Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers

IMPORTANCE: Because moisturizer use is critical for the prevention and treatment of numerous dermatological conditions, patients frequently request product recommendations from dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the product performance characteristics and ingredients of best-selling moisturizer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2017-11, Vol.153 (11), p.1099-1105
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Shuai, Kwa, Michael, Lohman, Mary E, Evers-Meltzer, Rachel, Silverberg, Jonathan I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1105
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1099
container_title JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.)
container_volume 153
creator Xu, Shuai
Kwa, Michael
Lohman, Mary E
Evers-Meltzer, Rachel
Silverberg, Jonathan I
description IMPORTANCE: Because moisturizer use is critical for the prevention and treatment of numerous dermatological conditions, patients frequently request product recommendations from dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the product performance characteristics and ingredients of best-selling moisturizers. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cohort study involved publicly available data of the top 100 best-selling whole-body moisturizing products at 3 major online retailers (Amazon, Target, and Walmart). Products marketed for use on a specific body part (eg, face, hands, eyelids) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pairwise comparisons of median price per ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergenic) and presence of ingredients represented in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) series were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The effect of vehicle type (eg, ointment, lotion, cream, butter) was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Cross-reactors and botanicals for fragrances were derived from the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s Contact Allergen Management Program database. RESULTS: A total of 174 unique best-selling moisturizer products were identified, constituting 109 713 reviews as of August 2016. The median price per ounce was $0.59 (range, $0.10-$9.51 per ounce) with a wide range (9400%). The most popular vehicles were lotions (102 [59%]), followed by creams (22 [13%]), oils (21 [12%]), butters (14 [8%]), and ointments (3 [2%]). Only 12% (n = 21) of best-selling moisturizer products were free of NACDG allergens. The 3 most common allergens were fragrance mix (n = 87), paraben mix (n = 75), and tocopherol (n = 74). Products with the claim “dermatologist recommended” had higher median price per ounce ($0.79; interquartile range [IQR], $0.56-$1.27) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.34-$0.92). Products with the claim “phthalate free” had higher median price per ounce ($1.38; IQR, $0.86-$1.63) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.35-$0.91). Lotions (median, $0.49; IQR, $0.31-0.68) were statistically less expensive per ounce than butters (median, $1.20; IQR, $0.76-$1.63), creams (median, $0.80; IQR, $0.69-$1.25) and oils (median, $1.30; IQR, $0.64-$2.43). For products with a claim of “fragrance free,” 18 (45%) had at least 1 fragrance cross-reactor or botanical ingredient. Products without any ingredients in the NACDG (median, $0.83; IQR, $0.47-$1.69) were n
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5710429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2652353</ama_id><sourcerecordid>1936625333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-82f5b7f635c822899acd4c0e21618c88e9f5e9c150174bb0889b2195e3dfb093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIUOkPcEA5ciDFj8RxLkhQ8ZJAcOjdcpxNMXJssBOk8vW4KhTYi23N7OyOB6ETgmcEY3L-qnrVQujV4O2MYlLNGC74DjqkhIucY1Hsbu9cHKBpjK84lcC4YGQfHVAhqooRfIjC3Ls49hCy5wAdBHAa4ll6-HbUQzZ_UUHpAYKJg9EJUK7Nnv0AbjDK2lV2aS2EJTijs3u3DNCaBMXMuOwK4pBHsNa4Zfbok8AYzCeEeIT2OmUjTL_PCVrcXC_md_nD0-39_PIhVwVjQy5oVzZVx1mpBaWirpVuC40h-SJCCwF1V0KtSZn8F02DhagbSuoSWNs1uGYTdLGRfRubHlqd9grKyrdgehVW0isj_yPOvMil_5BlRXBB1wKn3wLBv4_JjexN1MmQcuDHKEnNOKclSzVBfEPVwceYPnI7hmC5jkz-jUyuI5PryFLjyd8lt20_ASXC8YaQ-n9RXlKWBn8BzEqhcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936625333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Xu, Shuai ; Kwa, Michael ; Lohman, Mary E ; Evers-Meltzer, Rachel ; Silverberg, Jonathan I</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shuai ; Kwa, Michael ; Lohman, Mary E ; Evers-Meltzer, Rachel ; Silverberg, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Because moisturizer use is critical for the prevention and treatment of numerous dermatological conditions, patients frequently request product recommendations from dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the product performance characteristics and ingredients of best-selling moisturizers. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cohort study involved publicly available data of the top 100 best-selling whole-body moisturizing products at 3 major online retailers (Amazon, Target, and Walmart). Products marketed for use on a specific body part (eg, face, hands, eyelids) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pairwise comparisons of median price per ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergenic) and presence of ingredients represented in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) series were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The effect of vehicle type (eg, ointment, lotion, cream, butter) was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Cross-reactors and botanicals for fragrances were derived from the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s Contact Allergen Management Program database. RESULTS: A total of 174 unique best-selling moisturizer products were identified, constituting 109 713 reviews as of August 2016. The median price per ounce was $0.59 (range, $0.10-$9.51 per ounce) with a wide range (9400%). The most popular vehicles were lotions (102 [59%]), followed by creams (22 [13%]), oils (21 [12%]), butters (14 [8%]), and ointments (3 [2%]). Only 12% (n = 21) of best-selling moisturizer products were free of NACDG allergens. The 3 most common allergens were fragrance mix (n = 87), paraben mix (n = 75), and tocopherol (n = 74). Products with the claim “dermatologist recommended” had higher median price per ounce ($0.79; interquartile range [IQR], $0.56-$1.27) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.34-$0.92). Products with the claim “phthalate free” had higher median price per ounce ($1.38; IQR, $0.86-$1.63) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.35-$0.91). Lotions (median, $0.49; IQR, $0.31-0.68) were statistically less expensive per ounce than butters (median, $1.20; IQR, $0.76-$1.63), creams (median, $0.80; IQR, $0.69-$1.25) and oils (median, $1.30; IQR, $0.64-$2.43). For products with a claim of “fragrance free,” 18 (45%) had at least 1 fragrance cross-reactor or botanical ingredient. Products without any ingredients in the NACDG (median, $0.83; IQR, $0.47-$1.69) were not statistically more expensive per ounce than products with 1 or more allergens (median, $0.60; IQR, $0.35-$1.06). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Best-selling moisturizers vary widely by price and product characteristics. Given the lack of readily available comparison data on moisturizer efficacy, dermatologists should balance consumer preference, price, and allergenicity in their recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28877310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Allergens - chemistry ; Cohort Studies ; Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emollients - administration &amp; dosage ; Emollients - chemistry ; Emollients - economics ; Humans ; Online First ; Original Investigation ; Perfume - chemistry ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.), 2017-11, Vol.153 (11), p.1099-1105</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-82f5b7f635c822899acd4c0e21618c88e9f5e9c150174bb0889b2195e3dfb093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,778,782,883,3329,27911,27912,76244,76247</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers-Meltzer, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverberg, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers</title><title>JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.)</title><addtitle>JAMA Dermatol</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Because moisturizer use is critical for the prevention and treatment of numerous dermatological conditions, patients frequently request product recommendations from dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the product performance characteristics and ingredients of best-selling moisturizers. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cohort study involved publicly available data of the top 100 best-selling whole-body moisturizing products at 3 major online retailers (Amazon, Target, and Walmart). Products marketed for use on a specific body part (eg, face, hands, eyelids) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pairwise comparisons of median price per ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergenic) and presence of ingredients represented in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) series were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The effect of vehicle type (eg, ointment, lotion, cream, butter) was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Cross-reactors and botanicals for fragrances were derived from the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s Contact Allergen Management Program database. RESULTS: A total of 174 unique best-selling moisturizer products were identified, constituting 109 713 reviews as of August 2016. The median price per ounce was $0.59 (range, $0.10-$9.51 per ounce) with a wide range (9400%). The most popular vehicles were lotions (102 [59%]), followed by creams (22 [13%]), oils (21 [12%]), butters (14 [8%]), and ointments (3 [2%]). Only 12% (n = 21) of best-selling moisturizer products were free of NACDG allergens. The 3 most common allergens were fragrance mix (n = 87), paraben mix (n = 75), and tocopherol (n = 74). Products with the claim “dermatologist recommended” had higher median price per ounce ($0.79; interquartile range [IQR], $0.56-$1.27) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.34-$0.92). Products with the claim “phthalate free” had higher median price per ounce ($1.38; IQR, $0.86-$1.63) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.35-$0.91). Lotions (median, $0.49; IQR, $0.31-0.68) were statistically less expensive per ounce than butters (median, $1.20; IQR, $0.76-$1.63), creams (median, $0.80; IQR, $0.69-$1.25) and oils (median, $1.30; IQR, $0.64-$2.43). For products with a claim of “fragrance free,” 18 (45%) had at least 1 fragrance cross-reactor or botanical ingredient. Products without any ingredients in the NACDG (median, $0.83; IQR, $0.47-$1.69) were not statistically more expensive per ounce than products with 1 or more allergens (median, $0.60; IQR, $0.35-$1.06). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Best-selling moisturizers vary widely by price and product characteristics. Given the lack of readily available comparison data on moisturizer efficacy, dermatologists should balance consumer preference, price, and allergenicity in their recommendations.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Allergens - chemistry</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emollients - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Emollients - chemistry</subject><subject>Emollients - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Online First</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Perfume - chemistry</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>2168-6068</issn><issn>2168-6084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIUOkPcEA5ciDFj8RxLkhQ8ZJAcOjdcpxNMXJssBOk8vW4KhTYi23N7OyOB6ETgmcEY3L-qnrVQujV4O2MYlLNGC74DjqkhIucY1Hsbu9cHKBpjK84lcC4YGQfHVAhqooRfIjC3Ls49hCy5wAdBHAa4ll6-HbUQzZ_UUHpAYKJg9EJUK7Nnv0AbjDK2lV2aS2EJTijs3u3DNCaBMXMuOwK4pBHsNa4Zfbok8AYzCeEeIT2OmUjTL_PCVrcXC_md_nD0-39_PIhVwVjQy5oVzZVx1mpBaWirpVuC40h-SJCCwF1V0KtSZn8F02DhagbSuoSWNs1uGYTdLGRfRubHlqd9grKyrdgehVW0isj_yPOvMil_5BlRXBB1wKn3wLBv4_JjexN1MmQcuDHKEnNOKclSzVBfEPVwceYPnI7hmC5jkz-jUyuI5PryFLjyd8lt20_ASXC8YaQ-n9RXlKWBn8BzEqhcw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Xu, Shuai</creator><creator>Kwa, Michael</creator><creator>Lohman, Mary E</creator><creator>Evers-Meltzer, Rachel</creator><creator>Silverberg, Jonathan I</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers</title><author>Xu, Shuai ; Kwa, Michael ; Lohman, Mary E ; Evers-Meltzer, Rachel ; Silverberg, Jonathan I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-82f5b7f635c822899acd4c0e21618c88e9f5e9c150174bb0889b2195e3dfb093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Allergens - chemistry</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Commerce - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emollients - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Emollients - chemistry</topic><topic>Emollients - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Online First</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Perfume - chemistry</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers-Meltzer, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverberg, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Shuai</au><au>Kwa, Michael</au><au>Lohman, Mary E</au><au>Evers-Meltzer, Rachel</au><au>Silverberg, Jonathan I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers</atitle><jtitle>JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Dermatol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1105</epage><pages>1099-1105</pages><issn>2168-6068</issn><eissn>2168-6084</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Because moisturizer use is critical for the prevention and treatment of numerous dermatological conditions, patients frequently request product recommendations from dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the product performance characteristics and ingredients of best-selling moisturizers. DESIGN AND SETTING: This cohort study involved publicly available data of the top 100 best-selling whole-body moisturizing products at 3 major online retailers (Amazon, Target, and Walmart). Products marketed for use on a specific body part (eg, face, hands, eyelids) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pairwise comparisons of median price per ounce on the basis of marketing claims (eg, dermatologist recommended, fragrance free, hypoallergenic) and presence of ingredients represented in the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) series were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The effect of vehicle type (eg, ointment, lotion, cream, butter) was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Cross-reactors and botanicals for fragrances were derived from the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s Contact Allergen Management Program database. RESULTS: A total of 174 unique best-selling moisturizer products were identified, constituting 109 713 reviews as of August 2016. The median price per ounce was $0.59 (range, $0.10-$9.51 per ounce) with a wide range (9400%). The most popular vehicles were lotions (102 [59%]), followed by creams (22 [13%]), oils (21 [12%]), butters (14 [8%]), and ointments (3 [2%]). Only 12% (n = 21) of best-selling moisturizer products were free of NACDG allergens. The 3 most common allergens were fragrance mix (n = 87), paraben mix (n = 75), and tocopherol (n = 74). Products with the claim “dermatologist recommended” had higher median price per ounce ($0.79; interquartile range [IQR], $0.56-$1.27) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.34-$0.92). Products with the claim “phthalate free” had higher median price per ounce ($1.38; IQR, $0.86-$1.63) than products without the claim ($0.59; IQR, $0.35-$0.91). Lotions (median, $0.49; IQR, $0.31-0.68) were statistically less expensive per ounce than butters (median, $1.20; IQR, $0.76-$1.63), creams (median, $0.80; IQR, $0.69-$1.25) and oils (median, $1.30; IQR, $0.64-$2.43). For products with a claim of “fragrance free,” 18 (45%) had at least 1 fragrance cross-reactor or botanical ingredient. Products without any ingredients in the NACDG (median, $0.83; IQR, $0.47-$1.69) were not statistically more expensive per ounce than products with 1 or more allergens (median, $0.60; IQR, $0.35-$1.06). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Best-selling moisturizers vary widely by price and product characteristics. Given the lack of readily available comparison data on moisturizer efficacy, dermatologists should balance consumer preference, price, and allergenicity in their recommendations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>28877310</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6068
ispartof JAMA dermatology (Chicago, Ill.), 2017-11, Vol.153 (11), p.1099-1105
issn 2168-6068
2168-6084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5710429
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Administration, Cutaneous
Allergens - chemistry
Cohort Studies
Commerce - statistics & numerical data
Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Emollients - administration & dosage
Emollients - chemistry
Emollients - economics
Humans
Online First
Original Investigation
Perfume - chemistry
Statistics, Nonparametric
title Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A32%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer%20Preferences,%20Product%20Characteristics,%20and%20Potentially%20Allergenic%20Ingredients%20in%20Best-selling%20Moisturizers&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20dermatology%20(Chicago,%20Ill.)&rft.au=Xu,%20Shuai&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1105&rft.pages=1099-1105&rft.issn=2168-6068&rft.eissn=2168-6084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1936625333%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936625333&rft_id=info:pmid/28877310&rft_ama_id=2652353&rfr_iscdi=true