Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global spine journal 2017-10, Vol.7 (7), p.672-680
Hauptverfasser: Ishida, Wataru, Elder, Benjamin D., Holmes, Christina, Lo, Sheng-Fu L., Goodwin, C. Rory, Kosztowski, Thomas A., Bydon, Ali, Gokaslan, Ziya L., Wolinsky, Jean-Paul, Sciubba, Daniel M., Witham, Timothy F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 680
container_issue 7
container_start_page 672
container_title Global spine journal
container_volume 7
creator Ishida, Wataru
Elder, Benjamin D.
Holmes, Christina
Lo, Sheng-Fu L.
Goodwin, C. Rory
Kosztowski, Thomas A.
Bydon, Ali
Gokaslan, Ziya L.
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul
Sciubba, Daniel M.
Witham, Timothy F.
description Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P = .01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P > .99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P = .001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P = .08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P = .001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2192568217700111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5624376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2192568217700111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1949086323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f80940ae2788736ae7998eee90d3fb27f6884032e0d69b0e79a663ec3c0956ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EolXpnRPykUvAdhJ_cEBathQqVSrqtmfL60wWV4kdbKdlfwb_GJctK0DFPsxo5pl3LL8IvaTkDaVCvGVUsZZLVnJCKKVP0OF9qWq5Ik_3uWQH6DilG1IOZ6Km7Dk6YFKV24hD9GMZxslEl4LHHyDfAXi8YtViMLE6G5yxeGUj3OFT991kVyDjO_xow3m86OYh4xPoQxxd3uLVHDcQt-_wJYQJ4o67NBnSL5nV5HypD7fO4i8mmhEyxPQCPevNkOD4IR6h69OPV8vP1fnFp7Pl4ryyLSG56iVRDTHAhJSi5gaEUhIAFOnqfs1Ez6VsSM2AdFytSWkbzmuwtSWq5SUeofc73Wlej9BZ8DmaQU_RjSZudTBO_93x7qvehFvdctbUgheB1w8CMXybIWU9umRhGIyHMCdNVaOI5DWrC0p2qI0hpQj9fg0l-t5M_a-ZZeTVn8_bD_y2rgDVDkhmA_omzNGX7_q_4E_sA6ju</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949086323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ishida, Wataru ; Elder, Benjamin D. ; Holmes, Christina ; Lo, Sheng-Fu L. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Kosztowski, Thomas A. ; Bydon, Ali ; Gokaslan, Ziya L. ; Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ; Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Witham, Timothy F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Wataru ; Elder, Benjamin D. ; Holmes, Christina ; Lo, Sheng-Fu L. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Kosztowski, Thomas A. ; Bydon, Ali ; Gokaslan, Ziya L. ; Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ; Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Witham, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P = .01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P &gt; .99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P = .001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P = .08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P = .001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2192568217700111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28989847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2017-10, Vol.7 (7), p.672-680</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f80940ae2788736ae7998eee90d3fb27f6884032e0d69b0e79a663ec3c0956ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f80940ae2788736ae7998eee90d3fb27f6884032e0d69b0e79a663ec3c0956ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5624376/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5624376/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21964,27851,27922,27923,44943,45331,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elder, Benjamin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Sheng-Fu L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosztowski, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bydon, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokaslan, Ziya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolinsky, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witham, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P = .01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P &gt; .99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P = .001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P = .08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P = .001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EolXpnRPykUvAdhJ_cEBathQqVSrqtmfL60wWV4kdbKdlfwb_GJctK0DFPsxo5pl3LL8IvaTkDaVCvGVUsZZLVnJCKKVP0OF9qWq5Ik_3uWQH6DilG1IOZ6Km7Dk6YFKV24hD9GMZxslEl4LHHyDfAXi8YtViMLE6G5yxeGUj3OFT991kVyDjO_xow3m86OYh4xPoQxxd3uLVHDcQt-_wJYQJ4o67NBnSL5nV5HypD7fO4i8mmhEyxPQCPevNkOD4IR6h69OPV8vP1fnFp7Pl4ryyLSG56iVRDTHAhJSi5gaEUhIAFOnqfs1Ez6VsSM2AdFytSWkbzmuwtSWq5SUeofc73Wlej9BZ8DmaQU_RjSZudTBO_93x7qvehFvdctbUgheB1w8CMXybIWU9umRhGIyHMCdNVaOI5DWrC0p2qI0hpQj9fg0l-t5M_a-ZZeTVn8_bD_y2rgDVDkhmA_omzNGX7_q_4E_sA6ju</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Ishida, Wataru</creator><creator>Elder, Benjamin D.</creator><creator>Holmes, Christina</creator><creator>Lo, Sheng-Fu L.</creator><creator>Goodwin, C. Rory</creator><creator>Kosztowski, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Bydon, Ali</creator><creator>Gokaslan, Ziya L.</creator><creator>Wolinsky, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Witham, Timothy F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters</title><author>Ishida, Wataru ; Elder, Benjamin D. ; Holmes, Christina ; Lo, Sheng-Fu L. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Kosztowski, Thomas A. ; Bydon, Ali ; Gokaslan, Ziya L. ; Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ; Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Witham, Timothy F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-f80940ae2788736ae7998eee90d3fb27f6884032e0d69b0e79a663ec3c0956ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elder, Benjamin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Sheng-Fu L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosztowski, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bydon, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokaslan, Ziya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolinsky, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witham, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishida, Wataru</au><au>Elder, Benjamin D.</au><au>Holmes, Christina</au><au>Lo, Sheng-Fu L.</au><au>Goodwin, C. Rory</au><au>Kosztowski, Thomas A.</au><au>Bydon, Ali</au><au>Gokaslan, Ziya L.</au><au>Wolinsky, Jean-Paul</au><au>Sciubba, Daniel M.</au><au>Witham, Timothy F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>680</epage><pages>672-680</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique has been described as an alternative method for pelvic fixation in place of iliac screws (ISs) in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of S2AI screws on radiographical outcomes, including spinopelvic parameters. Methods: A retrospective review of 17 patients receiving ISs and 46 patients receiving S2AI screws for correction of adult spinal deformity between 2010 and 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up was conducted. Patient data on postoperative complications, including reoperation rates and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and radiographical parameters was collected and statistically analyzed. Results: With mean follow-up of 21.1 months, the overall reoperation rate was significantly lower in the S2AI group than in the IS group (21.7% vs 58.8%, P = .01), but the incidence of PJK was similar (32.6% vs 35.3%, P &gt; .99). Moreover, the time to reoperation in the IS group was significantly shorter than in the S2AI group (P = .001), and the S2AI group trended toward a longer time to reoperation due to PJK (P = .08). There was a significantly higher change in pelvic incidence (PI) in the S2AI group (−6.0°) compared with the IS group (P = .001). Conclusions: Compared with the IS technique, the S2AI technique demonstrated a lower rate of overall reoperation, a similar rate of PJK, longer time to reoperation, and possible reduction in PI. Future studies may be warranted to clarify the mechanism of these results and how they can be translated into improved patient care.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28989847</pmid><doi>10.1177/2192568217700111</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-5682
ispartof Global spine journal, 2017-10, Vol.7 (7), p.672-680
issn 2192-5682
2192-5690
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5624376
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20S2-Alar-Iliac%20Screw%20Fixation%20and%20Iliac%20Screw%20Fixation%20in%20Adult%20Deformity%20Surgery:%20Reoperation%20Rates%20and%20Spinopelvic%20Parameters&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Ishida,%20Wataru&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=680&rft.pages=672-680&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2192568217700111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1949086323%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949086323&rft_id=info:pmid/28989847&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2192568217700111&rfr_iscdi=true