Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical imaging science 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Journal of clinical imaging science |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Pierro, Antonio Cilla, Savino Maselli, Giuseppina Cucci, Eleonora Ciuffreda, Matteo Sallustio, Giuseppina |
description | Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5590400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938854240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ktuPEyEUxidG427WffbNkPjiS3dhgJnBB2PTeKkZr9VnwjBnKl0GKjDbbPznpba7URN54HD58cHhO0XxmOALRjC93GgTL_adLJkk9b3itCS8mnEu6vvHcc0JOynOY9zg3JhgFeYPi5OyEZg1lJwWP1dqbVJSFn3wYcyhNaNJEfkBtdPY-ah0yKurrXGAjEMKtSqsAc37ySb0yW8nq5Lx7jmao8-TcsmkPL8G9F6tHSSj0ReI3imnAS3HfJdbo7lT9iaa-Kh4MCgb4fwYz4pvr199XbydtR_fLBfzdqZZ3dhZ1VWkUbqjQg9VDR10HTDMSEVBU9ZRJTTXrFeKQwmClpoR0desEzUVwPuBnhUvDrrbqRuh1-BSzklugxlVuJFeGfn3jjPf5dpfy_yTmGGcBZ4dBYL_MUFMcjRRg7XKgZ-iJII2DWcl26NP_0E3fgo54T3FcCNqzOtMXR4oHXyMAYa7xxAs997K37a-WyxXB2_ziSd_5nDH3zqZgZcHYOdtghCv7LSDIDN75fzuf7qScnlbAfQXHhm6XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940897057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</creator><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28904831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Confidence intervals ; Females ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Marfan syndrome ; Medical imaging ; Morphology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Original ; Patients ; Population ; Spine ; Studies ; Vertebrae ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical imaging science, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35</ispartof><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jan 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590400/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590400/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilla, Savino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maselli, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical imaging science</title><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Marfan syndrome</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2156-7514</issn><issn>2156-5597</issn><issn>2156-7514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ktuPEyEUxidG427WffbNkPjiS3dhgJnBB2PTeKkZr9VnwjBnKl0GKjDbbPznpba7URN54HD58cHhO0XxmOALRjC93GgTL_adLJkk9b3itCS8mnEu6vvHcc0JOynOY9zg3JhgFeYPi5OyEZg1lJwWP1dqbVJSFn3wYcyhNaNJEfkBtdPY-ah0yKurrXGAjEMKtSqsAc37ySb0yW8nq5Lx7jmao8-TcsmkPL8G9F6tHSSj0ReI3imnAS3HfJdbo7lT9iaa-Kh4MCgb4fwYz4pvr199XbydtR_fLBfzdqZZ3dhZ1VWkUbqjQg9VDR10HTDMSEVBU9ZRJTTXrFeKQwmClpoR0desEzUVwPuBnhUvDrrbqRuh1-BSzklugxlVuJFeGfn3jjPf5dpfy_yTmGGcBZ4dBYL_MUFMcjRRg7XKgZ-iJII2DWcl26NP_0E3fgo54T3FcCNqzOtMXR4oHXyMAYa7xxAs997K37a-WyxXB2_ziSd_5nDH3zqZgZcHYOdtghCv7LSDIDN75fzuf7qScnlbAfQXHhm6XQ</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Pierro, Antonio</creator><creator>Cilla, Savino</creator><creator>Maselli, Giuseppina</creator><creator>Cucci, Eleonora</creator><creator>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creator><creator>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><author>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Marfan syndrome</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilla, Savino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maselli, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pierro, Antonio</au><au>Cilla, Savino</au><au>Maselli, Giuseppina</au><au>Cucci, Eleonora</au><au>Ciuffreda, Matteo</au><au>Sallustio, Giuseppina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>35-35</pages><artnum>35</artnum><issn>2156-7514</issn><eissn>2156-5597</eissn><eissn>2156-7514</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>28904831</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2156-7514 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical imaging science, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35 |
issn | 2156-7514 2156-5597 2156-7514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5590400 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Back pain Confidence intervals Females Magnetic resonance imaging Marfan syndrome Medical imaging Morphology NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Original Patients Population Spine Studies Vertebrae Young adults |
title | Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sagittal%20Normal%20Limits%20of%20Lumbosacral%20Spine%20in%20a%20Large%20Adult%20Population:%20A%20Quantitative%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20imaging%20science&rft.au=Pierro,%20Antonio&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=35-35&rft.artnum=35&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1938854240%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940897057&rft_id=info:pmid/28904831&rfr_iscdi=true |