U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014

Abstract Background Culturing combat-related wounds often yields both fungi and bacteria. It is difficult to differentiate fungal contamination from infection, and objective criteria that identify patients at risk for IFI are needed. This study was designed to characterize IFI among US combat casual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open forum infectious diseases 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S5-S6
Hauptverfasser: Ganesan, Anuradha, Shaikh, Faraz, Peterson, Philip, Bradley, William P, Blyth, Dana M, Lu, Dan Z, Bennett, Denise, Schnaubelt, Elizabeth, Johnson, Brian, Merritt, Teresa, Flores, Nicole, Hawthorne, Virginia, Wells, Justin, Carson, Leigh, Tribble, David R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S6
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page S5
container_title Open forum infectious diseases
container_volume 4
creator Ganesan, Anuradha
Shaikh, Faraz
Peterson, Philip
Bradley, William P
Blyth, Dana M
Lu, Dan Z
Bennett, Denise
Schnaubelt, Elizabeth
Johnson, Brian
Merritt, Teresa
Flores, Nicole
Hawthorne, Virginia
Wells, Justin
Carson, Leigh
Tribble, David R
description Abstract Background Culturing combat-related wounds often yields both fungi and bacteria. It is difficult to differentiate fungal contamination from infection, and objective criteria that identify patients at risk for IFI are needed. This study was designed to characterize IFI among US combat casualties in the Afghanistan Theater. Methods This retrospective study includes subjects with any labortory evidence of fungi (either histopathology or cultures). Wounds with ongoing necrosis and labortory evidence of infection were classified as IFI). Wounds with labortory evidence of fungal infection, but without ongoing necrosis were classified as either highly suspicious wounds based on objective clinical criteria (i.e., presence of systemic and local signs of infection and use of antifungals for ≥10 days) or non-IFI wounds if they failed to meet clinical criteria. Results Of 1932 subjects, 246 (12.7%) had labortory evidence of fungal infection. There were a total of 143 IFI wounds (n = 94), 157 non-IFI wounds (n = 96), and 113 high suspicion wounds (n = 56). IFI subjects had significantly higher injury severity scores (ISS median: 39.5 vs. 33), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (7 vs. 2) and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (66 vs. 28%). IFI patients also had higher ISS (93 vs. 84% with ISS >25) and SOFA scores (7 vs. 4) compared with the subjects with high suspicion wounds. IFI wounds often grew molds belonging to the order Mucorales compared with high suspicion (19 vs. 10%, P = 0.04) and non-IFI wounds (19 vs. 7%, P = 0.02). About half of the IF wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales either isolated alone or in conjunction with other fungi, in comparison, 25% of the high suspicion wounds and 11% of the non-IFI wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales. Three groups of fungi belonging to the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium accounted for 83% of the IFI wounds and 74% of the high suspicion wounds. Conclusion Labortory evidence of fungal infection is common among combat casualties. Clinical characteristics and wound microbiology allows us to group subjects into groups at low and high risk of IFI. Fungi of the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium should not be considered contaminants. The presence of these fungi should obligate close clinical follow-up and debridement as needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5631616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1712-17996d7702147fda775b189a8d11bfaed0ac3eb1f8a1553ce2ee1f1ce2257bbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1Lw0AUDKJgqT173aMKSfdtmmziQZDSaqDiwRaPyya7m64kuyEfxV7E_-A_9JeYEhE9eXnzmDcz8BjHOQfsAY79qVVa9OMVQuJhIEfOiPgkcqM4oMe_9lNn0jQvGGMAHGAaj5y3jffkobktU966tSx4KwVKzI43eifRsjM5L9Cz7cyBVTJrtTXoIlkml2hRaSFLbQub7xHvBYPsQWe1TQf6Gt2qfMuNblpu0Hor-_gaEYzjz_cPgmF25pwoXjRy8o1jZ7NcrOf37urxLpnfrtwMKBAXaByHglJMYEaV4JQGKUQxjwRAqrgUmGe-TEFFHILAzySREhT0SAKapsIfOzdDbtWlpRSZNG3NC1bVuuT1nlmu2d-L0VuW2x0LQh9CCPuA6RDQP9c0tVQ_XsDsUAE7VMCGClhfQe-4Ghy2q_4VfwErr4uJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ganesan, Anuradha ; Shaikh, Faraz ; Peterson, Philip ; Bradley, William P ; Blyth, Dana M ; Lu, Dan Z ; Bennett, Denise ; Schnaubelt, Elizabeth ; Johnson, Brian ; Merritt, Teresa ; Flores, Nicole ; Hawthorne, Virginia ; Wells, Justin ; Carson, Leigh ; Tribble, David R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Anuradha ; Shaikh, Faraz ; Peterson, Philip ; Bradley, William P ; Blyth, Dana M ; Lu, Dan Z ; Bennett, Denise ; Schnaubelt, Elizabeth ; Johnson, Brian ; Merritt, Teresa ; Flores, Nicole ; Hawthorne, Virginia ; Wells, Justin ; Carson, Leigh ; Tribble, David R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Culturing combat-related wounds often yields both fungi and bacteria. It is difficult to differentiate fungal contamination from infection, and objective criteria that identify patients at risk for IFI are needed. This study was designed to characterize IFI among US combat casualties in the Afghanistan Theater. Methods This retrospective study includes subjects with any labortory evidence of fungi (either histopathology or cultures). Wounds with ongoing necrosis and labortory evidence of infection were classified as IFI). Wounds with labortory evidence of fungal infection, but without ongoing necrosis were classified as either highly suspicious wounds based on objective clinical criteria (i.e., presence of systemic and local signs of infection and use of antifungals for ≥10 days) or non-IFI wounds if they failed to meet clinical criteria. Results Of 1932 subjects, 246 (12.7%) had labortory evidence of fungal infection. There were a total of 143 IFI wounds (n = 94), 157 non-IFI wounds (n = 96), and 113 high suspicion wounds (n = 56). IFI subjects had significantly higher injury severity scores (ISS median: 39.5 vs. 33), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (7 vs. 2) and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (66 vs. 28%). IFI patients also had higher ISS (93 vs. 84% with ISS &gt;25) and SOFA scores (7 vs. 4) compared with the subjects with high suspicion wounds. IFI wounds often grew molds belonging to the order Mucorales compared with high suspicion (19 vs. 10%, P = 0.04) and non-IFI wounds (19 vs. 7%, P = 0.02). About half of the IF wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales either isolated alone or in conjunction with other fungi, in comparison, 25% of the high suspicion wounds and 11% of the non-IFI wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales. Three groups of fungi belonging to the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium accounted for 83% of the IFI wounds and 74% of the high suspicion wounds. Conclusion Labortory evidence of fungal infection is common among combat casualties. Clinical characteristics and wound microbiology allows us to group subjects into groups at low and high risk of IFI. Fungi of the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium should not be considered contaminants. The presence of these fungi should obligate close clinical follow-up and debridement as needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Open forum infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S5-S6</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631616/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631616/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,1605,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Anuradha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Faraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blyth, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Dan Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaubelt, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merritt, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribble, David R</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014</title><title>Open forum infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract Background Culturing combat-related wounds often yields both fungi and bacteria. It is difficult to differentiate fungal contamination from infection, and objective criteria that identify patients at risk for IFI are needed. This study was designed to characterize IFI among US combat casualties in the Afghanistan Theater. Methods This retrospective study includes subjects with any labortory evidence of fungi (either histopathology or cultures). Wounds with ongoing necrosis and labortory evidence of infection were classified as IFI). Wounds with labortory evidence of fungal infection, but without ongoing necrosis were classified as either highly suspicious wounds based on objective clinical criteria (i.e., presence of systemic and local signs of infection and use of antifungals for ≥10 days) or non-IFI wounds if they failed to meet clinical criteria. Results Of 1932 subjects, 246 (12.7%) had labortory evidence of fungal infection. There were a total of 143 IFI wounds (n = 94), 157 non-IFI wounds (n = 96), and 113 high suspicion wounds (n = 56). IFI subjects had significantly higher injury severity scores (ISS median: 39.5 vs. 33), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (7 vs. 2) and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (66 vs. 28%). IFI patients also had higher ISS (93 vs. 84% with ISS &gt;25) and SOFA scores (7 vs. 4) compared with the subjects with high suspicion wounds. IFI wounds often grew molds belonging to the order Mucorales compared with high suspicion (19 vs. 10%, P = 0.04) and non-IFI wounds (19 vs. 7%, P = 0.02). About half of the IF wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales either isolated alone or in conjunction with other fungi, in comparison, 25% of the high suspicion wounds and 11% of the non-IFI wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales. Three groups of fungi belonging to the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium accounted for 83% of the IFI wounds and 74% of the high suspicion wounds. Conclusion Labortory evidence of fungal infection is common among combat casualties. Clinical characteristics and wound microbiology allows us to group subjects into groups at low and high risk of IFI. Fungi of the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium should not be considered contaminants. The presence of these fungi should obligate close clinical follow-up and debridement as needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1Lw0AUDKJgqT173aMKSfdtmmziQZDSaqDiwRaPyya7m64kuyEfxV7E_-A_9JeYEhE9eXnzmDcz8BjHOQfsAY79qVVa9OMVQuJhIEfOiPgkcqM4oMe_9lNn0jQvGGMAHGAaj5y3jffkobktU966tSx4KwVKzI43eifRsjM5L9Cz7cyBVTJrtTXoIlkml2hRaSFLbQub7xHvBYPsQWe1TQf6Gt2qfMuNblpu0Hor-_gaEYzjz_cPgmF25pwoXjRy8o1jZ7NcrOf37urxLpnfrtwMKBAXaByHglJMYEaV4JQGKUQxjwRAqrgUmGe-TEFFHILAzySREhT0SAKapsIfOzdDbtWlpRSZNG3NC1bVuuT1nlmu2d-L0VuW2x0LQh9CCPuA6RDQP9c0tVQ_XsDsUAE7VMCGClhfQe-4Ghy2q_4VfwErr4uJ</recordid><startdate>20171004</startdate><enddate>20171004</enddate><creator>Ganesan, Anuradha</creator><creator>Shaikh, Faraz</creator><creator>Peterson, Philip</creator><creator>Bradley, William P</creator><creator>Blyth, Dana M</creator><creator>Lu, Dan Z</creator><creator>Bennett, Denise</creator><creator>Schnaubelt, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Johnson, Brian</creator><creator>Merritt, Teresa</creator><creator>Flores, Nicole</creator><creator>Hawthorne, Virginia</creator><creator>Wells, Justin</creator><creator>Carson, Leigh</creator><creator>Tribble, David R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171004</creationdate><title>U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014</title><author>Ganesan, Anuradha ; Shaikh, Faraz ; Peterson, Philip ; Bradley, William P ; Blyth, Dana M ; Lu, Dan Z ; Bennett, Denise ; Schnaubelt, Elizabeth ; Johnson, Brian ; Merritt, Teresa ; Flores, Nicole ; Hawthorne, Virginia ; Wells, Justin ; Carson, Leigh ; Tribble, David R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1712-17996d7702147fda775b189a8d11bfaed0ac3eb1f8a1553ce2ee1f1ce2257bbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Anuradha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Faraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blyth, Dana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Dan Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaubelt, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merritt, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawthorne, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tribble, David R</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganesan, Anuradha</au><au>Shaikh, Faraz</au><au>Peterson, Philip</au><au>Bradley, William P</au><au>Blyth, Dana M</au><au>Lu, Dan Z</au><au>Bennett, Denise</au><au>Schnaubelt, Elizabeth</au><au>Johnson, Brian</au><au>Merritt, Teresa</au><au>Flores, Nicole</au><au>Hawthorne, Virginia</au><au>Wells, Justin</au><au>Carson, Leigh</au><au>Tribble, David R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014</atitle><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2017-10-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>S5</spage><epage>S6</epage><pages>S5-S6</pages><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Culturing combat-related wounds often yields both fungi and bacteria. It is difficult to differentiate fungal contamination from infection, and objective criteria that identify patients at risk for IFI are needed. This study was designed to characterize IFI among US combat casualties in the Afghanistan Theater. Methods This retrospective study includes subjects with any labortory evidence of fungi (either histopathology or cultures). Wounds with ongoing necrosis and labortory evidence of infection were classified as IFI). Wounds with labortory evidence of fungal infection, but without ongoing necrosis were classified as either highly suspicious wounds based on objective clinical criteria (i.e., presence of systemic and local signs of infection and use of antifungals for ≥10 days) or non-IFI wounds if they failed to meet clinical criteria. Results Of 1932 subjects, 246 (12.7%) had labortory evidence of fungal infection. There were a total of 143 IFI wounds (n = 94), 157 non-IFI wounds (n = 96), and 113 high suspicion wounds (n = 56). IFI subjects had significantly higher injury severity scores (ISS median: 39.5 vs. 33), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (7 vs. 2) and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (66 vs. 28%). IFI patients also had higher ISS (93 vs. 84% with ISS &gt;25) and SOFA scores (7 vs. 4) compared with the subjects with high suspicion wounds. IFI wounds often grew molds belonging to the order Mucorales compared with high suspicion (19 vs. 10%, P = 0.04) and non-IFI wounds (19 vs. 7%, P = 0.02). About half of the IF wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales either isolated alone or in conjunction with other fungi, in comparison, 25% of the high suspicion wounds and 11% of the non-IFI wounds grew fungi of the order Mucorales. Three groups of fungi belonging to the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium accounted for 83% of the IFI wounds and 74% of the high suspicion wounds. Conclusion Labortory evidence of fungal infection is common among combat casualties. Clinical characteristics and wound microbiology allows us to group subjects into groups at low and high risk of IFI. Fungi of the order Mucorales, genus Aspergillus and Fusarium should not be considered contaminants. The presence of these fungi should obligate close clinical follow-up and debridement as needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-8957
ispartof Open forum infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S5-S6
issn 2328-8957
2328-8957
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5631616
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts
title U.S. Combat-related Invasive Fungal Wound Infection (IFI) Epidemiology and Wound Microbiology: Afghanistan Theater 2009–2014
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T16%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20Combat-related%20Invasive%20Fungal%20Wound%20Infection%20(IFI)%20Epidemiology%20and%20Wound%20Microbiology:%20Afghanistan%20Theater%202009%E2%80%932014&rft.jtitle=Open%20forum%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Ganesan,%20Anuradha&rft.date=2017-10-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=S5&rft.epage=S6&rft.pages=S5-S6&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofx162.012&rfr_iscdi=true