Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis
Although no-till (NT) has been promoted as an alternative land management practice to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO 3 − ) loss remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO 3 − concentration and load in NT and CT systems via two maj...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2017-09, Vol.7 (1), p.12117-9, Article 12117 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 12117 |
| container_title | Scientific reports |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Daryanto, Stefani Wang, Lixin Jacinthe, Pierre-André |
| description | Although no-till (NT) has been promoted as an alternative land management practice to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO
3
−
) loss remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO
3
−
concentration and load in NT and CT systems via two major transport pathways: runoff and leaching. Rainfall variability, aridity, soil texture, tillage duration, crop species, and fertilizer type were used as co-varying factors. In comparison to CT, NT resulted in an overall increase of runoff NO
3
−
concentration, but similar runoff NO
3
−
load. In contrast, leachate NO
3
−
load was greater under NT than under CT, although leachate NO
3
−
concentration was similar under both tillage practices, indicating that the effect of NT on NO
3
−
load was largely determined by changes in water flux. Some deviations from these overall trends, however, were recorded with different co-varying variables. In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower leachate NO
3
−
concentration and similar (instead of elevated) NO
3
−
leachate load from soybean fields (no N fertilizer applied). These results suggest NT needs to be complemented with other practices (e.g., cover crops, reduced N rate, split N application) in order to improve soil N retention and water quality benefits. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-017-12383-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5608951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955044048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3897-3b8a385e8bac0ced99d588f3fc41e27670f65db52d2d4779d6fd14b85c2d0f603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LRCEUhiWKiuoPtAihbZafc7VFENEXBG1qLV71Tne4Vyd1ivn3WVMxLXJzhPc9z_H4AnBI8CnBTJ5lToSSCJMGEcokQ80G2KWYC0QZpZtr9x1wkPMM1yOo4kRtgx0qFRMKi10wux_nxpYMYwdDRKUfBjP1cDShltGHAmOAoS_JFA-HmDPsUhyhjSmcwByXrTcBmuDg-4s3BdrFUPo3U_oYzuElHH0xqKKGZe7zPtjqzJD9wXfdA883109Xd-jh8fb-6vIBWSZVg1grDZPCy9ZYbL1TygkpO9ZZTjxtJg3uJsK1gjrqeNMoN-kc4a0UlroqYbYHLlbc-aIdvbN1iWQGPU_9aNJSR9Prv0roX_Q0vmkxwVIJUgHH34AUXxc-Fz2Li1S3yJooITDnmMvqoiuXTfVbku9-JxCsPyPSq4h0jUh_RaSb2nS0_rbflp9AqoGtDLlKYerT2uz_sR_J-Z4h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1955044048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Daryanto, Stefani ; Wang, Lixin ; Jacinthe, Pierre-André</creator><creatorcontrib>Daryanto, Stefani ; Wang, Lixin ; Jacinthe, Pierre-André</creatorcontrib><description>Although no-till (NT) has been promoted as an alternative land management practice to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO
3
−
) loss remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO
3
−
concentration and load in NT and CT systems via two major transport pathways: runoff and leaching. Rainfall variability, aridity, soil texture, tillage duration, crop species, and fertilizer type were used as co-varying factors. In comparison to CT, NT resulted in an overall increase of runoff NO
3
−
concentration, but similar runoff NO
3
−
load. In contrast, leachate NO
3
−
load was greater under NT than under CT, although leachate NO
3
−
concentration was similar under both tillage practices, indicating that the effect of NT on NO
3
−
load was largely determined by changes in water flux. Some deviations from these overall trends, however, were recorded with different co-varying variables. In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower leachate NO
3
−
concentration and similar (instead of elevated) NO
3
−
leachate load from soybean fields (no N fertilizer applied). These results suggest NT needs to be complemented with other practices (e.g., cover crops, reduced N rate, split N application) in order to improve soil N retention and water quality benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12383-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28935905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/158/2456 ; 704/172/4081 ; Agricultural practices ; Cover crops ; Crop Production - methods ; Crops, Agricultural - growth & development ; Crops, Agricultural - metabolism ; Cultivation ; Fertilizers ; Fertilizers - analysis ; Glycine max ; Glycine max - growth & development ; Glycine max - metabolism ; Grain cultivation ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Land management ; Leachates ; Leaching ; Meta-analysis ; multidisciplinary ; Nitrates - analysis ; Nitrates - metabolism ; Nitrogen ; Rainfall ; Runoff ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil texture ; Soybeans ; Tillage ; Triticum - growth & development ; Triticum - metabolism ; Water - metabolism ; Water Quality ; Zea mays ; Zea mays - growth & development ; Zea mays - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2017-09, Vol.7 (1), p.12117-9, Article 12117</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3897-3b8a385e8bac0ced99d588f3fc41e27670f65db52d2d4779d6fd14b85c2d0f603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3897-3b8a385e8bac0ced99d588f3fc41e27670f65db52d2d4779d6fd14b85c2d0f603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608951/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5608951/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,41101,42170,51557,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daryanto, Stefani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacinthe, Pierre-André</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Although no-till (NT) has been promoted as an alternative land management practice to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO
3
−
) loss remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO
3
−
concentration and load in NT and CT systems via two major transport pathways: runoff and leaching. Rainfall variability, aridity, soil texture, tillage duration, crop species, and fertilizer type were used as co-varying factors. In comparison to CT, NT resulted in an overall increase of runoff NO
3
−
concentration, but similar runoff NO
3
−
load. In contrast, leachate NO
3
−
load was greater under NT than under CT, although leachate NO
3
−
concentration was similar under both tillage practices, indicating that the effect of NT on NO
3
−
load was largely determined by changes in water flux. Some deviations from these overall trends, however, were recorded with different co-varying variables. In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower leachate NO
3
−
concentration and similar (instead of elevated) NO
3
−
leachate load from soybean fields (no N fertilizer applied). These results suggest NT needs to be complemented with other practices (e.g., cover crops, reduced N rate, split N application) in order to improve soil N retention and water quality benefits.</description><subject>704/158/2456</subject><subject>704/172/4081</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Crop Production - methods</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - growth & development</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - metabolism</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fertilizers - analysis</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Glycine max - growth & development</subject><subject>Glycine max - metabolism</subject><subject>Grain cultivation</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nitrates - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrates - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Triticum - growth & development</subject><subject>Triticum - metabolism</subject><subject>Water - metabolism</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zea mays - growth & development</subject><subject>Zea mays - metabolism</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LRCEUhiWKiuoPtAihbZafc7VFENEXBG1qLV71Tne4Vyd1ivn3WVMxLXJzhPc9z_H4AnBI8CnBTJ5lToSSCJMGEcokQ80G2KWYC0QZpZtr9x1wkPMM1yOo4kRtgx0qFRMKi10wux_nxpYMYwdDRKUfBjP1cDShltGHAmOAoS_JFA-HmDPsUhyhjSmcwByXrTcBmuDg-4s3BdrFUPo3U_oYzuElHH0xqKKGZe7zPtjqzJD9wXfdA883109Xd-jh8fb-6vIBWSZVg1grDZPCy9ZYbL1TygkpO9ZZTjxtJg3uJsK1gjrqeNMoN-kc4a0UlroqYbYHLlbc-aIdvbN1iWQGPU_9aNJSR9Prv0roX_Q0vmkxwVIJUgHH34AUXxc-Fz2Li1S3yJooITDnmMvqoiuXTfVbku9-JxCsPyPSq4h0jUh_RaSb2nS0_rbflp9AqoGtDLlKYerT2uz_sR_J-Z4h</recordid><startdate>20170921</startdate><enddate>20170921</enddate><creator>Daryanto, Stefani</creator><creator>Wang, Lixin</creator><creator>Jacinthe, Pierre-André</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170921</creationdate><title>Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis</title><author>Daryanto, Stefani ; Wang, Lixin ; Jacinthe, Pierre-André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3897-3b8a385e8bac0ced99d588f3fc41e27670f65db52d2d4779d6fd14b85c2d0f603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>704/158/2456</topic><topic>704/172/4081</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Crop Production - methods</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - growth & development</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - metabolism</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fertilizers - analysis</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Glycine max - growth & development</topic><topic>Glycine max - metabolism</topic><topic>Grain cultivation</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nitrates - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrates - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Triticum - growth & development</topic><topic>Triticum - metabolism</topic><topic>Water - metabolism</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zea mays - growth & development</topic><topic>Zea mays - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daryanto, Stefani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacinthe, Pierre-André</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daryanto, Stefani</au><au>Wang, Lixin</au><au>Jacinthe, Pierre-André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2017-09-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12117</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>12117-9</pages><artnum>12117</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Although no-till (NT) has been promoted as an alternative land management practice to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO
3
−
) loss remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare NO
3
−
concentration and load in NT and CT systems via two major transport pathways: runoff and leaching. Rainfall variability, aridity, soil texture, tillage duration, crop species, and fertilizer type were used as co-varying factors. In comparison to CT, NT resulted in an overall increase of runoff NO
3
−
concentration, but similar runoff NO
3
−
load. In contrast, leachate NO
3
−
load was greater under NT than under CT, although leachate NO
3
−
concentration was similar under both tillage practices, indicating that the effect of NT on NO
3
−
load was largely determined by changes in water flux. Some deviations from these overall trends, however, were recorded with different co-varying variables. In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower leachate NO
3
−
concentration and similar (instead of elevated) NO
3
−
leachate load from soybean fields (no N fertilizer applied). These results suggest NT needs to be complemented with other practices (e.g., cover crops, reduced N rate, split N application) in order to improve soil N retention and water quality benefits.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>28935905</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-017-12383-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
| ispartof | Scientific reports, 2017-09, Vol.7 (1), p.12117-9, Article 12117 |
| issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5608951 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | 704/158/2456 704/172/4081 Agricultural practices Cover crops Crop Production - methods Crops, Agricultural - growth & development Crops, Agricultural - metabolism Cultivation Fertilizers Fertilizers - analysis Glycine max Glycine max - growth & development Glycine max - metabolism Grain cultivation Humanities and Social Sciences Land management Leachates Leaching Meta-analysis multidisciplinary Nitrates - analysis Nitrates - metabolism Nitrogen Rainfall Runoff Science Science (multidisciplinary) Soil - chemistry Soil texture Soybeans Tillage Triticum - growth & development Triticum - metabolism Water - metabolism Water Quality Zea mays Zea mays - growth & development Zea mays - metabolism |
| title | Impacts of no-tillage management on nitrate loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A37%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20no-tillage%20management%20on%20nitrate%20loss%20from%20corn,%20soybean%20and%20wheat%20cultivation:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Daryanto,%20Stefani&rft.date=2017-09-21&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12117&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=12117-9&rft.artnum=12117&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-017-12383-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1955044048%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1955044048&rft_id=info:pmid/28935905&rfr_iscdi=true |