MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial
Objectives To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo . Methods We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2017-11, Vol.27 (11), p.4767-4774 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4774 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4767 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Giganti, Francesco Moore, Caroline M. Robertson, Nicola L. McCartan, Neil Jameson, Charles Bott, Simon R. J. Winkler, Mathias Gambarota, Giulio Whitcher, Brandon Castro, Ramiro Emberton, Mark Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex |
description | Objectives
To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking
dutasteride
0.5 mg or
placebo
.
Methods
We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.
Results
A decrease in mean
conspicuity
in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54
vs
1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and
conspicuity
were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03
vs
0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11
vs
–0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).
Conclusions
Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced
conspicuity
. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.
Key points
•
Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI
-
visible prostate cancers
.
•
Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI
.
•
A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5635085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900838132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-f27a0e73fbea24ddd54c8cc5f0ab0c82da06e1ab42e02c0ad600d596c20c5e153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQxxdR7Fn9A3yRgC8Krk6SzW7OB6UUtYUToehzyCaz19Rsck12D_zP_PPMcrXUguQhYeYz3_mRqarnFN5SgO5dBuAcaqBd3Ugha3hQrWjDWU1BNg-rFay5rLv1ujmqnuR8BQBr2nSPqyMmBeNciFX1--vFORlcsC5sM3GBjBhIDESbye2R5Dnt0Xmvg0EyxER2KeZJT0jMYkrviY2YiZ0nnSdMziIZ9U8ki-reZdd7JB6ziyEvdyamvHbOzHHOH8kF5tlPmQwpjkSTndcG-1gXZkrRe7RvSNLBxtFltMR4F5zRnkzJaf-0ejRon_HZzX1c_fj86fvpWb359uX89GRTGwHNVA-s04AdH3rUrLHWisZIY8QAugcjmdXQItV9wxCYAW1bACvWrWFgBFLBj6sPB93d3I9oDZbatFe75EadfqmonfrXE9yl2sa9Ei0XIBeB1weBy3thZycbtdiAtqwRst3Twr66SZbi9Yx5UqV1g8v8sUxM0TWA5JJyVtCX99CrOKdQRlGoZjmSd4WiB8qUf8sJh9sKKKhlh9Rhh0oRnVp2SEGJeXG349uIv0tTAHYAcnGFLaY7qf-r-gdp69ZK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949494837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Giganti, Francesco ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Robertson, Nicola L. ; McCartan, Neil ; Jameson, Charles ; Bott, Simon R. J. ; Winkler, Mathias ; Gambarota, Giulio ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Castro, Ramiro ; Emberton, Mark ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Robertson, Nicola L. ; McCartan, Neil ; Jameson, Charles ; Bott, Simon R. J. ; Winkler, Mathias ; Gambarota, Giulio ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Castro, Ramiro ; Emberton, Mark ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking
dutasteride
0.5 mg or
placebo
.
Methods
We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.
Results
A decrease in mean
conspicuity
in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54
vs
1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and
conspicuity
were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03
vs
0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11
vs
–0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).
Conclusions
Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced
conspicuity
. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.
Key points
•
Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI
-
visible prostate cancers
.
•
Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI
.
•
A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28523355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Aged ; Bioengineering ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Clinical trials ; Conspicuity ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Dutasteride - therapeutic use ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lesions ; Life Sciences ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medication ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pharmaceutical sciences ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiology ; Randomization ; Reviews ; Surveillance ; Tumors ; Ultrasound ; Urogenital ; Urology and Nephrology</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2017-11, Vol.27 (11), p.4767-4774</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>European Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-f27a0e73fbea24ddd54c8cc5f0ab0c82da06e1ab42e02c0ad600d596c20c5e153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-f27a0e73fbea24ddd54c8cc5f0ab0c82da06e1ab42e02c0ad600d596c20c5e153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-rennes.hal.science/hal-01624586$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicola L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bott, Simon R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambarota, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking
dutasteride
0.5 mg or
placebo
.
Methods
We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.
Results
A decrease in mean
conspicuity
in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54
vs
1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and
conspicuity
were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03
vs
0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11
vs
–0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).
Conclusions
Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced
conspicuity
. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.
Key points
•
Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI
-
visible prostate cancers
.
•
Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI
.
•
A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride
.</description><subject>5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Conspicuity</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Dutasteride - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medication</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical sciences</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Urogenital</subject><subject>Urology and Nephrology</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQxxdR7Fn9A3yRgC8Krk6SzW7OB6UUtYUToehzyCaz19Rsck12D_zP_PPMcrXUguQhYeYz3_mRqarnFN5SgO5dBuAcaqBd3Ugha3hQrWjDWU1BNg-rFay5rLv1ujmqnuR8BQBr2nSPqyMmBeNciFX1--vFORlcsC5sM3GBjBhIDESbye2R5Dnt0Xmvg0EyxER2KeZJT0jMYkrviY2YiZ0nnSdMziIZ9U8ki-reZdd7JB6ziyEvdyamvHbOzHHOH8kF5tlPmQwpjkSTndcG-1gXZkrRe7RvSNLBxtFltMR4F5zRnkzJaf-0ejRon_HZzX1c_fj86fvpWb359uX89GRTGwHNVA-s04AdH3rUrLHWisZIY8QAugcjmdXQItV9wxCYAW1bACvWrWFgBFLBj6sPB93d3I9oDZbatFe75EadfqmonfrXE9yl2sa9Ei0XIBeB1weBy3thZycbtdiAtqwRst3Twr66SZbi9Yx5UqV1g8v8sUxM0TWA5JJyVtCX99CrOKdQRlGoZjmSd4WiB8qUf8sJh9sKKKhlh9Rhh0oRnVp2SEGJeXG349uIv0tTAHYAcnGFLaY7qf-r-gdp69ZK</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Giganti, Francesco</creator><creator>Moore, Caroline M.</creator><creator>Robertson, Nicola L.</creator><creator>McCartan, Neil</creator><creator>Jameson, Charles</creator><creator>Bott, Simon R. J.</creator><creator>Winkler, Mathias</creator><creator>Gambarota, Giulio</creator><creator>Whitcher, Brandon</creator><creator>Castro, Ramiro</creator><creator>Emberton, Mark</creator><creator>Allen, Clare</creator><creator>Kirkham, Alex</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial</title><author>Giganti, Francesco ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Robertson, Nicola L. ; McCartan, Neil ; Jameson, Charles ; Bott, Simon R. J. ; Winkler, Mathias ; Gambarota, Giulio ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Castro, Ramiro ; Emberton, Mark ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-f27a0e73fbea24ddd54c8cc5f0ab0c82da06e1ab42e02c0ad600d596c20c5e153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Conspicuity</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Dutasteride - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medication</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical sciences</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Urogenital</topic><topic>Urology and Nephrology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Nicola L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jameson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bott, Simon R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambarota, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Ramiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giganti, Francesco</au><au>Moore, Caroline M.</au><au>Robertson, Nicola L.</au><au>McCartan, Neil</au><au>Jameson, Charles</au><au>Bott, Simon R. J.</au><au>Winkler, Mathias</au><au>Gambarota, Giulio</au><au>Whitcher, Brandon</au><au>Castro, Ramiro</au><au>Emberton, Mark</au><au>Allen, Clare</au><au>Kirkham, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4767</spage><epage>4774</epage><pages>4767-4774</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking
dutasteride
0.5 mg or
placebo
.
Methods
We analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.
Results
A decrease in mean
conspicuity
in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54
vs
1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and
conspicuity
were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03
vs
0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11
vs
–0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).
Conclusions
Dutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced
conspicuity
. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer.
Key points
•
Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI
-
visible prostate cancers
.
•
Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI
.
•
A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride
.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28523355</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2017-11, Vol.27 (11), p.4767-4774 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5635085 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use Aged Bioengineering Biopsy Cancer Clinical trials Conspicuity Diagnostic Radiology Diffusion coefficient Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dutasteride - therapeutic use Human health and pathology Humans Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Lesions Life Sciences Magnetic resonance imaging Male Medication Medicine Medicine & Public Health Men Middle Aged Neuroradiology NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pharmaceutical sciences Prostate cancer Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Radiology Randomization Reviews Surveillance Tumors Ultrasound Urogenital Urology and Nephrology |
title | MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20findings%20in%20men%20on%20active%20surveillance%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20does%20dutasteride%20make%20MRI%20visible%20lesions%20less%20conspicuous?%20Results%20from%20a%20placebo-controlled,%20randomised%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Giganti,%20Francesco&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4767&rft.epage=4774&rft.pages=4767-4774&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-017-4858-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900838132%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949494837&rft_id=info:pmid/28523355&rfr_iscdi=true |