Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States

It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. This study was a retrospective cohort study of case...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Ochsner journal 2017-01, Vol.17 (3), p.243-249
Hauptverfasser: Morong, James J, Martin, Jane K, Ware, Robert S, Colditz, Paul B, Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 3
container_start_page 243
container_title The Ochsner journal
container_volume 17
creator Morong, James J
Martin, Jane K
Ware, Robert S
Colditz, Paul B
Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G
description It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. This study was a retrospective cohort study of cases of in-hospital maternal deaths in the Ochsner Health System (Louisiana, United States) and the Queensland Health System (Australia) from 1995 to 2013. The aim was to determine if American and Australian women have a similar rate of preventable maternal death and if the deaths were attributable to the same factors. A multidisciplinary team assessed medical records to determine preventability. Sixteen eligible medical records were identified in the Ochsner Health System and 15 in the Queensland Health System. In the American cohort, deaths in the private insurance group (n=5) were least likely to be preventable ( =0.003). Australian maternal deaths were less likely to occur among women with late or no prenatal care than American maternal deaths; the risk difference was 44.5% for all deaths (95% confidence interval [CI]=9.7%, 79.4%; =0.03) and 50.0% for potentially preventable deaths (95% CI=9.3%, 90.6%; =0.04). Women from Louisiana, United States and Queensland, Australia have similar rates of preventable maternal death. No statistically significant factors explained trends in Australian maternal death; American maternal mortality was significantly associated with point of entry into prenatal care, likely influenced by insurance status. Furthermore, the majority of deaths in this group were complicated by hospital systems-based factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1043/1524-5012-17.3.243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5625982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1951563597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-cc2f8d53d8ea49388eabefcfd1c0b680b0be2fa6090e77c0ae97579a6a9ce2683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFOwzAMhnMAsTF4AQ4oEhcO60jSpm0uSGMCNmkIobFzlbYuZFqT0qSgiZcnE2MCTo7t35_-2AidUTKiJAqvKGdRwAllAU1G4YhF4QHq74s9dGztipCI8IgdoR4ThMUhj_voc2LqRrbKGo1NhWc6mBrbKCfX-EE6aPX2YVqfK7fBN-A-ADTeaxYb66C2WGn81PmOXUtdDvG4s671IxL7FM9Np6ySWg7xUisHJV44z7Yn6LCSawunuzhAy7vb58k0mD_ezybjedAwEbmgKFiVljwsU5CRCFMfcqiKqqQFyeOU5CQHVsmYCAJJUhAJIuGJkLEUBbA4DQfo-pvbdHkNZQF6ay5rWlXLdpMZqbK_Ha1esxfznvGYcZEyD7jcAVrz1oF1Wa1sAWv_WTCdzajglPt9isRLL_5JV6bbbtFmjHLPEiTeAs9_O9pb-blL-AUyGZDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2158239062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morong, James J ; Martin, Jane K ; Ware, Robert S ; Colditz, Paul B ; Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</creator><creatorcontrib>Morong, James J ; Martin, Jane K ; Ware, Robert S ; Colditz, Paul B ; Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</creatorcontrib><description>It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. This study was a retrospective cohort study of cases of in-hospital maternal deaths in the Ochsner Health System (Louisiana, United States) and the Queensland Health System (Australia) from 1995 to 2013. The aim was to determine if American and Australian women have a similar rate of preventable maternal death and if the deaths were attributable to the same factors. A multidisciplinary team assessed medical records to determine preventability. Sixteen eligible medical records were identified in the Ochsner Health System and 15 in the Queensland Health System. In the American cohort, deaths in the private insurance group (n=5) were least likely to be preventable ( =0.003). Australian maternal deaths were less likely to occur among women with late or no prenatal care than American maternal deaths; the risk difference was 44.5% for all deaths (95% confidence interval [CI]=9.7%, 79.4%; =0.03) and 50.0% for potentially preventable deaths (95% CI=9.3%, 90.6%; =0.04). Women from Louisiana, United States and Queensland, Australia have similar rates of preventable maternal death. No statistically significant factors explained trends in Australian maternal death; American maternal mortality was significantly associated with point of entry into prenatal care, likely influenced by insurance status. Furthermore, the majority of deaths in this group were complicated by hospital systems-based factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-5012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/1524-5012-17.3.243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29026356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ochsner Clinic Foundation Academic Center - Publishing Services</publisher><subject>Births ; Data collection ; Hospitals ; Maternal mortality ; Medical records ; Morbidity ; Obstetrics ; Original Research ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Public health ; Trends ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The Ochsner journal, 2017-01, Vol.17 (3), p.243-249</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at http://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/permissions</rights><rights>Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2017 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625982/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625982/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morong, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ware, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colditz, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States</title><title>The Ochsner journal</title><addtitle>Ochsner J</addtitle><description>It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. This study was a retrospective cohort study of cases of in-hospital maternal deaths in the Ochsner Health System (Louisiana, United States) and the Queensland Health System (Australia) from 1995 to 2013. The aim was to determine if American and Australian women have a similar rate of preventable maternal death and if the deaths were attributable to the same factors. A multidisciplinary team assessed medical records to determine preventability. Sixteen eligible medical records were identified in the Ochsner Health System and 15 in the Queensland Health System. In the American cohort, deaths in the private insurance group (n=5) were least likely to be preventable ( =0.003). Australian maternal deaths were less likely to occur among women with late or no prenatal care than American maternal deaths; the risk difference was 44.5% for all deaths (95% confidence interval [CI]=9.7%, 79.4%; =0.03) and 50.0% for potentially preventable deaths (95% CI=9.3%, 90.6%; =0.04). Women from Louisiana, United States and Queensland, Australia have similar rates of preventable maternal death. No statistically significant factors explained trends in Australian maternal death; American maternal mortality was significantly associated with point of entry into prenatal care, likely influenced by insurance status. Furthermore, the majority of deaths in this group were complicated by hospital systems-based factors.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1524-5012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFOwzAMhnMAsTF4AQ4oEhcO60jSpm0uSGMCNmkIobFzlbYuZFqT0qSgiZcnE2MCTo7t35_-2AidUTKiJAqvKGdRwAllAU1G4YhF4QHq74s9dGztipCI8IgdoR4ThMUhj_voc2LqRrbKGo1NhWc6mBrbKCfX-EE6aPX2YVqfK7fBN-A-ADTeaxYb66C2WGn81PmOXUtdDvG4s671IxL7FM9Np6ySWg7xUisHJV44z7Yn6LCSawunuzhAy7vb58k0mD_ezybjedAwEbmgKFiVljwsU5CRCFMfcqiKqqQFyeOU5CQHVsmYCAJJUhAJIuGJkLEUBbA4DQfo-pvbdHkNZQF6ay5rWlXLdpMZqbK_Ha1esxfznvGYcZEyD7jcAVrz1oF1Wa1sAWv_WTCdzajglPt9isRLL_5JV6bbbtFmjHLPEiTeAs9_O9pb-blL-AUyGZDc</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Morong, James J</creator><creator>Martin, Jane K</creator><creator>Ware, Robert S</creator><creator>Colditz, Paul B</creator><creator>Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</creator><general>Ochsner Clinic Foundation Academic Center - Publishing Services</general><general>the Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States</title><author>Morong, James J ; Martin, Jane K ; Ware, Robert S ; Colditz, Paul B ; Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p294t-cc2f8d53d8ea49388eabefcfd1c0b680b0be2fa6090e77c0ae97579a6a9ce2683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morong, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ware, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colditz, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Ochsner journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morong, James J</au><au>Martin, Jane K</au><au>Ware, Robert S</au><au>Colditz, Paul B</au><au>Robichaux, 3rd, Alfred G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States</atitle><jtitle>The Ochsner journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ochsner J</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>243-249</pages><issn>1524-5012</issn><abstract>It is well documented that the American maternal mortality ratio has increased during the years 2000-2015. The Australian maternal mortality ratio, in contrast, has decreased during the same time period, a trend common among most Western countries. This study was a retrospective cohort study of cases of in-hospital maternal deaths in the Ochsner Health System (Louisiana, United States) and the Queensland Health System (Australia) from 1995 to 2013. The aim was to determine if American and Australian women have a similar rate of preventable maternal death and if the deaths were attributable to the same factors. A multidisciplinary team assessed medical records to determine preventability. Sixteen eligible medical records were identified in the Ochsner Health System and 15 in the Queensland Health System. In the American cohort, deaths in the private insurance group (n=5) were least likely to be preventable ( =0.003). Australian maternal deaths were less likely to occur among women with late or no prenatal care than American maternal deaths; the risk difference was 44.5% for all deaths (95% confidence interval [CI]=9.7%, 79.4%; =0.03) and 50.0% for potentially preventable deaths (95% CI=9.3%, 90.6%; =0.04). Women from Louisiana, United States and Queensland, Australia have similar rates of preventable maternal death. No statistically significant factors explained trends in Australian maternal death; American maternal mortality was significantly associated with point of entry into prenatal care, likely influenced by insurance status. Furthermore, the majority of deaths in this group were complicated by hospital systems-based factors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ochsner Clinic Foundation Academic Center - Publishing Services</pub><pmid>29026356</pmid><doi>10.1043/1524-5012-17.3.243</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-5012
ispartof The Ochsner journal, 2017-01, Vol.17 (3), p.243-249
issn 1524-5012
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5625982
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Births
Data collection
Hospitals
Maternal mortality
Medical records
Morbidity
Obstetrics
Original Research
Pregnancy
Prenatal care
Public health
Trends
Womens health
title Comparison of In-Hospital Maternal Mortality Between Hospital Systems in Queensland, Australia and Louisiana, United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20In-Hospital%20Maternal%20Mortality%20Between%20Hospital%20Systems%20in%20Queensland,%20Australia%20and%20Louisiana,%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=The%20Ochsner%20journal&rft.au=Morong,%20James%20J&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=243-249&rft.issn=1524-5012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/1524-5012-17.3.243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1951563597%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2158239062&rft_id=info:pmid/29026356&rfr_iscdi=true