Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical imaging science 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35
Hauptverfasser: Pierro, Antonio, Cilla, Savino, Maselli, Giuseppina, Cucci, Eleonora, Ciuffreda, Matteo, Sallustio, Giuseppina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of clinical imaging science
container_volume 7
creator Pierro, Antonio
Cilla, Savino
Maselli, Giuseppina
Cucci, Eleonora
Ciuffreda, Matteo
Sallustio, Giuseppina
description Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P < 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5590400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938854240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ktuPEyEUxidG427WffbNkPjiS3dhgJnBB2PTeKkZr9VnwjBnKl0GKjDbbPznpba7URN54HD58cHhO0XxmOALRjC93GgTL_adLJkk9b3itCS8mnEu6vvHcc0JOynOY9zg3JhgFeYPi5OyEZg1lJwWP1dqbVJSFn3wYcyhNaNJEfkBtdPY-ah0yKurrXGAjEMKtSqsAc37ySb0yW8nq5Lx7jmao8-TcsmkPL8G9F6tHSSj0ReI3imnAS3HfJdbo7lT9iaa-Kh4MCgb4fwYz4pvr199XbydtR_fLBfzdqZZ3dhZ1VWkUbqjQg9VDR10HTDMSEVBU9ZRJTTXrFeKQwmClpoR0desEzUVwPuBnhUvDrrbqRuh1-BSzklugxlVuJFeGfn3jjPf5dpfy_yTmGGcBZ4dBYL_MUFMcjRRg7XKgZ-iJII2DWcl26NP_0E3fgo54T3FcCNqzOtMXR4oHXyMAYa7xxAs997K37a-WyxXB2_ziSd_5nDH3zqZgZcHYOdtghCv7LSDIDN75fzuf7qScnlbAfQXHhm6XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940897057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</creator><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P &lt; 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28904831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Confidence intervals ; Females ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Marfan syndrome ; Medical imaging ; Morphology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Original ; Patients ; Population ; Spine ; Studies ; Vertebrae ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical imaging science, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35</ispartof><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd. Jan 2017</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590400/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590400/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilla, Savino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maselli, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical imaging science</title><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P &lt; 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Marfan syndrome</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>2156-7514</issn><issn>2156-5597</issn><issn>2156-7514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ktuPEyEUxidG427WffbNkPjiS3dhgJnBB2PTeKkZr9VnwjBnKl0GKjDbbPznpba7URN54HD58cHhO0XxmOALRjC93GgTL_adLJkk9b3itCS8mnEu6vvHcc0JOynOY9zg3JhgFeYPi5OyEZg1lJwWP1dqbVJSFn3wYcyhNaNJEfkBtdPY-ah0yKurrXGAjEMKtSqsAc37ySb0yW8nq5Lx7jmao8-TcsmkPL8G9F6tHSSj0ReI3imnAS3HfJdbo7lT9iaa-Kh4MCgb4fwYz4pvr199XbydtR_fLBfzdqZZ3dhZ1VWkUbqjQg9VDR10HTDMSEVBU9ZRJTTXrFeKQwmClpoR0desEzUVwPuBnhUvDrrbqRuh1-BSzklugxlVuJFeGfn3jjPf5dpfy_yTmGGcBZ4dBYL_MUFMcjRRg7XKgZ-iJII2DWcl26NP_0E3fgo54T3FcCNqzOtMXR4oHXyMAYa7xxAs997K37a-WyxXB2_ziSd_5nDH3zqZgZcHYOdtghCv7LSDIDN75fzuf7qScnlbAfQXHhm6XQ</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Pierro, Antonio</creator><creator>Cilla, Savino</creator><creator>Maselli, Giuseppina</creator><creator>Cucci, Eleonora</creator><creator>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creator><creator>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</title><author>Pierro, Antonio ; Cilla, Savino ; Maselli, Giuseppina ; Cucci, Eleonora ; Ciuffreda, Matteo ; Sallustio, Giuseppina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478l-6b618acb39cf67ebebbe404163ec34b3a9c5c4daa5e2e932c419d74b9739e5df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Marfan syndrome</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pierro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilla, Savino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maselli, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucci, Eleonora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallustio, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pierro, Antonio</au><au>Cilla, Savino</au><au>Maselli, Giuseppina</au><au>Cucci, Eleonora</au><au>Ciuffreda, Matteo</au><au>Sallustio, Giuseppina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Imaging Sci</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>35-35</pages><artnum>35</artnum><issn>2156-7514</issn><eissn>2156-5597</eissn><eissn>2156-7514</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine from L1 to S1, the values of the normal sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (SCD), sagittal diameter of the dural sac (DSD), and the normal values of dural sac ratio (DSR) in a large nonsymptomatic adult population and to discriminate whether a vertebral canal is pathological or nonpathological for dural ectasia and/or stenosis. Materials and Methods: Six hundred and four patients were prospectively enrolled. All measurements were performed on MRI sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI), defined as mean ± 1.96 standard deviation, was determined for each metric. The upper limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal DSR; the lower limit of 95% CI was considered the cutoff value for the normal SCD. Results: SCD cutoff values from L1 to S1 ranged from 14.5-10.1 mm (males) to 15.0-9.9 mm (females). DSD ratios at S1 and L4 level show a significant difference in male and female groups: 11% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in male group while only 4% of S1/L4 values exceeded 1 in female group. Mean DSR at each level was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (P &lt; 0.001), ranging from 0.70 to 0.56 (male) and from 0.82 to 0.63 (female). Conclusions: We determined the cutoff values for the normal DSR and for the normal SCD. Our findings show the relevant discrepancies with respect to literature data for diagnosis of lumbar stenosis and/or dural ectasia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>28904831</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-7514
ispartof Journal of clinical imaging science, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.35-35, Article 35
issn 2156-7514
2156-5597
2156-7514
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5590400
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Back pain
Confidence intervals
Females
Magnetic resonance imaging
Marfan syndrome
Medical imaging
Morphology
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Original
Patients
Population
Spine
Studies
Vertebrae
Young adults
title Sagittal Normal Limits of Lumbosacral Spine in a Large Adult Population: A Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sagittal%20Normal%20Limits%20of%20Lumbosacral%20Spine%20in%20a%20Large%20Adult%20Population:%20A%20Quantitative%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20imaging%20science&rft.au=Pierro,%20Antonio&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=35-35&rft.artnum=35&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcis.jcis_24_17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1938854240%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940897057&rft_id=info:pmid/28904831&rfr_iscdi=true