Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision
Patient-specific phantomless calibration of computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to simplify and expand the use of pre-existing clinical CT for quantitative bone densitometry and bone strength analysis for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. In this study, we quantified the inter-operato...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2017-10, Vol.103, p.325-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | Bone (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Lee, David C. Hoffmann, Paul F. Kopperdahl, David L. Keaveny, Tony M. |
description | Patient-specific phantomless calibration of computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to simplify and expand the use of pre-existing clinical CT for quantitative bone densitometry and bone strength analysis for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. In this study, we quantified the inter-operator reanalysis precision errors for a novel implementation of patient-specific phantomless calibration, using air and either aortic blood or hip adipose tissue as internal calibrating reference materials, and sought to confirm the equivalence between phantomless and (traditional) phantom-based measurements. CT scans of the spine and hip for 25 women and 15 men (mean±SD age of 67±9years, range 41–86years), one scan per anatomic site per patient, were analyzed independently by two analysts using the VirtuOst software (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). The scans were acquired at 120kVp, with a slice thickness/increment of 3mm or less, on nine different CT scanner models across 24 different scanners. The main parameters assessed were areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (total hip and femoral neck), trabecular volumetric BMD at the spine, and vertebral and femoral strength by finite element analysis; other volumetric BMD measures were also assessed. We found that the reanalysis precision errors for all phantomless measurements were ≤0.5%, which was as good as for phantom calibration. Regression analysis indicated equivalence of the phantom- versus phantomless-calibrated measurements (slope not different than unity, R2≥0.98). Of the main parameters assessed, non-significant paired mean differences (n=40) between the two measurements ranged from 0.6% for hip areal BMD to 1.1% for mid-vertebral trabecular BMD. These results indicate that phantom-equivalent measurements of both BMD and finite element-derived bone strength can be reliably obtained from CT scans using patient-specific phantomless calibration.
•Phantomless calibration of CT scans has excellent inter-operator precision.•Precision for finite element-derived bone strength is comparable to precision for BMD.•Accuracy of phantomless calibration was confirmed vs. phantom calibration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5636218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8756328217302648</els_id><sourcerecordid>1926687402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6958b372ed31026a3095d7c63837c056a86dfd62a5953ed496700c54c5bcc10d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1ERUPhBVggL9lM8E_8MxJCooH-SEWwKGvLY99pHM3YwZ5U6o6H4Al5knqUUpUN0pW8uOd8vjoHoTeULCmh8v122aUIS0aoWpI6rH2GFlQr3jAl-XO00ErIhjPNjtHLUraEEN4q-gIdM62UFq1eoPx9Y-OUxgFKwc4Ooct2Cini1OP1NS7OxoL7lPEItuwzjBCneXf69TO20eP5AlymDPFm2vz59fsyTpCbtIOKqa4MNtrhroSCdxlcKBX9Ch31dijw-uE9QT_OvlyvL5qrb-eX609XjROMTo1she64YuA5JUxaTlrhlZNcc-WIkFZL33vJrGgFB79qpSLEiZUTnXOUeH6CPh64u303gnf18mwHs8thtPnOJBvMv5sYNuYm3RohuWRUV8C7B0BOP_dQJjOG4mAYbIS0L4a2TEqtVoRVKTtIXU6lZOgfv6HEzGWZrZmjMnNZhtRhbTW9fXrgo-VvO1Xw4SCAGtNtgGyKCxAd-FDDnIxP4X_8ey4XqVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926687402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lee, David C. ; Hoffmann, Paul F. ; Kopperdahl, David L. ; Keaveny, Tony M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, David C. ; Hoffmann, Paul F. ; Kopperdahl, David L. ; Keaveny, Tony M.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient-specific phantomless calibration of computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to simplify and expand the use of pre-existing clinical CT for quantitative bone densitometry and bone strength analysis for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. In this study, we quantified the inter-operator reanalysis precision errors for a novel implementation of patient-specific phantomless calibration, using air and either aortic blood or hip adipose tissue as internal calibrating reference materials, and sought to confirm the equivalence between phantomless and (traditional) phantom-based measurements. CT scans of the spine and hip for 25 women and 15 men (mean±SD age of 67±9years, range 41–86years), one scan per anatomic site per patient, were analyzed independently by two analysts using the VirtuOst software (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). The scans were acquired at 120kVp, with a slice thickness/increment of 3mm or less, on nine different CT scanner models across 24 different scanners. The main parameters assessed were areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (total hip and femoral neck), trabecular volumetric BMD at the spine, and vertebral and femoral strength by finite element analysis; other volumetric BMD measures were also assessed. We found that the reanalysis precision errors for all phantomless measurements were ≤0.5%, which was as good as for phantom calibration. Regression analysis indicated equivalence of the phantom- versus phantomless-calibrated measurements (slope not different than unity, R2≥0.98). Of the main parameters assessed, non-significant paired mean differences (n=40) between the two measurements ranged from 0.6% for hip areal BMD to 1.1% for mid-vertebral trabecular BMD. These results indicate that phantom-equivalent measurements of both BMD and finite element-derived bone strength can be reliably obtained from CT scans using patient-specific phantomless calibration.
•Phantomless calibration of CT scans has excellent inter-operator precision.•Precision for finite element-derived bone strength is comparable to precision for BMD.•Accuracy of phantomless calibration was confirmed vs. phantom calibration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-3282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28778598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; BMD ; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Density ; Bone strength ; Calibration ; Female ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Osteoporosis ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Precision ; Repeatability ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><ispartof>Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2017-10, Vol.103, p.325-333</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6958b372ed31026a3095d7c63837c056a86dfd62a5953ed496700c54c5bcc10d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6958b372ed31026a3095d7c63837c056a86dfd62a5953ed496700c54c5bcc10d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopperdahl, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keaveny, Tony M.</creatorcontrib><title>Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision</title><title>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><description>Patient-specific phantomless calibration of computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to simplify and expand the use of pre-existing clinical CT for quantitative bone densitometry and bone strength analysis for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. In this study, we quantified the inter-operator reanalysis precision errors for a novel implementation of patient-specific phantomless calibration, using air and either aortic blood or hip adipose tissue as internal calibrating reference materials, and sought to confirm the equivalence between phantomless and (traditional) phantom-based measurements. CT scans of the spine and hip for 25 women and 15 men (mean±SD age of 67±9years, range 41–86years), one scan per anatomic site per patient, were analyzed independently by two analysts using the VirtuOst software (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). The scans were acquired at 120kVp, with a slice thickness/increment of 3mm or less, on nine different CT scanner models across 24 different scanners. The main parameters assessed were areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (total hip and femoral neck), trabecular volumetric BMD at the spine, and vertebral and femoral strength by finite element analysis; other volumetric BMD measures were also assessed. We found that the reanalysis precision errors for all phantomless measurements were ≤0.5%, which was as good as for phantom calibration. Regression analysis indicated equivalence of the phantom- versus phantomless-calibrated measurements (slope not different than unity, R2≥0.98). Of the main parameters assessed, non-significant paired mean differences (n=40) between the two measurements ranged from 0.6% for hip areal BMD to 1.1% for mid-vertebral trabecular BMD. These results indicate that phantom-equivalent measurements of both BMD and finite element-derived bone strength can be reliably obtained from CT scans using patient-specific phantomless calibration.
•Phantomless calibration of CT scans has excellent inter-operator precision.•Precision for finite element-derived bone strength is comparable to precision for BMD.•Accuracy of phantomless calibration was confirmed vs. phantom calibration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>BMD</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone strength</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Precision</subject><subject>Repeatability</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><issn>8756-3282</issn><issn>1873-2763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1ERUPhBVggL9lM8E_8MxJCooH-SEWwKGvLY99pHM3YwZ5U6o6H4Al5knqUUpUN0pW8uOd8vjoHoTeULCmh8v122aUIS0aoWpI6rH2GFlQr3jAl-XO00ErIhjPNjtHLUraEEN4q-gIdM62UFq1eoPx9Y-OUxgFKwc4Ooct2Cini1OP1NS7OxoL7lPEItuwzjBCneXf69TO20eP5AlymDPFm2vz59fsyTpCbtIOKqa4MNtrhroSCdxlcKBX9Ch31dijw-uE9QT_OvlyvL5qrb-eX609XjROMTo1she64YuA5JUxaTlrhlZNcc-WIkFZL33vJrGgFB79qpSLEiZUTnXOUeH6CPh64u303gnf18mwHs8thtPnOJBvMv5sYNuYm3RohuWRUV8C7B0BOP_dQJjOG4mAYbIS0L4a2TEqtVoRVKTtIXU6lZOgfv6HEzGWZrZmjMnNZhtRhbTW9fXrgo-VvO1Xw4SCAGtNtgGyKCxAd-FDDnIxP4X_8ey4XqVQ</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Lee, David C.</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Paul F.</creator><creator>Kopperdahl, David L.</creator><creator>Keaveny, Tony M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision</title><author>Lee, David C. ; Hoffmann, Paul F. ; Kopperdahl, David L. ; Keaveny, Tony M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-6958b372ed31026a3095d7c63837c056a86dfd62a5953ed496700c54c5bcc10d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>BMD</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone strength</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Precision</topic><topic>Repeatability</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopperdahl, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keaveny, Tony M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, David C.</au><au>Hoffmann, Paul F.</au><au>Kopperdahl, David L.</au><au>Keaveny, Tony M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision</atitle><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>325</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>325-333</pages><issn>8756-3282</issn><eissn>1873-2763</eissn><abstract>Patient-specific phantomless calibration of computed tomography (CT) scans has the potential to simplify and expand the use of pre-existing clinical CT for quantitative bone densitometry and bone strength analysis for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. In this study, we quantified the inter-operator reanalysis precision errors for a novel implementation of patient-specific phantomless calibration, using air and either aortic blood or hip adipose tissue as internal calibrating reference materials, and sought to confirm the equivalence between phantomless and (traditional) phantom-based measurements. CT scans of the spine and hip for 25 women and 15 men (mean±SD age of 67±9years, range 41–86years), one scan per anatomic site per patient, were analyzed independently by two analysts using the VirtuOst software (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). The scans were acquired at 120kVp, with a slice thickness/increment of 3mm or less, on nine different CT scanner models across 24 different scanners. The main parameters assessed were areal bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (total hip and femoral neck), trabecular volumetric BMD at the spine, and vertebral and femoral strength by finite element analysis; other volumetric BMD measures were also assessed. We found that the reanalysis precision errors for all phantomless measurements were ≤0.5%, which was as good as for phantom calibration. Regression analysis indicated equivalence of the phantom- versus phantomless-calibrated measurements (slope not different than unity, R2≥0.98). Of the main parameters assessed, non-significant paired mean differences (n=40) between the two measurements ranged from 0.6% for hip areal BMD to 1.1% for mid-vertebral trabecular BMD. These results indicate that phantom-equivalent measurements of both BMD and finite element-derived bone strength can be reliably obtained from CT scans using patient-specific phantomless calibration.
•Phantomless calibration of CT scans has excellent inter-operator precision.•Precision for finite element-derived bone strength is comparable to precision for BMD.•Accuracy of phantomless calibration was confirmed vs. phantom calibration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28778598</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.029</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8756-3282 |
ispartof | Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2017-10, Vol.103, p.325-333 |
issn | 8756-3282 1873-2763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5636218 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over BMD Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging Bone Density Bone strength Calibration Female Finite Element Analysis Humans Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Osteoporosis Phantoms, Imaging Precision Repeatability Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards |
title | Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength—Inter-operator reanalysis precision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A50%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phantomless%20calibration%20of%20CT%20scans%20for%20measurement%20of%20BMD%20and%20bone%20strength%E2%80%94Inter-operator%20reanalysis%20precision&rft.jtitle=Bone%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lee,%20David%20C.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=325-333&rft.issn=8756-3282&rft.eissn=1873-2763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1926687402%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926687402&rft_id=info:pmid/28778598&rft_els_id=S8756328217302648&rfr_iscdi=true |