Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams

Machine Performance Check (MPC) is an automated and integrated image‐based tool for verification of beam and geometric performance of the TrueBeam linac. The aims of the study were to evaluate the MPC beam performance tests against current daily quality assurance (QA) methods, to compare MPC perform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.139-150
Hauptverfasser: Barnes, Michael P, Greer, Peter B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 18
creator Barnes, Michael P
Greer, Peter B
description Machine Performance Check (MPC) is an automated and integrated image‐based tool for verification of beam and geometric performance of the TrueBeam linac. The aims of the study were to evaluate the MPC beam performance tests against current daily quality assurance (QA) methods, to compare MPC performance against more accurate monthly QA tests and to test the sensitivity of MPC to changes in beam performance. The MPC beam constancy checks test the beam output, uniformity, and beam center against the user defined baseline. MPC was run daily over a period of 5 months (n = 115) in parallel with the Daily QA3 device. Additionally, IC Profiler, in‐house EPID tests, and ion chamber measurements were performed biweekly and results presented in a form directly comparable to MPC. The sensitivity of MPC was investigated using controlled adjustments of output, beam angle, and beam position steering. Over the period, MPC output agreed with ion chamber to within 0.6%. For an output adjustment of 1.2%, MPC was found to agree with ion chamber to within 0.17%. MPC beam center was found to agree with the in‐house EPID method within 0.1 mm. A focal spot position adjustment of 0.4 mm (at isocenter) was measured with MPC beam center to within 0.01 mm. An average systematic offset of 0.5% was measured in the MPC uniformity and agreement of MPC uniformity with symmetry measurements was found to be within 0.9% for all beams. MPC uniformity detected a change in beam symmetry of 1.5% to within 0.3% and 0.9% of IC Profiler for flattened and FFF beams, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5689878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877856105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-b1631ade83a981c40dd4a1f2ea01fea7c27f809b0dd55c2be3d8fff3a9f4b6733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EohfY8ADIEpsp0hQf52ZvkMqoA0itYFHWluMcNymJPdhJ0ez6BIhn5EnwkLYqLFj58n_6fKyfkBfAjoEx_kabgR8DZ1A-IvtQ8HIpJeSPH-z3yEGMV4wBiEw8JXtccAmSwz75cXqt-0mPnXfUWzq2SC_ChO9QD3TQpu0c0g0G68OgnUFqWjRf6eL88-qI1jvIeBfHFG3nKNKEUtvrcUSHDdWuuTt17pLarh8x_Lr5aQMiXazX6yO6af2YXt_Z4jPyxOo-4vPb9ZB8WZ9erD4szz69_7g6OVuaAvJyWUOZgW5QZFoKMDlrmlyD5agZWNSV4ZUVTNbpvigMrzFrhLU20TavyyrLDsnb2buZ6gEbg24Muleb0A06bJXXnfo7cV2rLv21KkohRSWSYHErCP7bhHFUQxcN9r126KeoQFSVKEpgRUJf_YNe-Sm49D3FuWRMSsmqRL2eKRN8jAHt_TDA1K5mtatZ_ak5wS8fjn-P3vWaAJiB712P2_-o1MnqnM_S3-UstPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290099907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Barnes, Michael P ; Greer, Peter B</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Michael P ; Greer, Peter B</creatorcontrib><description>Machine Performance Check (MPC) is an automated and integrated image‐based tool for verification of beam and geometric performance of the TrueBeam linac. The aims of the study were to evaluate the MPC beam performance tests against current daily quality assurance (QA) methods, to compare MPC performance against more accurate monthly QA tests and to test the sensitivity of MPC to changes in beam performance. The MPC beam constancy checks test the beam output, uniformity, and beam center against the user defined baseline. MPC was run daily over a period of 5 months (n = 115) in parallel with the Daily QA3 device. Additionally, IC Profiler, in‐house EPID tests, and ion chamber measurements were performed biweekly and results presented in a form directly comparable to MPC. The sensitivity of MPC was investigated using controlled adjustments of output, beam angle, and beam position steering. Over the period, MPC output agreed with ion chamber to within 0.6%. For an output adjustment of 1.2%, MPC was found to agree with ion chamber to within 0.17%. MPC beam center was found to agree with the in‐house EPID method within 0.1 mm. A focal spot position adjustment of 0.4 mm (at isocenter) was measured with MPC beam center to within 0.01 mm. An average systematic offset of 0.5% was measured in the MPC uniformity and agreement of MPC uniformity with symmetry measurements was found to be within 0.9% for all beams. MPC uniformity detected a change in beam symmetry of 1.5% to within 0.3% and 0.9% of IC Profiler for flattened and FFF beams, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28291921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Datasets ; Equipment Design ; Filtration - instrumentation ; Humans ; linac quality assurance ; machine performance check (MPC) ; Particle Accelerators - instrumentation ; Particle Accelerators - standards ; Photons ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Quality Control ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Sensors ; Standard deviation ; Symmetry</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.139-150</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-b1631ade83a981c40dd4a1f2ea01fea7c27f809b0dd55c2be3d8fff3a9f4b6733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-b1631ade83a981c40dd4a1f2ea01fea7c27f809b0dd55c2be3d8fff3a9f4b6733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689878/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689878/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1416,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Peter B</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Machine Performance Check (MPC) is an automated and integrated image‐based tool for verification of beam and geometric performance of the TrueBeam linac. The aims of the study were to evaluate the MPC beam performance tests against current daily quality assurance (QA) methods, to compare MPC performance against more accurate monthly QA tests and to test the sensitivity of MPC to changes in beam performance. The MPC beam constancy checks test the beam output, uniformity, and beam center against the user defined baseline. MPC was run daily over a period of 5 months (n = 115) in parallel with the Daily QA3 device. Additionally, IC Profiler, in‐house EPID tests, and ion chamber measurements were performed biweekly and results presented in a form directly comparable to MPC. The sensitivity of MPC was investigated using controlled adjustments of output, beam angle, and beam position steering. Over the period, MPC output agreed with ion chamber to within 0.6%. For an output adjustment of 1.2%, MPC was found to agree with ion chamber to within 0.17%. MPC beam center was found to agree with the in‐house EPID method within 0.1 mm. A focal spot position adjustment of 0.4 mm (at isocenter) was measured with MPC beam center to within 0.01 mm. An average systematic offset of 0.5% was measured in the MPC uniformity and agreement of MPC uniformity with symmetry measurements was found to be within 0.9% for all beams. MPC uniformity detected a change in beam symmetry of 1.5% to within 0.3% and 0.9% of IC Profiler for flattened and FFF beams, respectively.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Filtration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>linac quality assurance</subject><subject>machine performance check (MPC)</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators - instrumentation</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators - standards</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EohfY8ADIEpsp0hQf52ZvkMqoA0itYFHWluMcNymJPdhJ0ez6BIhn5EnwkLYqLFj58n_6fKyfkBfAjoEx_kabgR8DZ1A-IvtQ8HIpJeSPH-z3yEGMV4wBiEw8JXtccAmSwz75cXqt-0mPnXfUWzq2SC_ChO9QD3TQpu0c0g0G68OgnUFqWjRf6eL88-qI1jvIeBfHFG3nKNKEUtvrcUSHDdWuuTt17pLarh8x_Lr5aQMiXazX6yO6af2YXt_Z4jPyxOo-4vPb9ZB8WZ9erD4szz69_7g6OVuaAvJyWUOZgW5QZFoKMDlrmlyD5agZWNSV4ZUVTNbpvigMrzFrhLU20TavyyrLDsnb2buZ6gEbg24Muleb0A06bJXXnfo7cV2rLv21KkohRSWSYHErCP7bhHFUQxcN9r126KeoQFSVKEpgRUJf_YNe-Sm49D3FuWRMSsmqRL2eKRN8jAHt_TDA1K5mtatZ_ak5wS8fjn-P3vWaAJiB712P2_-o1MnqnM_S3-UstPs</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Barnes, Michael P</creator><creator>Greer, Peter B</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams</title><author>Barnes, Michael P ; Greer, Peter B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5146-b1631ade83a981c40dd4a1f2ea01fea7c27f809b0dd55c2be3d8fff3a9f4b6733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Filtration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>linac quality assurance</topic><topic>machine performance check (MPC)</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators - instrumentation</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators - standards</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Peter B</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnes, Michael P</au><au>Greer, Peter B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>139-150</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Machine Performance Check (MPC) is an automated and integrated image‐based tool for verification of beam and geometric performance of the TrueBeam linac. The aims of the study were to evaluate the MPC beam performance tests against current daily quality assurance (QA) methods, to compare MPC performance against more accurate monthly QA tests and to test the sensitivity of MPC to changes in beam performance. The MPC beam constancy checks test the beam output, uniformity, and beam center against the user defined baseline. MPC was run daily over a period of 5 months (n = 115) in parallel with the Daily QA3 device. Additionally, IC Profiler, in‐house EPID tests, and ion chamber measurements were performed biweekly and results presented in a form directly comparable to MPC. The sensitivity of MPC was investigated using controlled adjustments of output, beam angle, and beam position steering. Over the period, MPC output agreed with ion chamber to within 0.6%. For an output adjustment of 1.2%, MPC was found to agree with ion chamber to within 0.17%. MPC beam center was found to agree with the in‐house EPID method within 0.1 mm. A focal spot position adjustment of 0.4 mm (at isocenter) was measured with MPC beam center to within 0.01 mm. An average systematic offset of 0.5% was measured in the MPC uniformity and agreement of MPC uniformity with symmetry measurements was found to be within 0.9% for all beams. MPC uniformity detected a change in beam symmetry of 1.5% to within 0.3% and 0.9% of IC Profiler for flattened and FFF beams, respectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28291921</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.12016</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.139-150
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5689878
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Datasets
Equipment Design
Filtration - instrumentation
Humans
linac quality assurance
machine performance check (MPC)
Particle Accelerators - instrumentation
Particle Accelerators - standards
Photons
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards
Quality Control
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiometry - instrumentation
Sensors
Standard deviation
Symmetry
title Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A36%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20TrueBeam%20machine%20performance%20check%20(MPC)%20beam%20constancy%20checks%20for%20flattened%20and%20flattening%20filter%E2%80%90free%20(FFF)%20photon%20beams&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Barnes,%20Michael%20P&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=139-150&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.12016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1877856105%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290099907&rft_id=info:pmid/28291921&rfr_iscdi=true