Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism
Despite the long persistence of many mutualisms, it is largely unknown which mechanisms stabilize these interactions. This is especially true if only one mutualism partner can choose alternative partners while the other cannot, resulting in a power asymmetry. According to biological market theory th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2017-10, Vol.7 (1), p.13170-9, Article 13170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13170 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Schöner, Michael G. Schöner, Caroline R. Ermisch, Rebecca Puechmaille, Sébastien J. Grafe, T. Ulmar Tan, Moi Chan Kerth, Gerald |
description | Despite the long persistence of many mutualisms, it is largely unknown which mechanisms stabilize these interactions. This is especially true if only one mutualism partner can choose alternative partners while the other cannot, resulting in a power asymmetry. According to biological market theory the choosing partner should prefer the more dependent partner if the latter offers commodities of higher quality than its competitors. We tested this prediction using Bornean carnivorous pitcher plants (
Nepenthes hemsleyana
) that strongly rely on faecal nitrogen of bats (
Kerivoula hardwickii
) which roost inside the pitchers. The bats also roost in furled leaves of various plants. Surprisingly, during field observations the bats did not always choose
N. hemsleyana
pitchers despite their superior quality but were generally faithful either to pitchers or to furled leaves. In behavioural experiments 21% of the leaf-roosting bats switched to pitchers, while the majority of these bats and all pitcher-roosting individuals were faithful to the roost type in which we had found them. Genetic differentiation cannot explain this faithfulness, which likely results from different roosting traditions. Such traditions could have stabilizing or destabilizing effects on various mutualisms and should be investigated in more detail. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-017-13535-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5640698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957861150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-864d3972b4ba12efc9052ceee16376725e8d13e5e34ab970b63c5607297c79d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWtQ_4EEWvOhhNZNsks1FKOIXFDyo55BNU5uyHzXJCvrrTV2VWjCXhJln3pnJi9AR4HPAtLwIBTBZ5hhEDpRRlrMtNCK4YDmhhGyvvffQYQgLnA4jsgC5i_aIxBQzKUbo_DHqytXuQ0fXtVk3y3RW6ZgvXTRz67NlrduYNX3sde1Cc4B2ZroO9vD73kfPN9dPV3f55OH2_mo8yQ3DZcxLXkypFKQqKg3EzoxMvY21FjgVXBBmyylQyywtdCUFrjg1jGNBpDBCTgndR5eD7rKvGjs1to1e12rpXaP9u-q0U38zrZurl-5NMV5gLsskcDYIzDfK7sYTtYphKNMcnL5BYk-_m_nutbchqsYFY-u0uu36oEAyKIADxwk92UAXXe_b9BUrSpQcgK0oMlDGdyF4O_udALBauacG99IQQn25p1gqOl5f-bfkx6sE0AEIKdW-WL_W-3_ZT9qpork</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957861150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Schöner, Michael G. ; Schöner, Caroline R. ; Ermisch, Rebecca ; Puechmaille, Sébastien J. ; Grafe, T. Ulmar ; Tan, Moi Chan ; Kerth, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Schöner, Michael G. ; Schöner, Caroline R. ; Ermisch, Rebecca ; Puechmaille, Sébastien J. ; Grafe, T. Ulmar ; Tan, Moi Chan ; Kerth, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the long persistence of many mutualisms, it is largely unknown which mechanisms stabilize these interactions. This is especially true if only one mutualism partner can choose alternative partners while the other cannot, resulting in a power asymmetry. According to biological market theory the choosing partner should prefer the more dependent partner if the latter offers commodities of higher quality than its competitors. We tested this prediction using Bornean carnivorous pitcher plants (
Nepenthes hemsleyana
) that strongly rely on faecal nitrogen of bats (
Kerivoula hardwickii
) which roost inside the pitchers. The bats also roost in furled leaves of various plants. Surprisingly, during field observations the bats did not always choose
N. hemsleyana
pitchers despite their superior quality but were generally faithful either to pitchers or to furled leaves. In behavioural experiments 21% of the leaf-roosting bats switched to pitchers, while the majority of these bats and all pitcher-roosting individuals were faithful to the roost type in which we had found them. Genetic differentiation cannot explain this faithfulness, which likely results from different roosting traditions. Such traditions could have stabilizing or destabilizing effects on various mutualisms and should be investigated in more detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13535-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29030597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>38/22 ; 38/77 ; 631/158/856 ; 631/449/2676 ; 631/601/18 ; Animal biology ; Animals ; Chiroptera ; Chiroptera - physiology ; Ecology, environment ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; multidisciplinary ; Mutualism ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Roosting behavior ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Symbiosis ; Symbiosis - physiology ; Traditions ; Vertebrate Zoology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2017-10, Vol.7 (1), p.13170-9, Article 13170</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-864d3972b4ba12efc9052ceee16376725e8d13e5e34ab970b63c5607297c79d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-864d3972b4ba12efc9052ceee16376725e8d13e5e34ab970b63c5607297c79d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7538-7367 ; 0000-0001-9517-5775</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640698/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640698/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,41099,42168,51554,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29030597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01872563$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schöner, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöner, Caroline R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ermisch, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafe, T. Ulmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Moi Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerth, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Despite the long persistence of many mutualisms, it is largely unknown which mechanisms stabilize these interactions. This is especially true if only one mutualism partner can choose alternative partners while the other cannot, resulting in a power asymmetry. According to biological market theory the choosing partner should prefer the more dependent partner if the latter offers commodities of higher quality than its competitors. We tested this prediction using Bornean carnivorous pitcher plants (
Nepenthes hemsleyana
) that strongly rely on faecal nitrogen of bats (
Kerivoula hardwickii
) which roost inside the pitchers. The bats also roost in furled leaves of various plants. Surprisingly, during field observations the bats did not always choose
N. hemsleyana
pitchers despite their superior quality but were generally faithful either to pitchers or to furled leaves. In behavioural experiments 21% of the leaf-roosting bats switched to pitchers, while the majority of these bats and all pitcher-roosting individuals were faithful to the roost type in which we had found them. Genetic differentiation cannot explain this faithfulness, which likely results from different roosting traditions. Such traditions could have stabilizing or destabilizing effects on various mutualisms and should be investigated in more detail.</description><subject>38/22</subject><subject>38/77</subject><subject>631/158/856</subject><subject>631/449/2676</subject><subject>631/601/18</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Chiroptera - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Roosting behavior</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Symbiosis - physiology</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Vertebrate Zoology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMoWtQ_4EEWvOhhNZNsks1FKOIXFDyo55BNU5uyHzXJCvrrTV2VWjCXhJln3pnJi9AR4HPAtLwIBTBZ5hhEDpRRlrMtNCK4YDmhhGyvvffQYQgLnA4jsgC5i_aIxBQzKUbo_DHqytXuQ0fXtVk3y3RW6ZgvXTRz67NlrduYNX3sde1Cc4B2ZroO9vD73kfPN9dPV3f55OH2_mo8yQ3DZcxLXkypFKQqKg3EzoxMvY21FjgVXBBmyylQyywtdCUFrjg1jGNBpDBCTgndR5eD7rKvGjs1to1e12rpXaP9u-q0U38zrZurl-5NMV5gLsskcDYIzDfK7sYTtYphKNMcnL5BYk-_m_nutbchqsYFY-u0uu36oEAyKIADxwk92UAXXe_b9BUrSpQcgK0oMlDGdyF4O_udALBauacG99IQQn25p1gqOl5f-bfkx6sE0AEIKdW-WL_W-3_ZT9qpork</recordid><startdate>20171013</startdate><enddate>20171013</enddate><creator>Schöner, Michael G.</creator><creator>Schöner, Caroline R.</creator><creator>Ermisch, Rebecca</creator><creator>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</creator><creator>Grafe, T. Ulmar</creator><creator>Tan, Moi Chan</creator><creator>Kerth, Gerald</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-7367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-5775</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171013</creationdate><title>Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism</title><author>Schöner, Michael G. ; Schöner, Caroline R. ; Ermisch, Rebecca ; Puechmaille, Sébastien J. ; Grafe, T. Ulmar ; Tan, Moi Chan ; Kerth, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-864d3972b4ba12efc9052ceee16376725e8d13e5e34ab970b63c5607297c79d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>38/22</topic><topic>38/77</topic><topic>631/158/856</topic><topic>631/449/2676</topic><topic>631/601/18</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Chiroptera - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Roosting behavior</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Symbiosis - physiology</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Vertebrate Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schöner, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöner, Caroline R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ermisch, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafe, T. Ulmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Moi Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerth, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schöner, Michael G.</au><au>Schöner, Caroline R.</au><au>Ermisch, Rebecca</au><au>Puechmaille, Sébastien J.</au><au>Grafe, T. Ulmar</au><au>Tan, Moi Chan</au><au>Kerth, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2017-10-13</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13170</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>13170-9</pages><artnum>13170</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Despite the long persistence of many mutualisms, it is largely unknown which mechanisms stabilize these interactions. This is especially true if only one mutualism partner can choose alternative partners while the other cannot, resulting in a power asymmetry. According to biological market theory the choosing partner should prefer the more dependent partner if the latter offers commodities of higher quality than its competitors. We tested this prediction using Bornean carnivorous pitcher plants (
Nepenthes hemsleyana
) that strongly rely on faecal nitrogen of bats (
Kerivoula hardwickii
) which roost inside the pitchers. The bats also roost in furled leaves of various plants. Surprisingly, during field observations the bats did not always choose
N. hemsleyana
pitchers despite their superior quality but were generally faithful either to pitchers or to furled leaves. In behavioural experiments 21% of the leaf-roosting bats switched to pitchers, while the majority of these bats and all pitcher-roosting individuals were faithful to the roost type in which we had found them. Genetic differentiation cannot explain this faithfulness, which likely results from different roosting traditions. Such traditions could have stabilizing or destabilizing effects on various mutualisms and should be investigated in more detail.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>29030597</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-017-13535-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-7367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-5775</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2017-10, Vol.7 (1), p.13170-9, Article 13170 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5640698 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 38/22 38/77 631/158/856 631/449/2676 631/601/18 Animal biology Animals Chiroptera Chiroptera - physiology Ecology, environment Humanities and Social Sciences Leaves Life Sciences Magnoliopsida - physiology multidisciplinary Mutualism Nitrogen - metabolism Roosting behavior Science Science (multidisciplinary) Symbiosis Symbiosis - physiology Traditions Vertebrate Zoology |
title | Stabilization of a bat-pitcher plant mutualism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A02%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stabilization%20of%20a%20bat-pitcher%20plant%20mutualism&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Sch%C3%B6ner,%20Michael%20G.&rft.date=2017-10-13&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13170&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=13170-9&rft.artnum=13170&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-017-13535-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1957861150%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957861150&rft_id=info:pmid/29030597&rfr_iscdi=true |