Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization
Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e1732 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Tsay, Annie J Langan, Sara Simon, Scott |
description | Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We present a case of a 73-year-old woman with a right internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm treated with a pipeline embolization device (PED). Initial follow-up post-PED placement by three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA demonstrated aneurysm occlusion, which was confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CE-MRA in subsequent follow-up appointments. However, repeat CE-MRA two years later suggested recanalization of the aneurysm. After discussion with neuroradiologists and follow-up with a dynamic MRA, this finding was determined to be false. These findings shed light on the potential pitfall of using CE-MRA alone or any single imaging modality in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement. Our case report explores various imaging modalities used in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement and highlights the need to use multiple techniques for an accurate assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.1732 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5707175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1970512525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-be8ae5662abbfc28b95bf216353afa49451f893805fade8df41d0f5d35c727713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFLAzEQhYMottSevMuCR9maZJsmexFKqVooWLRevIRsdmK3tElNskL99W5tLXqagfl4M28eQpcE9zhn-a2uPdShR3hGT1CbkoFIBRH90z99C3VDWGKMCeYUc3yOWjSnmDBB2uht5Gz0KsRkbBfKaliDjYkzydBC7bdhnbwoncxciOms2sCqspDMPaj4w01sBL_xEKFMVEieQSurVtWXipWzF-jMqFWA7qF20Ov9eD56TKdPD5PRcJrqDA9iWoBQwAYDqorCaCqKnBWmOT5jmTKqn_cZMSLPBGZGlSBK0yclNqzMmOaUc5J10N1ed1MXayg17Ayt5MZXa-W30qlK_p_YaiHf3adkHHPCWSNwfRDw7qOGEOXS1b4xEiTJOWaEMrqjbvaU9i4ED-a4gWC5y0Lus5C7LBr66u9RR_b389k36_qICg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970512525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Tsay, Annie J ; Langan, Sara ; Simon, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsay, Annie J ; Langan, Sara ; Simon, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We present a case of a 73-year-old woman with a right internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm treated with a pipeline embolization device (PED). Initial follow-up post-PED placement by three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA demonstrated aneurysm occlusion, which was confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CE-MRA in subsequent follow-up appointments. However, repeat CE-MRA two years later suggested recanalization of the aneurysm. After discussion with neuroradiologists and follow-up with a dynamic MRA, this finding was determined to be false. These findings shed light on the potential pitfall of using CE-MRA alone or any single imaging modality in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement. Our case report explores various imaging modalities used in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement and highlights the need to use multiple techniques for an accurate assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1732</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29201581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Aneurysms ; Carotid arteries ; Case reports ; Medical imaging ; Neurosurgery ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pipelines ; Radiology ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1732</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017, Tsay et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ ) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017, Tsay et al. 2017 Tsay et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-be8ae5662abbfc28b95bf216353afa49451f893805fade8df41d0f5d35c727713</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707175/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5707175/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsay, Annie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langan, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We present a case of a 73-year-old woman with a right internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm treated with a pipeline embolization device (PED). Initial follow-up post-PED placement by three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA demonstrated aneurysm occlusion, which was confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CE-MRA in subsequent follow-up appointments. However, repeat CE-MRA two years later suggested recanalization of the aneurysm. After discussion with neuroradiologists and follow-up with a dynamic MRA, this finding was determined to be false. These findings shed light on the potential pitfall of using CE-MRA alone or any single imaging modality in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement. Our case report explores various imaging modalities used in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement and highlights the need to use multiple techniques for an accurate assessment.</description><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Carotid arteries</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFLAzEQhYMottSevMuCR9maZJsmexFKqVooWLRevIRsdmK3tElNskL99W5tLXqagfl4M28eQpcE9zhn-a2uPdShR3hGT1CbkoFIBRH90z99C3VDWGKMCeYUc3yOWjSnmDBB2uht5Gz0KsRkbBfKaliDjYkzydBC7bdhnbwoncxciOms2sCqspDMPaj4w01sBL_xEKFMVEieQSurVtWXipWzF-jMqFWA7qF20Ov9eD56TKdPD5PRcJrqDA9iWoBQwAYDqorCaCqKnBWmOT5jmTKqn_cZMSLPBGZGlSBK0yclNqzMmOaUc5J10N1ed1MXayg17Ayt5MZXa-W30qlK_p_YaiHf3adkHHPCWSNwfRDw7qOGEOXS1b4xEiTJOWaEMrqjbvaU9i4ED-a4gWC5y0Lus5C7LBr66u9RR_b389k36_qICg</recordid><startdate>20170929</startdate><enddate>20170929</enddate><creator>Tsay, Annie J</creator><creator>Langan, Sara</creator><creator>Simon, Scott</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170929</creationdate><title>Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization</title><author>Tsay, Annie J ; Langan, Sara ; Simon, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-be8ae5662abbfc28b95bf216353afa49451f893805fade8df41d0f5d35c727713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Carotid arteries</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsay, Annie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langan, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsay, Annie J</au><au>Langan, Sara</au><au>Simon, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2017-09-29</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e1732</spage><pages>e1732-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We present a case of a 73-year-old woman with a right internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm treated with a pipeline embolization device (PED). Initial follow-up post-PED placement by three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA demonstrated aneurysm occlusion, which was confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CE-MRA in subsequent follow-up appointments. However, repeat CE-MRA two years later suggested recanalization of the aneurysm. After discussion with neuroradiologists and follow-up with a dynamic MRA, this finding was determined to be false. These findings shed light on the potential pitfall of using CE-MRA alone or any single imaging modality in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement. Our case report explores various imaging modalities used in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement and highlights the need to use multiple techniques for an accurate assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>29201581</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.1732</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2017-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e1732 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5707175 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Aneurysms Carotid arteries Case reports Medical imaging Neurosurgery NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pipelines Radiology Veins & arteries |
title | Contrast Enhancement of Aneurysm Sac Post-Pipeline Treatment Interpreted as Recanalization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrast%20Enhancement%20of%20Aneurysm%20Sac%20Post-Pipeline%20Treatment%20Interpreted%20as%20Recanalization&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Tsay,%20Annie%20J&rft.date=2017-09-29&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e1732&rft.pages=e1732-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.1732&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1970512525%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970512525&rft_id=info:pmid/29201581&rfr_iscdi=true |