Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016
Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2017-04, Vol.66 (15), p.397-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 403 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Marder, Ellyn P. Cieslak, Paul R. Cronquist, Alicia B. Dunn, John Lathrop, Sarah Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese Ryan, Patricia Smith, Kirk Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa Vugia, Duc J. Zansky, Shelley Holt, Kristin G. Wolpert, Beverly J. Lynch, Michael Tauxe, Robert Geissler, Aimee L. |
description | Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture
; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6615a1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5687182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A491136535</galeid><jstor_id>26404052</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A491136535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-7495c8af5e2190347b84fdf811959a7021dde1a7c1c806f9d9acaa2aa33102db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYmNw5QayhIQ4LMVO4vy5IFVlg0oTILWVuEWu_SbxSOzOdlrttu8An3BfgwtOu41VanKwYv_e53395AmC1wSPCKU5_dh1GzPqujQllJEnwTGhCQ3zlPx8GhxjkhRhRAp6FLyw9hIPT4yfB0dRnkRpmsTHwd-p4lKA4oCYEmhuQAmLdIWmqgLupFYWbaRr0A_mGl2D_5wbpmwnnQOBJrrrtGqv0bwxuq8bdK612Cq5BtBZNWjs1LgBZqWq0cLCsDPpW9cbCKdKwMo3BeXQZ8lqpa2THM3BOj-HQrPerEG2LRtGvL35s-2w1EaBx63XBIvGftA17KPfwG20-XWKCEaL0WyEZtKBPUURJvHtzW-_pC-DZxVrLby6W0-CxfnZfPI1vPj-ZToZX4ScJrkLs6SgPGcVBW8ljpNsmSeVqHLijS1YhiMiBBCWccJznFaFKBhnLGIsjgmOxDI-CT7tdFf9sgPB_VUNa8uVkR0z16Vmstw_UbIpa70uaZpnJI-8wIc7AaOveu9M2UnLYbgp6N6WJC8IiWiUDei7HVqzFkqpKu0V-YCX48RTcUpj6qnwAOX_Lvj2WkEl_fYePzrA-1dAJ_nBgvePChpgrWusbvttoA4qc6OtNVA92EJwuU14OSS8vE-4L3j72MwH_D7SHnizAy6t0-b_eZrgBNMo_gf_wgXG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891125272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Marder, Ellyn P. ; Cieslak, Paul R. ; Cronquist, Alicia B. ; Dunn, John ; Lathrop, Sarah ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese ; Ryan, Patricia ; Smith, Kirk ; Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa ; Vugia, Duc J. ; Zansky, Shelley ; Holt, Kristin G. ; Wolpert, Beverly J. ; Lynch, Michael ; Tauxe, Robert ; Geissler, Aimee L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marder, Ellyn P. ; Cieslak, Paul R. ; Cronquist, Alicia B. ; Dunn, John ; Lathrop, Sarah ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese ; Ryan, Patricia ; Smith, Kirk ; Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa ; Vugia, Duc J. ; Zansky, Shelley ; Holt, Kristin G. ; Wolpert, Beverly J. ; Lynch, Michael ; Tauxe, Robert ; Geissler, Aimee L.</creatorcontrib><description>Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture
; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-861X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6615a1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28426643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</publisher><subject>Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data ; Disease transmission ; Food Microbiology ; Food Parasitology ; Foodborne diseases ; Foodborne Diseases - diagnosis ; Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology ; Full Report ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infection ; Medical tests ; Pathogenic microorganisms ; Population Surveillance ; Surveys ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2017-04, Vol.66 (15), p.397-403</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 U.S. Government Printing Office</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-7495c8af5e2190347b84fdf811959a7021dde1a7c1c806f9d9acaa2aa33102db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-7495c8af5e2190347b84fdf811959a7021dde1a7c1c806f9d9acaa2aa33102db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26404052$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26404052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28426643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marder, Ellyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cieslak, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronquist, Alicia B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lathrop, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vugia, Duc J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zansky, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, Kristin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, Beverly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauxe, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Aimee L.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016</title><title>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</title><addtitle>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</addtitle><description>Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture
; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance.</description><subject>Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food Parasitology</subject><subject>Foodborne diseases</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Full Report</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Pathogenic microorganisms</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0149-2195</issn><issn>1545-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYmNw5QayhIQ4LMVO4vy5IFVlg0oTILWVuEWu_SbxSOzOdlrttu8An3BfgwtOu41VanKwYv_e53395AmC1wSPCKU5_dh1GzPqujQllJEnwTGhCQ3zlPx8GhxjkhRhRAp6FLyw9hIPT4yfB0dRnkRpmsTHwd-p4lKA4oCYEmhuQAmLdIWmqgLupFYWbaRr0A_mGl2D_5wbpmwnnQOBJrrrtGqv0bwxuq8bdK612Cq5BtBZNWjs1LgBZqWq0cLCsDPpW9cbCKdKwMo3BeXQZ8lqpa2THM3BOj-HQrPerEG2LRtGvL35s-2w1EaBx63XBIvGftA17KPfwG20-XWKCEaL0WyEZtKBPUURJvHtzW-_pC-DZxVrLby6W0-CxfnZfPI1vPj-ZToZX4ScJrkLs6SgPGcVBW8ljpNsmSeVqHLijS1YhiMiBBCWccJznFaFKBhnLGIsjgmOxDI-CT7tdFf9sgPB_VUNa8uVkR0z16Vmstw_UbIpa70uaZpnJI-8wIc7AaOveu9M2UnLYbgp6N6WJC8IiWiUDei7HVqzFkqpKu0V-YCX48RTcUpj6qnwAOX_Lvj2WkEl_fYePzrA-1dAJ_nBgvePChpgrWusbvttoA4qc6OtNVA92EJwuU14OSS8vE-4L3j72MwH_D7SHnizAy6t0-b_eZrgBNMo_gf_wgXG</recordid><startdate>20170421</startdate><enddate>20170421</enddate><creator>Marder, Ellyn P.</creator><creator>Cieslak, Paul R.</creator><creator>Cronquist, Alicia B.</creator><creator>Dunn, John</creator><creator>Lathrop, Sarah</creator><creator>Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese</creator><creator>Ryan, Patricia</creator><creator>Smith, Kirk</creator><creator>Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa</creator><creator>Vugia, Duc J.</creator><creator>Zansky, Shelley</creator><creator>Holt, Kristin G.</creator><creator>Wolpert, Beverly J.</creator><creator>Lynch, Michael</creator><creator>Tauxe, Robert</creator><creator>Geissler, Aimee L.</creator><general>Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</general><general>U.S. Government Printing Office</general><general>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170421</creationdate><title>Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016</title><author>Marder, Ellyn P. ; Cieslak, Paul R. ; Cronquist, Alicia B. ; Dunn, John ; Lathrop, Sarah ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese ; Ryan, Patricia ; Smith, Kirk ; Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa ; Vugia, Duc J. ; Zansky, Shelley ; Holt, Kristin G. ; Wolpert, Beverly J. ; Lynch, Michael ; Tauxe, Robert ; Geissler, Aimee L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-7495c8af5e2190347b84fdf811959a7021dde1a7c1c806f9d9acaa2aa33102db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food Parasitology</topic><topic>Foodborne diseases</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Full Report</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Pathogenic microorganisms</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marder, Ellyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cieslak, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronquist, Alicia B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lathrop, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vugia, Duc J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zansky, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holt, Kristin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolpert, Beverly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauxe, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Aimee L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marder, Ellyn P.</au><au>Cieslak, Paul R.</au><au>Cronquist, Alicia B.</au><au>Dunn, John</au><au>Lathrop, Sarah</au><au>Rabatsky-Ehr, Therese</au><au>Ryan, Patricia</au><au>Smith, Kirk</au><au>Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa</au><au>Vugia, Duc J.</au><au>Zansky, Shelley</au><au>Holt, Kristin G.</au><au>Wolpert, Beverly J.</au><au>Lynch, Michael</au><au>Tauxe, Robert</au><au>Geissler, Aimee L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016</atitle><jtitle>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</jtitle><addtitle>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</addtitle><date>2017-04-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>397-403</pages><issn>0149-2195</issn><eissn>1545-861X</eissn><abstract>Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture
; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</pub><pmid>28426643</pmid><doi>10.15585/mmwr.mm6615a1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2195 |
ispartof | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2017-04, Vol.66 (15), p.397-403 |
issn | 0149-2195 1545-861X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5687182 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Culture Techniques - statistics & numerical data Diagnostic Tests, Routine - methods Diagnostic Tests, Routine - statistics & numerical data Disease transmission Food Microbiology Food Parasitology Foodborne diseases Foodborne Diseases - diagnosis Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology Full Report Health aspects Humans Incidence Infection Medical tests Pathogenic microorganisms Population Surveillance Surveys United States - epidemiology |
title | Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food and the Effect of Increasing Use of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Surveillance — Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2013–2016 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A10%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20and%20Trends%20of%20Infections%20with%20Pathogens%20Transmitted%20Commonly%20Through%20Food%20and%20the%20Effect%20of%20Increasing%20Use%20of%20Culture-Independent%20Diagnostic%20Tests%20on%20Surveillance%20%E2%80%94%20Foodborne%20Diseases%20Active%20Surveillance%20Network,%2010%20U.S.%20Sites,%202013%E2%80%932016&rft.jtitle=MMWR.%20Morbidity%20and%20mortality%20weekly%20report&rft.au=Marder,%20Ellyn%20P.&rft.date=2017-04-21&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=397-403&rft.issn=0149-2195&rft.eissn=1545-861X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15585/mmwr.mm6615a1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA491136535%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891125272&rft_id=info:pmid/28426643&rft_galeid=A491136535&rft_jstor_id=26404052&rfr_iscdi=true |