Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas

To assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton–photon radiat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2017-11, Vol.99 (4), p.787-796
Hauptverfasser: Sanford, Nina N., Yeap, Beow Y., Larvie, Mykol, Daartz, Juliane, Munzenrider, John E., Liebsch, Norbert J., Fullerton, Barbara, Pan, Elizabeth, Loeffler, Jay S., Shih, Helen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 4
container_start_page 787
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 99
creator Sanford, Nina N.
Yeap, Beow Y.
Larvie, Mykol
Daartz, Juliane
Munzenrider, John E.
Liebsch, Norbert J.
Fullerton, Barbara
Pan, Elizabeth
Loeffler, Jay S.
Shih, Helen A.
description To assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities. Between 1991 and 2000, 47 patients were randomized. Three patients were excluded for nonbenign histology; therefore, 44 patients were analyzed: 22 who received 55.8 Gy(RBE) and 22 who received 63.0 Gy(RBE). The median follow-up was 17.1 years. Local control for the entire cohort was 98% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Of the 5 patients with local recurrence, 4 occurred after 10 years of follow-up, and 3 were in the lower dose group (P=.322). In the modified intention to treat analysis, there was no difference in progression-free survival (P=.234) and overall survival (P=.271) between arms. A total of 26 patients (59%) experienced a grade 2 or higher late toxicity, including 9 patients (20%) incurring a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), 7 of which were deemed at least possibly attributable to irradiation. The median time between completion of radiation therapy and CVA was 5.6 years (range, 1.4-14.0 years). Fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy is effective for BM, with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk of late toxicities, including CVA after cranial radiation therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5654667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301617335678</els_id><sourcerecordid>28865924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-e06213d2624bd5147d26e0bd32d5266923afe83c030beea137af62f7489ce4f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UdtuEzEQtRCIpoU_QMgfwIbxZb2bFyQILSAVUUERvFleezZxlLVX9iZS-Po6ChR4qTTS8Yx9zoznEPKCwZwBU683c79JsRvnHFgzhxLQPiIz1jaLStT1z8dkBkJBJcrjM3Ke8wYAGGvkU3LG21bVCy5nZHeTYh7RTn6Pr-hXE1wc_C909Nu0cwca-1Jz3kw-Bvo-ZqSX2ZrtKf_hpzVdxqHzoRCK0BRDdbM-Ar1dYzLjgfYx0XcY_CrQzwXCysfB5GfkSW-2GZ__xgvy_erydvmxuv7y4dPy7XVlpRJThaA4E44rLjtXM9mUI0LnBHc1V2rBhemxFRYEdIiGicb0iveNbBcWZQ_igrw56Y67bkBnMUzJbPWY_GDSQUfj9f83wa_1Ku51rWqpVFME5EnAljXlhP09l4E-2qA3-mSDPtqgoQS0hfby3773pD97_zsYlt_vPSadrcdg0flUzNAu-oc73AGy7p5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sanford, Nina N. ; Yeap, Beow Y. ; Larvie, Mykol ; Daartz, Juliane ; Munzenrider, John E. ; Liebsch, Norbert J. ; Fullerton, Barbara ; Pan, Elizabeth ; Loeffler, Jay S. ; Shih, Helen A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanford, Nina N. ; Yeap, Beow Y. ; Larvie, Mykol ; Daartz, Juliane ; Munzenrider, John E. ; Liebsch, Norbert J. ; Fullerton, Barbara ; Pan, Elizabeth ; Loeffler, Jay S. ; Shih, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities. Between 1991 and 2000, 47 patients were randomized. Three patients were excluded for nonbenign histology; therefore, 44 patients were analyzed: 22 who received 55.8 Gy(RBE) and 22 who received 63.0 Gy(RBE). The median follow-up was 17.1 years. Local control for the entire cohort was 98% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Of the 5 patients with local recurrence, 4 occurred after 10 years of follow-up, and 3 were in the lower dose group (P=.322). In the modified intention to treat analysis, there was no difference in progression-free survival (P=.234) and overall survival (P=.271) between arms. A total of 26 patients (59%) experienced a grade 2 or higher late toxicity, including 9 patients (20%) incurring a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), 7 of which were deemed at least possibly attributable to irradiation. The median time between completion of radiation therapy and CVA was 5.6 years (range, 1.4-14.0 years). Fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy is effective for BM, with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk of late toxicities, including CVA after cranial radiation therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28865924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Disease-Free Survival ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis - methods ; Male ; Meningeal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Meningeal Neoplasms - mortality ; Meningeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Meningioma - diagnostic imaging ; Meningioma - mortality ; Meningioma - radiotherapy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy ; Photons - adverse effects ; Photons - therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Proton Therapy - adverse effects ; Proton Therapy - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; Relative Biological Effectiveness ; Stroke - etiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017-11, Vol.99 (4), p.787-796</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-e06213d2624bd5147d26e0bd32d5266923afe83c030beea137af62f7489ce4f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-e06213d2624bd5147d26e0bd32d5266923afe83c030beea137af62f7489ce4f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4235-3624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28865924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanford, Nina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeap, Beow Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larvie, Mykol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daartz, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munzenrider, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebsch, Norbert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities. Between 1991 and 2000, 47 patients were randomized. Three patients were excluded for nonbenign histology; therefore, 44 patients were analyzed: 22 who received 55.8 Gy(RBE) and 22 who received 63.0 Gy(RBE). The median follow-up was 17.1 years. Local control for the entire cohort was 98% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Of the 5 patients with local recurrence, 4 occurred after 10 years of follow-up, and 3 were in the lower dose group (P=.322). In the modified intention to treat analysis, there was no difference in progression-free survival (P=.234) and overall survival (P=.271) between arms. A total of 26 patients (59%) experienced a grade 2 or higher late toxicity, including 9 patients (20%) incurring a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), 7 of which were deemed at least possibly attributable to irradiation. The median time between completion of radiation therapy and CVA was 5.6 years (range, 1.4-14.0 years). Fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy is effective for BM, with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk of late toxicities, including CVA after cranial radiation therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meningeal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Meningeal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Meningeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Meningioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Meningioma - mortality</subject><subject>Meningioma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Photons - adverse effects</subject><subject>Photons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</subject><subject>Relative Biological Effectiveness</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UdtuEzEQtRCIpoU_QMgfwIbxZb2bFyQILSAVUUERvFleezZxlLVX9iZS-Po6ChR4qTTS8Yx9zoznEPKCwZwBU683c79JsRvnHFgzhxLQPiIz1jaLStT1z8dkBkJBJcrjM3Ke8wYAGGvkU3LG21bVCy5nZHeTYh7RTn6Pr-hXE1wc_C909Nu0cwca-1Jz3kw-Bvo-ZqSX2ZrtKf_hpzVdxqHzoRCK0BRDdbM-Ar1dYzLjgfYx0XcY_CrQzwXCysfB5GfkSW-2GZ__xgvy_erydvmxuv7y4dPy7XVlpRJThaA4E44rLjtXM9mUI0LnBHc1V2rBhemxFRYEdIiGicb0iveNbBcWZQ_igrw56Y67bkBnMUzJbPWY_GDSQUfj9f83wa_1Ku51rWqpVFME5EnAljXlhP09l4E-2qA3-mSDPtqgoQS0hfby3773pD97_zsYlt_vPSadrcdg0flUzNAu-oc73AGy7p5k</recordid><startdate>20171115</startdate><enddate>20171115</enddate><creator>Sanford, Nina N.</creator><creator>Yeap, Beow Y.</creator><creator>Larvie, Mykol</creator><creator>Daartz, Juliane</creator><creator>Munzenrider, John E.</creator><creator>Liebsch, Norbert J.</creator><creator>Fullerton, Barbara</creator><creator>Pan, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Loeffler, Jay S.</creator><creator>Shih, Helen A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-3624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171115</creationdate><title>Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas</title><author>Sanford, Nina N. ; Yeap, Beow Y. ; Larvie, Mykol ; Daartz, Juliane ; Munzenrider, John E. ; Liebsch, Norbert J. ; Fullerton, Barbara ; Pan, Elizabeth ; Loeffler, Jay S. ; Shih, Helen A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-e06213d2624bd5147d26e0bd32d5266923afe83c030beea137af62f7489ce4f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meningeal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Meningeal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Meningeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Meningioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Meningioma - mortality</topic><topic>Meningioma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Photons - adverse effects</topic><topic>Photons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</topic><topic>Relative Biological Effectiveness</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanford, Nina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeap, Beow Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larvie, Mykol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daartz, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munzenrider, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebsch, Norbert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Helen A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanford, Nina N.</au><au>Yeap, Beow Y.</au><au>Larvie, Mykol</au><au>Daartz, Juliane</au><au>Munzenrider, John E.</au><au>Liebsch, Norbert J.</au><au>Fullerton, Barbara</au><au>Pan, Elizabeth</au><au>Loeffler, Jay S.</au><au>Shih, Helen A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2017-11-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>787-796</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>To assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities. Between 1991 and 2000, 47 patients were randomized. Three patients were excluded for nonbenign histology; therefore, 44 patients were analyzed: 22 who received 55.8 Gy(RBE) and 22 who received 63.0 Gy(RBE). The median follow-up was 17.1 years. Local control for the entire cohort was 98% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Of the 5 patients with local recurrence, 4 occurred after 10 years of follow-up, and 3 were in the lower dose group (P=.322). In the modified intention to treat analysis, there was no difference in progression-free survival (P=.234) and overall survival (P=.271) between arms. A total of 26 patients (59%) experienced a grade 2 or higher late toxicity, including 9 patients (20%) incurring a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), 7 of which were deemed at least possibly attributable to irradiation. The median time between completion of radiation therapy and CVA was 5.6 years (range, 1.4-14.0 years). Fractionated combined proton–photon radiation therapy is effective for BM, with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk of late toxicities, including CVA after cranial radiation therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28865924</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-3624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017-11, Vol.99 (4), p.787-796
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5654667
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Disease-Free Survival
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis - methods
Male
Meningeal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Meningeal Neoplasms - mortality
Meningeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Meningioma - diagnostic imaging
Meningioma - mortality
Meningioma - radiotherapy
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy
Photons - adverse effects
Photons - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Proton Therapy - adverse effects
Proton Therapy - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Relative Biological Effectiveness
Stroke - etiology
Time Factors
title Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective,%20Randomized%20Study%20of%20Radiation%20Dose%20Escalation%20With%20Combined%20Proton-Photon%20Therapy%20for%20Benign%20Meningiomas&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Sanford,%20Nina%20N.&rft.date=2017-11-15&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=787-796&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E28865924%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28865924&rft_els_id=S0360301617335678&rfr_iscdi=true