The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Serum biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC), have been widely used to evaluate renal function in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD). This article aims to assess the value of determining SCr and SCysC levels in patients that have long-term kidney disease....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oncotarget 2017-09, Vol.8 (42), p.72985-72999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72999 |
---|---|
container_issue | 42 |
container_start_page | 72985 |
container_title | Oncotarget |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Qiu, Xilian Liu, Chunyong Ye, Yuqiu Li, Huiqun Chen, Yanbing Fu, Yongmei Liu, Zhenjie Huang, Xianzhang Zhang, Yunqiang Liao, Xueyuan Liu, Hongyong Zhao, Wenbo Liu, Xun |
description | Serum biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC), have been widely used to evaluate renal function in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
This article aims to assess the value of determining SCr and SCysC levels in patients that have long-term kidney disease. Approaches: MEDLINE, EmBase, the Cochrane Library and other databases were searched using both MeSH terms and text words to collect research that assessed the diagnostic value of using SCr and SCysC to evaluate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in patients with CKD. Data were converted into fourfold tables. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and meta-analyses were accomplished via Meta-Disc version 1.4.
In total, 21 relevant articles involving 3112 study subjects were included in our review. Results showed that the collective sensitivity for SCr and SCysC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled specificity for SCr and SCysC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
), the pooled sensitivity is 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96) for SCysC and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) for SCr.
The diagnostical accuracy for impaired kidney function favors SCysC. Confidence intervals for the pooled sensitivity and specificity for SCr and SCysC overlap. However, SCysC is more sensitive for estimating GFR than SCr when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
). |
doi_str_mv | 10.18632/oncotarget.20271 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5641185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1956099171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b0e1e25f7f382845fa69e397c85163399d990b846a68f934e2183a7ee979fda23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUc1u1DAQjhCIVqUPwAX5yCUltuPE5oCEqgKVKnEpZ2vWmWQNjr3Yzlb7ajwdzra0xQePx_5-xvqq6i1tLqjsOPsQvAkZ4oT5gjWspy-qU6paVTMh-Mtn55PqPKWfTVmi7SVTr6sTpppOyZadVn9ut0gGC5MPKVtD9uAWJGEkCeMyExMRsvXWIwE_EHNIee2JIWXDFby2E5lcmAvBQSSjdTmW2-BJKbgCd6VFnxO5s3lLzDYGX6x-2cHjoZgnhIQfCZBU5HGGdQ5nMxb6EpFE3Fu8O_rPmKEGD-6QbHpTvRrBJTx_qGfVjy9Xt5ff6pvvX68vP9_Uhosu15sGKTIx9iOXTLZihE4hV72RgnacKzUo1Wxk20EnR8VbZFRy6BFVr8YBGD-rPt3r7pbNjIMpP4ng9C7aGeJBB7D6_xdvt3oKey26llIpisD7B4EYfi-Ysp5tMugceAxL0lSJrlGK9rRA6T3UxJBSxPHRhjb6GLt-il0fYy-cd8_ne2T8C5n_BZbasgk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1956099171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Qiu, Xilian ; Liu, Chunyong ; Ye, Yuqiu ; Li, Huiqun ; Chen, Yanbing ; Fu, Yongmei ; Liu, Zhenjie ; Huang, Xianzhang ; Zhang, Yunqiang ; Liao, Xueyuan ; Liu, Hongyong ; Zhao, Wenbo ; Liu, Xun</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Xilian ; Liu, Chunyong ; Ye, Yuqiu ; Li, Huiqun ; Chen, Yanbing ; Fu, Yongmei ; Liu, Zhenjie ; Huang, Xianzhang ; Zhang, Yunqiang ; Liao, Xueyuan ; Liu, Hongyong ; Zhao, Wenbo ; Liu, Xun</creatorcontrib><description>Serum biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC), have been widely used to evaluate renal function in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
This article aims to assess the value of determining SCr and SCysC levels in patients that have long-term kidney disease. Approaches: MEDLINE, EmBase, the Cochrane Library and other databases were searched using both MeSH terms and text words to collect research that assessed the diagnostic value of using SCr and SCysC to evaluate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in patients with CKD. Data were converted into fourfold tables. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and meta-analyses were accomplished via Meta-Disc version 1.4.
In total, 21 relevant articles involving 3112 study subjects were included in our review. Results showed that the collective sensitivity for SCr and SCysC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled specificity for SCr and SCysC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
), the pooled sensitivity is 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96) for SCysC and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) for SCr.
The diagnostical accuracy for impaired kidney function favors SCysC. Confidence intervals for the pooled sensitivity and specificity for SCr and SCysC overlap. However, SCysC is more sensitive for estimating GFR than SCr when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20271</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29069842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Impact Journals LLC</publisher><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Oncotarget, 2017-09, Vol.8 (42), p.72985-72999</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Qiu et al. 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b0e1e25f7f382845fa69e397c85163399d990b846a68f934e2183a7ee979fda23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b0e1e25f7f382845fa69e397c85163399d990b846a68f934e2183a7ee979fda23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641185/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5641185/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29069842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Xilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Yuqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xianzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yunqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Xueyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xun</creatorcontrib><title>The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis</title><title>Oncotarget</title><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><description>Serum biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC), have been widely used to evaluate renal function in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
This article aims to assess the value of determining SCr and SCysC levels in patients that have long-term kidney disease. Approaches: MEDLINE, EmBase, the Cochrane Library and other databases were searched using both MeSH terms and text words to collect research that assessed the diagnostic value of using SCr and SCysC to evaluate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in patients with CKD. Data were converted into fourfold tables. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and meta-analyses were accomplished via Meta-Disc version 1.4.
In total, 21 relevant articles involving 3112 study subjects were included in our review. Results showed that the collective sensitivity for SCr and SCysC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled specificity for SCr and SCysC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
), the pooled sensitivity is 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96) for SCysC and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) for SCr.
The diagnostical accuracy for impaired kidney function favors SCysC. Confidence intervals for the pooled sensitivity and specificity for SCr and SCysC overlap. However, SCysC is more sensitive for estimating GFR than SCr when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
).</description><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>1949-2553</issn><issn>1949-2553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUc1u1DAQjhCIVqUPwAX5yCUltuPE5oCEqgKVKnEpZ2vWmWQNjr3Yzlb7ajwdzra0xQePx_5-xvqq6i1tLqjsOPsQvAkZ4oT5gjWspy-qU6paVTMh-Mtn55PqPKWfTVmi7SVTr6sTpppOyZadVn9ut0gGC5MPKVtD9uAWJGEkCeMyExMRsvXWIwE_EHNIee2JIWXDFby2E5lcmAvBQSSjdTmW2-BJKbgCd6VFnxO5s3lLzDYGX6x-2cHjoZgnhIQfCZBU5HGGdQ5nMxb6EpFE3Fu8O_rPmKEGD-6QbHpTvRrBJTx_qGfVjy9Xt5ff6pvvX68vP9_Uhosu15sGKTIx9iOXTLZihE4hV72RgnacKzUo1Wxk20EnR8VbZFRy6BFVr8YBGD-rPt3r7pbNjIMpP4ng9C7aGeJBB7D6_xdvt3oKey26llIpisD7B4EYfi-Ysp5tMugceAxL0lSJrlGK9rRA6T3UxJBSxPHRhjb6GLt-il0fYy-cd8_ne2T8C5n_BZbasgk</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Qiu, Xilian</creator><creator>Liu, Chunyong</creator><creator>Ye, Yuqiu</creator><creator>Li, Huiqun</creator><creator>Chen, Yanbing</creator><creator>Fu, Yongmei</creator><creator>Liu, Zhenjie</creator><creator>Huang, Xianzhang</creator><creator>Zhang, Yunqiang</creator><creator>Liao, Xueyuan</creator><creator>Liu, Hongyong</creator><creator>Zhao, Wenbo</creator><creator>Liu, Xun</creator><general>Impact Journals LLC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis</title><author>Qiu, Xilian ; Liu, Chunyong ; Ye, Yuqiu ; Li, Huiqun ; Chen, Yanbing ; Fu, Yongmei ; Liu, Zhenjie ; Huang, Xianzhang ; Zhang, Yunqiang ; Liao, Xueyuan ; Liu, Hongyong ; Zhao, Wenbo ; Liu, Xun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b0e1e25f7f382845fa69e397c85163399d990b846a68f934e2183a7ee979fda23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Xilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Yuqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xianzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yunqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Xueyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiu, Xilian</au><au>Liu, Chunyong</au><au>Ye, Yuqiu</au><au>Li, Huiqun</au><au>Chen, Yanbing</au><au>Fu, Yongmei</au><au>Liu, Zhenjie</au><au>Huang, Xianzhang</au><au>Zhang, Yunqiang</au><au>Liao, Xueyuan</au><au>Liu, Hongyong</au><au>Zhao, Wenbo</au><au>Liu, Xun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>42</issue><spage>72985</spage><epage>72999</epage><pages>72985-72999</pages><issn>1949-2553</issn><eissn>1949-2553</eissn><abstract>Serum biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC), have been widely used to evaluate renal function in patients who have chronic kidney disease (CKD).
This article aims to assess the value of determining SCr and SCysC levels in patients that have long-term kidney disease. Approaches: MEDLINE, EmBase, the Cochrane Library and other databases were searched using both MeSH terms and text words to collect research that assessed the diagnostic value of using SCr and SCysC to evaluate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in patients with CKD. Data were converted into fourfold tables. Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves and meta-analyses were accomplished via Meta-Disc version 1.4.
In total, 21 relevant articles involving 3112 study subjects were included in our review. Results showed that the collective sensitivity for SCr and SCysC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The pooled specificity for SCr and SCysC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
), the pooled sensitivity is 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96) for SCysC and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82) for SCr.
The diagnostical accuracy for impaired kidney function favors SCysC. Confidence intervals for the pooled sensitivity and specificity for SCr and SCysC overlap. However, SCysC is more sensitive for estimating GFR than SCr when GFR cut-off values are set to 60 (ml/min/1.73 m
).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Impact Journals LLC</pub><pmid>29069842</pmid><doi>10.18632/oncotarget.20271</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1949-2553 |
ispartof | Oncotarget, 2017-09, Vol.8 (42), p.72985-72999 |
issn | 1949-2553 1949-2553 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5641185 |
source | Freely Accessible Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Meta-Analysis |
title | The diagnostic value of serum creatinine and cystatin c in evaluating glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A37%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20diagnostic%20value%20of%20serum%20creatinine%20and%20cystatin%20c%20in%20evaluating%20glomerular%20filtration%20rate%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20kidney%20disease:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Oncotarget&rft.au=Qiu,%20Xilian&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=42&rft.spage=72985&rft.epage=72999&rft.pages=72985-72999&rft.issn=1949-2553&rft.eissn=1949-2553&rft_id=info:doi/10.18632/oncotarget.20271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1956099171%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1956099171&rft_id=info:pmid/29069842&rfr_iscdi=true |