Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector

A commercial version of a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (SCDD) in a Schottky diode configuration was recently released as the new type 60019 microDiamond detector (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). In this study we investigate the dosimetric properties of this detector to independently confirm tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2014-11, Vol.15 (6), p.92-102
Hauptverfasser: Laub, Wolfram U., Crilly, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 6
container_start_page 92
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 15
creator Laub, Wolfram U.
Crilly, Richard
description A commercial version of a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (SCDD) in a Schottky diode configuration was recently released as the new type 60019 microDiamond detector (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). In this study we investigate the dosimetric properties of this detector to independently confirm that findings from the developing group of the SCDDs still hold true for the commercial version of the SCDDs. We further explore if the use of the microDiamond detector can be expanded to high‐energy photon beams of up to 15 MV and to large field measurements. Measurements were performed with an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator delivering 6, 10, and 15 MV X‐rays, as well as 6, 9, 12, 15, and 20 MeV electron beams. The dependence of the microdiamond detector response on absorbed dose after connecting the detector was investigated. Furthermore, the dark current of the diamond detector was observed after irradiation. Results are compared to similar results from measurements with a diamond detector type 60003. Energy dependency was investigated, as well. Photon depth‐dose curves were measured for field sizes 3×3,10×10, and 30×30cm2. PDDs were measured with the Semiflex type 31010 detector, microLion type 31018 detector, P Diode type 60016, SRS Diode type 60018, and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Photon profiles were measured at a depth of 10 cm. Electron depth‐dose curves normalized to the dose maximum were measured with the 14×14cm2 electron cone. PDDs were measured with a Markus chamber type 23343, an E Diode type 60017 and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Profiles were measured with the E Diode and microDiamond at half of D90,D90,D70, and D50 depths and for electron cone sizes of 6×6cm2, 14×14cm2, and 20×20cm2. Within a tolerance of 0.5% detector response of the investigated detector was stable without any preirradiation. After preirradition with approximately 250 cGy the detector response was stable within 0.1%. A dark current after irradiation was not observed. The microDiamond detector shows no energy dependence in high energy photon or electron dosimetry. Electron PDD measurements with the E Diode and microDiamond are in good agreement. However, compared to E Diode measurements, dose values in the bremsstrahlungs region are about 0.5% lower when measured with the microDiamond detector. Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. For depths larger than dmax, depth‐d
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4890
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5711122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826610374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-8ccdb727cdf54a81c060e68dd68b718579971a753cc04b1a481e548e178332ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0Eoh9w54QsceGS4PHaa-8FqYqgIBVxgbPleCeJo1072N5G-9_jNqUqXDjNSPN7TzPzCHkDbAnA2Ye9deNheQvSt0uhO_aMnIPk7aLrQDx_0p-Ri5z3jAHoRr8kZ1yKrpHAz8l2NfjgnR1osr23xcdAyw6TPcx0RJunhCOGkunRlx21NOCRujiOmJyvojyHShfvaPZhOyB1ac6lDqrXGENPeyzoSkyvyIuNHTK-fqiX5OfnTz9WXxY336-_rq5uFk4o4AvtXL9WXLl-I4XV4FjLsNV93-q1Ai1V1ymwSjbOMbEGKzSgFBpB6abh1jWX5OPJ9zCtR-xd3T3ZwRySH22aTbTe_D0Jfme28dZIBfWlvBq8fzBI8deEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRvQvG2BNUpU9N0_6D5OKdTzDOcdA8FFoyrFTpRLMeeEm8dlgJm7FM19iuY-RXOXYpW8fXrEo-BPbBVoT8DRDzj_19Bcrb5xxjre_AYEzq1U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290142437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Laub, Wolfram U. ; Crilly, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Laub, Wolfram U. ; Crilly, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>A commercial version of a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (SCDD) in a Schottky diode configuration was recently released as the new type 60019 microDiamond detector (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). In this study we investigate the dosimetric properties of this detector to independently confirm that findings from the developing group of the SCDDs still hold true for the commercial version of the SCDDs. We further explore if the use of the microDiamond detector can be expanded to high‐energy photon beams of up to 15 MV and to large field measurements. Measurements were performed with an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator delivering 6, 10, and 15 MV X‐rays, as well as 6, 9, 12, 15, and 20 MeV electron beams. The dependence of the microdiamond detector response on absorbed dose after connecting the detector was investigated. Furthermore, the dark current of the diamond detector was observed after irradiation. Results are compared to similar results from measurements with a diamond detector type 60003. Energy dependency was investigated, as well. Photon depth‐dose curves were measured for field sizes 3×3,10×10, and 30×30cm2. PDDs were measured with the Semiflex type 31010 detector, microLion type 31018 detector, P Diode type 60016, SRS Diode type 60018, and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Photon profiles were measured at a depth of 10 cm. Electron depth‐dose curves normalized to the dose maximum were measured with the 14×14cm2 electron cone. PDDs were measured with a Markus chamber type 23343, an E Diode type 60017 and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Profiles were measured with the E Diode and microDiamond at half of D90,D90,D70, and D50 depths and for electron cone sizes of 6×6cm2, 14×14cm2, and 20×20cm2. Within a tolerance of 0.5% detector response of the investigated detector was stable without any preirradiation. After preirradition with approximately 250 cGy the detector response was stable within 0.1%. A dark current after irradiation was not observed. The microDiamond detector shows no energy dependence in high energy photon or electron dosimetry. Electron PDD measurements with the E Diode and microDiamond are in good agreement. However, compared to E Diode measurements, dose values in the bremsstrahlungs region are about 0.5% lower when measured with the microDiamond detector. Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. For depths larger than dmax, depth‐dose curves of photon beams measured with the microDiamond detector are in close agreement to those measured with the microLion detector for small fields and with those measured with a Semiflex 0.125 cc ionization chamber for large fields. Differences are in the range of 0.25% and less. For profile measurements, microDiamond detector measurements agree well with microLion and P Diode measurements in the high‐dose region of the profile and the penumbra region. For areas outside the open field, P Diode measurements are about 0.5%–1.0% higher than microDiamond and microLion measurements. Thus it becomes evident that the investigated diamond detector (type 60019) is suitable for a wide range of applications in high‐energy photon and electron dosimetry and is interesting for relative, as well as absolute, dosimetry. PACS numbers: 00.06, 80.87</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25493512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>absolute dosimetry ; Diamonds ; Dosimetry ; electron dosimetry ; Energy ; photon dosimetry ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; relative dosimetry ; Sensors ; Single crystals ; synthetic single crystal diamond detectors</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2014-11, Vol.15 (6), p.92-102</ispartof><rights>2014 The Authors.</rights><rights>2014. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-8ccdb727cdf54a81c060e68dd68b718579971a753cc04b1a481e548e178332ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-8ccdb727cdf54a81c060e68dd68b718579971a753cc04b1a481e548e178332ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5711122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,1412,11543,27905,27906,45555,45556,46033,46457,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25493512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laub, Wolfram U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crilly, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>A commercial version of a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (SCDD) in a Schottky diode configuration was recently released as the new type 60019 microDiamond detector (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). In this study we investigate the dosimetric properties of this detector to independently confirm that findings from the developing group of the SCDDs still hold true for the commercial version of the SCDDs. We further explore if the use of the microDiamond detector can be expanded to high‐energy photon beams of up to 15 MV and to large field measurements. Measurements were performed with an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator delivering 6, 10, and 15 MV X‐rays, as well as 6, 9, 12, 15, and 20 MeV electron beams. The dependence of the microdiamond detector response on absorbed dose after connecting the detector was investigated. Furthermore, the dark current of the diamond detector was observed after irradiation. Results are compared to similar results from measurements with a diamond detector type 60003. Energy dependency was investigated, as well. Photon depth‐dose curves were measured for field sizes 3×3,10×10, and 30×30cm2. PDDs were measured with the Semiflex type 31010 detector, microLion type 31018 detector, P Diode type 60016, SRS Diode type 60018, and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Photon profiles were measured at a depth of 10 cm. Electron depth‐dose curves normalized to the dose maximum were measured with the 14×14cm2 electron cone. PDDs were measured with a Markus chamber type 23343, an E Diode type 60017 and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Profiles were measured with the E Diode and microDiamond at half of D90,D90,D70, and D50 depths and for electron cone sizes of 6×6cm2, 14×14cm2, and 20×20cm2. Within a tolerance of 0.5% detector response of the investigated detector was stable without any preirradiation. After preirradition with approximately 250 cGy the detector response was stable within 0.1%. A dark current after irradiation was not observed. The microDiamond detector shows no energy dependence in high energy photon or electron dosimetry. Electron PDD measurements with the E Diode and microDiamond are in good agreement. However, compared to E Diode measurements, dose values in the bremsstrahlungs region are about 0.5% lower when measured with the microDiamond detector. Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. For depths larger than dmax, depth‐dose curves of photon beams measured with the microDiamond detector are in close agreement to those measured with the microLion detector for small fields and with those measured with a Semiflex 0.125 cc ionization chamber for large fields. Differences are in the range of 0.25% and less. For profile measurements, microDiamond detector measurements agree well with microLion and P Diode measurements in the high‐dose region of the profile and the penumbra region. For areas outside the open field, P Diode measurements are about 0.5%–1.0% higher than microDiamond and microLion measurements. Thus it becomes evident that the investigated diamond detector (type 60019) is suitable for a wide range of applications in high‐energy photon and electron dosimetry and is interesting for relative, as well as absolute, dosimetry. PACS numbers: 00.06, 80.87</description><subject>absolute dosimetry</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>electron dosimetry</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>photon dosimetry</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>relative dosimetry</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Single crystals</subject><subject>synthetic single crystal diamond detectors</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0Eoh9w54QsceGS4PHaa-8FqYqgIBVxgbPleCeJo1072N5G-9_jNqUqXDjNSPN7TzPzCHkDbAnA2Ye9deNheQvSt0uhO_aMnIPk7aLrQDx_0p-Ri5z3jAHoRr8kZ1yKrpHAz8l2NfjgnR1osr23xcdAyw6TPcx0RJunhCOGkunRlx21NOCRujiOmJyvojyHShfvaPZhOyB1ac6lDqrXGENPeyzoSkyvyIuNHTK-fqiX5OfnTz9WXxY336-_rq5uFk4o4AvtXL9WXLl-I4XV4FjLsNV93-q1Ai1V1ymwSjbOMbEGKzSgFBpB6abh1jWX5OPJ9zCtR-xd3T3ZwRySH22aTbTe_D0Jfme28dZIBfWlvBq8fzBI8deEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRvQvG2BNUpU9N0_6D5OKdTzDOcdA8FFoyrFTpRLMeeEm8dlgJm7FM19iuY-RXOXYpW8fXrEo-BPbBVoT8DRDzj_19Bcrb5xxjre_AYEzq1U</recordid><startdate>20141108</startdate><enddate>20141108</enddate><creator>Laub, Wolfram U.</creator><creator>Crilly, Richard</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141108</creationdate><title>Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector</title><author>Laub, Wolfram U. ; Crilly, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4712-8ccdb727cdf54a81c060e68dd68b718579971a753cc04b1a481e548e178332ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>absolute dosimetry</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>electron dosimetry</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>photon dosimetry</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>relative dosimetry</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Single crystals</topic><topic>synthetic single crystal diamond detectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laub, Wolfram U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crilly, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laub, Wolfram U.</au><au>Crilly, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2014-11-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>92-102</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>A commercial version of a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (SCDD) in a Schottky diode configuration was recently released as the new type 60019 microDiamond detector (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). In this study we investigate the dosimetric properties of this detector to independently confirm that findings from the developing group of the SCDDs still hold true for the commercial version of the SCDDs. We further explore if the use of the microDiamond detector can be expanded to high‐energy photon beams of up to 15 MV and to large field measurements. Measurements were performed with an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator delivering 6, 10, and 15 MV X‐rays, as well as 6, 9, 12, 15, and 20 MeV electron beams. The dependence of the microdiamond detector response on absorbed dose after connecting the detector was investigated. Furthermore, the dark current of the diamond detector was observed after irradiation. Results are compared to similar results from measurements with a diamond detector type 60003. Energy dependency was investigated, as well. Photon depth‐dose curves were measured for field sizes 3×3,10×10, and 30×30cm2. PDDs were measured with the Semiflex type 31010 detector, microLion type 31018 detector, P Diode type 60016, SRS Diode type 60018, and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Photon profiles were measured at a depth of 10 cm. Electron depth‐dose curves normalized to the dose maximum were measured with the 14×14cm2 electron cone. PDDs were measured with a Markus chamber type 23343, an E Diode type 60017 and the microDiamond type 60019 detector (all PTW‐Freiburg). Profiles were measured with the E Diode and microDiamond at half of D90,D90,D70, and D50 depths and for electron cone sizes of 6×6cm2, 14×14cm2, and 20×20cm2. Within a tolerance of 0.5% detector response of the investigated detector was stable without any preirradiation. After preirradition with approximately 250 cGy the detector response was stable within 0.1%. A dark current after irradiation was not observed. The microDiamond detector shows no energy dependence in high energy photon or electron dosimetry. Electron PDD measurements with the E Diode and microDiamond are in good agreement. However, compared to E Diode measurements, dose values in the bremsstrahlungs region are about 0.5% lower when measured with the microDiamond detector. Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. For depths larger than dmax, depth‐dose curves of photon beams measured with the microDiamond detector are in close agreement to those measured with the microLion detector for small fields and with those measured with a Semiflex 0.125 cc ionization chamber for large fields. Differences are in the range of 0.25% and less. For profile measurements, microDiamond detector measurements agree well with microLion and P Diode measurements in the high‐dose region of the profile and the penumbra region. For areas outside the open field, P Diode measurements are about 0.5%–1.0% higher than microDiamond and microLion measurements. Thus it becomes evident that the investigated diamond detector (type 60019) is suitable for a wide range of applications in high‐energy photon and electron dosimetry and is interesting for relative, as well as absolute, dosimetry. PACS numbers: 00.06, 80.87</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>25493512</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4890</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2014-11, Vol.15 (6), p.92-102
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5711122
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects absolute dosimetry
Diamonds
Dosimetry
electron dosimetry
Energy
photon dosimetry
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiation therapy
relative dosimetry
Sensors
Single crystals
synthetic single crystal diamond detectors
title Clinical radiation therapy measurements with a new commercial synthetic single crystal diamond detector
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20radiation%20therapy%20measurements%20with%20a%20new%20commercial%20synthetic%20single%20crystal%20diamond%20detector&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Laub,%20Wolfram%20U.&rft.date=2014-11-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=92-102&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826610374%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290142437&rft_id=info:pmid/25493512&rfr_iscdi=true