Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking

Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a cu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208
Hauptverfasser: Butler, Wayne M., Merrick, Gregory S., Reed, Joshua L., Murray, Brian C., Kurko, Brian S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 208
container_issue 2
container_start_page 198
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 14
creator Butler, Wayne M.
Merrick, Gregory S.
Reed, Joshua L.
Murray, Brian C.
Kurko, Brian S.
description Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by > 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other. PACS number: 87.50.st
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5714377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2289627260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQXSEqWgp3TsgS5wR_rT8uSFUEtFJRL3C2HO84OOyuF9sbyI2fwG_kl9RpSlVOnGY8896bGb-meUXwkhCK326tG6bljvBAl5xw8qQ5Iy0VC60Jf_ooP22e57zFmBDF1LPmlDIusebsrPl5NZZkfbKuhDiiLuSptw4GGAuKHk0pjoB2kPKcUZ6nUF-1lostNYk5HFhh3KChhhITdGi9Rwls_-fX7xIGQNCDKykOdjNCCQ7Vae5bZbxoTrztM7y8j-fNlw_vP68uF9c3H69WF9cL10qsFtoSK3zHOFm3ljjfqY4rJ7XXIIB5R7THoIRkayxV57QQVna4lcxDpxTV7Lx5d9Sd5vUAnYPDvb2ZUhhs2ptog_m3M4avZhN3ppWEMymrwJt7gRS_z5CL2cY5jXVnQ6nSgkoqcEXhI8rV38kJ_MMEgs3BK3Pnlbnzyhy8qpTXjzd7IPw1pwLEEfAj9LD_r6C5WH2imGjFbgHEZaid</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289627260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><description>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by &gt; 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other. PACS number: 87.50.st</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23470943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Calypso ; Computer Systems ; Dose Fractionation ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; external beam radiation ; fiducials ; Humans ; intrafraction motion ; Lasers ; Localization ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Patient Positioning - instrumentation ; Patient Positioning - methods ; Patients ; Prone Position ; prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiration ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Supine Position ; Telemetry - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors.</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23470943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrick, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by &gt; 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other. PACS number: 87.50.st</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Calypso</subject><subject>Computer Systems</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>external beam radiation</subject><subject>fiducials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intrafraction motion</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - instrumentation</subject><subject>Patient Positioning - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>prostate</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Conformal</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><subject>Telemetry - instrumentation</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQXSEqWgp3TsgS5wR_rT8uSFUEtFJRL3C2HO84OOyuF9sbyI2fwG_kl9RpSlVOnGY8896bGb-meUXwkhCK326tG6bljvBAl5xw8qQ5Iy0VC60Jf_ooP22e57zFmBDF1LPmlDIusebsrPl5NZZkfbKuhDiiLuSptw4GGAuKHk0pjoB2kPKcUZ6nUF-1lostNYk5HFhh3KChhhITdGi9Rwls_-fX7xIGQNCDKykOdjNCCQ7Vae5bZbxoTrztM7y8j-fNlw_vP68uF9c3H69WF9cL10qsFtoSK3zHOFm3ljjfqY4rJ7XXIIB5R7THoIRkayxV57QQVna4lcxDpxTV7Lx5d9Sd5vUAnYPDvb2ZUhhs2ptog_m3M4avZhN3ppWEMymrwJt7gRS_z5CL2cY5jXVnQ6nSgkoqcEXhI8rV38kJ_MMEgs3BK3Pnlbnzyhy8qpTXjzd7IPw1pwLEEfAj9LD_r6C5WH2imGjFbgHEZaid</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Butler, Wayne M.</creator><creator>Merrick, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Reed, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Murray, Brian C.</creator><creator>Kurko, Brian S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</title><author>Butler, Wayne M. ; Merrick, Gregory S. ; Reed, Joshua L. ; Murray, Brian C. ; Kurko, Brian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5708-9a1a6fd341b5a1cfd8d48c79f9e6e3fc19f0e8673b078dc966a7d0573fed88293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Calypso</topic><topic>Computer Systems</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>external beam radiation</topic><topic>fiducials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intrafraction motion</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - instrumentation</topic><topic>Patient Positioning - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>prostate</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Conformal</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><topic>Telemetry - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, Wayne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merrick, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurko, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, Wayne M.</au><au>Merrick, Gregory S.</au><au>Reed, Joshua L.</au><au>Murray, Brian C.</au><au>Kurko, Brian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>198-208</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Implanted radiofrequency transponders were used for real‐time monitoring of the intrafraction prostate displacement between patients in the prone position and the same patients in the supine position. Thirteen patients had three transponders implanted transperineally and were treated prone with a custom‐fitted thermoplastic immobilization device. After collecting data from the last fraction, patients were realigned in the supine position and the displacements of the transponders were monitored for 5–7 minutes. Fourier transforms were applied to the data from each patient to determine periodicity and its amplitude. To remove auto correlation from the stream of displacement data, the distribution of short‐term and long‐term velocity components were calculated from Poincaré plots of paired sequential vector displacements. The mean absolute displacement was significantly greater prone than supine in the superior–inferior (SI) plane (1.2±0.6mm vs. 0.6±0.4mm, p=0.015), but not for the lateral or anterior–posterior (AP) planes. Displacements were least in the lateral direction. Fourier analyses showed the amplitude of respiratory oscillations was much greater for the SI and AP planes in the prone versus the supine position. Analysis of Poincaré plots confirmed greater short‐term variance in the prone position, but no difference in the long‐term variance. The centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by &gt; 5 mm for 1.9% of the time versus 0.8% of the time for supine. These results confirmed significantly greater net intrafraction prostate displacement of patients in the prone position than in the supine position, but most of the difference was due to respiration‐induced motion that was most pronounced in the SI and AP directions. Because the respiratory motion remained within the action threshold and also within our 5 mm treatment planning margins, there is no compelling reason to choose one treatment position over the other. PACS number: 87.50.st</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>23470943</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2013-03, Vol.14 (2), p.198-208
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5714377
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Abdomen
Calypso
Computer Systems
Dose Fractionation
Electromagnetic Fields
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure Analysis
external beam radiation
fiducials
Humans
intrafraction motion
Lasers
Localization
Male
Medical imaging
Patient Positioning - instrumentation
Patient Positioning - methods
Patients
Prone Position
prostate
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Conformal
Reproducibility of Results
Respiration
Sensitivity and Specificity
Supine Position
Telemetry - instrumentation
title Intrafraction displacement of prone versus supine prostate positioning monitored by real‐time electromagnetic tracking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T22%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrafraction%20displacement%20of%20prone%20versus%20supine%20prostate%20positioning%20monitored%20by%20real%E2%80%90time%20electromagnetic%20tracking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Butler,%20Wayne%20M.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=198-208&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2289627260%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289627260&rft_id=info:pmid/23470943&rfr_iscdi=true