Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device

The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrative biology (Cambridge) 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.800-809
Hauptverfasser: McClanahan, Patrick D, Xu, Joyce H, Fang-Yen, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 809
container_issue 10
container_start_page 800
container_title Integrative biology (Cambridge)
container_volume 9
creator McClanahan, Patrick D
Xu, Joyce H
Fang-Yen, Christopher
description The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c7ib00120g
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5645015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2010866835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9732f450c3d2f0570844503959c29a92d14c23e94bd2b174eec029a00cd678623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcuKFTEQDaI4M1c3foAE3MjA1bz6kY0gF18w4EbXIZ1Ud2dIJ23SuTj48-Yy4zi6qhR16uScOgi9oOQNJVy-NZ0bCKGMTI_QOe2abi870j9-8D5DFzlfE9IKQsRTdMZ6SQWn9Bz9OsRl1cmFCR80hJhmPVi3uYzBw6RDxhOEzQPWweJZpzzjLRYz4wR5jSEDHmDWRxcTLvnEovFS_OZWDz-hbtzYpIt3Bi_OpDj64mxtLBydgWfoyah9hud3dYe-f_zw7fB5f_X105fD-6u9EZRu1QBno2iI4ZaNpKl2RO24bKRhUktmqTCMgxSDZQPtBIAhdUCIsW3Xt4zv0Ltb3rUMC1hTDSXt1ZrcotONitqpfyfBzWqKR9W09SPaVILXdwQp_iiQN7W4bMB7HSCWrKisd216WlXt0Kv_oNexpFDtKUYo6du25yfCy1tUvUnOCcZ7MZSoU6bqb6YV_PKh_HvonxD5b_PTntc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010866835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>McClanahan, Patrick D ; Xu, Joyce H ; Fang-Yen, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>McClanahan, Patrick D ; Xu, Joyce H ; Fang-Yen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-9708</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1757-9694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-9708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c7ib00120g</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28914311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Assaying ; Behavior, Animal ; Caenorhabditis elegans ; Caenorhabditis elegans - physiology ; Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins - physiology ; Calibration ; Genetics ; Hydraulic equipment ; Hydraulic valves ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Innervation ; Lab-On-A-Chip Devices ; Locomotion ; Mechanical stimuli ; Mechanoreceptors - physiology ; Mechanotransduction ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology ; Microfluidics ; Movement ; Nematodes ; Neurons ; Nociception ; Pain perception ; Pressure ; Receptive field ; Refractometry ; Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology ; Stimuli ; Tactile stimuli ; Touch</subject><ispartof>Integrative biology (Cambridge), 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.800-809</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9732f450c3d2f0570844503959c29a92d14c23e94bd2b174eec029a00cd678623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9732f450c3d2f0570844503959c29a92d14c23e94bd2b174eec029a00cd678623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28914311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClanahan, Patrick D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Joyce H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang-Yen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device</title><title>Integrative biology (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Integr Biol (Camb)</addtitle><description>The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans - physiology</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins - physiology</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Hydraulic equipment</subject><subject>Hydraulic valves</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Innervation</subject><subject>Lab-On-A-Chip Devices</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Mechanical stimuli</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</subject><subject>Microfluidics</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Nociception</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Receptive field</subject><subject>Refractometry</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Tactile stimuli</subject><subject>Touch</subject><issn>1757-9708</issn><issn>1757-9694</issn><issn>1757-9708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUcuKFTEQDaI4M1c3foAE3MjA1bz6kY0gF18w4EbXIZ1Ud2dIJ23SuTj48-Yy4zi6qhR16uScOgi9oOQNJVy-NZ0bCKGMTI_QOe2abi870j9-8D5DFzlfE9IKQsRTdMZ6SQWn9Bz9OsRl1cmFCR80hJhmPVi3uYzBw6RDxhOEzQPWweJZpzzjLRYz4wR5jSEDHmDWRxcTLvnEovFS_OZWDz-hbtzYpIt3Bi_OpDj64mxtLBydgWfoyah9hud3dYe-f_zw7fB5f_X105fD-6u9EZRu1QBno2iI4ZaNpKl2RO24bKRhUktmqTCMgxSDZQPtBIAhdUCIsW3Xt4zv0Ltb3rUMC1hTDSXt1ZrcotONitqpfyfBzWqKR9W09SPaVILXdwQp_iiQN7W4bMB7HSCWrKisd216WlXt0Kv_oNexpFDtKUYo6du25yfCy1tUvUnOCcZ7MZSoU6bqb6YV_PKh_HvonxD5b_PTntc</recordid><startdate>20171016</startdate><enddate>20171016</enddate><creator>McClanahan, Patrick D</creator><creator>Xu, Joyce H</creator><creator>Fang-Yen, Christopher</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171016</creationdate><title>Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device</title><author>McClanahan, Patrick D ; Xu, Joyce H ; Fang-Yen, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9732f450c3d2f0570844503959c29a92d14c23e94bd2b174eec029a00cd678623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans - physiology</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins - physiology</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Hydraulic equipment</topic><topic>Hydraulic valves</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Innervation</topic><topic>Lab-On-A-Chip Devices</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Mechanical stimuli</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</topic><topic>Microfluidics</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Nociception</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Receptive field</topic><topic>Refractometry</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Tactile stimuli</topic><topic>Touch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClanahan, Patrick D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Joyce H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang-Yen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Integrative biology (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClanahan, Patrick D</au><au>Xu, Joyce H</au><au>Fang-Yen, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device</atitle><jtitle>Integrative biology (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Biol (Camb)</addtitle><date>2017-10-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>800</spage><epage>809</epage><pages>800-809</pages><issn>1757-9708</issn><issn>1757-9694</issn><eissn>1757-9708</eissn><abstract>The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28914311</pmid><doi>10.1039/c7ib00120g</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-9708
ispartof Integrative biology (Cambridge), 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.800-809
issn 1757-9708
1757-9694
1757-9708
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5645015
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
Assaying
Behavior, Animal
Caenorhabditis elegans
Caenorhabditis elegans - physiology
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins - physiology
Calibration
Genetics
Hydraulic equipment
Hydraulic valves
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Innervation
Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
Locomotion
Mechanical stimuli
Mechanoreceptors - physiology
Mechanotransduction
Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology
Microfluidics
Movement
Nematodes
Neurons
Nociception
Pain perception
Pressure
Receptive field
Refractometry
Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology
Stimuli
Tactile stimuli
Touch
title Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A07%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Caenorhabditis%20elegans%20gentle%20and%20harsh%20touch%20response%20behavior%20using%20a%20multiplexed%20hydraulic%20microfluidic%20device&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20biology%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=McClanahan,%20Patrick%20D&rft.date=2017-10-16&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=800&rft.epage=809&rft.pages=800-809&rft.issn=1757-9708&rft.eissn=1757-9708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c7ib00120g&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2010866835%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010866835&rft_id=info:pmid/28914311&rfr_iscdi=true