An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Abstract Background The outcomes associated with the acceptance or refusal of a recommendation from an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on an individual level have not been studied yet. Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of patients for whom a recommendati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Open forum infectious diseases 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S481-S482 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S482 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_1 |
container_start_page | S481 |
container_title | Open forum infectious diseases |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Carignan, Alex Mercier, Adam Perron, Julie Nault, Vincent Alarie, Isabelle Bergeron, Cybele Beaudoin, Mathieu Valiquette, Louis |
description | Abstract
Background
The outcomes associated with the acceptance or refusal of a recommendation from an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on an individual level have not been studied yet. Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of patients for whom a recommendation from an ASP, based on prospective audit and feedback and triggered by a computerized decision support system, was accepted or refused.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized adult patients who received intravenous or oral antimicrobials in two tertiary care hospitals in Canada between 2014 and 2016, and for whom a recommendation was issued by an ASP.
Results
We identified 1,251 recommendations throughout the study period. Among the recommendations made by the pharmacist to prescribers, 1,144 (91.5%) were accepted. The most frequent interventions were immediate scheduling end of treatment (n = 364, 29%), dosing/frequency adjustments (n = 321, 26%), streamlining (n = 251, 20%), and switching from intravenous to oral therapy (n = 247, 20%). The antimicrobials most frequently targeted by recommendations were piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 273, 22%) and fluroquinolones (n = 267, 21). Overall, the length of the antimicrobial targeted by the recommendation was significantly shorter when a recommendation was accepted (0.37 days vs. 2.11 days; P < .001). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality were the Charlson score, issuance of a recommendation for a patient in the intensive care unit, the duration between admission and the recommendation, issuance of a recommendation in 2016 (compared with 2014), and age of the patient. A recommendation issued on a fluoroquinolone or oral penicillin/first generation cephalosporin was associated with lower odds of mortality. After adjustment, refusal of a recommendation by the attending physician was associated with a higher, albeit nonsignificant, risk of mortality (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.89–3.68; P = .10).
Conclusion
The duration of the antimicrobial treatment was significantly shorter when a recommendation triggered by an ASP program was accepted. This decrease in antimicrobial duration was not associated with increased mortality.
Disclosures
J. Perron, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; V. Nault, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; M. Beaudoin, Lumed |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5631505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1747-c7360a9bb5ca345dcd0c09fc899e138692baaa30750d6e8fb0b3daaf7f168d373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhYMoWLR7l7OX1JlMk0lcCCH4KBQqPhauhpt5tFOSmTBJfWzEv-Hf85eYGhFdubn3XO45Z_MFwRHBE4IzeuK0kf14JgmdkIiynWAU0SgN0yxmu7_0fjBu2zXGmBAcY5aNgtfcooXWyqMHt0EF2I-39w7dKL1p1SkqKmONgArN6gZEh5xGuRCq6YxdIud731qJrwN6LVxdKyuhM84i7V2NwKLcdqY0rjMC3XbqCbxsV6ZB194tPdSHwZ6GqlXj730Q3F-c3xVX4XxxOSvyeSgIm7JQMJpgyMoyFkCnsRQSC5xpkWaZIjRNsqgEAIpZjGWiUl3ikkoAzTRJUkkZPQjOht5mU9ZKCmU7DxVvvKnBv3AHhv_9WLPiS_fI44SSGMd9AR4KhHdt65X-yRLMtwz4lgEfGPAtgz5yPETcpvnf_QlKcI5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carignan, Alex ; Mercier, Adam ; Perron, Julie ; Nault, Vincent ; Alarie, Isabelle ; Bergeron, Cybele ; Beaudoin, Mathieu ; Valiquette, Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Carignan, Alex ; Mercier, Adam ; Perron, Julie ; Nault, Vincent ; Alarie, Isabelle ; Bergeron, Cybele ; Beaudoin, Mathieu ; Valiquette, Louis</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
The outcomes associated with the acceptance or refusal of a recommendation from an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on an individual level have not been studied yet. Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of patients for whom a recommendation from an ASP, based on prospective audit and feedback and triggered by a computerized decision support system, was accepted or refused.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized adult patients who received intravenous or oral antimicrobials in two tertiary care hospitals in Canada between 2014 and 2016, and for whom a recommendation was issued by an ASP.
Results
We identified 1,251 recommendations throughout the study period. Among the recommendations made by the pharmacist to prescribers, 1,144 (91.5%) were accepted. The most frequent interventions were immediate scheduling end of treatment (n = 364, 29%), dosing/frequency adjustments (n = 321, 26%), streamlining (n = 251, 20%), and switching from intravenous to oral therapy (n = 247, 20%). The antimicrobials most frequently targeted by recommendations were piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 273, 22%) and fluroquinolones (n = 267, 21). Overall, the length of the antimicrobial targeted by the recommendation was significantly shorter when a recommendation was accepted (0.37 days vs. 2.11 days; P < .001). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality were the Charlson score, issuance of a recommendation for a patient in the intensive care unit, the duration between admission and the recommendation, issuance of a recommendation in 2016 (compared with 2014), and age of the patient. A recommendation issued on a fluoroquinolone or oral penicillin/first generation cephalosporin was associated with lower odds of mortality. After adjustment, refusal of a recommendation by the attending physician was associated with a higher, albeit nonsignificant, risk of mortality (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.89–3.68; P = .10).
Conclusion
The duration of the antimicrobial treatment was significantly shorter when a recommendation triggered by an ASP program was accepted. This decrease in antimicrobial duration was not associated with increased mortality.
Disclosures
J. Perron, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; V. Nault, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; M. Beaudoin, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; L. Valiquette, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Open forum infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S481-S482</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631505/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631505/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1603,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carignan, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nault, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarie, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeron, Cybele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valiquette, Louis</creatorcontrib><title>An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program</title><title>Open forum infectious diseases</title><description>Abstract
Background
The outcomes associated with the acceptance or refusal of a recommendation from an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on an individual level have not been studied yet. Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of patients for whom a recommendation from an ASP, based on prospective audit and feedback and triggered by a computerized decision support system, was accepted or refused.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized adult patients who received intravenous or oral antimicrobials in two tertiary care hospitals in Canada between 2014 and 2016, and for whom a recommendation was issued by an ASP.
Results
We identified 1,251 recommendations throughout the study period. Among the recommendations made by the pharmacist to prescribers, 1,144 (91.5%) were accepted. The most frequent interventions were immediate scheduling end of treatment (n = 364, 29%), dosing/frequency adjustments (n = 321, 26%), streamlining (n = 251, 20%), and switching from intravenous to oral therapy (n = 247, 20%). The antimicrobials most frequently targeted by recommendations were piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 273, 22%) and fluroquinolones (n = 267, 21). Overall, the length of the antimicrobial targeted by the recommendation was significantly shorter when a recommendation was accepted (0.37 days vs. 2.11 days; P < .001). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality were the Charlson score, issuance of a recommendation for a patient in the intensive care unit, the duration between admission and the recommendation, issuance of a recommendation in 2016 (compared with 2014), and age of the patient. A recommendation issued on a fluoroquinolone or oral penicillin/first generation cephalosporin was associated with lower odds of mortality. After adjustment, refusal of a recommendation by the attending physician was associated with a higher, albeit nonsignificant, risk of mortality (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.89–3.68; P = .10).
Conclusion
The duration of the antimicrobial treatment was significantly shorter when a recommendation triggered by an ASP program was accepted. This decrease in antimicrobial duration was not associated with increased mortality.
Disclosures
J. Perron, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; V. Nault, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; M. Beaudoin, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; L. Valiquette, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2328-8957</issn><issn>2328-8957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhYMoWLR7l7OX1JlMk0lcCCH4KBQqPhauhpt5tFOSmTBJfWzEv-Hf85eYGhFdubn3XO45Z_MFwRHBE4IzeuK0kf14JgmdkIiynWAU0SgN0yxmu7_0fjBu2zXGmBAcY5aNgtfcooXWyqMHt0EF2I-39w7dKL1p1SkqKmONgArN6gZEh5xGuRCq6YxdIud731qJrwN6LVxdKyuhM84i7V2NwKLcdqY0rjMC3XbqCbxsV6ZB194tPdSHwZ6GqlXj730Q3F-c3xVX4XxxOSvyeSgIm7JQMJpgyMoyFkCnsRQSC5xpkWaZIjRNsqgEAIpZjGWiUl3ikkoAzTRJUkkZPQjOht5mU9ZKCmU7DxVvvKnBv3AHhv_9WLPiS_fI44SSGMd9AR4KhHdt65X-yRLMtwz4lgEfGPAtgz5yPETcpvnf_QlKcI5E</recordid><startdate>20171004</startdate><enddate>20171004</enddate><creator>Carignan, Alex</creator><creator>Mercier, Adam</creator><creator>Perron, Julie</creator><creator>Nault, Vincent</creator><creator>Alarie, Isabelle</creator><creator>Bergeron, Cybele</creator><creator>Beaudoin, Mathieu</creator><creator>Valiquette, Louis</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171004</creationdate><title>An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program</title><author>Carignan, Alex ; Mercier, Adam ; Perron, Julie ; Nault, Vincent ; Alarie, Isabelle ; Bergeron, Cybele ; Beaudoin, Mathieu ; Valiquette, Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1747-c7360a9bb5ca345dcd0c09fc899e138692baaa30750d6e8fb0b3daaf7f168d373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carignan, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nault, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarie, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergeron, Cybele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valiquette, Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carignan, Alex</au><au>Mercier, Adam</au><au>Perron, Julie</au><au>Nault, Vincent</au><au>Alarie, Isabelle</au><au>Bergeron, Cybele</au><au>Beaudoin, Mathieu</au><au>Valiquette, Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program</atitle><jtitle>Open forum infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2017-10-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>S481</spage><epage>S482</epage><pages>S481-S482</pages><issn>2328-8957</issn><eissn>2328-8957</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
The outcomes associated with the acceptance or refusal of a recommendation from an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on an individual level have not been studied yet. Our objective was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of patients for whom a recommendation from an ASP, based on prospective audit and feedback and triggered by a computerized decision support system, was accepted or refused.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospitalized adult patients who received intravenous or oral antimicrobials in two tertiary care hospitals in Canada between 2014 and 2016, and for whom a recommendation was issued by an ASP.
Results
We identified 1,251 recommendations throughout the study period. Among the recommendations made by the pharmacist to prescribers, 1,144 (91.5%) were accepted. The most frequent interventions were immediate scheduling end of treatment (n = 364, 29%), dosing/frequency adjustments (n = 321, 26%), streamlining (n = 251, 20%), and switching from intravenous to oral therapy (n = 247, 20%). The antimicrobials most frequently targeted by recommendations were piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 273, 22%) and fluroquinolones (n = 267, 21). Overall, the length of the antimicrobial targeted by the recommendation was significantly shorter when a recommendation was accepted (0.37 days vs. 2.11 days; P < .001). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality were the Charlson score, issuance of a recommendation for a patient in the intensive care unit, the duration between admission and the recommendation, issuance of a recommendation in 2016 (compared with 2014), and age of the patient. A recommendation issued on a fluoroquinolone or oral penicillin/first generation cephalosporin was associated with lower odds of mortality. After adjustment, refusal of a recommendation by the attending physician was associated with a higher, albeit nonsignificant, risk of mortality (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.89–3.68; P = .10).
Conclusion
The duration of the antimicrobial treatment was significantly shorter when a recommendation triggered by an ASP program was accepted. This decrease in antimicrobial duration was not associated with increased mortality.
Disclosures
J. Perron, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; V. Nault, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; M. Beaudoin, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder; L. Valiquette, Lumed Inc., the company that commercializes APSS: Shareholder, Shareholder</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-8957 |
ispartof | Open forum infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.4 (suppl_1), p.S481-S482 |
issn | 2328-8957 2328-8957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5631505 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abstracts |
title | An Offer You Can’t Refuse: Clinical Impact of Accepting or Rejecting a Recommendation from an Antibiotic Stewardship Program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Offer%20You%20Can%E2%80%99t%20Refuse:%20Clinical%20Impact%20of%20Accepting%20or%20Rejecting%20a%20Recommendation%20from%20an%20Antibiotic%20Stewardship%20Program&rft.jtitle=Open%20forum%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Carignan,%20Alex&rft.date=2017-10-04&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=S481&rft.epage=S482&rft.pages=S481-S482&rft.issn=2328-8957&rft.eissn=2328-8957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1237&rfr_iscdi=true |