Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking
Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a cu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 208 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Journal of applied clinical medical physics |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Butler, Wayne M. Merrick, Gregory S. Reed, Joshua L. Murray, Brian C. Kurko, Brian S. |
description | Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by > 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other.
PACS number: 87.50.st |
doi_str_mv | 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5714377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289627260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQXSEqWgp3TsgS5wR_rT8uSFUEtFJRL3C2HO84OOyuF9sbyI2fwG_kl9RpSlVOnGY8896bGb-meUXwkhCK326tG6bljvBAl5xw8qQ5Iy0VC60Jf_ooP22e57zFmBDF1LPmlDIusebsrPl5NZZkfbKuhDiiLuSptw4GGAuKHk0pjoB2kPKcUZ6nUF-1lostNYk5HFhh3KChhhITdGi9Rwls_-fX7xIGQNCDKykOdjNCCQ7Vae5bZbxoTrztM7y8j-fNlw_vP68uF9c3H69WF9cL10qsFtoSK3zHOFm3ljjfqY4rJ7XXIIB5R7THoIRkayxV57QQVna4lcxDpxTV7Lx5d9Sd5vUAnYPDvb2ZUhhs2ptog_m3M4avZhN3ppWEMymrwJt7gRS_z5CL2cY5jXVnQ6nSgkoqcEXhI8rV38kJ_MMEgs3BK3Pnlbnzyhy8qpTXjzd7IPw1pwLEEfAj9LD_r6C5WH2imGjFbgHEZaid</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289627260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><description>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by > 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other.
PACS number: 87.50.st</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23470943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Calypso ; Computer Systems ; Dose Fractionation ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; external beam radiation ; fiducials ; Humans ; intrafraction motion ; Lasers ; Localization ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Patient Positioning - instrumentation ; Patient Positioning - methods ; Patients ; Prone Position ; prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiration ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Supine Position ; Telemetry - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23470943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrick, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by > 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other.
PACS number: 87.50.st</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Calypso</subject><subject>Computer Systems</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>external beam radiation</subject><subject>fiducials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intrafraction motion</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - instrumentation</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>prostate</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><subject>Telemetry - instrumentation</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQXSEqWgp3TsgS5wR_rT8uSFUEtFJRL3C2HO84OOyuF9sbyI2fwG_kl9RpSlVOnGY8896bGb-meUXwkhCK326tG6bljvBAl5xw8qQ5Iy0VC60Jf_ooP22e57zFmBDF1LPmlDIusebsrPl5NZZkfbKuhDiiLuSptw4GGAuKHk0pjoB2kPKcUZ6nUF-1lostNYk5HFhh3KChhhITdGi9Rwls_-fX7xIGQNCDKykOdjNCCQ7Vae5bZbxoTrztM7y8j-fNlw_vP68uF9c3H69WF9cL10qsFtoSK3zHOFm3ljjfqY4rJ7XXIIB5R7THoIRkayxV57QQVna4lcxDpxTV7Lx5d9Sd5vUAnYPDvb2ZUhhs2ptog_m3M4avZhN3ppWEMymrwJt7gRS_z5CL2cY5jXVnQ6nSgkoqcEXhI8rV38kJ_MMEgs3BK3Pnlbnzyhy8qpTXjzd7IPw1pwLEEfAj9LD_r6C5WH2imGjFbgHEZaid</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Butler, Wayne M.</creator><creator>Merrick, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Reed, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Murray, Brian C.</creator><creator>Kurko, Brian S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><author>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Calypso</topic><topic>Computer Systems</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>external beam radiation</topic><topic>fiducials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intrafraction motion</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - instrumentation</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>prostate</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><topic>Telemetry - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrick, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, Wayne M.</au><au>Merrick, Gregory S.</au><au>Reed, Joshua L.</au><au>Murray, Brian C.</au><au>Kurko, Brian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>198-208</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by > 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other.
PACS number: 87.50.st</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>23470943</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208 |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5714377 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdomen Calypso Computer Systems Dose Fractionation Electromagnetic Fields Equipment Design Equipment Failure Analysis external beam radiation fiducials Humans intrafraction motion Lasers Localization Male Medical imaging Patient Positioning - instrumentation Patient Positioning - methods Patients Prone Position prostate Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiation Oncology Physics Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Conformal Reproducibility of Results Respiration Sensitivity and Specificity Supine Position Telemetry - instrumentation |
title | Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T22%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrafraction%20displacement%20of%20prone%20versus%20supine%20prostate%20positioning%20monitored%20by%20real%E2%80%90time%20electromagnetic%20tracking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Butler,%20Wayne%20M.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=198-208&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2289627260%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289627260&rft_id=info:pmid/23470943&rfr_iscdi=true |