the beam numbers required to produce clinically acceptable dose distribution in IMRT of head and neck tumors. Especially N0.1 (represents the beam number at which the objective function reaches a value of 0.1) is considerably reduced by beam angle optimization in almost all the cases included in the study. We believe that the experimental findings of this study will be helpful in understanding the interplay between beam angle optimization and beam number selection process in IMRT which, in turn, can be used to improve the performance of BAO algorithms and beam number selection process in IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.de</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3912</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22766955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; beam angles ; beam number ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; IMRT ; inverse planning ; Neck ; Optimization ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Spinal cord ; Studies ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2012-07, Vol.13 (4), p.36-43</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors.</rights><rights>2012. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5416-dddcc317a2c4c95ffd382cd57066e014c5ecfb9e27a51d73e9573b55bf959f5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5416-dddcc317a2c4c95ffd382cd57066e014c5ecfb9e27a51d73e9573b55bf959f5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716515/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5716515/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaitheeswaran, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhangle, Janhavi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiya, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zade, Bhooshan</creatorcontrib><title>An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and neck cases to carry out the study. Basically the methodology uses a parameter called “Beam Intensity Profile Perturbation Score” (BIPPS) to determine the suitable beam angles in IMRT. We used two set of plans in which one set contains plans with equispaced beam configuration starting from beam numbers 3 to 18, and another set contains plans with optimal beam angles chosen using the in‐house BAO algorithm. We used quadratic dose‐based single criteria objective function as a measure of the quality of a plan. The objective function scores obtained for equispaced beam plans and optimal beam angle plans for six head and neck cases were plotted against the beam numbers in a single graphical plot for effective comparison. It is observed that the optimization of beam angles reduces the beam numbers required to produce clinically acceptable dose distribution in IMRT of head and neck tumors. Especially N0.1 (represents the beam number at which the objective function reaches a value of 0.1) is considerably reduced by beam angle optimization in almost all the cases included in the study. We believe that the experimental findings of this study will be helpful in understanding the interplay between beam angle optimization and beam number selection process in IMRT which, in turn, can be used to improve the performance of BAO algorithms and beam number selection process in IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.de</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>beam angles</subject><subject>beam number</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IMRT</subject><subject>inverse planning</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vEzEQxS0EoqVw54QsceGS4D_r3fiCFEVQKrVCQuVsee1x4rBrL_ZuoHyBfm2cJlQtFyRLY8385snPD6HXlMwpZeT9Vpt-mO8o99WcS8qeoFMqWD2TklZPH9xP0Iuct4RQuuCL5-iEsaaupRCn6HYZMPwaIPkewqg77MMO8ujXevQx4HLGDWBwDsyIo8Mt6B7rsO4Ax2H0vf_9CExgJ3NoHNkw9S2kXHTxxdXX631_A9oWDYsDmO94nPqY8kv0zOkuw6tjPUPfPn28Xn2eXX45v1gtL2dGVLSeWWuN4bTRzFRGCucsXzBjRUPqGgitjADjWgms0YLahoMUDW-FaJ0U0gnHz9CHg-4wtT1YU0wn3amh-NfpRkXt1eNJ8Bu1jjslGloLKorAu6NAij-m8lWq99lA1-kAccqKElYRWTHBC_r2H3QbpxSKPcWYJLQpaZBCkQNlUsw5gbt_DCVqn7K6S1ndpaz2KZeVNw9N3C_8jbUA9QH46Tu4-a-gWq6uGCG85n8ADAa4fg</recordid><startdate>20120705</startdate><enddate>20120705</enddate><creator>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya</creator><creator>Vaitheeswaran, R.</creator><creator>Bhangle, Janhavi R.</creator><creator>Basu, Sumit</creator><creator>Maiya, Vikram</creator><creator>Zade, Bhooshan</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120705</creationdate><title>An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors</title><author>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya ; Vaitheeswaran, R. ; Bhangle, Janhavi R. ; Basu, Sumit ; Maiya, Vikram ; Zade, Bhooshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5416-dddcc317a2c4c95ffd382cd57066e014c5ecfb9e27a51d73e9573b55bf959f5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>beam angles</topic><topic>beam number</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IMRT</topic><topic>inverse planning</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaitheeswaran, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhangle, Janhavi R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiya, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zade, Bhooshan</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Narayanan, V. K. Sathiya</au><au>Vaitheeswaran, R.</au><au>Bhangle, Janhavi R.</au><au>Basu, Sumit</au><au>Maiya, Vikram</au><au>Zade, Bhooshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-07-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>36-43</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and neck cases to carry out the study. Basically the methodology uses a parameter called “Beam Intensity Profile Perturbation Score” (BIPPS) to determine the suitable beam angles in IMRT. We used two set of plans in which one set contains plans with equispaced beam configuration starting from beam numbers 3 to 18, and another set contains plans with optimal beam angles chosen using the in‐house BAO algorithm. We used quadratic dose‐based single criteria objective function as a measure of the quality of a plan. The objective function scores obtained for equispaced beam plans and optimal beam angle plans for six head and neck cases were plotted against the beam numbers in a single graphical plot for effective comparison. It is observed that the optimization of beam angles reduces the beam numbers required to produce clinically acceptable dose distribution in IMRT of head and neck tumors. Especially N0.1 (represents the beam number at which the objective function reaches a value of 0.1) is considerably reduced by beam angle optimization in almost all the cases included in the study. We believe that the experimental findings of this study will be helpful in understanding the interplay between beam angle optimization and beam number selection process in IMRT which, in turn, can be used to improve the performance of BAO algorithms and beam number selection process in IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.de</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>22766955</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3912</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2012-07, Vol.13 (4), p.36-43
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5716515
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
beam angles
beam number
Head & neck cancer
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
IMRT
inverse planning
Neck
Optimization
Radiation Oncology Physics
radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Spinal cord
Studies
Tumors
title An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A54%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20experimental%20investigation%20on%20the%20effect%20of%20beam%20angle%20optimization%20on%20the%20reduction%20of%20beam%20numbers%20in%20IMRT%20of%20head%20and%20neck%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Narayanan,%20V.%20K.%20Sathiya&rft.date=2012-07-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=36-43&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3912&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024094253%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290171830&rft_id=info:pmid/22766955&rfr_iscdi=true