Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review
Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not rel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2016-12, Vol.89 (1068), p.20160296-20160296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20160296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1068 |
container_start_page | 20160296 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | O'Neill, Angela G M Jain, Suneil Hounsell, Alan R O'Sullivan, Joe M |
description | Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not reliable when using reduced margins, dose escalation or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Fiducial markers (FMs) for prostate IGRT have been in use since the 1990s. They require surgical implantation and provide a surrogate for the position of the prostate gland. A variety of FMs are available and they can be used in a number of ways. This review aimed to establish the evidence for using prostate FMs in terms of feasibility, implantation procedures, types of FMs used, FM migration, imaging modalities used and the clinical impact of FMs. A search strategy was defined and a literature search was carried out in Medline. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, which resulted in 50 articles being included in this review. The evidence demonstrates that FMs provide a more accurate surrogate for the position of the prostate than either external skin marks or bony anatomy. A combination of FM alignment and soft-tissue analysis is currently the most effective and widely available approach to ensuring accuracy in prostate IGRT. FM implantation is safe and well tolerated. FM migration is possible but minimal. Standardization of all techniques and procedures in relation to the use of prostate FMs is required. Finally, a clinical trial investigating a non-surgical alternative to prostate FMs is introduced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20160296 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5604907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1843913078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-20a9fc8f5822f6ab3c7b32293f89d07b8747829d91d768ca3834f3cd1557f9e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLw0AQhxdRbK3ePEuOHkzdR_blQZBiVSh4UfC2bPbRbk2buEkq_e9N6QO9eRqG-fgxMx8AlwgOEabyNp_HIYaIQSzZEegjnolUCPhxDPoQQp4iLGgPnNX1fNNSCU9BD3MqKCesD9g42NYEXSQLHT9dTKZtsM4mVSzrRjcuidqGspm5qKv1XaKT6FbBfZ-DE6-L2l3s6gC8jx_fRs_p5PXpZfQwSU0mSJNiqKU3wlOBsWc6J4bnBGNJvJAW8lzwjAssrUSWM2E0ESTzxFhEKffSMTIA99vcqs0Xzhq3bKIuVBVDt-5alTqov5NlmKlpuVKUwUxC3gVc7wJi-dW6ulGLUBtXFHrpyrZWSEgkOMkQ_AeaEYkI5KJDb7ao6d5UR-cPGyGoNlZUZ0XtrXT41e8rDvBeA_kBlCCIBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1843913078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>O'Neill, Angela G M ; Jain, Suneil ; Hounsell, Alan R ; O'Sullivan, Joe M</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Angela G M ; Jain, Suneil ; Hounsell, Alan R ; O'Sullivan, Joe M</creatorcontrib><description>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not reliable when using reduced margins, dose escalation or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Fiducial markers (FMs) for prostate IGRT have been in use since the 1990s. They require surgical implantation and provide a surrogate for the position of the prostate gland. A variety of FMs are available and they can be used in a number of ways. This review aimed to establish the evidence for using prostate FMs in terms of feasibility, implantation procedures, types of FMs used, FM migration, imaging modalities used and the clinical impact of FMs. A search strategy was defined and a literature search was carried out in Medline. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, which resulted in 50 articles being included in this review. The evidence demonstrates that FMs provide a more accurate surrogate for the position of the prostate than either external skin marks or bony anatomy. A combination of FM alignment and soft-tissue analysis is currently the most effective and widely available approach to ensuring accuracy in prostate IGRT. FM implantation is safe and well tolerated. FM migration is possible but minimal. Standardization of all techniques and procedures in relation to the use of prostate FMs is required. Finally, a clinical trial investigating a non-surgical alternative to prostate FMs is introduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160296</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27585736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Fiducial Markers ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy and Oncology ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Review</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2016-12, Vol.89 (1068), p.20160296-20160296</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-20a9fc8f5822f6ab3c7b32293f89d07b8747829d91d768ca3834f3cd1557f9e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-20a9fc8f5822f6ab3c7b32293f89d07b8747829d91d768ca3834f3cd1557f9e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27585736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Angela G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Suneil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hounsell, Alan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Joe M</creatorcontrib><title>Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not reliable when using reduced margins, dose escalation or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Fiducial markers (FMs) for prostate IGRT have been in use since the 1990s. They require surgical implantation and provide a surrogate for the position of the prostate gland. A variety of FMs are available and they can be used in a number of ways. This review aimed to establish the evidence for using prostate FMs in terms of feasibility, implantation procedures, types of FMs used, FM migration, imaging modalities used and the clinical impact of FMs. A search strategy was defined and a literature search was carried out in Medline. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, which resulted in 50 articles being included in this review. The evidence demonstrates that FMs provide a more accurate surrogate for the position of the prostate than either external skin marks or bony anatomy. A combination of FM alignment and soft-tissue analysis is currently the most effective and widely available approach to ensuring accuracy in prostate IGRT. FM implantation is safe and well tolerated. FM migration is possible but minimal. Standardization of all techniques and procedures in relation to the use of prostate FMs is required. Finally, a clinical trial investigating a non-surgical alternative to prostate FMs is introduced.</description><subject>Fiducial Markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy and Oncology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLw0AQhxdRbK3ePEuOHkzdR_blQZBiVSh4UfC2bPbRbk2buEkq_e9N6QO9eRqG-fgxMx8AlwgOEabyNp_HIYaIQSzZEegjnolUCPhxDPoQQp4iLGgPnNX1fNNSCU9BD3MqKCesD9g42NYEXSQLHT9dTKZtsM4mVSzrRjcuidqGspm5qKv1XaKT6FbBfZ-DE6-L2l3s6gC8jx_fRs_p5PXpZfQwSU0mSJNiqKU3wlOBsWc6J4bnBGNJvJAW8lzwjAssrUSWM2E0ESTzxFhEKffSMTIA99vcqs0Xzhq3bKIuVBVDt-5alTqov5NlmKlpuVKUwUxC3gVc7wJi-dW6ulGLUBtXFHrpyrZWSEgkOMkQ_AeaEYkI5KJDb7ao6d5UR-cPGyGoNlZUZ0XtrXT41e8rDvBeA_kBlCCIBA</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>O'Neill, Angela G M</creator><creator>Jain, Suneil</creator><creator>Hounsell, Alan R</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Joe M</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review</title><author>O'Neill, Angela G M ; Jain, Suneil ; Hounsell, Alan R ; O'Sullivan, Joe M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-20a9fc8f5822f6ab3c7b32293f89d07b8747829d91d768ca3834f3cd1557f9e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fiducial Markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy and Oncology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Angela G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Suneil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hounsell, Alan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Joe M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Neill, Angela G M</au><au>Jain, Suneil</au><au>Hounsell, Alan R</au><au>O'Sullivan, Joe M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1068</issue><spage>20160296</spage><epage>20160296</epage><pages>20160296-20160296</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential tool in the accurate delivery of modern radiotherapy techniques. Prostate radiotherapy positioned using skin marks or bony anatomy may be adequate for delivering a relatively homogeneous whole-pelvic radiotherapy dose, but these surrogates are not reliable when using reduced margins, dose escalation or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Fiducial markers (FMs) for prostate IGRT have been in use since the 1990s. They require surgical implantation and provide a surrogate for the position of the prostate gland. A variety of FMs are available and they can be used in a number of ways. This review aimed to establish the evidence for using prostate FMs in terms of feasibility, implantation procedures, types of FMs used, FM migration, imaging modalities used and the clinical impact of FMs. A search strategy was defined and a literature search was carried out in Medline. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, which resulted in 50 articles being included in this review. The evidence demonstrates that FMs provide a more accurate surrogate for the position of the prostate than either external skin marks or bony anatomy. A combination of FM alignment and soft-tissue analysis is currently the most effective and widely available approach to ensuring accuracy in prostate IGRT. FM implantation is safe and well tolerated. FM migration is possible but minimal. Standardization of all techniques and procedures in relation to the use of prostate FMs is required. Finally, a clinical trial investigating a non-surgical alternative to prostate FMs is introduced.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>27585736</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20160296</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2016-12, Vol.89 (1068), p.20160296-20160296 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5604907 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Fiducial Markers Humans Male Prostate Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiotherapy and Oncology Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Review |
title | Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A51%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fiducial%20marker%20guided%20prostate%20radiotherapy:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=O'Neill,%20Angela%20G%20M&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1068&rft.spage=20160296&rft.epage=20160296&rft.pages=20160296-20160296&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20160296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1843913078%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1843913078&rft_id=info:pmid/27585736&rfr_iscdi=true |