Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents

The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development and psychopathology 2017-05, Vol.29 (2), p.365-378
Hauptverfasser: Raby, K. Lee, Yarger, Heather A., Lind, Teresa, Fraley, R. Chris, Leerkes, Esther, Dozier, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 378
container_issue 2
container_start_page 365
container_title Development and psychopathology
container_volume 29
creator Raby, K. Lee
Yarger, Heather A.
Lind, Teresa
Fraley, R. Chris
Leerkes, Esther
Dozier, Mary
description The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults’ preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults’ preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0954579417000049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5610913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0954579417000049</cupid><sourcerecordid>4321653743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-b0a97c4270f224a1ea43d7b6e4de753a894d392ab280dc1d50a07b923233c1e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFPHCEUxompqav2D-jFTNJLL1N5wCxwaWKMtU1NPFjP5M3ArJiZYQV2E_97Wd0arTHlwuH7fd-D9xHyGeg3oCCPr6huRCO1AEnLEXqHzEDMdc1Aqw9ktpHrjb5H9lO6LUjDRfOR7DElKCgOM_L7JGfsbkY35SplzC5Voa9GP9kKxzAtKj9lFyfMPkw4DPcV2rDMfu0qLEgfUlGrJcbiT4dkt8chuU_b-4Bc_zj7c_qzvrg8_3V6clF3DRW5bilq2Qkmac-YQHAouJXt3AnrZMNRaWG5ZtgyRW0HtqFIZasZZ5x34IAfkO9PuctVOzrbldkRB7OMfsR4bwJ681qZ_I1ZhLVp5kA18BLwdRsQw93KpWxGnzo3DDi5sEoGlAYlNZSZ_0eVLIvXWhb0yz_obViV1Q2P1FzJkicKBU9UF0NK0fXP7wZqNq2aN60Wz9HLDz87_tZYAL4NxbGN3i7ci9nvxj4A2PesQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886871924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Raby, K. Lee ; Yarger, Heather A. ; Lind, Teresa ; Fraley, R. Chris ; Leerkes, Esther ; Dozier, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Raby, K. Lee ; Yarger, Heather A. ; Lind, Teresa ; Fraley, R. Chris ; Leerkes, Esther ; Dozier, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults’ preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults’ preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0954579417000049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28401831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adoption ; Adoption - psychology ; Adult ; Child ; Child Protective Services ; Child, Preschool ; Children &amp; youth ; Education, Nonprofessional ; Female ; Foster care ; Foster Home Care - psychology ; Humans ; Internationality ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Object Attachment ; Parent-Child Relations ; Poverty - psychology ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology ; Risk Factors ; Special Issue Articles</subject><ispartof>Development and psychopathology, 2017-05, Vol.29 (2), p.365-378</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><rights>(c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-b0a97c4270f224a1ea43d7b6e4de753a894d392ab280dc1d50a07b923233c1e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-b0a97c4270f224a1ea43d7b6e4de753a894d392ab280dc1d50a07b923233c1e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0954579417000049/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28401831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raby, K. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarger, Heather A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraley, R. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents</title><title>Development and psychopathology</title><addtitle>Dev Psychopathol</addtitle><description>The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults’ preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults’ preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adoption</subject><subject>Adoption - psychology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Protective Services</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Education, Nonprofessional</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foster care</subject><subject>Foster Home Care - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Poverty - psychology</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Special Issue Articles</subject><issn>0954-5794</issn><issn>1469-2198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFPHCEUxompqav2D-jFTNJLL1N5wCxwaWKMtU1NPFjP5M3ArJiZYQV2E_97Wd0arTHlwuH7fd-D9xHyGeg3oCCPr6huRCO1AEnLEXqHzEDMdc1Aqw9ktpHrjb5H9lO6LUjDRfOR7DElKCgOM_L7JGfsbkY35SplzC5Voa9GP9kKxzAtKj9lFyfMPkw4DPcV2rDMfu0qLEgfUlGrJcbiT4dkt8chuU_b-4Bc_zj7c_qzvrg8_3V6clF3DRW5bilq2Qkmac-YQHAouJXt3AnrZMNRaWG5ZtgyRW0HtqFIZasZZ5x34IAfkO9PuctVOzrbldkRB7OMfsR4bwJ681qZ_I1ZhLVp5kA18BLwdRsQw93KpWxGnzo3DDi5sEoGlAYlNZSZ_0eVLIvXWhb0yz_obViV1Q2P1FzJkicKBU9UF0NK0fXP7wZqNq2aN60Wz9HLDz87_tZYAL4NxbGN3i7ci9nvxj4A2PesQg</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Raby, K. Lee</creator><creator>Yarger, Heather A.</creator><creator>Lind, Teresa</creator><creator>Fraley, R. Chris</creator><creator>Leerkes, Esther</creator><creator>Dozier, Mary</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents</title><author>Raby, K. Lee ; Yarger, Heather A. ; Lind, Teresa ; Fraley, R. Chris ; Leerkes, Esther ; Dozier, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-b0a97c4270f224a1ea43d7b6e4de753a894d392ab280dc1d50a07b923233c1e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adoption</topic><topic>Adoption - psychology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Protective Services</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Education, Nonprofessional</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foster care</topic><topic>Foster Home Care - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Poverty - psychology</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Special Issue Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raby, K. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarger, Heather A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraley, R. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leerkes, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Development and psychopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raby, K. Lee</au><au>Yarger, Heather A.</au><au>Lind, Teresa</au><au>Fraley, R. Chris</au><au>Leerkes, Esther</au><au>Dozier, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents</atitle><jtitle>Development and psychopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Psychopathol</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>365-378</pages><issn>0954-5794</issn><eissn>1469-2198</eissn><abstract>The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults’ preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults’ preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28401831</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0954579417000049</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-5794
ispartof Development and psychopathology, 2017-05, Vol.29 (2), p.365-378
issn 0954-5794
1469-2198
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5610913
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adoption
Adoption - psychology
Adult
Child
Child Protective Services
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Education, Nonprofessional
Female
Foster care
Foster Home Care - psychology
Humans
Internationality
Interview, Psychological
Male
Middle Aged
Object Attachment
Parent-Child Relations
Poverty - psychology
Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis
Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology
Risk Factors
Special Issue Articles
title Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A11%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attachment%20states%20of%20mind%20among%20internationally%20adoptive%20and%20foster%20parents&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20psychopathology&rft.au=Raby,%20K.%20Lee&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=365-378&rft.issn=0954-5794&rft.eissn=1469-2198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0954579417000049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4321653743%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886871924&rft_id=info:pmid/28401831&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0954579417000049&rfr_iscdi=true